Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Colorado by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Colorado 6 1,755.8 (1,742.4, 1,769.3) N/A 13,729 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.4, 1.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 1,944.4 (1,942.6, 1,946.1) N/A 971,828 stable stable trend -0.5 (-0.8, 0.1)
Jackson County 6 1,950.8 (1,317.1, 2,788.6) 3 (1, 60) 6
*
*
Kiowa County 6 2,009.0 (1,381.3, 2,827.4) 1 (1, 60) 7 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.7, 1.3)
Cheyenne County 6 1,999.0 (1,375.1, 2,802.0) 2 (1, 60) 7 stable stable trend 1.1 (-3.5, 6.1)
Dolores County 6 1,474.1 (1,039.3, 2,032.7) 39 (1, 61) 8
*
*
Costilla County 6 812.6 (576.0, 1,114.5) 61 (53, 61) 8 falling falling trend -5.5 (-9.4, -1.8)
Crowley County 6 1,499.0 (1,134.0, 1,945.1) 38 (2, 60) 12 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.6, 0.4)
Sedgwick County 6 1,897.3 (1,434.9, 2,460.3) 6 (1, 56) 12 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.3, 4.0)
Lake County 6 1,205.7 (912.6, 1,565.6) 55 (23, 61) 13 stable stable trend -4.8 (-25.5, 2.1)
Gilpin County 6 1,289.9 (966.0, 1,699.9) 51 (6, 61) 14 falling falling trend -6.7 (-10.5, -2.4)
Bent County 6 1,396.0 (1,086.0, 1,766.7) 48 (4, 61) 14 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.6, 0.3)
Phillips County 6 1,513.0 (1,182.5, 1,907.1) 36 (2, 60) 15 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.2, 0.4)
Baca County 6 1,703.8 (1,339.6, 2,135.8) 25 (1, 58) 16 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.1, 1.5)
Washington County 6 1,578.2 (1,245.3, 1,972.3) 33 (2, 60) 16 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.1, 1.7)
Saguache County 6 1,165.7 (918.1, 1,461.3) 58 (32, 61) 17 falling falling trend -4.4 (-6.8, -1.9)
Kit Carson County 6 1,285.2 (1,031.0, 1,582.8) 53 (24, 61) 18 falling falling trend -2.6 (-5.0, -0.4)
San Miguel County 6 1,889.8 (1,461.7, 2,403.4) 7 (1, 54) 18 stable stable trend -2.8 (-6.7, 2.6)
Conejos County 6 1,203.4 (966.1, 1,481.4) 56 (31, 61) 18 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.6, 2.0)
Rio Blanco County 6 1,866.3 (1,500.0, 2,295.2) 10 (1, 51) 18 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.9, 0.7)
Lincoln County 6 1,948.5 (1,572.8, 2,386.3) 4 (1, 47) 19 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.6, 5.1)
Custer County 6 1,276.6 (1,014.8, 1,586.6) 54 (15, 61) 19 falling falling trend -12.7 (-38.4, -0.2)
Ouray County 6 1,718.6 (1,378.2, 2,118.1) 24 (1, 55) 21 rising rising trend 16.2 (1.4, 32.7)
Clear Creek County 6 1,184.8 (969.9, 1,436.9) 57 (34, 61) 24 falling falling trend -7.5 (-18.6, -2.8)
Yuma County 6 1,407.3 (1,170.8, 1,677.1) 47 (10, 60) 25 falling falling trend -6.4 (-24.4, -1.6)
Moffat County 6 1,529.2 (1,287.8, 1,803.1) 35 (3, 57) 30 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.6, -0.9)
Gunnison County 6 1,454.5 (1,218.7, 1,723.1) 43 (8, 59) 31 falling falling trend -4.3 (-6.3, -2.4)
Alamosa County 6 1,455.9 (1,235.6, 1,704.4) 42 (12, 58) 32 falling falling trend -4.6 (-11.5, -2.5)
Huerfano County 6 1,509.5 (1,282.3, 1,765.5) 37 (6, 58) 32 falling falling trend -4.6 (-6.9, -2.4)
Rio Grande County 6 1,467.3 (1,249.6, 1,712.3) 41 (11, 58) 33 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.7, -0.2)
Grand County 6 1,450.9 (1,226.9, 1,704.3) 44 (12, 58) 36 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.8, 2.4)
Prowers County 6 1,735.1 (1,488.9, 2,010.3) 22 (1, 49) 36 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.5, 1.4)
Archuleta County 6 1,129.4 (965.9, 1,313.3) 59 (44, 61) 39 falling falling trend -4.1 (-7.0, -0.8)
Summit County 6 1,091.7 (932.0, 1,271.9) 60 (46, 61) 43 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.8, 2.2)
