Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Illinois by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <50

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Illinois 7 106.0 (105.0, 107.1) N/A 8,438 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.6, 0.6)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 105.2 (105.0, 105.5) N/A 202,435 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.1, 0.3)
Adams County 7 122.9 (107.3, 140.2) 26 (6, 81) 45 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.7, 2.7)
Bond County 7 128.2 (98.8, 163.7) 20 (1, 92) 13 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.8, 2.6)
Boone County 7 108.5 (93.2, 125.6) 63 (14, 91) 37 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.9, 3.0)
Bureau County 7 132.8 (110.0, 158.9) 16 (1, 83) 24 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.8, 3.7)
Carroll County 7 110.2 (78.9, 149.6) 58 (2, 94) 8 stable stable trend 1.4 (-2.3, 5.1)
Cass County 7 104.3 (73.8, 143.0) 74 (4, 94) 8 stable stable trend 0.8 (-3.0, 4.6)
Champaign County 7 98.9 (90.7, 107.5) 85 (48, 91) 114 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.4, 1.4)
Christian County 7 121.9 (100.7, 146.2) 29 (3, 89) 23 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.0, 2.6)
Clark County 7 114.7 (85.0, 151.3) 44 (3, 94) 10 stable stable trend 1.5 (-2.6, 5.7)
Clay County 7 103.9 (73.3, 142.6) 75 (4, 94) 8 stable stable trend 1.7 (-2.1, 5.5)
Clinton County 7 112.5 (93.6, 134.0) 53 (9, 91) 25 stable stable trend -0.3 (-9.7, 2.6)
Coles County 7 101.6 (85.4, 119.9) 80 (17, 93) 29 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.0, 1.5)
Cook County 7 99.3 (97.8, 100.9) 83 (67, 87) 3,337 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.1, 2.0)
Crawford County 7 75.5 (54.6, 101.9) 93 (42, 94) 9 falling falling trend -15.5 (-37.9, -5.1)
Cumberland County 7 153.1 (112.4, 203.7) 3 (1, 89) 9 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.5, 5.2)
De Witt County 7 109.5 (81.2, 144.5) 61 (3, 94) 10 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.1, 3.1)
DeKalb County 7 123.5 (110.9, 137.1) 24 (8, 73) 73 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.2, 3.3)
Douglas County 7 126.5 (98.7, 159.6) 21 (1, 91) 14 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.6, 4.1)
DuPage County 7 108.6 (104.8, 112.5) 62 (42, 76) 630 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.6, 1.4)
Edgar County 7 120.4 (91.6, 155.5) 33 (2, 92) 12 stable stable trend 16.1 (-0.9, 29.9)
Edwards County 7 108.0 (65.8, 167.0) 66 (1, 94) 4 stable stable trend -0.5 (-5.6, 4.1)
Effingham County 7 114.5 (93.8, 138.3) 46 (6, 91) 22 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.9, 3.9)
Fayette County 7 99.2 (76.4, 126.8) 84 (10, 94) 13 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.9, 4.2)
Ford County 7 141.1 (105.2, 185.0) 12 (1, 91) 10 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.6, 2.4)
Franklin County 7 119.6 (100.1, 141.7) 37 (5, 90) 27 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.4, 3.8)
Fulton County 7 119.6 (99.5, 142.6) 36 (5, 90) 25 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.0, 3.2)
Gallatin County 7 145.8 (90.0, 223.8) 7 (1, 94) 4 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.6, 4.8)
Greene County 7 94.7 (66.2, 131.3) 89 (8, 94) 7 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.4, 2.9)
Grundy County 7 129.3 (112.5, 148.0) 19 (3, 75) 42 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.7, 2.3)
Hamilton County 7 98.3 (61.6, 148.7) 86 (2, 94) 4
*
*
Hancock County 7 134.9 (103.5, 172.6) 14 (1, 91) 13 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.3, 4.3)
