Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report by State

Liver & Bile Duct (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name
State
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 8.6 (8.5, 8.6) N/A 34,507 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.3)
Alabama 6 *** 8.0 (7.7, 8.3) 26 (17, 34) 508 rising rising trend 4.2 (3.6, 4.9)
Alaska 6 *** 9.0 (8.0, 10.1) 10 (3, 36) 69 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.1, 3.2)
Arizona 6 *** 8.0 (7.8, 8.3) 25 (18, 33) 706 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.5, 1.5)
Arkansas 6 *** 8.3 (7.8, 8.7) 22 (10, 32) 315 rising rising trend 5.5 (4.6, 6.5)
California 7 *** 9.9 (9.7, 10.0) 6 (4, 7) 4,404 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.4, -0.6)
Colorado 6 *** 7.6 (7.2, 7.9) 33 (24, 41) 486 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.2, 2.7)
Connecticut 7 *** 7.9 (7.5, 8.2) 29 (18, 38) 379 stable stable trend -3.6 (-7.8, 0.8)
Delaware 6 *** 8.3 (7.6, 9.1) 21 (7, 38) 110 stable stable trend -4.5 (-12.1, 3.7)
District of Columbia 6 *** 12.4 (11.2, 13.6) 1 (1, 3) 88 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.4, 1.0)
Florida 6 *** 8.0 (7.8, 8.1) 27 (21, 31) 2,400 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.2)
Georgia 7 *** 8.3 (8.1, 8.6) 20 (13, 28) 976 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.6, 3.1)
Hawaii 7 *** 10.6 (10.0, 11.3) 3 (2, 6) 200 falling falling trend -6.5 (-11.9, -0.7)
Idaho 7 *** 7.7 (7.1, 8.2) 31 (17, 43) 157 stable stable trend -1.2 (-10.5, 9.2)
Illinois 6 *** 8.0 (7.8, 8.2) 28 (20, 33) 1,244 rising rising trend 2.8 (2.3, 3.3)
Indiana 6 *** 7.4 (7.1, 7.7) 36 (29, 42) 610 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.6, 2.3)
Iowa 7 *** 6.9 (6.5, 7.3) 42 (34, 46) 278 rising rising trend 4.0 (3.5, 4.5)
Kansas 6 *** 7.1 (6.7, 7.5) 40 (31, 46) 254 rising rising trend 5.4 (4.3, 6.6)
Kentucky 7 *** 8.5 (8.2, 8.9) 17 (8, 26) 482 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.0, 2.3)
Louisiana 7 *** 10.3 (10.0, 10.7) 4 (3, 6) 606 rising rising trend 3.7 (3.1, 4.3)
Maine 6 *** 5.9 (5.4, 6.4) 48 (44, 51) 121 rising rising trend 2.6 (1.6, 3.5)
Maryland 6 *** 8.8 (8.5, 9.1) 12 (7, 21) 658 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.8, 4.6)
Massachusetts 7 *** 8.5 (8.2, 8.7) 19 (11, 26) 739 stable stable trend 1.0 (0.0, 2.1)
Michigan 5 *** 7.2 (7.0, 7.4) 39 (34, 44) 953 rising rising trend 2.1 (1.7, 2.6)
Minnesota 6 *** 7.5 (7.2, 7.8) 35 (26, 41) 508 rising rising trend 5.7 (4.5, 6.9)
Mississippi 6 *** 9.0 (8.5, 9.4) 11 (7, 21) 333
*
*
Missouri 6 *** 7.9 (7.6, 8.1) 30 (20, 36) 628 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.8, 2.9)
Montana 6 *** 6.7 (6.1, 7.3) 44 (31, 48) 98 rising rising trend 4.7 (3.4, 6.0)
Nebraska 6 *** 5.6 (5.1, 6.0) 49 (46, 51) 130 rising rising trend 2.5 (1.3, 3.6)
Nevada 6 *** 7.1 (6.6, 7.5) 41 (30, 46) 197
*
*
New Hampshire 6 *** 6.3 (5.8, 6.9) 46 (40, 50) 118 rising rising trend 3.1 (1.5, 4.7)
New Jersey 7 *** 8.0 (7.8, 8.3) 24 (19, 32) 910 rising rising trend 2.2 (2.0, 2.4)
New Mexico 7 *** 10.0 (9.5, 10.6) 5 (3, 8) 268 stable stable trend -6.5 (-15.5, 3.3)
New York 7 *** 9.0 (8.8, 9.2) 9 (7, 14) 2,235 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.4, 0.7)
North Carolina 6 *** 8.6 (8.3, 8.8) 16 (10, 23) 1,098 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.2, 2.4)
North Dakota 6 *** 5.3 (4.6, 6.1) 51 (45, 51) 46 rising rising trend 4.3 (2.0, 6.6)
Ohio 6 *** 7.3 (7.1, 7.5) 38 (31, 42) 1,127 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.1, 4.0)
Oklahoma 6 *** 8.6 (8.2, 9.0) 14 (8, 25) 415 rising rising trend 3.7 (2.8, 4.7)
Oregon 6 *** 9.2 (8.9, 9.6) 7 (6, 14) 514 stable stable trend -4.0 (-8.3, 0.5)
Pennsylvania 6 *** 8.6 (8.4, 8.8) 15 (10, 22) 1,516 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.7, 2.2)
Puerto Rico 6 *** 8.2 (7.8, 8.6) N/A 392 stable stable trend -1.1 (-10.2, 9.1)
Rhode Island 6 *** 8.5 (7.8, 9.2) 18 (7, 35) 118 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.4, 3.0)
South Carolina 6 *** 8.2 (7.9, 8.5) 23 (13, 32) 544 stable stable trend -1.1 (-8.9, 7.5)
South Dakota 6 *** 6.8 (6.1, 7.6) 43 (28, 48) 72 rising rising trend 6.0 (3.7, 8.4)
Tennessee 6 *** 8.6 (8.3, 8.9) 13 (8, 22) 737 rising rising trend 3.3 (1.9, 4.7)
Texas 6 *** 12.0 (11.8, 12.2) 2 (1, 2) 3,526 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.0, 1.8)
Utah 7 *** 6.5 (6.1, 6.9) 45 (39, 48) 178 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.6, 4.5)
Vermont 6 *** 5.4 (4.7, 6.2) 50 (45, 51) 48 stable stable trend -2.2 (-6.0, 1.6)
Virginia 6 *** 7.5 (7.3, 7.8) 34 (28, 40) 780 rising rising trend 3.4 (2.2, 4.5)
Washington 5 *** 9.0 (8.7, 9.3) 8 (7, 16) 817 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.3, 1.4)
West Virginia 6 *** 7.6 (7.1, 8.1) 32 (20, 43) 203 rising rising trend 4.5 (3.3, 5.7)
Wisconsin 6 *** 7.4 (7.1, 7.7) 37 (29, 42) 554 rising rising trend 3.0 (2.3, 3.6)
Wyoming 6 *** 6.0 (5.2, 6.9) 47 (38, 51) 46 rising rising trend 3.3 (0.7, 6.0)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/20/2022 1:15 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
CI*Rank data for Puerto Rico is not available.

Return to Top