Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Iowa by County

Prostate (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Iowa 7 120.4 (118.2, 122.6) N/A 2,432 rising rising trend 4.3 (3.0, 6.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 110.5 (110.2, 110.7) N/A 212,734 rising rising trend 2.5 (1.0, 4.1)
Van Buren County 7 66.0 (39.3, 107.3) 99 (47, 99) 4 falling falling trend -4.1 (-7.7, -1.6)
Keokuk County 7 71.6 (47.6, 105.6) 98 (44, 99) 6 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.1, -1.3)
Decatur County 7 78.0 (49.2, 120.4) 97 (28, 99) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.6, 1.2)
Allamakee County 7 85.0 (61.7, 115.6) 96 (34, 99) 10 falling falling trend -7.3 (-32.0, -2.3)
Washington County 7 85.6 (66.2, 109.5) 95 (46, 99) 14 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.5, -0.6)
Hamilton County 7 87.2 (64.5, 116.6) 94 (36, 99) 10 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.3, -0.1)
Guthrie County 7 87.8 (61.1, 124.3) 93 (20, 99) 8 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.2, -1.1)
Davis County 7 89.4 (59.1, 131.6) 92 (14, 99) 6 stable stable trend -2.8 (-6.0, 0.3)
Jasper County 7 90.1 (74.3, 108.6) 91 (51, 99) 24 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.0, -0.8)
Wright County 7 90.3 (65.2, 123.3) 90 (22, 99) 9 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.0, -1.2)
Osceola County 7 90.7 (57.2, 141.1) 89 (10, 99) 5 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.6, -0.5)
Cedar County 7 92.3 (71.1, 118.9) 88 (32, 99) 13 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.4, -0.3)
Kossuth County 7 93.0 (70.3, 122.1) 87 (27, 99) 12 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.7, -0.9)
Benton County 7 93.2 (74.4, 116.0) 86 (38, 99) 17 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.9, -2.0)
Lucas County 7 93.5 (64.0, 134.7) 85 (14, 99) 7 falling falling trend -2.3 (-5.0, -0.1)
Louisa County 7 94.2 (66.4, 131.2) 84 (18, 99) 8 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.5, 0.6)
Jefferson County 7 98.2 (75.9, 126.2) 83 (22, 99) 15 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.5, -0.4)
Howard County 7 99.7 (70.0, 140.3) 82 (9, 99) 7 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.1, 0.1)
Iowa County 7 100.1 (75.4, 131.2) 81 (16, 99) 11 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.4, 0.0)
Clarke County 7 101.9 (68.9, 146.5) 80 (5, 99) 6 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.4, -0.2)
Poweshiek County 7 102.1 (78.3, 131.6) 79 (16, 99) 13 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.8, 12.7)
Warren County 7 103.4 (88.1, 120.7) 78 (32, 94) 34 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.7, -0.2)
Mahaska County 7 104.1 (81.6, 131.3) 77 (19, 98) 15 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.6, -1.0)
Hardin County 7 104.3 (81.0, 133.4) 76 (16, 98) 14 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.1)
Union County 7 105.2 (77.1, 141.7) 75 (11, 99) 10 stable stable trend 18.6 (-2.4, 36.4)
Polk County 7 105.5 (99.7, 111.6) 74 (55, 85) 265 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.6, -1.3)
Adair County 7 106.3 (70.4, 157.0) 73 (3, 99) 6 rising rising trend 41.5 (18.4, 81.2)
Franklin County 7 107.0 (76.5, 147.5) 72 (6, 99) 9 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.7, 0.1)
Fayette County 7 107.1 (84.8, 134.4) 71 (15, 97) 16 falling falling trend -4.3 (-12.6, -1.9)
Wapello County 7 107.5 (89.3, 128.7) 70 (22, 96) 26 stable stable trend 14.1 (-1.8, 25.1)
Ringgold County 7 109.4 (69.1, 170.6) 69 (2, 99) 5 stable stable trend 1.2 (-6.0, 32.8)
