Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Nebraska by County

Breast (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Nebraska 2 N/A 129.3 (126.3, 132.4) N/A 1,478 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.3, 0.6)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 131.3 (131.1, 131.6) N/A 270,245 rising rising trend 0.6 (0.5, 0.8)
Adams County 2 Rural 138.8 (114.9, 166.4) 21 (3, 53) 27 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.1, 1.9)
Antelope County 2 Rural 88.9 (46.8, 153.0) 61 (5, 64) 3 falling falling trend -2.9 (-6.0, -0.3)
Boone County 2 Rural 102.4 (56.4, 172.0) 57 (3, 64) 4 stable stable trend -0.3 (-5.1, 4.5)
Box Butte County 2 Rural 117.4 (80.9, 165.0) 39 (3, 64) 8 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.2, 1.7)
Buffalo County 2 Rural 125.4 (106.1, 147.2) 32 (9, 56) 33 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.1, 2.0)
Burt County 2 Rural 141.2 (95.1, 204.4) 15 (1, 62) 7 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.2, 4.6)
Butler County 2 Rural 140.1 (97.6, 196.2) 18 (1, 63) 8 stable stable trend 2.5 (-1.3, 6.7)
Cass County 2 Urban 125.5 (102.1, 153.1) 31 (6, 59) 22 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.7, 3.4)
Cedar County 2 Rural 139.5 (98.6, 193.8) 20 (1, 61) 9 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.8, 5.9)
Cherry County 2 Rural 114.3 (69.0, 180.9) 44 (2, 64) 4 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.7, 3.9)
Cheyenne County 2 Rural 104.9 (70.2, 151.7) 56 (6, 64) 7 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.6, 1.4)
Clay County 2 Rural 170.4 (117.2, 242.1) 4 (1, 58) 7 rising rising trend 5.4 (1.8, 9.8)
Colfax County 2 Rural 127.0 (85.9, 180.8) 30 (2, 63) 7 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.2, 4.6)
Cuming County 2 Rural 132.3 (87.5, 191.4) 26 (1, 64) 7 rising rising trend 4.2 (0.1, 16.9)
Custer County 2 Rural 106.8 (72.3, 152.7) 52 (6, 64) 7 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.2, 0.6)
Dakota County 2 Urban 106.3 (79.9, 138.7) 54 (12, 64) 11 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.3, 5.2)
Dawes County 2 Rural 106.8 (71.7, 155.5) 53 (5, 64) 7 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.2, 2.4)
Dawson County 2 Rural 107.8 (83.9, 136.7) 50 (13, 63) 15 stable stable trend 3.0 (-0.7, 15.5)
Dixon County 2 Rural 98.7 (59.7, 157.4) 58 (5, 64) 4 falling falling trend -3.8 (-7.9, -0.2)
Dodge County 2 Rural 142.0 (119.3, 167.8) 14 (4, 48) 32 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.1, 1.7)
Douglas County 2 Urban 140.1 (134.1, 146.2) 19 (11, 32) 444 stable stable trend 0.7 (0.0, 1.4)
Fillmore County 2 Rural 98.5 (58.6, 159.3) 59 (5, 64) 4 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.4, 0.6)
Franklin County 2 Rural 140.8 (79.8, 240.8) 16 (1, 64) 4
*
*
Furnas County 2 Rural 98.0 (52.4, 170.2) 60 (3, 64) 3 stable stable trend -19.7 (-52.1, 4.2)
Gage County 2 Rural 121.2 (97.5, 149.6) 37 (7, 60) 20 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.0, 1.2)
Hall County 2 Urban 108.8 (93.3, 126.1) 49 (23, 61) 38 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.1, -0.2)
Hamilton County 2 Rural 131.2 (92.2, 182.3) 27 (2, 63) 8 stable stable trend -0.1 (-4.9, 4.8)
Harlan County 2 Rural 169.1 (91.0, 290.7) 6 (1, 64) 3
*
*
Hitchcock County 2 Rural 189.2 (102.3, 325.9) 1 (1, 64) 3
*
*
Holt County 2 Rural 110.9 (76.8, 156.4) 47 (6, 64) 8 stable stable trend -3.2 (-7.6, 0.7)
Howard County 2 Urban 124.2 (77.6, 189.5) 33 (1, 64) 5 stable stable trend -0.7 (-5.0, 3.4)
Jefferson County 2 Rural 173.2 (122.9, 239.1) 3 (1, 54) 9 rising rising trend 5.7 (2.3, 16.3)
Johnson County 2 Rural 184.1 (111.2, 287.8) 2 (1, 62) 5 stable stable trend 1.1 (-5.0, 7.7)
Kearney County 2 Rural 120.0 (75.1, 183.0) 38 (2, 64) 5 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.1, 4.3)
Keith County 2 Rural 88.5 (54.6, 137.4) 62 (11, 64) 6 falling falling trend -13.3 (-38.1, -4.6)
Knox County 2 Rural 76.7 (45.5, 122.6) 64 (22, 64) 5 falling falling trend -25.7 (-48.4, -2.1)
Lancaster County 2 Urban 121.5 (114.0, 129.4) 35 (23, 49) 210 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Lincoln County 2 Rural 130.3 (109.0, 154.8) 28 (6, 55) 30 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.8, 2.6)
