Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report by State

Liver & Bile Duct (All Stages^), 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc
State
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 8.6 (8.6, 8.7) N/A 35,262 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.4)
Arkansas 6 8.6 (8.2, 9.0) 17 (8, 29) 336 rising rising trend 5.4 (4.6, 6.2)
Minnesota 6 7.8 (7.5, 8.2) 30 (21, 37) 542 rising rising trend 5.4 (4.3, 6.6)
Kansas 6 7.2 (6.8, 7.7) 39 (30, 44) 265 rising rising trend 5.0 (3.9, 6.1)
North Dakota 6 5.7 (4.9, 6.4) 49 (43, 50) 50 rising rising trend 4.6 (2.6, 6.6)
Montana 6 6.7 (6.1, 7.3) 43 (34, 48) 102 rising rising trend 4.5 (3.3, 5.7)
West Virginia 6 7.8 (7.3, 8.3) 32 (17, 42) 210 rising rising trend 4.4 (3.4, 5.4)
Alabama 6 8.3 (8.0, 8.6) 22 (13, 32) 535 rising rising trend 4.1 (3.5, 4.7)
Iowa 7 7.1 (6.7, 7.5) 41 (33, 45) 290 rising rising trend 3.9 (3.5, 4.4)
Oklahoma 6 8.7 (8.4, 9.1) 14 (7, 25) 428 rising rising trend 3.7 (2.9, 4.5)
Louisiana 7 10.5 (10.1, 10.9) 3 (3, 6) 625 rising rising trend 3.6 (3.0, 4.1)
New Hampshire 6 6.6 (6.1, 7.2) 44 (36, 49) 126 rising rising trend 3.2 (1.9, 4.5)
Maine 6 6.3 (5.8, 6.9) 46 (40, 50) 132 rising rising trend 3.0 (2.1, 4.0)
Virginia 6 7.4 (7.2, 7.7) 36 (31, 42) 787 rising rising trend 2.9 (1.8, 4.1)
Illinois 7 8.1 (7.9, 8.3) 24 (20, 32) 1,285 rising rising trend 2.7 (2.4, 3.1)
Wyoming 6 5.9 (5.2, 6.8) 47 (41, 50) 47 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.2, 5.2)
Nebraska 6 5.9 (5.4, 6.3) 48 (44, 50) 138 rising rising trend 2.4 (1.4, 3.4)
Ohio 6 7.6 (7.4, 7.8) 35 (29, 39) 1,184 rising rising trend 2.4 (1.6, 3.1)
New Jersey 7 8.1 (7.9, 8.3) 26 (19, 33) 931 rising rising trend 2.1 (1.8, 2.4)
Rhode Island 6 9.0 (8.3, 9.8) 10 (5, 28) 126 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.9, 3.1)
Alaska 6 9.1 (8.2, 10.2) 8 (3, 33) 72 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.4, 3.2)
Missouri 6 8.0 (7.7, 8.3) 28 (19, 35) 652 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.2, 2.6)
Utah 7 6.5 (6.1, 6.9) 45 (40, 48) 184 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.4, 3.7)
Massachusetts 7 8.6 (8.3, 8.9) 18 (10, 24) 763 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.1, 1.9)
Colorado 6 7.4 (7.1, 7.7) 37 (30, 42) 488 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.1, 2.1)
Maryland 6 8.8 (8.5, 9.1) 13 (7, 22) 670 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.1, 3.2)
North Carolina 6 8.7 (8.5, 8.9) 15 (9, 22) 1,146 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.1, 2.0)
Georgia 7 8.5 (8.2, 8.7) 21 (12, 26) 1,017 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.9, 2.6)
Texas 7 12.1 (11.9, 12.3) 2 (1, 2) 3,641 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.2)
Indiana 6 7.8 (7.5, 8.0) 33 (23, 38) 652 stable stable trend -0.3 (-5.0, 4.6)
Kentucky 7 8.5 (8.1, 8.8) 20 (10, 29) 488 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.2, 1.8)
South Carolina 6 8.1 (7.8, 8.4) 25 (17, 34) 557 stable stable trend -0.8 (-5.6, 4.3)
Florida 6 8.1 (7.9, 8.2) 27 (21, 32) 2,499 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.2, 1.3)
Tennessee 6 8.7 (8.4, 9.0) 16 (8, 23) 755 stable stable trend -1.1 (-5.6, 3.7)
Washington 1 9.1 (8.8, 9.4) 9 (7, 16) 843 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.1, 0.6)
California 7 9.8 (9.7, 9.9) 6 (4, 8) 4,461 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.2)
Wisconsin 6 7.4 (7.1, 7.6) 38 (31, 43) 565 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.7, 2.6)
Michigan 6 7.1 (6.9, 7.4) 40 (36, 44) 969 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.4, 1.2)
Vermont 6 5.5 (4.9, 6.3) 50 (44, 50) 50 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.8, 1.2)
District of Columbia 6 12.4 (11.2, 13.6) 1 (1, 3) 90 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.4, 0.2)
Idaho 7 7.6 (7.1, 8.2) 34 (20, 43) 161 stable stable trend -2.1 (-8.8, 5.0)
Pennsylvania 6 8.6 (8.4, 8.8) 19 (11, 23) 1,532 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.7, 0.5)
Connecticut 7 7.8 (7.5, 8.2) 31 (21, 38) 383 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.6, 0.5)
New York 7 8.9 (8.7, 9.1) 12 (8, 17) 2,236 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.8, -0.4)
Arizona 6 7.9 (7.7, 8.2) 29 (21, 36) 724 stable stable trend -2.7 (-6.0, 0.6)
Oregon 6 9.3 (8.9, 9.6) 7 (6, 15) 526 stable stable trend -2.7 (-5.3, 0.1)
Puerto Rico 6 8.5 (8.1, 8.9) N/A 371 stable stable trend -2.7 (-8.9, 3.9)
Delaware 6 8.2 (7.5, 8.9) 23 (8, 40) 113 stable stable trend -3.9 (-9.3, 1.8)
South Dakota 6 6.9 (6.2, 7.7) 42 (27, 48) 75 stable stable trend -4.7 (-15.2, 7.2)
New Mexico 7 10.3 (9.7, 10.8) 4 (3, 7) 280 stable stable trend -5.0 (-11.6, 2.0)
Hawaii 7 10.2 (9.6, 10.9) 5 (3, 8) 196 falling falling trend -8.0 (-12.6, -3.1)
Mississippi 6 9.0 (8.6, 9.4) 11 (7, 23) 340
*
*
Nevada 6
data not available
N/A
data not available
data not available
data not available
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/09/2023 8:33 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Nevada

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Data not available for this combination of data selections.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data not available for this combination of geography, cancer site, age, and race/ethnicity.

Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
CI*Rank data for Puerto Rico is not available.

Return to Top