Incidence Rates Table
County
|
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate† cases per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval) 
|
CI*Rank⋔ (95% Confidence Interval) 
|
Average Annual Count
|
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend‡ in Incidence Rates (95% Confidence Interval)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama 6 | 451.7 (449.3, 454.2) | N/A | 27,407 |
falling 
|
-0.7 (-1.0, -0.3) |
| US (SEER+NPCR) 1 | 449.4 (449.1, 449.7) | N/A | 1,728,431 |
stable 
|
-0.9 (-2.0, 0.2) |
| Lowndes County 6 | 593.4 (533.9, 658.1) | 1 (1, 9) | 80 |
stable
|
-1.3 (-13.7, 12.8) |
| Crenshaw County 6 | 559.3 (510.0, 612.4) | 2 (1, 16) | 104 |
rising 
|
2.8 (1.6, 4.1) |
| Walker County 6 | 521.7 (499.6, 544.6) | 3 (1, 14) | 455 |
rising
|
0.5 (0.2, 0.8) |
| Elmore County 6 | 512.9 (492.3, 534.2) | 4 (2, 17) | 492 |
rising
|
0.6 (0.1, 1.1) |
| Autauga County 6 | 506.4 (481.9, 531.8) | 5 (2, 23) | 331 |
stable
|
0.5 (-0.1, 1.1) |
| Tallapoosa County 6 | 504.6 (477.8, 532.7) | 6 (2, 25) | 300 |
rising
|
0.9 (0.4, 1.3) |
| Lamar County 6 | 500.5 (455.3, 549.4) | 7 (1, 52) | 100 |
stable
|
0.7 (-0.6, 2.1) |
| Chambers County 6 | 500.1 (470.6, 531.2) | 8 (2, 32) | 233 |
stable
|
0.4 (-0.5, 1.4) |
| Macon County 6 | 492.2 (452.1, 535.2) | 9 (2, 51) | 126 |
stable
|
1.3 (0.0, 2.7) |
| Clay County 6 | 492.0 (446.6, 541.1) | 10 (1, 55) | 94 |
stable
|
-0.2 (-1.1, 0.7) |
| Dallas County 6 | 491.5 (463.2, 521.2) | 11 (2, 40) | 247 |
stable
|
0.4 (-0.6, 1.3) |
| Calhoun County 6 | 485.9 (469.5, 502.7) | 12 (5, 28) | 709 |
stable
|
0.3 (-0.1, 0.8) |
| Clarke County 6 | 483.3 (449.3, 519.3) | 13 (2, 51) | 161 |
stable
|
0.2 (-0.3, 0.8) |
| Wilcox County 6 | 482.7 (430.9, 539.4) | 14 (1, 63) | 70 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-1.2, 1.0) |
| Morgan County 6 | 480.0 (464.1, 496.3) | 15 (6, 31) | 729 |
stable
|
-1.5 (-7.2, 4.6) |
| Pickens County 6 | 477.8 (440.1, 518.1) | 16 (2, 58) | 129 |
stable
|
0.4 (-0.7, 1.5) |
| Bullock County 6 | 475.2 (421.5, 534.3) | 17 (2, 65) | 60 |
stable
|
-0.9 (-2.5, 0.7) |
| Lawrence County 6 | 473.5 (444.3, 504.3) | 18 (4, 50) | 210 |
stable
|
-0.2 (-0.9, 0.6) |
| St. Clair County 6 | 469.7 (451.3, 488.7) | 19 (8, 41) | 519 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-0.6, 0.4) |
| Etowah County 6 | 467.9 (451.3, 485.0) | 20 (9, 41) | 643 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-0.6, 0.4) |
| Talladega County 6 | 467.0 (448.0, 486.8) | 21 (8, 45) | 484 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-1.3, 0.4) |
| Bibb County 6 | 466.1 (430.3, 504.3) | 22 (3, 60) | 130 |
stable
|
0.3 (-0.7, 1.2) |
| Sumter County 6 | 465.9 (416.2, 520.1) | 23 (2, 66) | 74 |
stable
|
1.2 (0.0, 2.4) |
| Perry County 6 | 465.6 (409.1, 528.1) | 24 (2, 66) | 55 |
stable
|
0.3 (-1.6, 2.2) |
| Henry County 6 | 461.3 (423.1, 502.4) | 25 (4, 63) | 119 |
falling
|
-0.8 (-1.6, -0.1) |
| Montgomery County 6 | 457.5 (445.6, 469.5) | 26 (15, 45) | 1,185 |
stable
|
0.4 (0.0, 0.8) |
| Limestone County 6 | 456.8 (439.1, 475.2) | 27 (12, 52) | 519 |
stable
|
0.0 (-0.6, 0.5) |
| Jackson County 6 | 456.5 (433.8, 480.2) | 28 (10, 56) | 331 |
stable
|
0.5 (-0.4, 1.5) |
| Jefferson County 6 | 456.3 (449.4, 463.2) | 29 (19, 40) | 3,597 |
falling
|
-0.7 (-0.9, -0.4) |
| Marion County 6 | 455.9 (427.0, 486.4) | 30 (7, 60) | 200 |
stable
|
0.7 (0.0, 1.4) |
| Baldwin County 6 | 455.7 (444.6, 467.2) | 31 (16, 45) | 1,369 |
stable
|
0.1 (-0.4, 0.5) |
| Geneva County 6 | 453.9 (422.7, 486.9) | 32 (7, 62) | 170 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-2.2, -0.4) |
| Butler County 6 | 448.8 (412.1, 488.0) | 33 (5, 64) | 122 |
stable
|
0.5 (-0.7, 1.6) |
