Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report by State

Kidney & Renal Pelvis (All Stages^), 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count
State
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 17.3 (17.3, 17.4) N/A 66,203 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.4, 0.7)
California 7 15.1 (15.0, 15.3) 45 (42, 47) 6,559 stable stable trend 0.5 (0.0, 0.9)
Texas 7 19.8 (19.6, 20.1) 9 (7, 11) 5,696 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.8, 1.2)
Florida 6 15.1 (14.9, 15.3) 46 (42, 47) 4,339 stable stable trend 0.3 (0.0, 0.5)
New York 7 17.1 (16.9, 17.3) 30 (23, 33) 4,073 rising rising trend 0.6 (0.4, 0.8)
Pennsylvania 6 17.5 (17.2, 17.8) 24 (19, 30) 2,879 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.8, 1.0)
Illinois 7 18.3 (17.9, 18.6) 17 (14, 22) 2,737 rising rising trend 0.4 (0.1, 0.8)
Ohio 6 17.9 (17.6, 18.2) 19 (15, 26) 2,570 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.9, 1.7)
North Carolina 6 17.8 (17.5, 18.2) 21 (16, 27) 2,214 rising rising trend 0.5 (0.2, 0.8)
Michigan 6 16.4 (16.1, 16.7) 34 (29, 39) 2,035 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Georgia 7 17.4 (17.1, 17.7) 25 (19, 31) 2,002 rising rising trend 1.8 (1.4, 2.2)
New Jersey 7 16.7 (16.3, 17.0) 32 (26, 37) 1,818 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.5, 1.2)
Tennessee 6 20.1 (19.6, 20.5) 7 (6, 11) 1,627 rising rising trend 2.3 (1.8, 2.8)
Virginia 6 15.6 (15.2, 16.0) 43 (36, 46) 1,555 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.5, 1.7)
Indiana 6 19.1 (18.6, 19.5) 12 (9, 17) 1,486 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.3, 1.4)
Missouri 6 19.4 (18.9, 19.9) 11 (7, 15) 1,451 stable stable trend -1.3 (-6.2, 3.9)
Arizona 6 16.2 (15.8, 16.6) 36 (29, 42) 1,381 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6)
Wisconsin 6 19.0 (18.5, 19.5) 13 (9, 17) 1,373 rising rising trend 1.7 (1.2, 2.1)
Washington 1 15.6 (15.3, 16.0) 41 (35, 46) 1,348 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.1)
Massachusetts 7 15.6 (15.2, 16.0) 42 (35, 46) 1,316 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
Louisiana 7 22.5 (21.9, 23.1) 2 (1, 4) 1,217 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.3, 1.6)
Minnesota 6 17.7 (17.2, 18.2) 22 (15, 30) 1,169 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.9, 1.8)
Kentucky 7 21.3 (20.7, 21.9) 4 (2, 7) 1,143 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.1, 1.5)
Maryland 6 16.0 (15.6, 16.4) 38 (31, 44) 1,141 rising rising trend 2.6 (1.0, 4.1)
South Carolina 6 17.9 (17.4, 18.4) 20 (15, 29) 1,130 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.9, 2.0)
Alabama 6 18.7 (18.2, 19.2) 14 (10, 20) 1,117 rising rising trend 2.0 (1.6, 2.4)
Oklahoma 6 20.9 (20.3, 21.6) 6 (3, 8) 953 rising rising trend 2.3 (1.9, 2.7)
Colorado 6 14.4 (14.0, 14.9) 48 (45, 49) 894 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.5, 1.1)
Oregon 6 15.7 (15.3, 16.3) 39 (32, 46) 817 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.0, 0.2)
Mississippi 6 22.6 (21.9, 23.4) 1 (1, 4) 794
*
*
Arkansas 6 21.9 (21.2, 22.7) 3 (1, 6) 793 rising rising trend 4.2 (3.4, 4.9)
Iowa 7 20.0 (19.3, 20.6) 8 (5, 13) 769 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.6, 2.2)
Connecticut 7 16.3 (15.8, 16.9) 35 (28, 43) 740 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.2, 1.0)
Kansas 6 19.5 (18.9, 20.2) 10 (6, 16) 658 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.9, 3.5)
West Virginia 6 21.1 (20.3, 22.0) 5 (2, 8) 515 rising rising trend 2.3 (1.7, 2.9)
Utah 7 14.9 (14.2, 15.5) 47 (39, 49) 409 rising rising trend 2.8 (2.3, 3.3)
Nebraska 6 18.5 (17.7, 19.3) 15 (9, 27) 407 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.1, 3.7)
New Mexico 7 16.1 (15.4, 16.8) 37 (27, 46) 399 rising rising trend 1.7 (1.5, 2.0)
Puerto Rico 6 9.4 (8.9, 9.8) N/A 370 stable stable trend -0.2 (-5.0, 4.8)
Idaho 7 17.6 (16.8, 18.5) 23 (13, 35) 346 rising rising trend 2.0 (1.5, 2.4)
Maine 6 17.2 (16.3, 18.1) 26 (15, 39) 331 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.4, 1.5)
New Hampshire 6 16.7 (15.8, 17.6) 31 (18, 44) 297 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.6, 1.8)
Hawaii 7 13.7 (12.9, 14.5) 49 (46, 49) 245 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.5)
Montana 6 17.1 (16.1, 18.2) 29 (14, 41) 234 rising rising trend 2.1 (1.2, 2.9)
Rhode Island 6 16.6 (15.6, 17.7) 33 (17, 45) 222 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.7, 0.8)
Delaware 6 17.2 (16.1, 18.3) 28 (14, 41) 216 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.2, 1.4)
South Dakota 6 17.2 (16.0, 18.4) 27 (13, 43) 179 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.6, 2.2)
North Dakota 6 18.1 (16.8, 19.5) 18 (7, 37) 154 rising rising trend 1.8 (1.1, 2.4)
Alaska 6 18.4 (17.0, 20.0) 16 (6, 36) 134 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.1, 2.2)
Vermont 6 15.7 (14.5, 17.0) 40 (23, 49) 133 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.6, 1.5)
Wyoming 6 15.4 (14.1, 16.8) 44 (24, 49) 106 stable stable trend 1.5 (0.0, 3.0)
District of Columbia 6 11.4 (10.3, 12.6) 50 (50, 50) 79 falling falling trend -6.1 (-11.1, -0.8)
Nevada 6
data not available
N/A
data not available
data not available
data not available
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/03/2022 11:38 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Nevada

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Data not available for this combination of data selections.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data not available for this combination of geography, cancer site, age, and race/ethnicity.

Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
CI*Rank data for Puerto Rico is not available.

Return to Top