Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Alabama by County

Liver & Bile Duct (All Stages^), 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Alabama 6 8.3 (8.0, 8.6) N/A 535 rising rising trend 4.1 (3.5, 4.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 8.6 (8.6, 8.7) N/A 35,262 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.4)
Washington County 6 16.0 (9.7, 25.7) 1 (1, 30) 4
*
*
Mobile County 6 11.8 (10.6, 13.2) 2 (1, 12) 65 rising rising trend 4.5 (2.7, 6.4)
Walker County 6 11.8 (8.7, 15.7) 3 (1, 28) 11 rising rising trend 5.5 (1.2, 10.0)
Cherokee County 6 11.1 (7.1, 17.2) 4 (1, 37) 5
*
*
Marshall County 6 10.7 (8.2, 13.7) 5 (1, 28) 13 rising rising trend 6.8 (3.3, 10.5)
St. Clair County 6 10.4 (7.9, 13.5) 6 (1, 31) 12 stable stable trend 2.6 (-0.5, 5.9)
Calhoun County 6 10.4 (8.2, 13.1) 7 (1, 27) 16 rising rising trend 5.7 (2.4, 9.1)
Talladega County 6 10.2 (7.7, 13.3) 8 (1, 32) 12 rising rising trend 8.0 (3.0, 13.2)
Dale County 6 10.1 (6.9, 14.5) 9 (1, 37) 6
*
*
Randolph County 6 10.1 (5.8, 16.8) 10 (1, 40) 4
*
*
Chambers County 6 9.5 (5.8, 15.0) 11 (1, 39) 4 stable stable trend 3.4 (-1.1, 8.1)
Escambia County 6 9.4 (6.0, 14.1) 12 (1, 39) 5 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.4, 4.3)
Colbert County 6 9.3 (6.5, 13.1) 13 (1, 38) 7
*
*
Franklin County 6 9.2 (5.4, 14.7) 14 (1, 40) 4
*
*
Etowah County 6 9.2 (7.1, 11.7) 15 (2, 34) 14 stable stable trend 3.1 (-0.5, 6.8)
Jefferson County 6 9.1 (8.2, 10.1) 16 (7, 24) 76 rising rising trend 3.3 (2.0, 4.7)
Marion County 6 8.8 (5.4, 14.0) 17 (1, 40) 4
*
*
Elmore County 6 8.8 (6.3, 12.0) 18 (2, 37) 9 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.6, 5.0)
Chilton County 6 8.7 (5.6, 13.1) 19 (1, 40) 5 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.4, 3.8)
Dallas County 6 8.3 (5.0, 13.1) 20 (1, 40) 4
*
*
Cullman County 6 8.3 (6.0, 11.3) 21 (3, 38) 9 rising rising trend 7.5 (3.8, 11.4)
Covington County 6 8.1 (4.9, 12.7) 22 (2, 40) 4
*
*
Geneva County 6 8.0 (4.6, 13.6) 23 (1, 40) 3
*
*
Baldwin County 6 8.0 (6.6, 9.6) 24 (8, 35) 25 rising rising trend 3.6 (0.8, 6.6)
Blount County 6 7.9 (5.4, 11.4) 25 (3, 40) 6
*
*
Madison County 6 7.4 (6.3, 8.7) 26 (13, 36) 34 rising rising trend 3.3 (2.3, 4.2)
Houston County 6 7.3 (5.4, 9.7) 27 (8, 39) 10 stable stable trend 3.3 (-0.3, 7.1)
Montgomery County 6 7.3 (6.0, 8.9) 28 (11, 37) 21 stable stable trend 3.1 (-0.7, 7.0)
Autauga County 6 7.1 (4.6, 10.6) 29 (5, 40) 5
*
*
Shelby County 6 7.0 (5.6, 8.6) 30 (13, 38) 18 rising rising trend 3.7 (0.2, 7.3)
Tuscaloosa County 6 6.7 (5.3, 8.4) 31 (13, 39) 16 rising rising trend 3.5 (0.1, 7.0)
Russell County 6 6.6 (4.2, 10.0) 32 (7, 40) 5
*
*
Limestone County 6 6.5 (4.6, 8.9) 33 (11, 40) 8 stable stable trend 1.5 (-2.3, 5.4)
Coffee County 6 6.4 (4.0, 9.9) 34 (8, 40) 4 stable stable trend 2.6 (-1.3, 6.6)
Lauderdale County 6 6.4 (4.5, 8.8) 35 (12, 40) 8 rising rising trend 4.5 (0.3, 8.8)
DeKalb County 6 6.0 (4.0, 8.8) 36 (12, 40) 6 stable stable trend 2.9 (-1.4, 7.4)
Morgan County 6 5.7 (4.1, 7.7) 37 (18, 40) 9 stable stable trend 2.8 (-0.8, 6.5)
Jackson County 6 5.6 (3.5, 8.7) 38 (13, 40) 4
*
*
Tallapoosa County 6 4.6 (2.6, 7.9) 39 (20, 40) 3
*
*
Lee County 6 4.2 (2.9, 6.0) 40 (30, 40) 7 stable stable trend -1.0 (-5.1, 3.4)
Barbour County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bibb County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bullock County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Butler County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Choctaw County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clarke County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cleburne County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Conecuh County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coosa County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crenshaw County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fayette County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hale County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Henry County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lamar County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lawrence County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lowndes County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Macon County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marengo County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pickens County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pike County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sumter County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilcox County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Winston County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 02/05/2023 2:56 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Barbour, Bibb, Bullock, Butler, Choctaw, Clarke, Clay, Cleburne, Conecuh, Coosa, Crenshaw, Fayette, Greene, Hale, Henry, Lamar, Lawrence, Lowndes, Macon, Marengo, Monroe, Perry, Pickens, Pike, Sumter, Wilcox, Winston

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top