| Barbour County 6 | 447.2 (415.4, 480.9) | 34 (8, 63) | 156 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-1.1, 0.9) |
| Colbert County 6 | 446.8 (425.1, 469.6) | 35 (14, 59) | 340 |
rising
|
0.8 (0.1, 1.5) |
| Pike County 6 | 446.7 (415.5, 479.7) | 36 (9, 63) | 161 |
stable
|
0.5 (-0.2, 1.2) |
| Greene County 6 | 446.5 (390.2, 509.1) | 37 (2, 67) | 54 |
stable
|
0.4 (-1.1, 1.9) |
| Marengo County 6 | 444.0 (407.0, 483.7) | 38 (7, 66) | 116 |
stable
|
0.3 (-0.4, 0.9) |
| Escambia County 6 | 442.7 (416.0, 470.8) | 39 (13, 63) | 214 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.4, -0.4) |
| Fayette County 6 | 442.0 (403.0, 484.1) | 40 (7, 66) | 104 |
stable
|
0.4 (-0.8, 1.7) |
| Madison County 6 | 441.1 (432.0, 450.3) | 41 (28, 54) | 1,881 |
stable
|
-0.2 (-0.7, 0.3) |
| Dale County 6 | 440.8 (416.9, 465.8) | 42 (14, 62) | 269 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-1.0, 0.7) |
| Marshall County 6 | 440.8 (423.6, 458.5) | 43 (20, 59) | 526 |
falling
|
-0.4 (-0.7, -0.1) |
| Mobile County 6 | 440.1 (431.7, 448.7) | 44 (29, 54) | 2,208 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-1.7, -0.9) |
| Houston County 6 | 439.7 (423.6, 456.3) | 45 (21, 59) | 591 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.4, -0.3) |
| Blount County 6 | 438.7 (417.3, 461.0) | 46 (18, 62) | 332 |
stable
|
0.0 (-0.7, 0.8) |
| Conecuh County 6 | 437.8 (393.0, 486.7) | 47 (6, 67) | 80 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-1.4, 0.9) |
| Covington County 6 | 436.4 (410.7, 463.4) | 48 (16, 64) | 235 |
stable
|
0.3 (-0.7, 1.4) |
| Franklin County 6 | 435.4 (405.8, 466.7) | 49 (13, 65) | 167 |
stable
|
0.0 (-0.7, 0.6) |
| Cullman County 6 | 434.7 (416.7, 453.3) | 50 (23, 62) | 469 |
stable
|
0.1 (-0.3, 0.6) |
| Tuscaloosa County 6 | 432.0 (419.3, 444.9) | 51 (31, 60) | 929 |
falling
|
-1.8 (-2.4, -1.1) |
| Randolph County 6 | 431.9 (399.1, 467.0) | 52 (12, 67) | 140 |
stable
|
0.8 (-0.5, 2.1) |
| Coffee County 6 | 428.7 (405.8, 452.5) | 53 (21, 65) | 276 |
stable
|
0.1 (-0.5, 0.8) |
| Lauderdale County 6 | 423.0 (406.3, 440.3) | 54 (32, 64) | 530 |
stable
|
-0.2 (-2.1, 1.7) |
| Shelby County 6 | 421.8 (410.2, 433.7) | 55 (40, 64) | 1,048 |
falling
|
-0.8 (-1.3, -0.4) |
| Cleburne County 6 | 419.2 (379.4, 462.4) | 56 (12, 67) | 87 |
stable
|
0.0 (-1.5, 1.5) |
| Washington County 6 | 417.6 (379.2, 459.1) | 57 (12, 67) | 94 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-1.5, 0.3) |
| Chilton County 6 | 414.7 (390.2, 440.4) | 58 (28, 67) | 226 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-1.4, 0.4) |
| Choctaw County 6 | 414.2 (372.7, 459.4) | 59 (14, 67) | 82 |
stable
|
-8.6 (-22.5, 7.9) |
| Monroe County 6 | 413.9 (380.4, 449.9) | 60 (20, 67) | 123 |
stable
|
-2.6 (-5.3, 0.3) |
| Winston County 6 | 412.1 (381.2, 445.2) | 61 (25, 67) | 145 |
falling
|
-1.7 (-2.6, -0.7) |
| Russell County 6 | 405.2 (383.1, 428.2) | 62 (40, 67) | 265 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-2.3, 1.4) |
| Coosa County 6 | 402.9 (357.1, 453.5) | 63 (15, 67) | 66 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-2.6, 1.4) |
| Cherokee County 6 | 402.8 (373.6, 434.0) | 64 (29, 67) | 161 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-1.4, 0.7) |
| Hale County 6 | 402.1 (362.7, 445.0) | 65 (21, 67) | 83 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-1.9, 1.2) |
| DeKalb County 6 | 388.0 (369.4, 407.2) | 66 (55, 67) | 348 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-2.1, -0.5) |
| Lee County 6 | 384.5 (370.4, 399.1) | 67 (60, 67) | 587 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-1.0, 0.4) |
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/06/2023 7:24 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/06/2023 7:24 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.