Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Utah by County

All Cancer Sites, 2013-2017

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 161.4?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Utah Yes 109.1 (106.5, 111.6) N/A 1,437 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.1, -0.7)
United States Yes 135.7 (135.4, 135.9) N/A 281,450 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.5, -1.4)
Beaver County No 211.1 (142.5, 300.7) 1 (1, 9) 6 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.0, 2.5)
Box Elder County Yes 100.6 (84.3, 119.2) 16 (6, 23) 27 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.4)
Cache County Yes 99.1 (86.4, 113.2) 19 (8, 23) 44 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Carbon County Yes 150.9 (121.3, 185.8) 3 (1, 12) 19 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.8, 1.5)
Daggett County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Davis County Yes 100.3 (92.9, 108.2) 17 (10, 22) 138 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Duchesne County Yes 151.5 (116.8, 193.0) 2 (1, 16) 13 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.8, 2.5)
Emery County Yes 97.3 (65.8, 139.7) 20 (3, 23) 6 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.5, -0.2)
Garfield County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grand County Yes 140.8 (100.7, 192.5) 4 (1, 22) 9 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.8, 0.0)
Iron County Yes 129.9 (108.9, 153.7) 5 (2, 17) 28 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.8, 1.5)
Juab County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kane County Yes 118.9 (79.4, 173.9) 8 (1, 23) 6 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.8, 1.1)
Millard County Yes 125.8 (92.7, 167.8) 6 (1, 22) 10 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.6, 1.7)
Morgan County Yes 85.6 (51.8, 132.6) 22 (4, 23) 4 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.0, -1.3)
Piute County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rich County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Salt Lake County Yes 115.3 (111.0, 119.6) 11 (6, 14) 572 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.2, -0.7)
San Juan County Yes 106.3 (75.2, 145.8) 13 (2, 23) 8 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.3, 0.1)
Sanpete County Yes 105.7 (83.1, 132.7) 14 (4, 23) 15 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.5)
Sevier County Yes 95.2 (72.9, 122.7) 21 (5, 23) 12 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.0, 0.2)
Summit County Yes 79.6 (60.8, 102.4) 23 (12, 23) 15 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.0, 0.2)
Tooele County Yes 122.5 (103.2, 144.1) 7 (3, 19) 30 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
Uintah County Yes 118.2 (94.7, 145.5) 9 (2, 22) 18 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.2)
Utah County Yes 102.4 (95.9, 109.2) 15 (10, 21) 190 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.9, -0.2)
Wasatch County Yes 117.8 (90.1, 150.9) 10 (2, 22) 13 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.4)
Washington County Yes 99.6 (91.0, 108.8) 18 (10, 22) 110 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.6)
Wayne County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Weber County Yes 109.3 (101.0, 118.2) 12 (7, 19) 129 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/12/2020 5:51 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2017 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top