Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Colorado by County

Lung & Bronchus (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Colorado 6 38.3 (37.6, 39.0) N/A 2,417 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.5, -1.5)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 54.0 (53.9, 54.1) N/A 215,307 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.0, -1.7)
Yuma County 6 24.4 (13.7, 40.6) 37 (9, 44) 3 falling falling trend -18.5 (-48.0, -8.1)
Weld County 6 42.5 (39.2, 46.0) 11 (6, 23) 130 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.2)
Teller County 6 40.3 (30.8, 52.2) 14 (2, 36) 15 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.9, 2.7)
Summit County 6 14.7 (8.5, 23.6) 44 (35, 44) 4
*
*
Routt County 6 20.4 (13.6, 29.6) 41 (28, 44) 7 stable stable trend -5.2 (-10.5, 1.1)
Rio Grande County 6 42.9 (30.5, 59.5) 10 (1, 38) 8
*
*
Rio Blanco County 6 42.2 (23.9, 69.7) 12 (1, 43) 3 falling falling trend -4.4 (-8.3, -0.9)
Pueblo County 6 48.0 (44.1, 52.3) 6 (2, 15) 114 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
Prowers County 6 61.7 (45.0, 82.9) 1 (1, 25) 10 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.6, 4.9)
Pitkin County 6 22.4 (14.6, 33.4) 40 (23, 44) 6 stable stable trend -0.4 (-5.6, 5.8)
Park County 6 27.2 (18.3, 39.7) 34 (10, 44) 8 falling falling trend -5.4 (-9.4, -0.6)
Otero County 6 40.2 (30.4, 52.7) 16 (2, 37) 12 falling falling trend -5.0 (-9.1, -1.5)
Morgan County 6 37.3 (28.7, 47.8) 24 (3, 38) 13 stable stable trend -3.1 (-7.3, 1.0)
Montrose County 6 40.0 (33.6, 47.5) 18 (4, 32) 29 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.4, -2.1)
Montezuma County 6 33.2 (25.9, 42.4) 28 (9, 40) 15 falling falling trend -4.3 (-6.3, -2.3)
Moffat County 6 34.4 (22.4, 50.9) 27 (2, 43) 5 stable stable trend -3.1 (-8.1, 1.9)
Mesa County 6 47.4 (43.3, 51.8) 7 (2, 15) 105 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.8, -1.2)
Logan County 6 43.7 (33.4, 56.4) 9 (1, 34) 13 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.9, 0.8)
Lincoln County 6 58.2 (36.4, 89.6) 2 (1, 37) 4 stable stable trend 4.1 (-1.0, 10.4)
Las Animas County 6 42.0 (31.2, 56.3) 13 (2, 37) 11 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.0, 4.0)
Larimer County 6 34.5 (32.0, 37.2) 26 (18, 33) 143 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.5, -1.1)
La Plata County 6 26.4 (21.1, 32.6) 35 (25, 43) 19 falling falling trend -4.9 (-7.6, -2.2)
Jefferson County 6 39.3 (37.2, 41.4) 21 (10, 26) 287 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -0.9)
Huerfano County 6 29.9 (17.8, 51.1) 33 (3, 44) 4 falling falling trend -4.1 (-7.6, -0.7)
Gunnison County 6 23.7 (14.3, 37.2) 39 (13, 44) 4 stable stable trend -5.5 (-12.7, 1.6)
Grand County 6 20.3 (12.2, 32.3) 42 (24, 44) 5 stable stable trend -4.5 (-10.1, 1.8)
Garfield County 6 37.2 (30.5, 44.9) 25 (6, 36) 24 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.0, 1.5)
Fremont County 6 52.5 (45.4, 60.6) 4 (1, 14) 40 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.0, 0.7)
Elbert County 6 40.3 (30.4, 52.6) 15 (2, 37) 13 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.9, 3.4)
El Paso County 6 39.8 (37.7, 41.9) 19 (10, 25) 287 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.6, -2.4)
Eagle County 6 18.7 (13.0, 26.0) 43 (32, 44) 8 falling falling trend -3.9 (-6.5, -0.7)
Douglas County 6 32.7 (29.9, 35.8) 29 (21, 35) 105 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.0, -1.8)
Denver County 6 37.6 (35.5, 39.8) 23 (13, 28) 249 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.2, -1.8)
Delta County 6 38.3 (31.1, 47.1) 22 (4, 35) 22 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.1, 1.2)
Clear Creek County 6 32.4 (20.7, 50.2) 30 (3, 44) 5 stable stable trend -3.4 (-7.0, 0.5)
Chaffee County 6 26.3 (19.2, 36.0) 36 (17, 44) 9 stable stable trend -2.3 (-6.1, 1.8)
Broomfield County 6 39.7 (33.4, 46.8) 20 (5, 33) 30 stable stable trend -2.4 (-4.8, 0.6)
Boulder County 6 31.2 (28.6, 34.0) 32 (24, 36) 111 stable stable trend 3.6 (-2.9, 8.8)
Bent County 6 45.4 (27.2, 73.6) 8 (1, 42) 4 stable stable trend -2.7 (-9.3, 4.3)
Baca County 6 54.8 (30.9, 93.9) 3 (1, 42) 4
*
*
Archuleta County 6 24.1 (15.3, 37.2) 38 (15, 44) 6 falling falling trend -27.7 (-52.4, -1.3)
Arapahoe County 6 40.1 (38.0, 42.4) 17 (9, 25) 273 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.3, -1.2)
Alamosa County 6 31.4 (20.9, 45.6) 31 (5, 43) 6 stable stable trend 11.4 (-1.8, 28.0)
Adams County 6 48.5 (45.5, 51.6) 5 (2, 12) 211 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.8, -0.9)
Cheyenne County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Conejos County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Costilla County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crowley County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Custer County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dolores County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gilpin County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hinsdale County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kiowa County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kit Carson County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mineral County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ouray County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Phillips County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Saguache County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Juan County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Miguel County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sedgwick County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/28/2024 1:01 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Cheyenne, Conejos, Costilla, Crowley, Custer, Dolores, Gilpin, Hinsdale, Jackson, Kiowa, Kit Carson, Lake, Mineral, Ouray, Phillips, Saguache, San Juan, San Miguel, Sedgwick, Washington

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top