Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Wisconsin by County

Kidney & Renal Pelvis (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Wisconsin 2 N/A 19.1 (18.7, 19.6) N/A 1,443 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.2, 1.6)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 17.5 (17.5, 17.6) N/A 70,592 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.6)
Marathon County 2 Urban 17.3 (14.6, 20.4) 46 (17, 64) 31 falling falling trend -12.6 (-19.7, -3.7)
Rusk County 2 Rural 13.2 (7.0, 23.6) 66 (5, 68) 3 falling falling trend -5.9 (-25.7, -0.8)
Dunn County 2 Rural 13.2 (9.1, 18.6) 65 (23, 68) 7 stable stable trend -4.7 (-28.1, 0.4)
Dane County 2 Urban 17.1 (15.6, 18.7) 48 (28, 59) 104 stable stable trend -4.2 (-11.2, 1.4)
Columbia County 2 Urban 18.7 (14.5, 23.9) 35 (5, 65) 15 stable stable trend -3.4 (-15.9, 0.4)
Brown County 2 Urban 20.9 (18.7, 23.4) 23 (8, 46) 66 stable stable trend -2.7 (-8.6, 0.7)
Chippewa County 2 Urban 15.8 (12.3, 20.1) 57 (18, 68) 15 stable stable trend -2.4 (-11.6, 0.2)
Wood County 2 Rural 18.6 (15.0, 22.9) 36 (8, 63) 20 stable stable trend -1.9 (-12.3, 0.4)
Winnebago County 2 Urban 16.6 (14.1, 19.3) 54 (24, 65) 35 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.8, 0.0)
Waupaca County 2 Rural 16.8 (12.7, 21.9) 51 (10, 68) 13 stable stable trend -1.2 (-11.8, 1.1)
Outagamie County 2 Urban 15.0 (12.8, 17.5) 61 (34, 67) 35 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.0, 1.8)
Richland County 2 Rural 17.0 (10.3, 27.0) 49 (3, 68) 5 stable stable trend -0.5 (-5.4, 4.8)
Door County 2 Rural 16.3 (11.6, 22.8) 55 (8, 68) 10 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.3, 3.0)
Walworth County 2 Rural 18.7 (15.5, 22.4) 34 (9, 62) 27 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.5, 1.3)
Portage County 2 Rural 16.7 (12.9, 21.3) 52 (11, 67) 14 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.0, 3.3)
Calumet County 2 Urban 13.3 (9.6, 18.1) 63 (26, 68) 9 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.3, 4.0)
Eau Claire County 2 Urban 13.3 (10.4, 16.6) 64 (36, 68) 16 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.7, 3.2)
Washburn County 2 Rural 16.6 (10.0, 26.7) 53 (2, 68) 5 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.2, 4.2)
Marinette County 2 Rural 27.0 (21.0, 34.3) 3 (1, 45) 17 stable stable trend 0.4 (-7.9, 3.1)
Oneida County 2 Rural 22.7 (16.9, 30.0) 12 (2, 61) 13 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.3, 3.8)
Buffalo County 2 Rural 17.0 (9.5, 28.7) 50 (2, 68) 3 stable stable trend 0.8 (-4.9, 6.8)
St. Croix County 2 Urban 14.2 (11.1, 17.8) 62 (30, 68) 16 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.9, 2.9)
Waukesha County 2 Urban 17.8 (16.2, 19.5) 39 (26, 57) 102 stable stable trend 0.9 (0.0, 2.0)
Kenosha County 2 Urban 17.4 (14.9, 20.3) 45 (18, 62) 35 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.5, 2.8)
La Crosse County 2 Urban 17.7 (14.6, 21.2) 41 (13, 64) 25 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.0, 3.4)
Oconto County 2 Urban 22.0 (16.6, 28.8) 18 (2, 61) 13 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.4, 3.9)
Langlade County 2 Rural 19.3 (12.1, 29.5) 32 (2, 68) 6 stable stable trend 1.2 (-3.4, 6.0)
Clark County 2 Rural 20.1 (14.3, 27.6) 29 (2, 66) 9 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.8, 4.7)
Price County 2 Rural 18.1 (10.4, 30.3) 37 (2, 68) 4 stable stable trend 1.3 (-4.3, 6.9)
Trempealeau County 2 Rural 15.6 (10.7, 22.2) 59 (9, 68) 7 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.0, 5.1)
