Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report by State

Lung & Bronchus (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name
State
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 54.0 (53.9, 54.1) N/A 215,307 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.0, -1.7)
Wyoming 6 40.4 (38.4, 42.6) 45 (42, 47) 302 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.6, -1.3)
Wisconsin 6 57.1 (56.3, 57.9) 22 (21, 26) 4,411 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.9, -0.6)
West Virginia 6 75.7 (74.2, 77.3) 2 (2, 2) 2,053 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.7)
Washington 5 49.4 (48.7, 50.0) 37 (36, 39) 4,455 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.3, -2.2)
Virginia 6 52.1 (51.5, 52.7) 34 (31, 36) 5,455 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.8, -1.9)
Vermont 6 56.3 (54.0, 58.5) 24 (17, 31) 517 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.1, -1.7)
Utah 7 24.9 (24.0, 25.7) 49 (49, 49) 693 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6)
Texas 7 46.5 (46.1, 46.8) 40 (39, 41) 13,468 falling falling trend -2.7 (-2.9, -2.5)
Tennessee 6 69.7 (68.9, 70.5) 5 (3, 7) 6,102 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.9)
South Dakota 6 55.9 (53.9, 57.9) 26 (20, 31) 629 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.8, -0.2)
South Carolina 6 58.7 (57.8, 59.5) 20 (15, 23) 4,073 falling falling trend -2.1 (-4.3, -1.7)
Rhode Island 6 63.9 (62.0, 65.8) 9 (8, 13) 910 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.3, -0.9)
Puerto Rico 6 15.1 (14.6, 15.7) N/A 677 stable stable trend -1.1 (-6.4, 4.4)
Pennsylvania 6 59.5 (59.0, 60.1) 17 (14, 20) 10,742 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -1.1)
Oregon 6 49.1 (48.3, 49.9) 38 (37, 39) 2,736 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.1, -2.2)
Oklahoma 6 63.2 (62.2, 64.2) 10 (9, 12) 3,074 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.3)
Ohio 6 64.7 (64.2, 65.3) 8 (8, 9) 10,062 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -1.0)
North Dakota 6 56.1 (53.9, 58.4) 25 (18, 31) 503 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.7)
North Carolina 6 62.8 (62.1, 63.4) 11 (9, 12) 8,319 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.8, -1.7)
New York 7 55.4 (55.0, 55.8) 27 (24, 29) 13,946 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -1.1)
New Mexico 7 33.7 (32.8, 34.7) 48 (48, 48) 936 falling falling trend -5.0 (-6.4, -3.7)
New Jersey 7 51.3 (50.8, 51.9) 36 (32, 36) 5,849 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.9, -1.6)
New Hampshire 6 60.8 (59.2, 62.4) 13 (10, 20) 1,170 falling falling trend -1.3 (-3.5, -0.9)
Nebraska 6 52.3 (51.0, 53.7) 33 (30, 36) 1,236 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Montana 6 47.5 (45.9, 49.1) 39 (37, 41) 715 falling falling trend -2.5 (-6.4, -1.1)
Missouri 6 68.1 (67.3, 68.9) 7 (5, 7) 5,509 falling falling trend -1.3 (-3.3, -0.5)
Mississippi 6 69.9 (68.7, 71.1) 4 (3, 7) 2,621 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.5)
Minnesota 6 54.8 (54.0, 55.6) 29 (25, 31) 3,832 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.5, 0.0)
Michigan 6 59.6 (59.0, 60.2) 16 (14, 20) 7,998 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -1.5)
Massachusetts 7 59.2 (58.5, 59.9) 19 (14, 21) 5,292 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -1.3)
Maryland 6 51.8 (51.1, 52.6) 35 (31, 36) 3,862 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.1, -1.7)
Maine 6 69.3 (67.6, 70.9) 6 (3, 7) 1,447 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Louisiana 7 61.5 (60.6, 62.4) 12 (10, 15) 3,528 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.7, -1.6)
Kentucky 7 84.4 (83.3, 85.5) 1 (1, 1) 4,875 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.5)
Kansas 6 52.5 (51.4, 53.6) 32 (30, 36) 1,892 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.4)
Iowa 7 60.7 (59.6, 61.8) 14 (12, 18) 2,518 falling falling trend -0.9 (-2.3, -0.5)
Illinois 7 59.3 (58.8, 59.9) 18 (14, 20) 9,319 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.5)
Idaho 7 46.0 (44.7, 47.3) 41 (39, 42) 977 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)
Hawaii 7 41.7 (40.4, 43.0) 43 (42, 45) 815 falling falling trend -1.6 (-4.7, -1.1)
Georgia 7 57.9 (57.3, 58.5) 21 (19, 24) 6,885 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.0, -1.7)
Florida 6 54.4 (54.0, 54.8) 30 (27, 31) 17,677 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.9, -2.0)
District of Columbia 6 42.8 (40.6, 45.1) 42 (41, 45) 295 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.4, 3.1)
Delaware 6 57.0 (55.2, 58.8) 23 (16, 30) 793 falling falling trend -5.8 (-9.4, -2.3)
Connecticut 7 55.2 (54.2, 56.1) 28 (23, 31) 2,672 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.3)
Colorado 6 38.3 (37.6, 39.0) 46 (45, 47) 2,417 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.5, -1.5)
California 7 37.6 (37.3, 37.8) 47 (46, 47) 16,658 falling falling trend -2.5 (-2.9, -1.8)
Arkansas 6 71.3 (70.1, 72.5) 3 (3, 5) 2,824 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.2)
Arizona 6 41.6 (41.0, 42.2) 44 (42, 45) 3,978 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.1, -2.7)
Alaska 6 52.6 (50.1, 55.2) 31 (25, 38) 376 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.7, -2.6)
Alabama 6 60.1 (59.3, 61.0) 15 (12, 19) 3,904 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.6, -1.9)
Indiana 6
data not available
N/A
data not available
data not available
data not available
Nevada 6
data not available
N/A
data not available
data not available
data not available
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/28/2024 8:46 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Indiana, Nevada

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Data not available for this combination of data selections.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data not available for this combination of geography, cancer site, age, and race/ethnicity.

Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
CI*Rank data for Puerto Rico is not available.

Return to Top