Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Alabama by County

Lung & Bronchus (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Alabama 6 *** 63.7 (62.8, 64.6) N/A 3,971 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.6, -2.0)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 57.3 (57.1, 57.4) N/A 222,811 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.4, -1.8)
Crenshaw County 6 *** 83.6 (66.5, 104.4) 5 (1, 54) 17 rising rising trend 3.9 (0.9, 7.1)
Bullock County 6 *** 77.1 (56.9, 102.6) 9 (1, 66) 10 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.0, 4.8)
Lamar County 6 *** 89.9 (72.3, 111.1) 2 (1, 42) 19 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.8, 3.4)
Lowndes County 6 *** 82.4 (62.1, 107.8) 6 (1, 61) 12 stable stable trend 1.2 (-3.1, 5.8)
Sumter County 6 *** 72.9 (54.8, 95.5) 20 (1, 65) 12 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.4, 4.7)
Bibb County 6 *** 85.3 (70.5, 102.4) 4 (1, 45) 24 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.3, 3.3)
Randolph County 6 *** 58.8 (47.5, 72.2) 50 (10, 67) 20 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.1, 4.0)
Conecuh County 6 *** 77.9 (60.7, 99.0) 8 (1, 61) 15 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.3, 3.8)
Macon County 6 *** 65.7 (52.8, 81.4) 37 (2, 65) 19 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.0, 3.7)
Pike County 6 *** 63.5 (52.4, 76.5) 41 (6, 64) 23 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.8, 3.5)
Jackson County 6 *** 75.6 (67.1, 85.1) 13 (3, 44) 60 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 1.5)
Clay County 6 *** 100.4 (81.7, 122.8) 1 (1, 25) 21 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.2, 2.4)
Covington County 6 *** 73.6 (64.0, 84.6) 17 (3, 50) 43 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.6, 1.6)
Colbert County 6 *** 70.0 (61.9, 79.0) 28 (5, 54) 56 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.7, 1.6)
Russell County 6 *** 71.7 (62.7, 81.6) 24 (3, 52) 48 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.6, 2.6)
Tallapoosa County 6 *** 73.0 (63.6, 83.6) 19 (3, 53) 46 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.3)
Henry County 6 *** 73.7 (59.6, 90.8) 16 (1, 60) 20 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.6, 2.1)
Baldwin County 6 *** 66.6 (62.5, 70.9) 35 (17, 48) 205 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.6)
Cleburne County 6 *** 73.8 (58.2, 92.8) 15 (1, 62) 16 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.7, 1.9)
Coffee County 6 *** 68.5 (59.8, 78.2) 32 (5, 58) 45 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 1.0)
Pickens County 6 *** 70.6 (57.5, 86.3) 26 (2, 61) 21 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.8, 1.9)
Cullman County 6 *** 71.9 (65.0, 79.4) 23 (5, 46) 83 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.3, 1.0)
Lawrence County 6 *** 78.4 (67.4, 90.9) 7 (1, 45) 38 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.0, 1.8)
Talladega County 6 *** 72.1 (65.0, 79.9) 22 (5, 48) 78 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.6)
Wilcox County 6 *** 59.1 (43.0, 80.0) 49 (3, 67) 9 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.7, 3.2)
Cherokee County 6 *** 65.1 (54.5, 77.6) 38 (5, 63) 28 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.1, 1.2)
Geneva County 6 *** 75.8 (64.0, 89.4) 12 (1, 54) 30 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.9, 0.9)
Dallas County 6 *** 61.8 (52.6, 72.3) 44 (10, 63) 33 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.4, 1.4)
Walker County 6 *** 87.2 (78.8, 96.3) 3 (1, 19) 83 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.2)
Dale County 6 *** 73.6 (64.4, 83.9) 18 (3, 49) 47 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.2)
Calhoun County 6 *** 75.9 (69.7, 82.6) 11 (3, 36) 115 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.1)
Blount County 6 *** 72.3 (64.1, 81.3) 21 (4, 49) 58 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.9, 0.1)
