Incidence > Table
Incidence Rates Table
County |
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ |
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate † cases per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval) |
CI*Rank ⋔ (95% Confidence Interval) |
Average Annual Count |
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Incidence Rates (95% Confidence Interval) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Alabama 6 | N/A | 431.4 (429.0, 433.7) | N/A | 27,221 | falling | -0.8 (-1.2, -0.5) |
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 | N/A | 444.4 (444.1, 444.7) | N/A | 1,744,459 | falling | -0.5 (-0.7, -0.3) |
Conecuh County 6 | Rural | 464.9 (418.3, 515.8) | 14 (2, 62) | 84 | rising | 10.1 (1.4, 17.2) |
Hale County 6 | Urban | 453.9 (411.7, 499.6) | 21 (3, 62) | 94 | rising | 6.4 (0.9, 15.8) |
Clarke County 6 | Rural | 499.9 (464.8, 537.2) | 4 (1, 28) | 164 | rising | 5.5 (0.6, 8.1) |
Crenshaw County 6 | Rural | 558.5 (508.7, 612.3) | 1 (1, 10) | 102 | rising | 2.7 (1.1, 4.6) |
Calhoun County 6 | Urban | 493.2 (476.8, 510.0) | 5 (2, 16) | 733 | rising | 2.4 (0.7, 5.0) |
Barbour County 6 | Rural | 444.5 (413.1, 477.9) | 28 (5, 60) | 158 | stable | 1.9 (-0.9, 6.8) |
Lowndes County 6 | Urban | 548.3 (492.0, 609.7) | 2 (1, 19) | 77 | stable | 1.3 (-0.2, 3.0) |
Macon County 6 | Urban | 430.1 (392.9, 470.1) | 41 (6, 65) | 113 | stable | 0.9 (-0.4, 2.2) |
Pike County 6 | Rural | 464.1 (432.1, 497.9) | 15 (3, 52) | 167 | stable | 0.8 (0.0, 1.6) |
Randolph County 6 | Rural | 431.4 (398.2, 466.9) | 39 (7, 63) | 138 | stable | 0.7 (-0.6, 2.0) |
Butler County 6 | Rural | 460.9 (423.2, 501.3) | 18 (2, 57) | 122 | stable | 0.6 (-0.8, 2.0) |
Greene County 6 | Urban | 466.4 (408.3, 531.1) | 12 (1, 64) | 55 | stable | 0.6 (-1.4, 2.5) |
Pickens County 6 | Urban | 502.9 (464.1, 544.3) | 3 (1, 30) | 135 | stable | 0.6 (-0.4, 1.7) |
Tallapoosa County 6 | Rural | 483.1 (457.3, 510.2) | 8 (2, 31) | 301 | rising | 0.6 (0.2, 1.0) |
Lamar County 6 | Rural | 452.1 (409.2, 498.7) | 23 (2, 62) | 91 | stable | 0.5 (-1.2, 2.1) |
Marengo County 6 | Rural | 446.8 (409.3, 487.1) | 25 (4, 62) | 116 | stable | 0.5 (-0.2, 1.2) |
Mobile County 6 | Urban | 434.4 (426.1, 442.9) | 33 (23, 49) | 2,208 | stable | 0.3 (-0.6, 1.9) |
Montgomery County 6 | Urban | 447.7 (436.1, 459.5) | 24 (13, 41) | 1,198 | stable | 0.3 (-0.1, 0.7) |
Wilcox County 6 | Rural | 491.1 (439.1, 547.9) | 6 (1, 57) | 72 | stable | 0.3 (-0.9, 1.5) |
Jackson County 6 | Rural | 424.4 (403.0, 446.8) | 44 (18, 62) | 320 | stable | 0.2 (-0.8, 1.1) |
Autauga County 6 | Urban | 459.5 (437.0, 482.9) | 19 (5, 45) | 324 | stable | 0.1 (-0.5, 0.7) |
Elmore County 6 | Urban | 474.6 (455.8, 494.1) | 10 (3, 28) | 502 | stable | 0.1 (-0.4, 0.7) |
Perry County 6 | Rural | 435.5 (382.0, 495.1) | 32 (2, 66) | 53 | stable | 0.1 (-1.8, 1.9) |
Baldwin County 6 | Urban | 442.5 (431.9, 453.3) | 29 (16, 45) | 1,450 | stable | 0.0 (-0.5, 0.5) |
Cherokee County 6 | Rural | 421.5 (390.9, 454.1) | 52 (13, 65) | 163 | stable | 0.0 (-1.0, 1.1) |
Cleburne County 6 | Rural | 423.6 (383.6, 467.0) | 46 (6, 66) | 88 | stable | 0.0 (-1.5, 1.6) |
Washington County 6 | Rural | 461.3 (419.3, 506.6) | 16 (2, 59) | 98 | stable | 0.0 (-1.2, 1.1) |
Bibb County 6 | Urban | 444.8 (410.3, 481.6) | 27 (4, 61) | 128 | stable | -0.1 (-1.2, 1.1) |
Dale County 6 | Rural | 432.2 (408.7, 456.8) | 37 (12, 60) | 269 | stable | -0.1 (-0.9, 0.7) |
Etowah County 6 | Urban | 453.8 (437.6, 470.4) | 22 (9, 42) | 640 | stable | -0.1 (-0.6, 0.4) |
Lawrence County 6 | Urban | 474.9 (445.8, 505.6) | 9 (2, 42) | 215 | stable | -0.1 (-0.8, 0.7) |
Cullman County 6 | Rural | 406.7 (389.8, 424.2) | 56 (35, 64) | 471 | stable | -0.2 (-0.8, 0.4) |
Franklin County 6 | Rural | 421.9 (393.5, 452.0) | 51 (13, 64) | 170 | stable | -0.2 (-0.8, 0.4) |
