Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Illinois by County

Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Illinois 6 *** 19.5 (19.1, 19.8) N/A 2,852 falling falling trend -0.3 (-0.6, -0.1)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 19.1 (19.1, 19.2) N/A 71,520 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -1.0)
Adams County 6 *** 13.8 (10.6, 17.7) 80 (40, 82) 14 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.0, 1.2)
Bond County 6 *** 22.2 (14.1, 33.6) 14 (1, 82) 5 stable stable trend -1.1 (-6.8, 4.9)
Boone County 6 *** 20.2 (15.3, 26.2) 31 (2, 78) 12 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.0, 3.1)
Bureau County 6 *** 24.0 (17.9, 31.7) 7 (1, 75) 11 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.9, 3.4)
Carroll County 6 *** 20.0 (12.2, 31.5) 36 (1, 82) 5
*
*
Champaign County 6 *** 18.4 (15.8, 21.3) 52 (15, 76) 37 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.1, 0.4)
Christian County 6 *** 21.4 (15.7, 28.6) 24 (1, 79) 10 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.0, 3.9)
Clark County 6 *** 19.2 (12.1, 29.6) 45 (1, 82) 5 stable stable trend 1.3 (-4.2, 7.0)
Clay County 6 *** 19.7 (11.6, 31.9) 38 (1, 82) 4
*
*
Clinton County 6 *** 19.3 (13.8, 26.2) 44 (2, 81) 9 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.6, 3.1)
Coles County 6 *** 18.5 (13.9, 24.3) 51 (5, 81) 11 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.0, 1.1)
Cook County 6 *** 19.0 (18.5, 19.5) 46 (32, 58) 1,078 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.6, 0.2)
Crawford County 6 *** 24.8 (17.2, 35.1) 4 (1, 79) 7 stable stable trend 3.5 (-0.6, 7.9)
De Witt County 6 *** 20.1 (12.3, 31.5) 33 (1, 82) 4 stable stable trend 0.4 (-4.9, 6.0)
DeKalb County 6 *** 19.6 (15.8, 24.0) 40 (5, 78) 19 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.9, 2.1)
Douglas County 6 *** 21.3 (13.4, 32.2) 25 (1, 82) 5 stable stable trend 0.1 (-5.4, 5.9)
DuPage County 6 *** 21.0 (19.7, 22.3) 27 (12, 50) 223 stable stable trend -3.9 (-8.8, 1.3)
Edgar County 6 *** 12.3 (7.4, 20.1) 81 (22, 82) 4
*
*
Effingham County 6 *** 16.9 (11.6, 24.0) 69 (5, 82) 7 stable stable trend -0.9 (-5.0, 3.3)
Fayette County 6 *** 17.7 (11.6, 26.3) 61 (2, 82) 5 stable stable trend -0.1 (-4.4, 4.5)
Ford County 6 *** 16.7 (9.4, 28.0) 72 (1, 82) 3 stable stable trend -4.0 (-9.1, 1.4)
Franklin County 6 *** 19.4 (14.2, 26.0) 41 (2, 81) 10 stable stable trend -3.2 (-6.3, 0.0)
Fulton County 6 *** 22.0 (16.3, 29.2) 17 (1, 78) 11 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.5, 1.5)
Greene County 6 *** 22.7 (13.9, 35.6) 13 (1, 82) 4 stable stable trend -0.7 (-5.9, 4.8)
Grundy County 6 *** 17.5 (12.8, 23.3) 65 (6, 82) 10 stable stable trend -2.5 (-6.2, 1.3)
Hancock County 6 *** 18.6 (11.7, 28.5) 49 (1, 82) 5 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.7, 3.0)
Henry County 6 *** 25.3 (20.0, 31.7) 3 (1, 62) 17 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.8, 3.7)
Iroquois County 6 *** 18.3 (13.0, 25.3) 54 (3, 82) 8 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.7, 1.7)
Jackson County 6 *** 18.5 (13.8, 24.4) 50 (4, 81) 11 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.0, 2.6)
Jefferson County 6 *** 17.5 (12.7, 23.8) 63 (6, 82) 9 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.5, 1.4)
Jersey County 6 *** 25.9 (18.1, 36.3) 2 (1, 76) 8
*
*
Jo Daviess County 6 *** 12.0 (7.4, 19.2) 82 (25, 82) 5 stable stable trend -3.1 (-7.7, 1.7)
Johnson County 6 *** 23.1 (13.2, 37.8) 9 (1, 82) 4 stable stable trend 0.4 (-4.9, 6.0)
Kane County 6 *** 19.4 (17.7, 21.1) 42 (18, 66) 104 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.9, 1.1)
Kankakee County 6 *** 20.5 (17.1, 24.4) 28 (5, 72) 27 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.0, 1.7)
Kendall County 6 *** 18.8 (15.2, 22.9) 48 (8, 78) 21 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.5, 1.1)
Knox County 6 *** 17.4 (13.1, 22.7) 66 (8, 82) 12 falling falling trend -3.2 (-6.2, -0.1)
La Salle County 6 *** 17.9 (14.9, 21.4) 58 (15, 79) 27 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.5, 0.8)
Lake County 6 *** 21.5 (20.0, 23.0) 22 (10, 45) 163 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.2)
Lawrence County 6 *** 16.7 (9.4, 27.7) 71 (1, 82) 3 stable stable trend -0.7 (-5.0, 3.8)
Lee County 6 *** 20.0 (14.5, 27.1) 34 (2, 81) 9 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.7, 3.7)
Livingston County 6 *** 18.1 (13.1, 24.5) 56 (4, 82) 9 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.8, 1.5)
Logan County 6 *** 22.7 (16.3, 31.0) 12 (1, 78) 9 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.2, 1.7)
Macon County 6 *** 19.9 (16.7, 23.6) 37 (7, 73) 30 stable stable trend 0.5 (-8.8, 10.7)
Macoupin County 6 *** 17.8 (13.5, 23.2) 60 (8, 81) 12 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.5, 3.3)
Madison County 6 *** 20.2 (18.0, 22.5) 32 (11, 65) 69 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.9, 1.5)