Pitkin County 6 1,301.9 (1,128.6, 1,494.9) 50 (31, 60) 45 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.0, -0.8)
Park County 6 1,349.6 (1,154.3, 1,569.3) 49 (26, 60) 46 falling falling trend -3.9 (-5.9, -1.6)
Las Animas County 6 1,440.1 (1,263.6, 1,634.6) 45 (20, 57) 49 falling falling trend -3.6 (-10.9, -0.9)
Logan County 6 1,469.5 (1,299.5, 1,655.4) 40 (18, 55) 55 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.3, 8.2)
Otero County 6 1,587.7 (1,409.5, 1,782.2) 32 (5, 51) 58 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.1, -1.3)
Routt County 6 1,625.5 (1,432.7, 1,837.4) 30 (4, 49) 60 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.6, 0.9)
Elbert County 6 1,683.3 (1,495.9, 1,888.0) 26 (3, 46) 67 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.3)
Morgan County 6 1,640.6 (1,474.0, 1,820.9) 29 (4, 46) 72 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.0, 0.1)
Montezuma County 6 1,286.3 (1,154.4, 1,429.1) 52 (37, 59) 72 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.5, -1.9)
Teller County 6 1,678.4 (1,503.7, 1,868.2) 27 (3, 45) 83 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.0, -0.9)
Chaffee County 6 1,782.6 (1,614.8, 1,963.2) 15 (1, 38) 87 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.0, 1.3)
Eagle County 6 1,412.4 (1,269.5, 1,567.5) 46 (28, 56) 87 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.3, 5.2)
Delta County 6 1,673.7 (1,547.0, 1,808.0) 28 (6, 41) 132 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.1)
Garfield County 6 1,776.2 (1,638.5, 1,922.4) 16 (2, 35) 133 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.4)
La Plata County 6 1,572.8 (1,456.8, 1,695.7) 34 (18, 47) 149 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.2, -1.0)
Montrose County 6 1,621.5 (1,509.3, 1,739.8) 31 (13, 44) 157 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.4, 4.4)
Broomfield County 6 1,746.8 (1,627.6, 1,872.4) 21 (3, 36) 165 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.5)
Fremont County 6 1,818.6 (1,702.3, 1,940.8) 12 (2, 31) 185 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.2)
Mesa County 6 1,879.0 (1,808.0, 1,952.0) 8 (1, 18) 540 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.8, 4.6)
Pueblo County 6 1,827.1 (1,759.3, 1,896.8) 11 (3, 25) 561 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Weld County 6 1,867.4 (1,804.1, 1,932.4) 9 (2, 19) 690 stable stable trend 3.8 (-0.4, 7.1)
Douglas County 6 1,766.3 (1,706.0, 1,828.2) 18 (7, 29) 697 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.6)
Boulder County 6 1,759.6 (1,703.8, 1,816.7) 20 (8, 29) 790 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.5, 4.2)
Adams County 6 1,806.0 (1,753.0, 1,860.1) 14 (5, 26) 928 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.6)
Larimer County 6 1,904.1 (1,850.9, 1,958.5) 5 (1, 13) 1,012 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.3, 4.2)
Arapahoe County 6 1,733.3 (1,692.3, 1,775.1) 23 (12, 30) 1,426 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.4)
Denver County 6 1,773.3 (1,731.8, 1,815.6) 17 (8, 27) 1,449 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.6)
El Paso County 6 1,761.0 (1,721.2, 1,801.4) 19 (9, 28) 1,549 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.7)
Jefferson County 6 1,815.4 (1,775.8, 1,855.6) 13 (5, 22) 1,665 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Hinsdale County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mineral County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Juan County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/24/2024 2:54 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2022 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2022 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2022 data.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top