Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Utah by County

All Cancer Sites, 2014-2018

White Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Utah *** 125.4 (123.3, 127.5) N/A 2,835 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.2, -0.9)
United States 6 *** 160.2 (160.0, 160.4) N/A 465,913 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.5)
Beaver County *** 179.1 (132.4, 237.0) 1 (1, 22) 10 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.5)
Grand County *** 172.4 (139.2, 212.1) 2 (1, 16) 20 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.4)
Piute County *** 169.8 (90.8, 299.3) 3 (1, 27) 4
*
*
Carbon County *** 161.0 (137.4, 187.7) 4 (1, 15) 35 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.5)
Kane County *** 160.5 (126.0, 202.8) 5 (1, 22) 16 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.5)
Iron County *** 154.7 (137.8, 173.2) 6 (1, 13) 64 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.5)
Duchesne County *** 150.5 (125.0, 179.6) 7 (1, 21) 25 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.5)
Tooele County *** 143.7 (127.5, 161.2) 8 (2, 18) 61 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Sevier County *** 143.1 (122.2, 166.8) 9 (2, 21) 34 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.5)
San Juan County *** 135.3 (102.0, 176.8) 10 (1, 27) 12 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.3, 0.9)
Uintah County *** 135.2 (115.7, 157.1) 11 (3, 24) 35 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Salt Lake County *** 131.9 (128.3, 135.6) 12 (8, 17) 1,048 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.8)
Weber County *** 129.3 (122.2, 136.7) 13 (8, 19) 253 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6)
Garfield County *** 128.4 (90.6, 178.5) 14 (1, 27) 8 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.2, 0.0)
Millard County *** 124.0 (99.7, 153.1) 15 (4, 27) 19 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.6)
Wasatch County *** 123.2 (102.8, 146.4) 16 (5, 27) 28 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.4)
Utah County *** 120.6 (115.2, 126.2) 17 (12, 23) 388 falling falling trend -0.7 (-0.9, -0.5)
Emery County *** 117.8 (91.8, 149.6) 18 (5, 27) 15 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.1, -0.4)
Sanpete County *** 116.7 (99.0, 136.8) 19 (8, 27) 32 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.4)
Davis County *** 116.6 (110.5, 123.0) 20 (14, 25) 279 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.8)
Cache County *** 115.7 (105.4, 126.7) 21 (12, 26) 94 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Box Elder County *** 115.4 (102.3, 129.8) 22 (10, 27) 57 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Morgan County *** 109.2 (80.9, 143.8) 23 (5, 27) 10 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.8, -0.3)
Wayne County *** 109.0 (66.1, 174.6) 24 (1, 27) 4 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.4, 0.7)
Washington County *** 108.9 (102.4, 115.8) 25 (17, 27) 234 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)
Juab County *** 105.4 (77.6, 139.6) 26 (7, 27) 10 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -0.2)
Summit County *** 103.6 (86.8, 122.6) 27 (13, 27) 33 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.0)
Daggett County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rich County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/21/2021 6:27 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of estimates:
Daggett, Rich

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2017 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top