Etowah County 6 *** 69.0 (63.0, 75.5) 30 (8, 50) 100 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.2)
Chambers County 6 *** 68.8 (58.7, 80.4) 31 (4, 59) 34 stable stable trend -1.5 (-2.8, 0.0)
DeKalb County 6 *** 60.0 (53.1, 67.6) 48 (20, 63) 56 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.2)
Escambia County 6 *** 71.4 (61.4, 82.8) 25 (3, 54) 37 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.2, 0.4)
Fayette County 6 *** 62.5 (49.3, 78.7) 42 (5, 66) 16 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.2, 1.3)
Marion County 6 *** 65.8 (55.8, 77.3) 36 (6, 62) 31 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.2, 0.2)
Autauga County 6 *** 64.7 (56.2, 74.2) 39 (8, 60) 42 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.2, -0.1)
Morgan County 6 *** 67.7 (62.0, 73.8) 34 (10, 52) 107 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.9, -0.3)
Marengo County 6 *** 56.7 (44.3, 71.7) 55 (10, 67) 15 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.7, 0.5)
Monroe County 6 *** 51.6 (41.0, 64.5) 61 (25, 67) 17 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.4, 1.2)
Montgomery County 6 *** 54.1 (50.1, 58.3) 59 (45, 64) 141 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.5)
Marshall County 6 *** 74.6 (67.9, 81.8) 14 (4, 40) 93 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -0.9)
Lauderdale County 6 *** 61.2 (55.3, 67.6) 46 (22, 61) 82 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.9, -1.0)
Barbour County 6 *** 62.5 (51.3, 75.6) 43 (7, 65) 23 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.6, -0.4)
Elmore County 6 *** 69.6 (62.2, 77.8) 29 (6, 52) 67 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.9, -1.0)
Mobile County 6 *** 63.6 (60.5, 66.8) 40 (28, 52) 327 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.7, -1.2)
St. Clair County 6 *** 76.2 (69.0, 84.0) 10 (3, 40) 85 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.3, -0.8)
Franklin County 6 *** 67.8 (56.6, 80.5) 33 (4, 61) 27 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.2, -1.1)
Jefferson County 6 *** 58.7 (56.3, 61.2) 51 (40, 59) 467 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.3, -1.8)
Limestone County 6 *** 60.0 (53.7, 66.9) 47 (24, 62) 68 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.8, -0.5)
Perry County 6 *** 38.6 (25.1, 57.7) 67 (35, 67) 5 stable stable trend -2.1 (-6.5, 2.5)
Houston County 6 *** 58.3 (52.6, 64.4) 52 (30, 63) 81 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.0, -1.4)
Coosa County 6 *** 55.9 (41.2, 75.3) 57 (7, 67) 10 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.8, 1.3)
Clarke County 6 *** 53.7 (43.3, 66.2) 60 (22, 67) 19 stable stable trend -2.5 (-4.9, 0.0)
Chilton County 6 *** 61.3 (52.4, 71.4) 45 (13, 64) 35 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.5, -0.7)
Tuscaloosa County 6 *** 57.9 (53.3, 62.7) 53 (36, 62) 124 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.5, -1.8)
Washington County 6 *** 48.2 (36.2, 63.3) 63 (23, 67) 11 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.5, 0.4)
Choctaw County 6 *** 47.5 (35.5, 63.2) 64 (28, 67) 11 stable stable trend -2.7 (-6.2, 0.9)
Butler County 6 *** 55.5 (43.8, 69.7) 58 (11, 67) 16 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.8, -0.7)
Madison County 6 *** 56.2 (53.0, 59.6) 56 (42, 62) 239 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.1, -1.5)
Shelby County 6 *** 47.1 (43.2, 51.2) 65 (57, 67) 113 falling falling trend -3.7 (-4.7, -2.7)
Winston County 6 *** 70.6 (59.0, 84.2) 27 (3, 59) 27 falling falling trend -5.8 (-9.2, -2.2)
Lee County 6 *** 48.3 (43.2, 53.9) 62 (52, 67) 68 falling falling trend -7.8 (-14.9, -0.2)
Hale County 6 *** 43.3 (31.8, 58.1) 66 (40, 67) 10 falling falling trend -11.1 (-18.1, -3.6)
Greene County 6 *** 57.8 (40.6, 81.1) 54 (3, 67) 8
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/05/2022 3:20 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top