Incidence Rates Table
County
|
Met Healthy People Objective of ***? |
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate† cases per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval) 
|
CI*Rank⋔ (95% Confidence Interval) 
|
Average Annual Count
|
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend‡ in Incidence Rates (95% Confidence Interval)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama 6 | *** | 63.7 (62.8, 64.6) | N/A | 3,971 |
falling 
|
-2.3 (-2.6, -2.0) |
| US (SEER+NPCR) 1 | *** | 57.3 (57.1, 57.4) | N/A | 222,811 |
falling
|
-2.6 (-3.4, -1.8) |
| Clay County 6 | *** | 100.4 (81.7, 122.8) | 1 (1, 25) | 21 |
stable 
|
0.0 (-2.2, 2.4) |
| Lamar County 6 | *** | 89.9 (72.3, 111.1) | 2 (1, 42) | 19 |
stable
|
1.2 (-0.8, 3.4) |
| Walker County 6 | *** | 87.2 (78.8, 96.3) | 3 (1, 19) | 83 |
stable
|
-1.1 (-2.3, 0.2) |
| Bibb County 6 | *** | 85.3 (70.5, 102.4) | 4 (1, 45) | 24 |
stable
|
1.0 (-1.3, 3.3) |
| Crenshaw County 6 | *** | 83.6 (66.5, 104.4) | 5 (1, 54) | 17 |
rising 
|
3.9 (0.9, 7.1) |
| Lowndes County 6 | *** | 82.4 (62.1, 107.8) | 6 (1, 61) | 12 |
stable
|
1.2 (-3.1, 5.8) |
| Lawrence County 6 | *** | 78.4 (67.4, 90.9) | 7 (1, 45) | 38 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-3.0, 1.8) |
| Conecuh County 6 | *** | 77.9 (60.7, 99.0) | 8 (1, 61) | 15 |
stable
|
0.7 (-2.3, 3.8) |
| Bullock County 6 | *** | 77.1 (56.9, 102.6) | 9 (1, 66) | 10 |
stable
|
1.8 (-1.0, 4.8) |
| St. Clair County 6 | *** | 76.2 (69.0, 84.0) | 10 (3, 40) | 85 |
falling
|
-2.0 (-3.3, -0.8) |
| Calhoun County 6 | *** | 75.9 (69.7, 82.6) | 11 (3, 36) | 115 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-2.4, -0.1) |
| Geneva County 6 | *** | 75.8 (64.0, 89.4) | 12 (1, 54) | 30 |
stable
|
-1.0 (-2.9, 0.9) |
| Jackson County 6 | *** | 75.6 (67.1, 85.1) | 13 (3, 44) | 60 |
stable
|
0.1 (-1.2, 1.5) |
| Marshall County 6 | *** | 74.6 (67.9, 81.8) | 14 (4, 40) | 93 |
falling
|
-1.8 (-2.6, -0.9) |
| Cleburne County 6 | *** | 73.8 (58.2, 92.8) | 15 (1, 62) | 16 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-2.7, 1.9) |
| Henry County 6 | *** | 73.7 (59.6, 90.8) | 16 (1, 60) | 20 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-2.6, 2.1) |
| Covington County 6 | *** | 73.6 (64.0, 84.6) | 17 (3, 50) | 43 |
stable
|
0.0 (-1.6, 1.6) |
| Dale County 6 | *** | 73.6 (64.4, 83.9) | 18 (3, 49) | 47 |
stable
|
-1.2 (-2.6, 0.2) |
| Tallapoosa County 6 | *** | 73.0 (63.6, 83.6) | 19 (3, 53) | 46 |
stable
|
-0.2 (-1.7, 1.3) |
| Sumter County 6 | *** | 72.9 (54.8, 95.5) | 20 (1, 65) | 12 |
stable
|
1.1 (-2.4, 4.7) |
| Blount County 6 | *** | 72.3 (64.1, 81.3) | 21 (4, 49) | 58 |
stable
|
-1.4 (-2.9, 0.1) |
| Talladega County 6 | *** | 72.1 (65.0, 79.9) | 22 (5, 48) | 78 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-2.2, 0.6) |
| Cullman County 6 | *** | 71.9 (65.0, 79.4) | 23 (5, 46) | 83 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-2.3, 1.0) |
| Russell County 6 | *** | 71.7 (62.7, 81.6) | 24 (3, 52) | 48 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-2.6, 2.6) |
| Escambia County 6 | *** | 71.4 (61.4, 82.8) | 25 (3, 54) | 37 |
stable
|
-1.5 (-3.2, 0.4) |
| Pickens County 6 | *** | 70.6 (57.5, 86.3) | 26 (2, 61) | 21 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-2.8, 1.9) |
| Winston County 6 | *** | 70.6 (59.0, 84.2) | 27 (3, 59) | 27 |
falling
|
-5.8 (-9.2, -2.2) |
| Colbert County 6 | *** | 70.0 (61.9, 79.0) | 28 (5, 54) | 56 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-1.7, 1.6) |
| Elmore County 6 | *** | 69.6 (62.2, 77.8) | 29 (6, 52) | 67 |
falling
|
-2.0 (-2.9, -1.0) |
| Etowah County 6 | *** | 69.0 (63.0, 75.5) | 30 (8, 50) | 100 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-2.6, -0.2) |
| Chambers County 6 | *** | 68.8 (58.7, 80.4) | 31 (4, 59) | 34 |