Tama County 7 111.0 (85.7, 142.3) 68 (10, 98) 14 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.1, -1.2)
Clayton County 7 111.2 (88.3, 139.6) 67 (11, 97) 17 stable stable trend 4.7 (-2.6, 16.9)
Pottawattamie County 7 111.3 (99.5, 124.2) 66 (32, 87) 69 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.2)
Webster County 7 111.5 (93.4, 132.3) 65 (19, 94) 28 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.5, -1.2)
Wayne County 7 112.6 (75.2, 166.0) 64 (2, 99) 6 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.9, -0.5)
Winnebago County 7 113.7 (81.8, 155.6) 63 (4, 99) 9 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.7, 0.5)
Mitchell County 7 113.8 (82.8, 154.5) 62 (5, 99) 9 falling falling trend -2.1 (-4.1, -0.3)
Henry County 7 114.8 (90.4, 144.2) 61 (8, 95) 16 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.3, 0.1)
Mills County 7 115.8 (88.8, 149.6) 60 (6, 98) 13 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.4, 0.2)
Scott County 7 116.5 (107.4, 126.3) 59 (29, 79) 126 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.7)
Worth County 7 117.0 (80.0, 168.0) 58 (2, 99) 7 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.2, 1.2)
Dallas County 7 119.5 (104.8, 135.6) 57 (18, 83) 50 stable stable trend 13.0 (-0.7, 23.8)
Dubuque County 7 119.6 (107.5, 132.8) 56 (21, 80) 74 stable stable trend -2.1 (-6.9, 2.4)
Jackson County 7 120.3 (96.8, 148.7) 55 (7, 93) 19 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.4)
Marshall County 7 120.9 (102.9, 141.5) 54 (13, 87) 33 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.4, -1.1)
Woodbury County 7 121.2 (108.7, 134.8) 53 (18, 78) 72 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.1, -1.3)
Monroe County 7 121.5 (84.5, 171.9) 52 (2, 99) 7 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.7, 0.0)
Marion County 7 121.6 (101.8, 144.6) 51 (11, 90) 27 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 1.0)
Floyd County 7 122.7 (96.5, 155.0) 50 (5, 94) 15 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.5, -0.6)
Muscatine County 7 123.2 (105.0, 144.0) 49 (12, 85) 34 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.0)
Johnson County 7 124.3 (112.4, 137.1) 48 (18, 73) 86 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.7)
Jones County 7 124.5 (101.0, 152.6) 47 (6, 91) 20 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.8, -1.1)
Page County 7 124.7 (97.6, 157.9) 46 (4, 94) 15 falling falling trend -3.1 (-14.2, -1.1)
Butler County 7 124.8 (96.9, 159.5) 45 (4, 95) 14 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.7, 14.0)
Plymouth County 7 125.3 (102.4, 152.4) 44 (6, 90) 22 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.6, -1.2)
Lee County 7 126.2 (107.0, 148.2) 43 (10, 84) 32 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.9, -0.2)
Linn County 7 126.5 (117.9, 135.5) 42 (19, 64) 170 rising rising trend 13.1 (5.8, 22.5)
Crawford County 7 127.1 (99.5, 160.7) 41 (3, 93) 15 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.7, 0.4)
Clinton County 7 127.4 (110.6, 146.4) 40 (9, 79) 43 rising rising trend 16.8 (2.2, 26.8)
Lyon County 7 127.6 (93.7, 170.6) 39 (2, 97) 10 falling falling trend -7.1 (-30.3, -1.4)
Grundy County 7 127.7 (96.5, 167.2) 38 (2, 95) 12 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.1, -0.7)
Story County 7 128.0 (113.2, 144.3) 37 (11, 76) 57 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.4)
Humboldt County 7 128.2 (93.4, 173.8) 36 (2, 97) 9 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.3, -0.7)
Bremer County 7 128.9 (105.6, 156.3) 35 (4, 87) 22 stable stable trend 10.4 (-2.5, 27.9)
