Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report by State

Ovary (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate

State
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Puerto Rico 2 7.9 (7.3, 8.5) N/A 177 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.1, 2.0)
North Dakota 2 7.9 (6.7, 9.2) 51 (21, 51) 35 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.0, -2.1)
Mississippi 2 8.0 (7.4, 8.6) 50 (41, 51) 149 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.9)
Wyoming 2 8.3 (7.0, 9.8) 49 (10, 51) 29 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.3, -1.6)
South Carolina 2 8.3 (7.9, 8.8) 48 (40, 51) 283 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.2, -2.0)
Maine 2 8.4 (7.6, 9.4) 47 (21, 51) 79 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.8, -1.5)
Louisiana 7 8.6 (8.1, 9.1) 46 (35, 51) 243 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.1)
Kentucky 7 8.7 (8.2, 9.2) 45 (31, 50) 244 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.7, -1.5)
Alaska 2 8.8 (7.5, 10.4) 44 (3, 51) 32 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.0, -0.7)
Nebraska 2 8.9 (8.1, 9.7) 43 (17, 51) 101 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.7)
Virginia 2 8.9 (8.5, 9.3) 42 (32, 49) 473 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.8, -1.6)
Kansas 2 9.1 (8.4, 9.8) 41 (17, 50) 158 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.4, -1.3)
Rhode Island 2 9.1 (8.1, 10.2) 40 (8, 51) 68 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.4, -1.0)
Missouri 2 9.1 (8.7, 9.6) 39 (22, 47) 354 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.4, -1.3)
North Carolina 2 9.2 (8.8, 9.5) 38 (25, 46) 599 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.4)
New Mexico 7 9.3 (8.6, 10.1) 37 (9, 49) 124 falling falling trend -4.2 (-10.9, -1.3)
Oregon 2 9.4 (8.9, 10.0) 36 (14, 46) 255 falling falling trend -6.2 (-11.2, -3.0)
South Dakota 2 9.5 (8.3, 10.8) 35 (2, 51) 52 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.5)
Hawaii 7 9.5 (8.5, 10.5) 34 (4, 50) 82 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.6, -0.1)
Colorado 2 9.5 (9.0, 10.0) 33 (14, 45) 317 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.8, -1.8)
Massachusetts 2 9.5 (9.1, 9.9) 32 (15, 43) 440 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.8, -1.4)
Tennessee 2 9.5 (9.1, 10.0) 31 (15, 43) 411 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.9)
Minnesota 2 9.5 (9.1, 10.0) 30 (14, 44) 332 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.2, -1.6)
Michigan 2 9.6 (9.2, 10.0) 29 (16, 41) 622 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.8, 2.9)
Iowa 7 9.7 (9.0, 10.3) 28 (8, 45) 196 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.9, -1.8)
Georgia 7 9.7 (9.3, 10.1) 27 (14, 40) 615 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.2, -1.7)
Washington 1 9.7 (9.3, 10.1) 26 (12, 41) 445 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.1, -1.9)
Alabama 2 9.8 (9.3, 10.3) 24 (10, 41) 320 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.9)
Connecticut 7 9.8 (9.2, 10.4) 25 (8, 43) 236 falling falling trend -2.8 (-8.0, -1.6)
Maryland 2 9.8 (9.4, 10.3) 23 (10, 40) 388 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Ohio 2 9.8 (9.5, 10.2) 22 (12, 37) 743 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.2)
Vermont 2 10.0 (8.6, 11.5) 21 (1, 50) 42 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.1)
Arkansas 2 10.0 (9.3, 10.7) 20 (3, 42) 190 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Indiana 2 10.0 (9.5, 10.4) 19 (7, 37) 411 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.2)
Utah 7 10.1 (9.4, 10.8) 18 (3, 42) 154 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Delaware 2 10.2 (9.1, 11.4) 17 (1, 46) 70 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.1, -0.4)
Arizona 2 10.2 (9.8, 10.6) 16 (4, 32) 453 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -1.0)
Wisconsin 2 10.2 (9.8, 10.7) 14 (3, 33) 386 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.8, -1.6)
Illinois 7 10.2 (9.9, 10.6) 15 (6, 27) 813 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.5)
Oklahoma 2 10.4 (9.8, 11.0) 13 (2, 35) 242 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.7)
Pennsylvania 2 10.4 (10.1, 10.7) 12 (4, 23) 912 falling falling trend -2.1 (-4.7, -1.6)
New Hampshire 2 10.4 (9.5, 11.4) 11 (1, 43) 99 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.6, -1.1)
Idaho 7 10.5 (9.7, 11.5) 10 (1, 40) 114 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Texas 7 10.6 (10.3, 10.8) 9 (3, 17) 1,645 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.2, 0.7)
California 7 10.6 (10.4, 10.8) 8 (3, 15) 2,429 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.4, -1.1)
Nevada 2 10.6 (9.9, 11.3) 7 (1, 31) 191 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 1.1)
Montana 2 10.8 (9.7, 12.0) 6 (1, 40) 75 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.4, -0.3)
New York 7 10.9 (10.6, 11.1) 5 (1, 12) 1,392 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.4)
Florida 2 10.9 (10.7, 11.2) 4 (1, 11) 1,678 stable stable trend -1.0 (-1.9, 0.6)
District of Columbia 2 10.9 (9.4, 12.6) 3 (1, 46) 39 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.4, 0.9)
New Jersey 7 11.0 (10.6, 11.4) 2 (1, 13) 652 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.3, -1.6)
West Virginia 2 11.9 (11.0, 12.9) 1 (1, 10) 140 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.9)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 02/19/2026 4:17 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

CI*Rank data for Puerto Rico is not available.

Return to Top