Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Alabama by County

Liver & Bile Duct (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Alabama 6 8.3 (8.0, 8.6) N/A 544 rising rising trend 4.1 (3.4, 5.0)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 8.6 (8.5, 8.6) N/A 34,900 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.4, 0.5)
Morgan County 6 6.8 (5.1, 9.0) 32 (10, 40) 11 stable stable trend 14.4 (-4.2, 43.9)
Talladega County 6 10.2 (7.7, 13.4) 8 (1, 33) 12 rising rising trend 8.0 (3.6, 15.4)
Cullman County 6 9.1 (6.7, 12.2) 16 (2, 38) 10 rising rising trend 7.8 (3.5, 13.9)
Marshall County 6 9.4 (7.1, 12.2) 14 (2, 36) 12 rising rising trend 6.8 (3.7, 11.5)
Calhoun County 6 11.2 (8.9, 14.0) 4 (1, 24) 17 rising rising trend 5.8 (2.4, 11.0)
Walker County 6 11.2 (8.2, 15.0) 5 (1, 31) 10 rising rising trend 5.5 (0.9, 12.2)
Mobile County 6 11.7 (10.4, 13.1) 2 (1, 13) 65 rising rising trend 4.7 (3.0, 6.8)
Shelby County 6 6.9 (5.6, 8.6) 31 (15, 40) 18 rising rising trend 3.7 (0.1, 9.1)
Tuscaloosa County 6 6.5 (5.1, 8.2) 35 (16, 40) 16 rising rising trend 3.5 (0.4, 7.8)
Chambers County 6 7.6 (4.3, 12.6) 29 (1, 40) 3 stable stable trend 3.4 (-1.9, 10.5)
Houston County 6 8.0 (6.0, 10.4) 23 (5, 39) 11 rising rising trend 3.3 (0.1, 8.0)
Jefferson County 6 9.4 (8.4, 10.4) 12 (6, 24) 78 rising rising trend 3.3 (2.0, 4.8)
Madison County 6 7.9 (6.8, 9.2) 24 (11, 34) 37 rising rising trend 3.3 (2.5, 4.5)
Montgomery County 6 6.7 (5.4, 8.2) 34 (16, 40) 19 stable stable trend 3.1 (-1.3, 9.6)
DeKalb County 6 6.3 (4.2, 9.1) 37 (12, 40) 6 stable stable trend 2.9 (-2.6, 10.4)
St. Clair County 6 10.2 (7.8, 13.2) 9 (1, 33) 12 stable stable trend 2.8 (-0.4, 7.4)
Coffee County 6 6.2 (3.9, 9.6) 38 (7, 40) 4 stable stable trend 2.1 (-2.9, 9.2)
Elmore County 6 7.7 (5.5, 10.7) 26 (5, 40) 8 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.8, 6.1)
Limestone County 6 6.8 (4.9, 9.3) 33 (10, 40) 9 stable stable trend 1.5 (-2.3, 7.1)
Escambia County 6 9.5 (6.1, 14.4) 11 (1, 40) 5 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.1, 4.5)
Chilton County 6 8.8 (5.7, 13.3) 19 (1, 40) 5 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.5, 4.4)
Baldwin County 6 7.4 (6.1, 8.9) 30 (13, 38) 25 stable stable trend -0.3 (-10.8, 4.0)
Lee County 6 5.1 (3.6, 6.9) 40 (25, 40) 8 stable stable trend -0.8 (-5.7, 5.5)
Etowah County 6 10.1 (8.0, 12.8) 10 (1, 30) 16 stable stable trend -1.6 (-13.4, 2.9)
Lauderdale County 6 6.4 (4.5, 8.8) 36 (13, 40) 9 stable stable trend -2.2 (-22.7, 4.6)
Autauga County 6 7.7 (5.1, 11.3) 28 (3, 40) 6
*
*
Blount County 6 8.9 (6.2, 12.6) 18 (1, 39) 7
*
*
Cherokee County 6 9.3 (5.7, 15.1) 15 (1, 40) 4
*
*
Clarke County 6 10.3 (5.8, 17.3) 6 (1, 40) 3
*
*
Colbert County 6 8.6 (5.9, 12.2) 20 (2, 39) 7
*
*
Covington County 6 7.7 (4.6, 12.3) 27 (2, 40) 4
*
*
Dale County 6 8.2 (5.4, 12.1) 22 (2, 40) 5
*
*
Dallas County 6 9.4 (5.8, 14.4) 13 (1, 40) 5
*
*
Franklin County 6 9.0 (5.3, 14.5) 17 (1, 40) 4
*
*
Geneva County 6 8.4 (4.9, 14.0) 21 (1, 40) 3
*
*
Jackson County 6 5.3 (3.2, 8.5) 39 (15, 40) 4
*
*
Marion County 6 10.3 (6.6, 15.6) 7 (1, 39) 5
*
*
Randolph County 6 11.3 (6.8, 18.2) 3 (1, 39) 4
*
*
Russell County 6 7.8 (5.1, 11.4) 25 (3, 40) 6
*
*
Washington County 6 15.0 (9.0, 24.3) 1 (1, 36) 4
*
*
Barbour County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bibb County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bullock County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Butler County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Choctaw County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cleburne County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Conecuh County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coosa County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crenshaw County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fayette County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hale County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Henry County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lamar County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lawrence County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lowndes County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Macon County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marengo County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pickens County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pike County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sumter County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tallapoosa County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilcox County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Winston County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/19/2024 12:31 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Barbour, Bibb, Bullock, Butler, Choctaw, Clay, Cleburne, Conecuh, Coosa, Crenshaw, Fayette, Greene, Hale, Henry, Lamar, Lawrence, Lowndes, Macon, Marengo, Monroe, Perry, Pickens, Pike, Sumter, Tallapoosa, Wilcox, Winston

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top