Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Texas by County

Colon & Rectum, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 74.4?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Texas N/A Yes 13.9 (13.7, 14.0) N/A 4,085 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.1)
United States N/A Yes 12.9 (12.8, 12.9) N/A 52,325 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.8)
Jackson County Rural Yes 14.8 (8.3, 24.8) 98 (5, 149) 3
*
*
Leon County Rural Yes 11.6 (6.5, 20.2) 137 (19, 149) 3 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.4, -0.3)
Sabine County Rural Yes 18.2 (9.2, 33.6) 46 (1, 149) 3
*
*
Dawson County Rural Yes 25.8 (14.9, 41.7) 10 (1, 148) 3
*
*
Duval County Rural Yes 27.8 (15.9, 45.5) 5 (1, 148) 3
*
*
Lee County Rural Yes 13.5 (7.7, 22.4) 116 (11, 149) 3
*
*
Madison County Rural Yes 22.0 (12.7, 35.6) 22 (1, 149) 3
*
*
Red River County Rural Yes 17.6 (9.9, 30.0) 55 (2, 149) 3 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.4, 0.2)
Scurry County Rural Yes 16.6 (9.6, 26.9) 70 (4, 149) 3
*
*
Titus County Rural Yes 10.6 (6.1, 17.1) 143 (32, 149) 3 falling falling trend -2.0 (-4.0, -0.1)
Wilbarger County Rural Yes 18.9 (10.9, 31.2) 40 (1, 149) 3
*
*
Calhoun County Rural Yes 12.9 (7.5, 21.1) 125 (12, 149) 4
*
*
Nolan County Rural Yes 18.4 (10.8, 29.7) 45 (2, 149) 4
*
*
Reeves County Rural Yes 28.0 (16.5, 44.2) 4 (1, 148) 4
*
*
Zavala County Rural Yes 35.3 (20.7, 56.4) 2 (1, 132) 4
*
*
Karnes County Rural Yes 22.7 (13.6, 36.0) 18 (1, 149) 4
*
*
Newton County Rural Yes 22.6 (13.0, 37.1) 20 (1, 149) 4 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.4, 1.7)
Callahan County Urban Yes 20.1 (12.0, 32.3) 32 (2, 149) 4 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.7, 2.3)
Frio County Rural Yes 22.7 (13.8, 35.2) 19 (1, 149) 4
*
*
Hutchinson County Rural Yes 15.4 (9.2, 24.4) 88 (7, 149) 4 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.8, -0.3)
Jones County Urban Yes 17.9 (10.9, 28.1) 47 (2, 149) 4 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.6, 1.1)
Moore County Rural Yes 20.5 (12.4, 31.7) 30 (1, 149) 4
*
*
Willacy County Rural Yes 18.4 (11.2, 28.6) 44 (2, 149) 4
*
*
Bee County Rural Yes 13.4 (8.3, 20.7) 118 (13, 149) 4 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.7)
Trinity County Rural Yes 16.1 (9.9, 26.1) 79 (5, 149) 4 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.1, 1.9)
Coleman County Rural Yes 30.2 (18.6, 48.6) 3 (1, 136) 4
*
*
Llano County Rural Yes 10.6 (5.9, 18.3) 144 (32, 149) 4 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.8, -0.1)
Freestone County Rural Yes 17.4 (11.0, 26.6) 56 (4, 149) 5 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.0, 1.3)
Tyler County Rural Yes 15.0 (9.5, 23.2) 92 (9, 149) 5 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.2, 0.5)
Waller County Urban Yes 9.0 (5.7, 13.6) 149 (74, 149) 5 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.9, -1.4)
Burleson County Urban Yes 17.0 (10.9, 26.1) 64 (4, 149) 5 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.6, 0.1)
Gonzales County Rural Yes 21.0 (13.4, 31.4) 26 (1, 146) 5 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.5, 2.3)
Gray County Rural Yes 19.7 (12.8, 29.2) 34 (2, 148) 5 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.0)
Limestone County Rural Yes 15.7 (10.1, 23.7) 85 (7, 149) 5 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.4, 0.5)
Young County Rural Yes 20.6 (13.2, 31.0) 29 (2, 148) 5 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.9, 0.7)
Lavaca County Rural Yes 16.6 (10.6, 25.2) 68 (6, 149) 5 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.3)
Panola County Rural Yes 16.6 (10.8, 24.7) 71 (5, 149) 5 falling falling trend -2.0 (-4.1, -0.1)
Eastland County Rural Yes 23.3 (15.0, 34.9) 14 (1, 141) 6 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.1, 0.0)
Montague County Rural Yes 17.8 (11.8, 26.4) 51 (5, 148) 6 falling falling trend -4.9 (-25.0, -1.1)
Rains County Rural Yes 26.3 (17.5, 39.3) 7 (1, 136) 6
*
*
Bandera County Urban Yes 14.2 (9.5, 21.5) 104 (17, 149) 6 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.9, 0.9)
Colorado County Rural Yes 17.3 (11.6, 25.5) 59 (6, 148) 6 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.8, 0.7)
Gillespie County Rural Yes 12.3 (7.7, 19.1) 133 (19, 149) 6 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.8, 0.5)
Houston County Rural Yes 16.4 (11.0, 24.1) 75 (8, 149) 6 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 1.0)
Grimes County Rural Yes 15.8 (10.6, 22.7) 84 (8, 149) 6 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.9, -0.3)
Kendall County Urban Yes 9.7 (6.5, 14.1) 148 (70, 149) 6 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.8, -1.7)
Erath County Rural Yes 13.7 (9.3, 19.6) 114 (21, 149) 6 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.8, 0.6)
Uvalde County Rural Yes 21.9 (14.8, 31.2) 23 (1, 144) 6 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.3, 1.0)
Cass County Rural Yes 15.0 (10.2, 21.6) 95 (15, 149) 7 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.4, -0.5)
Hockley County Urban Yes 27.2 (18.6, 38.5) 6 (1, 122) 7
*
*
Hopkins County Rural Yes 13.0 (8.9, 18.5) 124 (28, 149) 7 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.2, -0.8)
Howard County Rural Yes 19.0 (12.9, 26.8) 39 (3, 147) 7 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.2, 1.9)
Morris County Rural Yes 35.8 (24.1, 51.8) 1 (1, 85) 7 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.5, 3.5)
San Jacinto County Urban Yes 16.0 (10.7, 23.3) 80 (8, 149) 7 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.5, 0.0)
Bosque County Urban Yes 23.3 (15.8, 33.7) 13 (1, 136) 7 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.0, 0.7)
Chambers County Urban Yes 17.3 (11.9, 24.2) 57 (7, 148) 7 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.5, 9.2)
