Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Washington by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 50+

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Washington N/A No 487.6 (483.7, 491.5) N/A 12,483 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.7, -1.4)
United States N/A No 490.4 (489.9, 491.0) N/A 573,761 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.6)
San Juan County Rural No 392.3 (340.1, 450.4) 39 (29, 39) 45 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.4)
Skamania County Urban No 420.9 (346.5, 506.5) 38 (11, 39) 24 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.9, -1.0)
King County Urban No 422.2 (415.0, 429.4) 37 (33, 39) 2,781 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.7, -2.0)
Jefferson County Rural No 433.0 (393.9, 475.1) 36 (24, 39) 101 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.9, -1.5)
Franklin County Urban No 447.3 (405.4, 492.2) 35 (18, 39) 90 falling falling trend -2.5 (-8.0, -1.7)
Garfield County Rural No 448.6 (292.9, 662.7) 34 (1, 39) 5 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.7, -0.8)
Asotin County Urban No 455.6 (400.7, 516.1) 33 (12, 39) 52 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Adams County Rural No 464.0 (380.5, 560.1) 32 (4, 39) 22 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.8, -0.9)
Chelan County Urban No 468.7 (435.4, 503.8) 31 (16, 37) 152 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.0)
Kitsap County Urban No 468.7 (449.9, 488.1) 30 (22, 36) 486 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.3, -1.7)
Walla Walla County Urban No 470.2 (432.2, 510.7) 29 (13, 38) 117 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.4)
Whatcom County Urban No 470.9 (449.6, 492.8) 28 (21, 35) 383 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Douglas County Urban No 481.8 (434.2, 533.3) 27 (9, 38) 76 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Lincoln County Rural No 490.7 (407.7, 585.6) 26 (2, 39) 27 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Whitman County Rural No 495.2 (437.9, 557.8) 25 (5, 38) 56 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Thurston County Urban No 495.7 (476.7, 515.3) 24 (14, 32) 532 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.3, -1.3)
Benton County Urban No 496.8 (472.8, 521.7) 23 (12, 32) 330 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.9)
Island County Rural No 498.4 (467.5, 530.8) 22 (10, 34) 206 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Snohomish County Urban No 503.7 (491.0, 516.7) 21 (14, 28) 1,250 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -0.9)
Clark County Urban No 506.6 (491.1, 522.5) 20 (12, 28) 837 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.8, -1.5)
Pierce County Urban No 514.9 (502.8, 527.2) 19 (11, 25) 1,428 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.4)
Spokane County Urban No 516.3 (501.6, 531.2) 18 (11, 26) 973 falling falling trend -1.3 (-3.5, -1.0)
Grant County Rural No 516.8 (480.1, 555.6) 17 (6, 32) 151 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.5)
Klickitat County Rural No 522.9 (463.1, 588.5) 16 (2, 35) 58 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.5)
Skagit County Urban No 528.7 (501.5, 557.0) 15 (6, 27) 293 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Yakima County Urban No 532.2 (509.1, 556.1) 14 (6, 24) 407 falling falling trend -0.7 (-0.9, -0.5)
Wahkiakum County Rural No 536.4 (413.4, 685.2) 13 (1, 39) 14 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.6)
Kittitas County Rural No 541.8 (490.0, 597.5) 12 (2, 31) 84 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.4)
Stevens County Urban No 542.2 (498.1, 589.2) 11 (3, 29) 119 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.5)
Pend Oreille County Rural No 550.6 (473.3, 637.1) 10 (1, 35) 39 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.7, 0.1)
Clallam County Rural No 552.6 (521.6, 585.0) 9 (3, 21) 254 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.1, -0.6)
Pacific County Rural No 560.7 (505.1, 620.9) 8 (1, 29) 80 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Ferry County Rural No 567.6 (464.0, 687.8) 7 (1, 37) 23 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.6)
Mason County Rural No 570.5 (532.1, 611.0) 6 (1, 19) 174 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Okanogan County Rural No 576.4 (527.6, 628.6) 5 (1, 22) 108 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.9, -0.1)
Lewis County Rural No 597.2 (561.0, 635.3) 4 (1, 12) 210 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.4)
Columbia County Rural No 604.4 (469.9, 767.2) 3 (1, 37) 14 falling falling trend -1.5 (-3.3, -0.5)
Grays Harbor County Rural No 607.7 (570.0, 647.3) 2 (1, 11) 205 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Cowlitz County Urban No 629.6 (596.2, 664.4) 1 (1, 7) 275 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.9, -0.3)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/22/2024 4:01 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top