Henderson County 7 96.5 (56.1, 155.2) 88 (2, 94) 3 stable stable trend 0.7 (-4.1, 5.1)
Henry County 7 114.0 (97.0, 133.1) 48 (7, 89) 32 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.1, 3.0)
Iroquois County 7 117.2 (93.8, 144.6) 42 (4, 92) 17 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.8, 1.7)
Jackson County 7 102.6 (86.6, 120.6) 78 (19, 93) 31 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.5, 2.3)
Jasper County 7 119.7 (81.2, 169.7) 35 (1, 94) 6 stable stable trend 18.0 (-0.5, 33.5)
Jefferson County 7 106.9 (88.5, 127.9) 70 (12, 92) 24 stable stable trend 2.0 (-12.4, 15.2)
Jersey County 7 114.2 (89.0, 144.2) 47 (4, 92) 14 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.6, 3.4)
Jo Daviess County 7 141.1 (110.6, 177.4) 11 (1, 87) 15 stable stable trend 2.7 (-0.1, 5.7)
Johnson County 7 74.3 (48.8, 108.4) 94 (33, 94) 5 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.2, 3.0)
Kane County 7 101.4 (96.7, 106.3) 81 (55, 87) 350 rising rising trend 0.6 (0.2, 1.1)
Kankakee County 7 121.8 (109.9, 134.5) 30 (9, 76) 78 rising rising trend 4.9 (0.5, 15.2)
Kendall County 7 113.6 (104.1, 123.7) 50 (17, 80) 106 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.0, 1.6)
Knox County 7 112.6 (95.5, 131.8) 52 (10, 89) 31 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.0, 2.4)
La Salle County 7 113.7 (102.1, 126.2) 49 (15, 85) 71 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.0, 1.6)
Lake County 7 108.0 (103.7, 112.5) 65 (42, 78) 472 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.5, 1.3)
Lawrence County 7 91.4 (67.0, 121.9) 91 (10, 94) 9 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.8, 2.2)
Lee County 7 112.3 (92.4, 135.2) 54 (7, 91) 23 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.1, 3.0)
Livingston County 7 102.5 (83.7, 124.3) 79 (16, 93) 21 stable stable trend -13.1 (-24.3, 0.5)
Logan County 7 118.7 (97.1, 143.7) 39 (5, 91) 21 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.7, 1.6)
Macon County 7 120.6 (108.3, 134.0) 32 (10, 77) 70 stable stable trend -0.9 (-6.3, 0.3)
Macoupin County 7 106.9 (89.8, 126.3) 69 (12, 93) 28 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.7, 2.1)
Madison County 7 106.4 (99.4, 113.9) 71 (37, 85) 170 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.3, 0.7)
Marion County 7 144.9 (122.6, 169.9) 8 (1, 60) 30 rising rising trend 3.0 (1.2, 4.9)
Marshall County 7 147.2 (107.2, 197.0) 6 (1, 90) 9 stable stable trend 2.4 (-1.4, 6.3)
Mason County 7 119.5 (87.3, 159.7) 38 (1, 93) 9 stable stable trend -1.3 (-9.9, 0.1)
Massac County 7 120.7 (89.1, 159.8) 31 (1, 94) 10 stable stable trend 0.8 (-3.1, 4.7)
McDonough County 7 96.6 (75.5, 121.7) 87 (13, 94) 15 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.6, 3.2)
McHenry County 7 114.8 (108.1, 121.8) 43 (23, 73) 222 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.2, 1.8)
McLean County 7 108.0 (98.9, 117.6) 67 (28, 87) 108 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.7, 1.1)
Menard County 7 138.6 (102.2, 183.8) 13 (1, 92) 10 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.9, 5.7)
Mercer County 7 148.8 (114.7, 189.9) 4 (1, 84) 13 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.9, 5.6)
Monroe County 7 108.3 (89.0, 130.5) 64 (10, 93) 22 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.4, 3.1)
Montgomery County 7 122.2 (99.7, 148.4) 28 (3, 90) 21 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.2, 2.1)
Morgan County 7 126.1 (104.8, 150.3) 23 (3, 87) 25 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.7, 3.4)
Moultrie County 7 102.7 (73.6, 139.0) 77 (4, 94) 8 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.9, 4.1)