Hale County Rural Yes 20.0 (13.9, 28.0) 33 (3, 144) 7 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.1, 1.1)
Lampasas County Urban Yes 22.7 (15.7, 32.2) 17 (1, 141) 7 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.5, 1.5)
Austin County Urban Yes 16.4 (11.3, 23.3) 74 (8, 149) 7 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.1)
Kleberg County Rural Yes 25.2 (17.5, 35.1) 11 (1, 125) 7 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.7, 2.3)
Palo Pinto County Rural Yes 17.7 (12.1, 25.1) 54 (4, 149) 7 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.5, 0.0)
Fayette County Rural Yes 17.7 (12.0, 25.5) 53 (4, 148) 7 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.4, -0.2)
Milam County Rural Yes 20.9 (14.5, 29.4) 28 (2, 137) 7 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.7)
Brown County Rural Yes 13.1 (9.3, 18.2) 123 (27, 149) 8 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.8, -1.2)
DeWitt County Rural Yes 26.0 (18.4, 36.1) 9 (1, 115) 8 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.8, 1.5)
Shelby County Rural Yes 23.1 (16.4, 31.9) 15 (1, 131) 8 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.5, 1.1)
Matagorda County Rural Yes 17.9 (12.7, 24.6) 48 (6, 145) 8 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -0.4)
Maverick County Urban Yes 16.1 (11.5, 21.9) 78 (9, 148) 8 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.5, 3.0)
Upshur County Urban Yes 14.9 (10.6, 20.5) 96 (13, 149) 8 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.2)
Aransas County Urban Yes 21.3 (14.6, 30.5) 24 (1, 142) 8 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 1.0)
Cooke County Rural Yes 15.5 (11.0, 21.3) 87 (12, 149) 8 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.5)
Jasper County Rural Yes 16.9 (12.1, 23.4) 66 (9, 147) 8 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.1)
Hill County Rural Yes 16.6 (11.8, 22.9) 69 (11, 147) 9 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Navarro County Rural Yes 13.9 (10.1, 18.9) 109 (24, 149) 9 stable stable trend -3.1 (-5.7, 4.6)
Cherokee County Rural Yes 13.8 (10.0, 18.7) 111 (28, 149) 9 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.0, -1.9)
Coryell County Urban Yes 13.4 (9.7, 18.0) 119 (27, 149) 9 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.1, 0.7)
Starr County Rural Yes 15.5 (11.3, 20.8) 86 (16, 149) 9 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.3, 3.9)
Caldwell County Urban Yes 17.3 (12.6, 23.3) 58 (11, 146) 9 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.6, 0.1)
Fannin County Rural Yes 19.5 (14.3, 26.3) 35 (6, 140) 9 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.6, -0.7)
Val Verde County Rural Yes 19.2 (14.0, 25.5) 38 (5, 137) 9 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.8, 1.5)
Washington County Rural Yes 17.9 (12.8, 24.5) 49 (6, 146) 9 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.5, -1.0)
Walker County Rural Yes 12.1 (8.9, 16.2) 134 (47, 149) 10 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.9, -0.8)
Lamar County Rural Yes 14.7 (10.8, 19.7) 99 (21, 149) 10 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.0, -1.2)
Burnet County Rural Yes 12.7 (9.3, 17.1) 128 (36, 149) 10 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.3, -0.3)
Medina County Urban Yes 16.1 (12.0, 21.4) 77 (15, 147) 11 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.4)
Wharton County Rural Yes 19.5 (14.5, 25.8) 36 (5, 138) 11 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.0)
Wilson County Urban Yes 17.8 (13.2, 23.6) 52 (7, 145) 11 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.8)
Hardin County Urban Yes 15.4 (11.4, 20.3) 89 (19, 148) 11 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.2)
Wood County Rural Yes 14.2 (10.4, 19.1) 106 (26, 149) 11 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.4, -0.4)
Jim Wells County Rural Yes 26.2 (19.8, 34.0) 8 (1, 74) 12 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.7, 3.1)
Polk County Rural Yes 23.5 (17.4, 30.9) 12 (1, 109) 12 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.2, 1.6)
Atascosa County Urban Yes 22.3 (17.0, 28.7) 21 (2, 112) 12 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.7, 2.8)
Harrison County Urban Yes 14.6 (11.1, 18.9) 100 (25, 148) 12 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -0.7)
Kerr County Rural Yes 13.3 (9.9, 17.7) 120 (33, 149) 13 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.1)
Rusk County Urban Yes 18.7 (14.3, 24.2) 42 (7, 133) 13 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.1)
Rockwall County Urban Yes 11.7 (8.9, 15.0) 136 (64, 149) 13 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.9, -0.5)
Bastrop County Urban Yes 11.2 (8.6, 14.4) 140 (70, 149) 13 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.1, -1.8)
Hood County Rural Yes 15.8 (12.0, 20.6) 83 (16, 146) 14 falling falling trend -2.8 (-8.8, -1.7)
Nacogdoches County Rural Yes 20.2 (15.6, 25.7) 31 (6, 125) 14 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.8)
Orange County Urban Yes 13.9 (10.8, 17.7) 110 (35, 148) 14 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.9, -1.0)
Van Zandt County Rural Yes 17.3 (13.4, 22.0) 60 (12, 139) 14 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.4)
Wise County Urban Yes 18.7 (14.5, 23.7) 43 (8, 133) 14 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.6)
Anderson County Rural Yes 22.7 (17.9, 28.5) 16 (3, 95) 16 falling falling trend -1.8 (-14.1, -0.2)
San Patricio County Urban Yes 21.0 (16.5, 26.3) 27 (5, 108) 16 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.5)
Angelina County Rural Yes 16.0 (12.6, 20.0) 81 (20, 142) 16 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.9, -1.0)
Liberty County Urban Yes 19.3 (15.2, 24.0) 37 (8, 126) 17 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.6)
