Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report by State

Liver & Bile Duct (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
State
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 8.6 (8.6, 8.7) N/A 35,841 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.6)
Wyoming 6 5.2 (4.5, 6.0) 50 (47, 50) 42 stable stable trend -8.9 (-21.5, 1.0)
Nebraska 6 6.0 (5.5, 6.4) 49 (44, 50) 145 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.4, 2.0)
Vermont 6 6.1 (5.4, 6.9) 48 (38, 50) 60 stable stable trend -1.1 (-7.8, 1.4)
New Hampshire 6 6.3 (5.8, 6.9) 47 (40, 50) 126 stable stable trend -3.5 (-16.2, 3.9)
North Dakota 6 6.5 (5.8, 7.3) 46 (33, 50) 61 rising rising trend 4.4 (2.5, 6.9)
Maine 6 6.5 (6.0, 7.1) 45 (36, 49) 139 rising rising trend 2.7 (1.5, 4.0)
Utah 7 6.7 (6.3, 7.1) 44 (35, 48) 200 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.2, 3.4)
South Dakota 6 7.1 (6.4, 7.8) 43 (23, 48) 80 rising rising trend 5.6 (4.1, 7.5)
Montana 6 7.1 (6.5, 7.8) 42 (27, 47) 111 rising rising trend 4.4 (3.1, 6.2)
Michigan 6 7.1 (6.9, 7.3) 41 (34, 45) 989 falling falling trend -2.5 (-5.0, -0.8)
Kansas 6 7.1 (6.8, 7.6) 40 (32, 46) 266 stable stable trend -1.3 (-5.1, 2.5)
Iowa 7 7.2 (6.8, 7.6) 39 (32, 46) 302 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.2, 3.4)
Nevada 6 7.2 (6.8, 7.6) 38 (31, 45) 277 stable stable trend 0.8 (0.0, 1.7)
Colorado 6 7.2 (6.9, 7.5) 37 (33, 44) 492 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.3, 0.5)
Wisconsin 6 7.3 (7.0, 7.5) 36 (32, 44) 579 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.8, 0.5)
Virginia 6 7.3 (7.1, 7.6) 35 (32, 43) 805 stable stable trend -1.2 (-7.3, 2.3)
Idaho 7 7.4 (6.9, 7.9) 34 (23, 45) 169 falling falling trend -3.9 (-8.7, -0.3)
Ohio 6 7.7 (7.5, 7.9) 33 (28, 36) 1,228 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 0.4)
Connecticut 7 7.8 (7.5, 8.2) 32 (19, 38) 386 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.2, 1.4)
Arizona 6 7.9 (7.7, 8.2) 31 (20, 34) 746 falling falling trend -6.7 (-11.9, -3.3)
South Carolina 6 7.9 (7.6, 8.2) 30 (18, 35) 562 stable stable trend -2.6 (-9.0, 1.2)
New Jersey 7 7.9 (7.7, 8.2) 29 (21, 34) 958 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.1, 1.5)
Minnesota 6 8.0 (7.7, 8.3) 28 (18, 35) 567 stable stable trend -2.4 (-7.2, 2.8)
Delaware 6 8.0 (7.4, 8.7) 27 (10, 42) 116 stable stable trend -3.4 (-11.9, 0.8)
Missouri 6 8.1 (7.8, 8.4) 26 (15, 33) 670 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.9, 2.2)
Illinois 7 8.1 (7.9, 8.3) 25 (17, 32) 1,316 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.1, 1.8)
Arkansas 6 8.2 (7.8, 8.6) 24 (13, 34) 322 rising rising trend 4.7 (3.8, 5.8)
West Virginia 6 8.2 (7.7, 8.7) 23 (10, 35) 221 rising rising trend 4.2 (3.2, 5.5)
Florida 6 8.3 (8.1, 8.4) 22 (16, 28) 2,664 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.7, 1.9)
New York 7 8.3 (8.2, 8.5) 21 (14, 27) 2,184 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.4, -1.6)
Alabama 6 8.4 (8.1, 8.7) 20 (11, 30) 567 rising rising trend 3.9 (3.3, 4.6)
Pennsylvania 6 8.4 (8.2, 8.6) 19 (13, 26) 1,549 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.1, 0.1)
Maryland 6 8.4 (8.1, 8.7) 18 (12, 29) 664 falling falling trend -3.4 (-7.4, -0.3)
Georgia 7 8.4 (8.2, 8.7) 17 (12, 27) 1,053 stable stable trend -0.6 (-5.0, 1.5)
Massachusetts 7 8.4 (8.2, 8.7) 16 (12, 28) 778 stable stable trend -4.6 (-8.9, 0.2)
Tennessee 6 8.6 (8.3, 8.9) 15 (9, 24) 776 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.9, 0.2)
Rhode Island 6 8.6 (8.0, 9.4) 14 (5, 33) 128 stable stable trend -6.2 (-18.9, 3.9)
Mississippi 6 8.8 (8.4, 9.2) 13 (6, 25) 340 stable stable trend -3.0 (-7.1, 2.0)
Washington 5 8.9 (8.6, 9.2) 12 (7, 17) 851 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.8, 0.3)
Kentucky 7 8.9 (8.6, 9.3) 11 (6, 18) 527 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.9, 2.7)
North Carolina 6 9.0 (8.7, 9.2) 10 (6, 15) 1,215 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.6, 2.0)
Oregon 6 9.1 (8.7, 9.5) 9 (5, 16) 528 falling falling trend -3.0 (-7.2, -0.6)
Oklahoma 6 9.2 (8.8, 9.6) 8 (4, 15) 458 rising rising trend 3.6 (2.8, 4.6)
Hawaii 7 9.4 (8.8, 10.1) 7 (3, 17) 189 falling falling trend -4.4 (-8.5, -2.0)
California 7 9.6 (9.5, 9.7) 6 (4, 8) 4,467 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.3, 0.0)
New Mexico 7 9.8 (9.2, 10.3) 5 (3, 11) 277 stable stable trend -4.3 (-8.6, 0.1)
Alaska 6 9.8 (8.8, 10.9) 4 (2, 22) 78 rising rising trend 2.2 (0.8, 3.8)
Louisiana 7 10.6 (10.2, 10.9) 3 (2, 5) 641 stable stable trend -1.2 (-7.9, 4.2)
District of Columbia 6 11.5 (10.4, 12.7) 2 (1, 4) 81 falling falling trend -2.3 (-5.4, -0.2)
Texas 7 12.5 (12.4, 12.7) 1 (1, 2) 3,900 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.6, 1.6)
Indiana 6
data not available
N/A
data not available
data not available
data not available
Puerto Rico 6 8.1 (7.7, 8.5) N/A 369 stable stable trend -2.5 (-10.9, 6.7)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/03/2024 2:19 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Indiana, Puerto Rico

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Data not available for this combination of data selections.
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
CI*Rank data for Puerto Rico is not available.

Return to Top