Madison County 2 Rural 106.1 (86.2, 129.2) 55 (19, 62) 22 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.4, 1.8)
Merrick County 2 Urban 76.9 (46.5, 121.8) 63 (23, 64) 4 stable stable trend -2.3 (-6.0, 1.0)
Morrill County 2 Rural 156.4 (95.3, 244.2) 9 (1, 63) 5 stable stable trend 1.5 (-4.0, 7.1)
Nance County 2 Rural 170.4 (96.2, 282.0) 5 (1, 64) 4
*
*
Nemaha County 2 Rural 112.6 (72.7, 168.4) 46 (3, 64) 6
*
*
Nuckolls County 2 Rural 149.5 (90.6, 237.6) 11 (1, 64) 5 stable stable trend -1.3 (-5.1, 2.4)
Otoe County 2 Rural 133.1 (101.3, 172.1) 25 (3, 60) 14 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.2, 4.3)
Phelps County 2 Rural 114.7 (78.1, 163.6) 43 (4, 64) 7 stable stable trend -0.5 (-6.2, 5.4)
Pierce County 2 Rural 133.1 (88.0, 194.4) 24 (1, 64) 6
*
*
Platte County 2 Rural 121.3 (100.0, 146.1) 36 (10, 58) 25 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.7, 2.7)
Polk County 2 Rural 114.8 (67.5, 185.3) 42 (1, 64) 4 falling falling trend -4.1 (-25.2, -0.7)
Red Willow County 2 Rural 160.8 (116.7, 216.2) 8 (1, 56) 11 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.3, 5.1)
Richardson County 2 Rural 115.7 (77.1, 169.1) 41 (3, 64) 7 stable stable trend -0.3 (-4.1, 3.3)
Saline County 2 Rural 149.4 (113.1, 193.8) 12 (1, 56) 12 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.0, 2.2)
Sarpy County 2 Urban 143.9 (133.4, 155.0) 13 (6, 33) 145 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.4, 1.5)
Saunders County 2 Urban 136.7 (108.8, 169.9) 22 (4, 56) 18 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.4, 3.0)
Scotts Bluff County 2 Rural 133.8 (112.8, 157.8) 23 (6, 52) 33 stable stable trend -4.4 (-10.6, 0.8)
Seward County 2 Urban 129.0 (97.6, 167.5) 29 (4, 61) 13 stable stable trend 0.6 (-17.1, 18.6)
Sheridan County 2 Rural 140.4 (87.2, 217.3) 17 (1, 64) 6 stable stable trend 1.3 (-3.3, 6.4)
Stanton County 2 Rural 107.7 (64.4, 171.0) 51 (3, 64) 4 stable stable trend -0.7 (-5.3, 3.6)
Thayer County 2 Rural 110.7 (62.7, 183.4) 48 (2, 64) 4
*
*
Thurston County 2 Rural 114.2 (69.9, 177.1) 45 (2, 64) 4 stable stable trend -18.0 (-40.4, 0.2)
Valley County 2 Rural 155.8 (94.9, 244.8) 10 (1, 63) 5 stable stable trend 2.8 (-1.4, 8.1)
Washington County 2 Urban 168.5 (137.7, 204.6) 7 (1, 37) 23 rising rising trend 2.2 (0.3, 4.5)
Wayne County 2 Rural 123.5 (81.4, 179.8) 34 (2, 64) 6 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.6, 3.5)
York County 2 Rural 116.0 (84.9, 155.1) 40 (6, 63) 11 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.8, 1.2)
Arthur County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Banner County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blaine County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Boyd County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brown County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chase County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Deuel County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dundy County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Frontier County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garden County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garfield County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gosper County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greeley County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hayes County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hooker County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Keya Paha County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kimball County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Logan County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loup County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McPherson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pawnee County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perkins County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rock County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sioux County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Thomas County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Webster County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/13/2026 3:55 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top