Hunt County Urban Yes 15.0 (12.1, 18.5) 94 (28, 141) 18 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.6)
Victoria County Urban Yes 16.4 (13.2, 20.2) 73 (20, 137) 19 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.2)
Brazos County Urban Yes 11.3 (9.1, 13.8) 139 (83, 149) 20 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.4, -1.5)
Bowie County Urban Yes 17.1 (13.8, 20.9) 62 (16, 127) 20 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Midland County Urban Yes 14.1 (11.4, 17.3) 108 (37, 145) 20 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.7)
Randall County Urban Yes 12.8 (10.3, 15.6) 127 (57, 148) 20 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.1)
Potter County Urban Yes 16.7 (13.7, 20.3) 67 (20, 132) 21 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.8)
Gregg County Urban Yes 15.2 (12.4, 18.4) 90 (32, 138) 22 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.6)
Tom Green County Urban Yes 16.0 (13.1, 19.3) 82 (26, 137) 22 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Comal County Urban Yes 10.5 (8.6, 12.7) 146 (98, 149) 23 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.1, -0.6)
Henderson County Rural Yes 18.8 (15.4, 22.9) 41 (11, 121) 23 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Guadalupe County Urban Yes 12.6 (10.5, 15.2) 130 (64, 148) 24 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.2, -1.5)
Kaufman County Urban Yes 17.0 (14.0, 20.4) 65 (19, 130) 24 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.4, -1.5)
Parker County Urban Yes 14.1 (11.7, 16.9) 107 (45, 144) 25 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.5, 0.2)
Wichita County Urban Yes 17.9 (14.8, 21.4) 50 (16, 120) 26 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Taylor County Urban Yes 16.5 (13.7, 19.6) 72 (26, 132) 26 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.8, -0.1)
Ector County Urban Yes 21.1 (17.6, 25.1) 25 (7, 86) 27 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.2, 1.8)
Hays County Urban Yes 12.9 (10.8, 15.4) 126 (61, 147) 28 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -0.6)
Ellis County Urban Yes 15.0 (12.6, 17.8) 93 (36, 138) 29 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.1, -1.1)
Grayson County Urban Yes 17.1 (14.4, 20.2) 61 (21, 122) 30 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.5)
Webb County Urban Yes 14.3 (12.1, 16.7) 103 (46, 140) 31 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.6, 1.8)
Johnson County Urban Yes 17.1 (14.5, 19.9) 63 (24, 120) 33 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.2)
Smith County Urban Yes 12.7 (10.8, 14.7) 129 (74, 145) 36 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.2, -1.2)
McLennan County Urban Yes 13.8 (11.9, 15.9) 113 (55, 139) 40 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.8, -1.4)
Jefferson County Urban Yes 15.1 (13.2, 17.3) 91 (42, 130) 45 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.6, -1.3)
Bell County Urban Yes 14.8 (12.9, 16.8) 97 (46, 133) 48 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -0.9)
Brazoria County Urban Yes 13.6 (11.9, 15.4) 115 (64, 139) 50 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.0, -1.3)
Lubbock County Urban Yes 16.3 (14.3, 18.5) 76 (32, 120) 50 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.4)
Nueces County Urban Yes 13.4 (11.8, 15.2) 117 (66, 139) 53 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.8)
Cameron County Urban Yes 12.5 (11.0, 14.1) 131 (83, 145) 54 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2)
Galveston County Urban Yes 14.5 (12.8, 16.3) 101 (56, 131) 57 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.0, -1.8)
Williamson County Urban Yes 11.4 (10.2, 12.7) 138 (107, 147) 69 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.9, -1.6)
Montgomery County Urban Yes 11.9 (10.7, 13.2) 135 (97, 145) 77 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.8, -1.3)
Denton County Urban Yes 9.9 (8.9, 11.0) 147 (129, 149) 81 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.4, -2.3)
Fort Bend County Urban Yes 10.5 (9.5, 11.6) 145 (120, 149) 82 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.5, -1.9)
Hidalgo County Urban Yes 12.3 (11.2, 13.5) 132 (94, 143) 95 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.5, 0.6)
Collin County Urban Yes 10.8 (9.9, 11.8) 142 (120, 148) 108 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.8, 4.8)
El Paso County Urban Yes 14.2 (13.1, 15.4) 105 (68, 127) 120 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.3)
Travis County Urban Yes 11.1 (10.2, 12.0) 141 (118, 147) 122 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.2, 5.5)
Tarrant County Urban Yes 13.3 (12.6, 14.0) 121 (89, 130) 267 stable stable trend 2.7 (-2.0, 5.4)
Bexar County Urban Yes 14.4 (13.7, 15.2) 102 (72, 117) 280 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -0.8)
Dallas County Urban Yes 13.8 (13.1, 14.5) 112 (82, 123) 328 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.2, -1.6)
Harris County Urban Yes 13.2 (12.7, 13.8) 122 (94, 128) 563 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.4, -1.9)
