Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Incidence Rate Report for Alabama by County

Cervix (All Stages^), 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate†
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count ascending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend‡ in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Alabama 6 9.5 (9.0, 10.1) N/A 241 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.5, 1.3)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 7.7 (7.6, 7.8) N/A 13,000 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.7)
Jefferson County 6 7.5 (6.3, 9.0) 22 (16, 26) 27 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.1, 1.2)
Mobile County 6 9.3 (7.5, 11.4) 20 (9, 24) 20 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.1, 3.7)
Madison County 6 6.8 (5.2, 8.8) 25 (17, 26) 13 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.3, 3.8)
Montgomery County 6 10.6 (8.1, 13.7) 16 (4, 24) 12 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.4, 2.5)
Tuscaloosa County 6 12.4 (9.4, 16.0) 12 (2, 20) 12 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.9, 5.6)
Baldwin County 6 11.0 (8.2, 14.3) 15 (4, 23) 12 stable stable trend 2.7 (-0.8, 6.4)
Etowah County 6 16.2 (11.5, 22.2) 2 (1, 17) 9 stable stable trend 3.2 (-0.4, 7.0)
Calhoun County 6 12.4 (8.6, 17.4) 11 (1, 23) 7 stable stable trend 0.4 (-4.8, 5.8)
Lee County 6 9.9 (6.9, 13.8) 17 (4, 25) 7
*
*
Houston County 6 9.7 (6.6, 13.9) 19 (4, 26) 7 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.3, 2.8)
Shelby County 6 5.4 (3.7, 7.7) 26 (20, 26) 6 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.7, 3.1)
Marshall County 6 12.6 (8.4, 18.1) 9 (1, 24) 6 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.1, 4.6)
Talladega County 6 12.6 (8.3, 18.4) 10 (1, 24) 6 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.1, 3.1)
DeKalb County 6 14.4 (9.2, 21.4) 4 (1, 23) 5
*
*
Elmore County 6 11.3 (7.2, 17.0) 13 (2, 26) 5 stable stable trend -2.3 (-6.4, 2.0)
St. Clair County 6 9.9 (6.2, 15.0) 18 (3, 26) 5 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.9, 5.2)
Walker County 6 12.9 (7.8, 19.9) 8 (1, 25) 4 stable stable trend 0.8 (-5.1, 7.2)
Dallas County 6 20.4 (12.2, 31.9) 1 (1, 19) 4
*
*
Morgan County 6 6.9 (4.1, 10.8) 24 (10, 26) 4 falling falling trend -4.2 (-7.9, -0.3)
Limestone County 6 7.1 (4.2, 11.3) 23 (9, 26) 4 stable stable trend -1.5 (-6.0, 3.3)
Chilton County 6 13.3 (7.5, 21.8) 5 (1, 26) 3
*
*
Colbert County 6 13.2 (7.6, 21.3) 7 (1, 26) 3
*
*
Cullman County 6 7.8 (4.4, 12.7) 21 (6, 26) 3 stable stable trend -0.6 (-6.2, 5.4)
Dale County 6 14.8 (8.5, 23.8) 3 (1, 25) 3
*
*
Russell County 6 11.0 (6.3, 17.8) 14 (1, 26) 3 stable stable trend -2.4 (-7.6, 3.0)
Jackson County 6 13.3 (7.4, 21.8) 6 (1, 26) 3
*
*
Autauga County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Barbour County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bibb County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blount County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bullock County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Butler County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chambers County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cherokee County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Choctaw County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clarke County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cleburne County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coffee County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Conecuh County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coosa County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Covington County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crenshaw County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Escambia County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fayette County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Geneva County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hale County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Henry County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lamar County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lauderdale County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lawrence County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lowndes County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Macon County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marengo County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marion County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pickens County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pike County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Randolph County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sumter County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tallapoosa County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilcox County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Winston County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/30/2023 2:56 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Autauga, Barbour, Bibb, Blount, Bullock, Butler, Chambers, Cherokee, Choctaw, Clarke, Clay, Cleburne, Coffee, Conecuh, Coosa, Covington, Crenshaw, Escambia, Fayette, Franklin, Geneva, Greene, Hale, Henry, Lamar, Lauderdale, Lawrence, Lowndes, Macon, Marengo, Marion, Monroe, Perry, Pickens, Pike, Randolph, Sumter, Tallapoosa, Washington, Wilcox, Winston

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top