Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Washington by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 50+

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Washington No 493.4 (489.4, 497.4) N/A 12,150 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.6)
United States No 501.7 (501.1, 502.3) N/A 569,776 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.3, -1.8)
Adams County No 478.0 (392.3, 576.6) 29 (2, 39) 22 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.7, -1.2)
Asotin County No 481.3 (425.2, 542.8) 27 (6, 38) 54 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.7)
Benton County No 489.8 (465.3, 515.2) 22 (13, 34) 311 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.0)
Chelan County No 479.5 (444.9, 516.1) 28 (11, 36) 147 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.0)
Clallam County No 530.2 (499.6, 562.3) 13 (5, 26) 238 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Clark County No 511.4 (495.2, 528.0) 16 (10, 27) 788 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.3, -1.5)
Columbia County No 611.6 (475.9, 775.2) 1 (1, 38) 14 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.8)
Cowlitz County No 608.5 (575.6, 642.8) 2 (1, 8) 264 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.0, -0.5)
Douglas County No 451.0 (404.1, 501.7) 34 (14, 39) 69 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.5, -0.9)
Ferry County No 532.2 (430.7, 650.5) 12 (1, 39) 21 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.3)
Franklin County No 459.3 (415.6, 506.2) 33 (12, 39) 87 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.5, -1.3)
Garfield County No 449.9 (290.2, 668.4) 35 (1, 39) 5 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.8, -1.0)
Grant County No 505.6 (468.8, 544.6) 19 (6, 34) 144 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.6)
Grays Harbor County No 604.5 (566.3, 644.6) 3 (1, 10) 196 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.8)
Island County No 484.6 (453.6, 517.2) 24 (12, 36) 192 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -1.1)
Jefferson County No 467.2 (425.3, 512.3) 31 (12, 38) 102 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.5, -1.4)
King County No 430.0 (422.7, 437.4) 37 (32, 39) 2,769 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.1, -2.4)
Kitsap County No 483.4 (463.7, 503.7) 26 (15, 34) 474 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.3, -1.5)
Kittitas County No 483.6 (435.5, 535.5) 25 (7, 38) 76 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)
Klickitat County No 535.6 (473.4, 603.7) 10 (1, 34) 57 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Lewis County No 597.4 (560.8, 635.8) 4 (1, 11) 204 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.4)
Lincoln County No 471.2 (391.5, 562.7) 30 (3, 39) 26 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.4)
Mason County No 563.8 (525.3, 604.3) 7 (1, 18) 168 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.7)
Okanogan County No 583.7 (534.1, 636.6) 5 (1, 18) 108 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Pacific County No 578.3 (519.8, 641.7) 6 (1, 24) 77 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Pend Oreille County No 523.0 (447.7, 607.5) 14 (1, 38) 37 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.5)
Pierce County No 522.1 (509.7, 534.8) 15 (8, 22) 1,392 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.0, -1.5)
San Juan County No 392.8 (339.4, 452.5) 39 (27, 39) 42 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Skagit County No 533.8 (506.0, 562.7) 11 (5, 24) 286 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6)
Skamania County No 427.3 (348.8, 518.0) 38 (8, 39) 22 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.8, -0.8)
Snohomish County No 509.2 (496.1, 522.6) 17 (11, 26) 1,220 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -1.0)
Spokane County No 540.2 (524.7, 556.1) 8 (6, 17) 953 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.2, -0.8)
Stevens County No 506.5 (463.4, 552.5) 18 (6, 34) 108 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Thurston County No 499.1 (479.4, 519.3) 20 (12, 31) 504 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.4, -1.5)
Wahkiakum County No 465.3 (350.7, 606.0) 32 (1, 39) 12 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.5)
Walla Walla County No 484.6 (444.8, 527.1) 23 (9, 37) 114 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Whatcom County No 498.5 (476.4, 521.5) 21 (11, 32) 395 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.8)
Whitman County No 435.6 (382.0, 494.7) 36 (14, 39) 49 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.6)
Yakima County No 536.2 (512.8, 560.5) 9 (5, 22) 402 falling falling trend -0.8 (-0.9, -0.6)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/09/2023 8:31 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.



Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top