Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report by State

Liver & Bile Duct (All Stages^), 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
State
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 8.6 (8.6, 8.7) N/A 35,262 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.4)
Vermont 6 5.5 (4.9, 6.3) 50 (44, 50) 50 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.8, 1.2)
North Dakota 6 5.7 (4.9, 6.4) 49 (43, 50) 50 rising rising trend 4.6 (2.6, 6.6)
Nebraska 6 5.9 (5.4, 6.3) 48 (44, 50) 138 rising rising trend 2.4 (1.4, 3.4)
Wyoming 6 5.9 (5.2, 6.8) 47 (41, 50) 47 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.2, 5.2)
Maine 6 6.3 (5.8, 6.9) 46 (40, 50) 132 rising rising trend 3.0 (2.1, 4.0)
Utah 7 6.5 (6.1, 6.9) 45 (40, 48) 184 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.4, 3.7)
New Hampshire 6 6.6 (6.1, 7.2) 44 (36, 49) 126 rising rising trend 3.2 (1.9, 4.5)
Montana 6 6.7 (6.1, 7.3) 43 (34, 48) 102 rising rising trend 4.5 (3.3, 5.7)
South Dakota 6 6.9 (6.2, 7.7) 42 (27, 48) 75 stable stable trend -4.7 (-15.2, 7.2)
Iowa 7 7.1 (6.7, 7.5) 41 (33, 45) 290 rising rising trend 3.9 (3.5, 4.4)
Michigan 6 7.1 (6.9, 7.4) 40 (36, 44) 969 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.4, 1.2)
Kansas 6 7.2 (6.8, 7.7) 39 (30, 44) 265 rising rising trend 5.0 (3.9, 6.1)
Wisconsin 6 7.4 (7.1, 7.6) 38 (31, 43) 565 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.7, 2.6)
Colorado 6 7.4 (7.1, 7.7) 37 (30, 42) 488 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.1, 2.1)
Virginia 6 7.4 (7.2, 7.7) 36 (31, 42) 787 rising rising trend 2.9 (1.8, 4.1)
Ohio 6 7.6 (7.4, 7.8) 35 (29, 39) 1,184 rising rising trend 2.4 (1.6, 3.1)
Idaho 7 7.6 (7.1, 8.2) 34 (20, 43) 161 stable stable trend -2.1 (-8.8, 5.0)
Indiana 6 7.8 (7.5, 8.0) 33 (23, 38) 652 stable stable trend -0.3 (-5.0, 4.6)
West Virginia 6 7.8 (7.3, 8.3) 32 (17, 42) 210 rising rising trend 4.4 (3.4, 5.4)
Connecticut 7 7.8 (7.5, 8.2) 31 (21, 38) 383 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.6, 0.5)
Minnesota 6 7.8 (7.5, 8.2) 30 (21, 37) 542 rising rising trend 5.4 (4.3, 6.6)
Arizona 6 7.9 (7.7, 8.2) 29 (21, 36) 724 stable stable trend -2.7 (-6.0, 0.6)
Missouri 6 8.0 (7.7, 8.3) 28 (19, 35) 652 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.2, 2.6)
Florida 6 8.1 (7.9, 8.2) 27 (21, 32) 2,499 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.2, 1.3)
New Jersey 7 8.1 (7.9, 8.3) 26 (19, 33) 931 rising rising trend 2.1 (1.8, 2.4)
South Carolina 6 8.1 (7.8, 8.4) 25 (17, 34) 557 stable stable trend -0.8 (-5.6, 4.3)
Illinois 7 8.1 (7.9, 8.3) 24 (20, 32) 1,285 rising rising trend 2.7 (2.4, 3.1)
Delaware 6 8.2 (7.5, 8.9) 23 (8, 40) 113 stable stable trend -3.9 (-9.3, 1.8)
Alabama 6 8.3 (8.0, 8.6) 22 (13, 32) 535 rising rising trend 4.1 (3.5, 4.7)
Georgia 7 8.5 (8.2, 8.7) 21 (12, 26) 1,017 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.9, 2.6)
Kentucky 7 8.5 (8.1, 8.8) 20 (10, 29) 488 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.2, 1.8)
Pennsylvania 6 8.6 (8.4, 8.8) 19 (11, 23) 1,532 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.7, 0.5)
Massachusetts 7 8.6 (8.3, 8.9) 18 (10, 24) 763 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.1, 1.9)
Arkansas 6 8.6 (8.2, 9.0) 17 (8, 29) 336 rising rising trend 5.4 (4.6, 6.2)
Tennessee 6 8.7 (8.4, 9.0) 16 (8, 23) 755 stable stable trend -1.1 (-5.6, 3.7)
North Carolina 6 8.7 (8.5, 8.9) 15 (9, 22) 1,146 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.1, 2.0)
Oklahoma 6 8.7 (8.4, 9.1) 14 (7, 25) 428 rising rising trend 3.7 (2.9, 4.5)
Maryland 6 8.8 (8.5, 9.1) 13 (7, 22) 670 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.1, 3.2)
New York 7 8.9 (8.7, 9.1) 12 (8, 17) 2,236 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.8, -0.4)
Mississippi 6 9.0 (8.6, 9.4) 11 (7, 23) 340
*
*
Rhode Island 6 9.0 (8.3, 9.8) 10 (5, 28) 126 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.9, 3.1)
Washington 1 9.1 (8.8, 9.4) 9 (7, 16) 843 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.1, 0.6)
Alaska 6 9.1 (8.2, 10.2) 8 (3, 33) 72 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.4, 3.2)
Oregon 6 9.3 (8.9, 9.6) 7 (6, 15) 526 stable stable trend -2.7 (-5.3, 0.1)
California 7 9.8 (9.7, 9.9) 6 (4, 8) 4,461 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.2)
Hawaii 7 10.2 (9.6, 10.9) 5 (3, 8) 196 falling falling trend -8.0 (-12.6, -3.1)
New Mexico 7 10.3 (9.7, 10.8) 4 (3, 7) 280 stable stable trend -5.0 (-11.6, 2.0)
Louisiana 7 10.5 (10.1, 10.9) 3 (3, 6) 625 rising rising trend 3.6 (3.0, 4.1)
Texas 7 12.1 (11.9, 12.3) 2 (1, 2) 3,641 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.2)
District of Columbia 6 12.4 (11.2, 13.6) 1 (1, 3) 90 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.4, 0.2)
Nevada 6
data not available
N/A
data not available
data not available
data not available
Puerto Rico 6 8.5 (8.1, 8.9) N/A 371 stable stable trend -2.7 (-8.9, 3.9)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/09/2022 9:13 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Nevada, Puerto Rico

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Data not available for this combination of data selections.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data not available for this combination of geography, cancer site, age, and race/ethnicity.

Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
CI*Rank data for Puerto Rico is not available.

Return to Top