Ogle County 7 106.1 (90.0, 124.2) 72 (15, 92) 31 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.1, 2.4)
Peoria County 7 114.6 (105.6, 124.1) 45 (18, 77) 122 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.7, 1.6)
Perry County 7 141.8 (114.3, 173.9) 9 (1, 81) 19 stable stable trend 2.9 (-0.1, 6.3)
Piatt County 7 134.0 (102.7, 171.7) 15 (1, 90) 12 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.2, 4.8)
Pike County 7 122.5 (91.6, 160.3) 27 (1, 93) 11 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.1, 5.1)
Randolph County 7 103.5 (84.4, 125.7) 76 (14, 93) 21 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.2, 2.6)
Richland County 7 111.9 (83.0, 147.6) 55 (3, 94) 10 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.9, 3.5)
Rock Island County 7 111.9 (101.8, 122.6) 56 (21, 84) 92 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.6, 2.2)
Saline County 7 119.9 (95.3, 148.7) 34 (3, 92) 17 stable stable trend 2.6 (-0.7, 6.2)
Sangamon County 7 130.1 (121.0, 139.8) 17 (7, 48) 151 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.1, 1.7)
Schuyler County 7 129.4 (85.0, 189.6) 18 (1, 94) 5 stable stable trend 2.6 (-1.1, 6.8)
Scott County 7 166.6 (106.6, 248.6) 2 (1, 93) 5 stable stable trend 2.3 (-2.0, 6.6)
Shelby County 7 141.3 (112.3, 175.4) 10 (1, 84) 16 rising rising trend 3.1 (0.3, 6.1)
St. Clair County 7 107.6 (100.4, 115.0) 68 (33, 86) 171 stable stable trend 0.7 (0.0, 1.4)
Stephenson County 7 105.5 (87.6, 125.8) 73 (13, 93) 25 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.1, 2.1)
Tazewell County 7 118.2 (107.8, 129.4) 40 (14, 77) 95 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.3, 1.7)
Union County 7 99.6 (73.1, 132.6) 82 (6, 94) 9 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.8, 4.1)
Vermilion County 7 109.6 (96.0, 124.6) 60 (17, 88) 47 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.8, 1.8)
Wabash County 7 111.0 (76.7, 155.1) 57 (1, 94) 7 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.7, 3.0)
Warren County 7 167.0 (131.8, 208.5) 1 (1, 59) 16 rising rising trend 3.6 (0.5, 7.2)
Washington County 7 148.6 (113.1, 191.9) 5 (1, 84) 12 stable stable trend 0.9 (-3.1, 4.8)
Wayne County 7 82.5 (58.0, 113.7) 92 (21, 94) 7 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.4, 3.0)
White County 7 126.1 (92.6, 167.8) 22 (1, 93) 9 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.5, 3.2)
Whiteside County 7 93.4 (78.8, 110.0) 90 (36, 94) 29 falling falling trend -6.6 (-20.6, -0.5)
Will County 7 109.8 (105.6, 114.2) 59 (38, 76) 507 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.6, 1.8)
Williamson County 7 123.4 (108.6, 139.6) 25 (6, 80) 51 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.1, 2.5)
Winnebago County 7 113.1 (105.9, 120.6) 51 (26, 76) 189 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.5, 1.8)
Woodford County 7 118.0 (98.7, 140.1) 41 (5, 89) 26 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.9, 2.1)
Alexander County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brown County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardin County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pope County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pulaski County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Putnam County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stark County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/28/2024 7:06 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Alexander, Brown, Calhoun, Hardin, Pope, Pulaski, Putnam, Stark

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top