Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Ohio by County

Stomach (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate †
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Perry County 2 Urban 9.0 (5.4, 14.4) 1 (1, 55) 4
*
*
Carroll County 2 Urban 8.5 (4.9, 14.1) 2 (1, 57) 4
*
*
Brown County 2 Urban 7.5 (4.6, 11.6) 3 (1, 57) 4 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.8, 5.8)
Lorain County 2 Urban 7.3 (6.2, 8.6) 4 (1, 29) 31 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.1)
Champaign County 2 Rural 7.3 (4.3, 11.8) 5 (1, 57) 4 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.9, 4.7)
Huron County 2 Rural 7.3 (4.9, 10.6) 6 (1, 56) 6 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.5, 5.8)
Cuyahoga County 2 Urban 7.2 (6.6, 7.8) 7 (2, 19) 123 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.2)
Preble County 2 Rural 7.1 (4.3, 11.3) 8 (1, 57) 4
*
*
Ottawa County 2 Urban 7.0 (4.1, 11.3) 9 (1, 57) 4 rising rising trend 4.9 (1.3, 9.7)
Coshocton County 2 Rural 6.9 (3.9, 11.5) 10 (1, 57) 3
*
*
Clinton County 2 Rural 6.9 (4.0, 11.2) 11 (1, 57) 4 stable stable trend -1.8 (-7.6, 4.0)
Clermont County 2 Urban 6.8 (5.5, 8.4) 12 (2, 44) 19 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.0, 3.9)
Guernsey County 2 Rural 6.8 (3.8, 11.3) 13 (1, 57) 3
*
*
Washington County 2 Rural 6.8 (4.4, 10.0) 14 (1, 56) 6 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.6, 2.9)
Columbiana County 2 Rural 6.6 (4.8, 9.0) 15 (1, 54) 9 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.3, 4.5)
Mahoning County 2 Urban 6.3 (5.1, 7.8) 16 (3, 47) 22 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.8, 2.0)
Butler County 2 Urban 6.2 (5.2, 7.4) 17 (4, 46) 28 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.7, 2.9)
Tuscarawas County 2 Rural 6.1 (4.3, 8.5) 18 (2, 56) 8 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.9, 5.7)
Medina County 2 Urban 6.0 (4.7, 7.6) 19 (3, 53) 15 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.2, 1.4)
Clark County 2 Urban 5.8 (4.3, 7.8) 20 (3, 56) 10 stable stable trend -1.3 (-5.1, 2.3)
Summit County 2 Urban 5.8 (5.0, 6.7) 21 (9, 48) 41 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.5)
Lawrence County 2 Urban 5.7 (3.6, 8.9) 22 (1, 57) 5 stable stable trend -3.5 (-7.6, 0.4)
Licking County 2 Urban 5.6 (4.3, 7.2) 23 (4, 55) 13 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.7, 3.8)
Hancock County 2 Rural 5.6 (3.7, 8.3) 24 (2, 57) 6
*
*
Scioto County 2 Rural 5.6 (3.6, 8.4) 25 (2, 57) 5 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.3, 4.2)
Franklin County 2 Urban 5.6 (5.0, 6.2) 26 (13, 46) 73 stable stable trend -3.4 (-11.1, 0.0)
Pickaway County 2 Urban 5.6 (3.5, 8.6) 27 (1, 57) 4 stable stable trend 0.6 (-4.3, 6.5)
Lucas County 2 Urban 5.6 (4.7, 6.6) 28 (9, 52) 30 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.8, 2.7)
Muskingum County 2 Rural 5.5 (3.8, 7.9) 29 (2, 57) 7 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.8, 1.4)
Crawford County 2 Rural 5.5 (3.3, 9.1) 30 (1, 57) 4
*
*
Montgomery County 2 Urban 5.5 (4.7, 6.4) 31 (11, 50) 39 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.1, 1.9)
Hamilton County 2 Urban 5.5 (4.8, 6.2) 32 (13, 49) 53 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.1)
Ross County 2 Rural 5.4 (3.6, 8.0) 33 (3, 57) 6 stable stable trend -0.3 (-4.4, 4.2)
Belmont County 2 Urban 5.4 (3.4, 8.2) 34 (2, 57) 5 stable stable trend 0.2 (-4.2, 4.3)
Union County 2 Urban 5.4 (3.1, 8.7) 35 (1, 57) 3 stable stable trend -13.1 (-35.1, 0.6)
Fairfield County 2 Urban 5.4 (4.0, 7.1) 36 (5, 57) 10 stable stable trend -18.3 (-35.4, 1.5)
Trumbull County 2 Urban 5.3 (4.2, 6.8) 37 (7, 56) 16 falling falling trend -21.0 (-37.3, -2.5)
Jefferson County 2 Urban 5.3 (3.4, 8.1) 38 (2, 57) 5 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.8, 1.2)
Richland County 2 Urban 5.3 (3.8, 7.2) 39 (5, 57) 9 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.1, 2.5)
Ashland County 2 Rural 5.3 (3.1, 8.5) 40 (1, 57) 4
*
*
Wayne County 2 Rural 5.3 (3.7, 7.3) 41 (5, 57) 8 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.4, 4.2)
Portage County 2 Urban 5.2 (3.9, 6.9) 42 (6, 57) 11 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.9, 2.4)
Geauga County 2 Urban 5.1 (3.6, 7.1) 43 (5, 57) 8 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.2, 2.2)
Lake County 2 Urban 5.0 (4.0, 6.2) 44 (13, 56) 18 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.1, 0.1)
Marion County 2 Rural 5.0 (3.1, 7.8) 45 (3, 57) 4 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.1, 3.2)
Stark County 2 Urban 4.9 (4.1, 5.9) 46 (16, 55) 27 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.2, 1.2)
Erie County 2 Urban 4.9 (3.3, 7.2) 47 (5, 57) 6 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.7, 5.7)
Seneca County 2 Rural 4.9 (2.8, 8.1) 48 (2, 57) 3
*
*
Sandusky County 2 Rural 4.8 (2.7, 7.9) 49 (2, 57) 4 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.1, 4.1)
Greene County 2 Urban 4.7 (3.4, 6.3) 50 (10, 57) 10 falling falling trend -5.7 (-17.4, -1.2)
Delaware County 2 Urban 4.7 (3.5, 6.2) 51 (11, 57) 11 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.7, 3.6)
Miami County 2 Urban 4.7 (3.2, 6.7) 52 (8, 57) 7 falling falling trend -7.7 (-22.9, -0.6)
Knox County 2 Rural 4.4 (2.7, 7.0) 53 (6, 57) 4 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.3, 5.4)
Allen County 2 Urban 4.3 (2.9, 6.3) 54 (9, 57) 6 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.9, 4.3)
Warren County 2 Urban 4.2 (3.2, 5.5) 55 (21, 57) 12 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.5, 1.0)
Wood County 2 Urban 4.2 (2.8, 6.0) 56 (12, 57) 6 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.5, 3.1)
Ashtabula County 2 Urban 4.2 (2.8, 6.1) 57 (13, 57) 6 falling falling trend -6.4 (-27.1, -2.3)
Adams County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Athens County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Auglaize County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Darke County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Defiance County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fayette County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fulton County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gallia County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardin County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harrison County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Henry County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Highland County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hocking County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Holmes County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Logan County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Meigs County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mercer County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morgan County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morrow County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Noble County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Paulding County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pike County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Putnam County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shelby County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Van Wert County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Vinton County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Williams County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wyandot County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/19/2026 5:57 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top