Blount County 6 | Urban | 410.1 (389.6, 431.4) | 55 (24, 64) | 319 | stable | -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6) |
St. Clair County 6 | Urban | 441.7 (424.3, 459.6) | 30 (13, 52) | 515 | stable | -0.3 (-0.8, 0.3) |
Chilton County 6 | Urban | 422.7 (398.2, 448.3) | 49 (16, 63) | 237 | stable | -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5) |
Monroe County 6 | Rural | 427.7 (392.7, 465.3) | 42 (7, 65) | 122 | stable | -0.4 (-7.4, 1.1) |
Clay County 6 | Rural | 466.4 (423.5, 512.8) | 13 (2, 58) | 96 | stable | -0.5 (-1.5, 0.4) |
Coffee County 6 | Rural | 419.5 (397.2, 442.8) | 53 (18, 63) | 277 | stable | -0.5 (-5.9, 1.0) |
Coosa County 6 | Rural | 388.1 (342.8, 438.4) | 63 (14, 67) | 64 | stable | -0.5 (-2.5, 1.5) |
Marshall County 6 | Rural | 423.8 (407.1, 441.0) | 45 (21, 60) | 515 | stable | -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0) |
Talladega County 6 | Rural | 461.2 (442.5, 480.6) | 17 (6, 39) | 494 | stable | -0.5 (-5.4, 0.4) |
Morgan County 6 | Urban | 467.3 (451.9, 483.1) | 11 (5, 30) | 737 | falling | -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1) |
Houston County 6 | Urban | 432.0 (416.2, 448.4) | 38 (18, 55) | 596 | falling | -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2) |
Jefferson County 6 | Urban | 434.2 (427.7, 440.9) | 36 (24, 47) | 3,530 | falling | -0.8 (-1.1, -0.5) |
Henry County 6 | Urban | 446.0 (408.8, 485.9) | 26 (3, 62) | 118 | falling | -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1) |
Lauderdale County 6 | Urban | 411.4 (395.0, 428.4) | 54 (32, 63) | 522 | falling | -1.0 (-2.7, -0.5) |
Bullock County 6 | Rural | 434.2 (384.0, 489.6) | 35 (3, 66) | 57 | stable | -1.1 (-2.9, 0.0) |
DeKalb County 6 | Rural | 369.3 (351.4, 387.9) | 65 (58, 67) | 338 | falling | -1.2 (-2.4, -0.7) |
Winston County 6 | Rural | 431.3 (399.2, 465.4) | 40 (8, 63) | 151 | falling | -1.2 (-2.4, -0.5) |
Marion County 6 | Rural | 423.2 (395.2, 452.8) | 48 (14, 64) | 184 | stable | -1.3 (-4.7, 0.3) |
Dallas County 6 | Rural | 426.1 (400.0, 453.6) | 43 (13, 63) | 221 | falling | -1.5 (-10.5, -0.1) |
Geneva County 6 | Urban | 406.7 (377.4, 438.0) | 57 (21, 66) | 155 | falling | -1.6 (-4.0, -0.9) |
Chambers County 6 | Rural | 435.9 (409.1, 464.2) | 31 (8, 61) | 215 | falling | -2.0 (-5.7, -0.6) |
Fayette County 6 | Rural | 422.2 (384.1, 463.4) | 50 (7, 66) | 100 | stable | -2.0 (-14.7, 1.2) |
Tuscaloosa County 6 | Urban | 391.0 (379.5, 402.8) | 62 (53, 65) | 926 | falling | -2.5 (-3.3, -1.9) |
Limestone County 6 | Urban | 423.3 (406.9, 440.3) | 47 (22, 59) | 522 | falling | -2.6 (-6.6, -0.1) |
Covington County 6 | Rural | 394.7 (370.5, 420.2) | 59 (34, 66) | 219 | stable | -3.0 (-12.7, 0.4) |
Madison County 6 | Urban | 405.5 (397.0, 414.1) | 58 (45, 62) | 1,848 | stable | -3.1 (-9.1, 0.2) |
Lee County 6 | Urban | 343.6 (330.9, 356.6) | 67 (65, 67) | 584 | falling | -3.7 (-8.8, -1.1) |
Walker County 6 | Urban | 488.8 (467.7, 510.6) | 7 (2, 22) | 441 | falling | -3.7 (-6.9, -0.3) |
Russell County 6 | Urban | 368.3 (347.7, 389.9) | 66 (57, 67) | 251 | falling | -4.1 (-18.1, -1.2) |
Shelby County 6 | Urban | 394.4 (383.5, 405.6) | 60 (50, 65) | 1,041 | falling | -5.3 (-8.4, -1.7) |
Colbert County 6 | Urban | 434.3 (413.2, 456.2) | 34 (13, 58) | 345 | stable | -5.6 (-11.3, 0.0) |
Choctaw County 6 | Rural | 384.3 (345.3, 427.0) | 64 (25, 67) | 79 | falling | -5.8 (-10.6, -3.5) |
Escambia County 6 | Rural | 393.2 (368.0, 419.8) | 61 (33, 66) | 191 | falling | -6.5 (-11.5, -1.5) |
Sumter County 6 | Rural | 454.3 (404.4, 508.9) | 20 (2, 64) | 70 | stable | -7.2 (-16.7, 1.5) |
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/19/2024 9:46 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/19/2024 9:46 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.