Shawano County 2 Rural 19.3 (14.3, 25.6) 31 (3, 66) 11 stable stable trend 1.4 (-2.0, 5.2)
Monroe County 2 Rural 21.4 (16.2, 27.9) 20 (2, 64) 12 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.8, 5.4)
Racine County 2 Urban 22.1 (19.5, 25.0) 16 (4, 41) 55 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.2, 3.5)
Milwaukee County 2 Urban 21.0 (19.7, 22.3) 22 (12, 37) 213 rising rising trend 1.8 (1.0, 2.7)
Washington County 2 Urban 22.2 (19.2, 25.6) 15 (4, 43) 43 stable stable trend 1.8 (0.0, 4.0)
Grant County 2 Rural 20.2 (15.5, 26.0) 28 (3, 64) 14 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.7, 6.0)
Ozaukee County 2 Urban 17.5 (14.3, 21.3) 44 (14, 65) 23 rising rising trend 2.2 (0.6, 4.0)
Waushara County 2 Rural 21.6 (15.0, 30.6) 19 (2, 66) 9 stable stable trend 2.2 (-2.5, 7.5)
Dodge County 2 Rural 20.8 (17.1, 25.0) 24 (4, 56) 25 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.5, 5.5)
Iowa County 2 Urban 17.1 (11.5, 25.1) 47 (5, 68) 6 stable stable trend 2.4 (-1.1, 6.7)
Juneau County 2 Rural 24.2 (17.5, 33.0) 8 (2, 63) 9 stable stable trend 2.4 (-1.1, 6.7)
Rock County 2 Urban 24.0 (21.0, 27.3) 9 (3, 33) 50 rising rising trend 2.5 (0.9, 4.4)
Douglas County 2 Urban 17.5 (12.9, 23.4) 43 (5, 68) 11 stable stable trend 2.7 (-2.0, 9.1)
Polk County 2 Rural 17.6 (13.3, 23.1) 42 (8, 67) 12 stable stable trend 2.7 (-0.4, 6.7)
Sheboygan County 2 Urban 20.0 (16.9, 23.6) 30 (6, 56) 31 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.5, 5.4)
Barron County 2 Rural 20.3 (15.4, 26.3) 27 (3, 64) 14 stable stable trend 2.8 (-0.1, 6.3)
Jefferson County 2 Rural 23.0 (19.1, 27.7) 10 (2, 51) 25 stable stable trend 2.8 (0.0, 6.5)
Green County 2 Urban 25.9 (20.0, 33.2) 5 (1, 50) 14 stable stable trend 3.0 (-0.4, 7.7)
Lincoln County 2 Rural 25.9 (19.0, 34.7) 6 (1, 53) 11 stable stable trend 3.0 (-0.2, 6.9)
Manitowoc County 2 Rural 22.3 (18.4, 26.8) 14 (3, 52) 26 rising rising trend 3.3 (0.8, 6.5)
Vilas County 2 Rural 26.3 (18.4, 36.8) 4 (1, 59) 10 stable stable trend 3.3 (-0.4, 7.5)
Vernon County 2 Urban 22.0 (16.0, 29.8) 17 (2, 64) 10 rising rising trend 3.5 (0.8, 6.9)
Adams County 2 Rural 25.3 (17.2, 36.6) 7 (1, 64) 9 stable stable trend 3.8 (-0.2, 9.3)
Sauk County 2 Rural 22.8 (18.4, 28.0) 11 (2, 53) 20 rising rising trend 3.9 (1.3, 7.6)
Forest County 2 Rural 51.4 (33.7, 75.8) 1 (1, 10) 6 rising rising trend 4.7 (0.3, 10.5)
Crawford County 2 Rural 28.9 (19.4, 41.9) 2 (1, 58) 7 rising rising trend 6.2 (2.1, 12.5)
Fond du Lac County 2 Urban 18.1 (14.9, 21.9) 38 (11, 64) 24 rising rising trend 6.8 (0.8, 12.5)
Ashland County 2 Rural 15.4 (8.7, 25.8) 60 (3, 68) 3
*
*
Bayfield County 2 Rural 12.1 (7.4, 20.3) 67 (20, 68) 4
*
*
Burnett County 2 Rural 20.6 (14.3, 30.3) 26 (2, 68) 7
*
*
Green Lake County 2 Rural 22.4 (14.2, 33.7) 13 (1, 68) 6
*
*
Jackson County 2 Rural 21.3 (14.3, 30.8) 21 (2, 67) 6
*
*
Kewaunee County 2 Urban 17.8 (11.3, 27.0) 40 (2, 68) 5
*
*
Lafayette County 2 Rural 19.0 (11.4, 30.0) 33 (2, 68) 4
*
*
Marquette County 2 Rural 15.8 (9.2, 26.2) 58 (3, 68) 4
*
*
Pierce County 2 Urban 11.6 (7.5, 17.3) 68 (30, 68) 5
*
*
Sawyer County 2 Rural 16.0 (9.8, 25.5) 56 (4, 68) 5
*
*
Taylor County 2 Rural 20.7 (13.7, 30.5) 25 (2, 68) 6
*
*
Florence County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iron County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menominee County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pepin County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/17/2026 12:50 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top