Marion County 6 *** 21.8 (16.3, 28.8) 18 (1, 77) 11 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.6, 4.7)
Marshall County 6 *** 17.5 (9.6, 30.2) 64 (1, 82) 3
*
*
Mason County 6 *** 19.6 (11.3, 32.0) 39 (1, 82) 4 stable stable trend -1.3 (-5.8, 3.4)
Massac County 6 *** 17.0 (9.4, 28.7) 68 (1, 82) 3
*
*
McDonough County 6 *** 22.0 (15.4, 30.7) 16 (1, 80) 8 stable stable trend -2.8 (-6.0, 0.4)
McHenry County 6 *** 17.9 (15.9, 20.1) 59 (23, 75) 62 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.4)
McLean County 6 *** 15.8 (13.2, 18.7) 77 (32, 81) 28 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.6, -1.1)
Mercer County 6 *** 29.9 (19.8, 43.7) 1 (1, 77) 6 stable stable trend 2.8 (-1.2, 6.9)
Monroe County 6 *** 20.5 (14.7, 28.1) 29 (1, 81) 9 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.0, 1.6)
Montgomery County 6 *** 18.2 (12.8, 25.5) 55 (3, 82) 8 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.3, 2.6)
Morgan County 6 *** 18.8 (13.6, 25.6) 47 (3, 81) 9 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.6, 2.9)
Moultrie County 6 *** 24.7 (15.7, 37.4) 6 (1, 81) 5 stable stable trend -0.1 (-6.4, 6.7)
Ogle County 6 *** 23.5 (18.3, 29.8) 8 (1, 70) 15 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.5, 4.2)
Peoria County 6 *** 19.4 (16.8, 22.2) 43 (11, 72) 43 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 1.0)
Perry County 6 *** 16.6 (10.4, 25.4) 73 (3, 82) 5 stable stable trend -2.3 (-8.1, 3.8)
Piatt County 6 *** 22.2 (14.0, 33.7) 15 (1, 82) 5 stable stable trend 3.0 (-1.8, 8.0)
Pike County 6 *** 14.8 (8.7, 24.3) 79 (5, 82) 4
*
*
Randolph County 6 *** 23.0 (16.9, 30.8) 10 (1, 78) 10 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.9, 5.2)
Richland County 6 *** 18.3 (11.2, 28.9) 53 (1, 82) 4 stable stable trend 1.8 (-3.9, 7.8)
Rock Island County 6 *** 17.7 (14.9, 20.8) 62 (18, 79) 32 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.9, 0.8)
Saline County 6 *** 16.2 (10.4, 24.3) 75 (3, 82) 5 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.3, 2.1)
Sangamon County 6 *** 24.7 (21.9, 27.8) 5 (1, 35) 62 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.4, 3.9)
Shelby County 6 *** 16.6 (10.8, 24.7) 74 (4, 82) 6 stable stable trend -1.5 (-6.8, 4.0)
St. Clair County 6 *** 17.3 (15.2, 19.6) 67 (29, 77) 52 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.7, 0.7)
Stephenson County 6 *** 16.1 (12.0, 21.4) 76 (11, 82) 11 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.8, 1.5)
Tazewell County 6 *** 21.8 (18.7, 25.3) 19 (4, 63) 37 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.6, 0.9)
Union County 6 *** 16.9 (10.4, 26.6) 70 (2, 82) 4 stable stable trend -3.4 (-7.8, 1.2)
Vermilion County 6 *** 20.4 (16.6, 24.9) 30 (4, 74) 22 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.6, 2.7)
Warren County 6 *** 15.2 (8.8, 24.7) 78 (4, 82) 4 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.7, 5.2)
Wayne County 6 *** 20.0 (12.9, 30.1) 35 (1, 82) 5
*
*
White County 6 *** 21.6 (13.4, 33.6) 21 (1, 82) 5 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.9, 3.8)
Whiteside County 6 *** 21.4 (16.9, 26.9) 23 (2, 76) 17 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.4, 3.7)
Will County 6 *** 21.6 (20.1, 23.3) 20 (9, 46) 149 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.6, 1.2)
Williamson County 6 *** 21.1 (16.9, 26.0) 26 (3, 75) 19 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.1, 3.0)
Winnebago County 6 *** 18.1 (16.1, 20.2) 57 (21, 74) 64 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.5)
Woodford County 6 *** 22.8 (16.9, 30.3) 11 (1, 77) 10 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.6, 3.1)
Alexander County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brown County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cass County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cumberland County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gallatin County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hamilton County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardin County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Henderson County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jasper County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menard County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pope County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pulaski County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Putnam County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schuyler County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scott County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stark County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wabash County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/07/2021 7:59 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2020 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2020 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2020 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top