Andrews County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Archer County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Armstrong County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bailey County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baylor County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blanco County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Borden County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brewster County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Briscoe County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brooks County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Camp County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carson County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Castro County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Childress County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cochran County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coke County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Collingsworth County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Comanche County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Concho County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottle County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crane County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crockett County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crosby County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Culberson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dallam County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Deaf Smith County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Delta County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickens County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dimmit County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Donley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Falls County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fisher County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Floyd County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Foard County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gaines County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garza County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glasscock County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Goliad County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hall County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hamilton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hansford County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardeman County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hartley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Haskell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hemphill County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hudspeth County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irion County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jack County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jeff Davis County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jim Hogg County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kenedy County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kent County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kimble County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kinney County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knox County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
La Salle County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lamb County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lipscomb County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Live Oak County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loving County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lynn County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marion County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mason County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McCulloch County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McMullen County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menard County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mills County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mitchell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Motley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ochiltree County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oldham County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Parmer County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pecos County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presidio County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reagan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Real County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Refugio County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roberts County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Robertson County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Runnels County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Augustine County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Saba County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schleicher County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shackelford County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Somervell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stephens County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sterling County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stonewall County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sutton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swisher County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terry County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Throckmorton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Upton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ward County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Winkler County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yoakum County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Zapata County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/03/2024 6:37 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.


Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top