stable
|
-1.5 (-2.8, 0.0) |
| Coffee County 6 | *** | 68.5 (59.8, 78.2) | 32 (5, 58) | 45 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-1.7, 1.0) |
| Franklin County 6 | *** | 67.8 (56.6, 80.5) | 33 (4, 61) | 27 |
falling
|
-2.1 (-3.2, -1.1) |
| Morgan County 6 | *** | 67.7 (62.0, 73.8) | 34 (10, 52) | 107 |
falling
|
-1.6 (-2.9, -0.3) |
| Baldwin County 6 | *** | 66.6 (62.5, 70.9) | 35 (17, 48) | 205 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-1.3, 0.6) |
| Marion County 6 | *** | 65.8 (55.8, 77.3) | 36 (6, 62) | 31 |
stable
|
-1.5 (-3.2, 0.2) |
| Macon County 6 | *** | 65.7 (52.8, 81.4) | 37 (2, 65) | 19 |
stable
|
0.3 (-3.0, 3.7) |
| Cherokee County 6 | *** | 65.1 (54.5, 77.6) | 38 (5, 63) | 28 |
stable
|
-1.0 (-3.1, 1.2) |
| Autauga County 6 | *** | 64.7 (56.2, 74.2) | 39 (8, 60) | 42 |
falling
|
-1.6 (-3.2, -0.1) |
| Mobile County 6 | *** | 63.6 (60.5, 66.8) | 40 (28, 52) | 327 |
falling
|
-2.0 (-2.7, -1.2) |
| Pike County 6 | *** | 63.5 (52.4, 76.5) | 41 (6, 64) | 23 |
stable
|
0.3 (-2.8, 3.5) |
| Fayette County 6 | *** | 62.5 (49.3, 78.7) | 42 (5, 66) | 16 |
stable
|
-1.5 (-4.2, 1.3) |
| Barbour County 6 | *** | 62.5 (51.3, 75.6) | 43 (7, 65) | 23 |
falling
|
-2.0 (-3.6, -0.4) |
| Dallas County 6 | *** | 61.8 (52.6, 72.3) | 44 (10, 63) | 33 |
stable
|
-1.1 (-3.4, 1.4) |
| Chilton County 6 | *** | 61.3 (52.4, 71.4) | 45 (13, 64) | 35 |
falling
|
-2.6 (-4.5, -0.7) |
| Lauderdale County 6 | *** | 61.2 (55.3, 67.6) | 46 (22, 61) | 82 |
falling
|
-1.9 (-2.9, -1.0) |
| Limestone County 6 | *** | 60.0 (53.7, 66.9) | 47 (24, 62) | 68 |
falling
|
-2.1 (-3.8, -0.5) |
| DeKalb County 6 | *** | 60.0 (53.1, 67.6) | 48 (20, 63) | 56 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-2.8, -0.2) |
| Wilcox County 6 | *** | 59.1 (43.0, 80.0) | 49 (3, 67) | 9 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-4.7, 3.2) |
| Randolph County 6 | *** | 58.8 (47.5, 72.2) | 50 (10, 67) | 20 |
stable
|
0.9 (-2.1, 4.0) |
| Jefferson County 6 | *** | 58.7 (56.3, 61.2) | 51 (40, 59) | 467 |
falling
|
-2.1 (-2.3, -1.8) |
| Houston County 6 | *** | 58.3 (52.6, 64.4) | 52 (30, 63) | 81 |
falling
|
-2.2 (-3.0, -1.4) |
| Tuscaloosa County 6 | *** | 57.9 (53.3, 62.7) | 53 (36, 62) | 124 |
falling
|
-2.6 (-3.5, -1.8) |
| Greene County 6 | *** | 57.8 (40.6, 81.1) | 54 (3, 67) | 8 |
|
|
| Marengo County 6 | *** | 56.7 (44.3, 71.7) | 55 (10, 67) | 15 |
stable
|
-1.7 (-3.7, 0.5) |
| Madison County 6 | *** | 56.2 (53.0, 59.6) | 56 (42, 62) | 239 |
falling
|
-2.8 (-4.1, -1.5) |
| Coosa County 6 | *** | 55.9 (41.2, 75.3) | 57 (7, 67) | 10 |
stable
|
-2.3 (-5.8, 1.3) |
| Butler County 6 | *** | 55.5 (43.8, 69.7) | 58 (11, 67) | 16 |
falling
|
-2.8 (-4.8, -0.7) |
| Montgomery County 6 | *** | 54.1 (50.1, 58.3) | 59 (45, 64) | 141 |
falling
|
-1.7 (-2.9, -0.5) |
| Clarke County 6 | *** | 53.7 (43.3, 66.2) | 60 (22, 67) | 19 |
stable
|
-2.5 (-4.9, 0.0) |
| Monroe County 6 | *** | 51.6 (41.0, 64.5) | 61 (25, 67) | 17 |
stable
|
-1.7 (-4.4, 1.2) |
| Lee County 6 | *** | 48.3 (43.2, 53.9) | 62 (52, 67) | 68 |
falling
|
-7.8 (-14.9, -0.2) |
| Washington County 6 | *** | 48.2 (36.2, 63.3) | 63 (23, 67) | 11 |
stable
|
-2.6 (-5.5, 0.4) |
| Choctaw County 6 | *** | 47.5 (35.5, 63.2) | 64 (28, 67) | 11 |
stable
|
-2.7 (-6.2, 0.9) |
| Shelby County 6 | *** | 47.1 (43.2, 51.2) | 65 (57, 67) | 113 |
falling
|
-3.7 (-4.7, -2.7) |
| Hale County 6 | *** | 43.3 (31.8, 58.1) | 66 (40, 67) | 10 |
falling
|
-11.1 (-18.1, -3.6) |
| Perry County 6 | *** | 38.6 (25.1, 57.7) | 67 (35, 67) | 5 |
stable
|
-2.1 (-6.5, 2.5) |
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 08/08/2022 4:31 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 08/08/2022 4:31 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.