Cerro Gordo County 7 129.4 (111.7, 149.5) 34 (7, 77) 41 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Appanoose County 7 129.5 (100.2, 166.5) 33 (3, 93) 14 rising rising trend 23.2 (0.4, 46.8)
Audubon County 7 130.0 (89.4, 188.8) 32 (1, 98) 7 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.9, 1.4)
Des Moines County 7 130.1 (111.8, 150.9) 31 (8, 79) 38 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.8, -0.1)
Delaware County 7 130.8 (104.5, 162.9) 30 (4, 89) 18 stable stable trend 17.4 (0.0, 33.5)
Taylor County 7 132.4 (91.9, 188.6) 29 (1, 98) 7 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.2, 3.1)
Emmet County 7 133.9 (98.8, 179.7) 28 (1, 95) 10 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.1, -0.1)
Hancock County 7 134.1 (101.0, 176.5) 27 (1, 93) 12 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.9, 0.3)
Montgomery County 7 135.1 (99.8, 180.7) 26 (1, 95) 10 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.2, 4.0)
Chickasaw County 7 135.1 (103.2, 175.3) 25 (2, 91) 13 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.6)
Carroll County 7 135.5 (109.0, 167.0) 24 (3, 86) 19 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.5, -0.2)
Adams County 7 136.1 (82.7, 219.2) 23 (1, 99) 4
*
*
Winneshiek County 7 136.3 (111.3, 166.3) 22 (3, 82) 22 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.2, 0.5)
Shelby County 7 137.3 (105.0, 178.4) 21 (2, 89) 13 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.4)
O'Brien County 7 138.7 (108.2, 176.4) 20 (2, 87) 15 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.9, 9.1)
Madison County 7 139.6 (109.4, 176.3) 19 (2, 88) 15 rising rising trend 28.4 (3.6, 47.1)
Boone County 7 140.7 (117.0, 168.4) 18 (3, 76) 27 stable stable trend 2.8 (0.0, 13.5)
Black Hawk County 7 144.1 (132.3, 156.8) 17 (6, 44) 115 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.1, 0.1)
Greene County 7 146.9 (108.8, 196.3) 16 (1, 89) 10 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.3, 2.2)
Monona County 7 147.3 (109.5, 196.8) 15 (1, 90) 11 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.8, 0.2)
Sac County 7 147.9 (111.0, 195.2) 14 (1, 90) 12 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.6, -0.1)
Dickinson County 7 148.2 (122.2, 179.7) 13 (2, 70) 24 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.5, -0.2)
Buchanan County 7 150.3 (122.8, 182.7) 12 (1, 70) 22 rising rising trend 20.1 (3.0, 33.0)
Clay County 7 154.6 (124.0, 191.5) 11 (1, 73) 18 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.1)
Sioux County 7 155.4 (131.3, 182.8) 10 (1, 56) 31 stable stable trend 7.1 (-4.9, 24.4)
Calhoun County 7 155.6 (118.1, 203.1) 9 (1, 83) 12 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.7, 0.9)
Cass County 7 156.3 (123.0, 197.3) 8 (1, 78) 16 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.1, 1.3)
Harrison County 7 158.5 (126.1, 197.9) 7 (1, 70) 17 stable stable trend 14.1 (-0.9, 35.7)
Pocahontas County 7 159.9 (116.0, 218.7) 6 (1, 87) 9 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.3, -0.4)
Fremont County 7 160.0 (116.7, 217.6) 5 (1, 90) 9 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.2, 2.7)
Cherokee County 7 171.7 (136.0, 215.9) 4 (1, 57) 17 stable stable trend 16.7 (-1.1, 31.4)
Buena Vista County 7 172.2 (140.4, 209.3) 3 (1, 53) 22 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -0.5)
Palo Alto County 7 192.4 (146.4, 249.9) 2 (1, 55) 13 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.8, 0.2)
Ida County 7 206.3 (154.2, 273.1) 1 (1, 51) 11 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.2, 2.4)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 02/27/2024 9:14 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top