Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Louisiana by Parish

Prostate (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Count
Parish
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Louisiana 7 138.1 (136.1, 140.1) N/A 3,817 rising rising trend 3.8 (1.1, 7.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 110.5 (110.2, 110.7) N/A 212,734 rising rising trend 2.5 (1.0, 4.1)
East Baton Rouge Parish 7 173.8 (166.1, 181.7) 4 (1, 12) 410 rising rising trend 4.1 (1.3, 8.8)
Jefferson Parish 7 124.3 (118.4, 130.5) 48 (33, 55) 352 stable stable trend 2.7 (-1.2, 6.4)
Orleans Parish 7 143.1 (135.9, 150.6) 26 (11, 40) 324 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.6)
St. Tammany Parish 7 126.7 (119.1, 134.7) 45 (27, 54) 220 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.0, -0.2)
Caddo Parish 7 141.3 (132.7, 150.4) 30 (12, 42) 210 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.0, -0.6)
Lafayette Parish 7 144.7 (135.1, 154.8) 19 (8, 41) 183 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 3.8)
Calcasieu Parish 7 140.8 (131.0, 151.1) 31 (10, 45) 162 rising rising trend 3.1 (0.5, 8.5)
Ouachita Parish 7 154.2 (142.2, 167.0) 11 (4, 34) 128 rising rising trend 9.2 (3.9, 18.8)
Tangipahoa Parish 7 145.8 (133.3, 159.3) 17 (7, 44) 108 rising rising trend 10.3 (4.5, 18.3)
Ascension Parish 7 154.1 (140.4, 168.8) 12 (3, 37) 101 rising rising trend 4.2 (0.7, 10.7)
Rapides Parish 7 129.2 (117.8, 141.4) 42 (17, 56) 99 falling falling trend -2.5 (-7.1, -1.1)
Bossier Parish 7 126.8 (114.9, 139.5) 44 (20, 57) 88 rising rising trend 9.2 (1.8, 20.3)
Livingston Parish 7 107.7 (97.2, 119.1) 59 (43, 64) 81 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.3, 0.2)
St. Landry Parish 7 148.6 (133.5, 165.1) 14 (4, 46) 75 rising rising trend 14.9 (5.5, 23.2)
Terrebonne Parish 7 114.8 (102.9, 127.8) 53 (33, 62) 72 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.8)
LaFourche Parish 7 114.0 (101.8, 127.2) 54 (34, 63) 67 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.4, -0.7)
Iberia Parish 7 142.0 (125.7, 159.8) 28 (6, 53) 59 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.2, -0.2)
Vermilion Parish 7 142.6 (125.1, 162.1) 27 (5, 53) 50 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.5, -0.6)
St. Martin Parish 7 145.4 (127.0, 165.9) 18 (4, 51) 48 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.4, -0.4)
Acadia Parish 7 133.0 (116.0, 151.8) 38 (9, 58) 47 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.8, 1.0)
St. Charles Parish 7 143.1 (124.3, 164.1) 25 (4, 54) 46 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.3, 0.5)
St. Mary Parish 7 126.6 (109.6, 145.8) 46 (12, 61) 42 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.4, 1.3)
St. John the Baptist Parish 7 143.9 (123.5, 167.0) 21 (4, 55) 38 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.0, 1.0)
Iberville Parish 7 183.9 (157.9, 213.2) 2 (1, 30) 38 falling falling trend -3.3 (-13.2, -0.9)
Webster Parish 7 143.5 (123.4, 166.3) 23 (3, 55) 38 falling falling trend -3.6 (-6.2, -1.2)
Washington Parish 7 117.1 (100.3, 136.1) 52 (23, 63) 37 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.2, -1.1)
Avoyelles Parish 7 138.0 (117.8, 160.8) 33 (5, 58) 35 falling falling trend -2.1 (-4.2, -0.1)
Lincoln Parish 7 141.6 (120.0, 166.0) 29 (4, 57) 32 stable stable trend 13.2 (-0.5, 25.0)
Natchitoches Parish 7 130.6 (110.4, 153.8) 40 (8, 61) 30 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.5, -0.3)
Jefferson Davis Parish 7 154.0 (129.7, 181.7) 13 (1, 53) 29 rising rising trend 18.8 (2.0, 30.1)
Morehouse Parish 7 165.5 (138.1, 197.1) 6 (1, 47) 28 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.1, 0.9)
Beauregard Parish 7 120.0 (100.0, 143.0) 50 (13, 63) 26 stable stable trend 9.9 (-2.4, 18.3)
West Baton Rouge Parish 7 172.9 (143.2, 207.2) 5 (1, 46) 26 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.7, 1.5)
East Feliciana Parish 7 165.4 (136.8, 198.9) 7 (1, 48) 25 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.1, 0.8)
St. Bernard Parish 7 97.3 (80.0, 117.3) 62 (41, 64) 25 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.5, -0.4)
De Soto Parish 7 131.0 (108.0, 158.0) 39 (6, 62) 24 falling falling trend -4.4 (-6.1, -2.9)
Vernon Parish 7 104.1 (85.8, 125.0) 60 (33, 64) 23 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.0, 1.5)
Sabine Parish 7 125.3 (103.0, 151.6) 47 (9, 63) 23 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.2, -1.1)
Pointe Coupee Parish 7 133.5 (108.9, 162.7) 37 (4, 62) 22 rising rising trend 8.2 (2.0, 23.4)
Assumption Parish 7 133.7 (108.9, 163.2) 36 (4, 62) 21 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.1, 2.0)
St. James Parish 7 143.9 (116.1, 176.9) 22 (2, 60) 20 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.3, 1.3)
Evangeline Parish 7 96.8 (78.2, 118.6) 63 (37, 64) 20 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.5, -0.2)
Union Parish 7 112.1 (90.5, 138.1) 56 (15, 64) 20 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.2, 0.3)
West Feliciana Parish 7 164.8 (131.8, 204.5) 8 (1, 54) 19 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.4, 3.0)
Concordia Parish 7 144.3 (115.2, 178.9) 20 (2, 62) 18 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.0, 2.5)
Plaquemines Parish 7 135.7 (108.3, 168.3) 35 (2, 63) 18 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.5, 1.8)
Richland Parish 7 128.1 (102.0, 159.6) 43 (5, 64) 17 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.9, 0.3)
Allen Parish 7 110.8 (88.1, 137.7) 58 (16, 64) 17 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.8, 0.9)
Claiborne Parish 7 143.5 (114.0, 179.2) 24 (1, 61) 17 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.4, -0.6)
Bienville Parish 7 164.6 (130.2, 206.6) 9 (1, 55) 16 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.6, 0.5)
Franklin Parish 7 130.1 (102.5, 163.2) 41 (4, 64) 16 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.5, 1.1)
Jackson Parish 7 148.3 (117.2, 185.7) 15 (1, 60) 16 rising rising trend 18.6 (3.2, 29.1)
Grant Parish 7 113.2 (88.4, 143.1) 55 (12, 64) 15 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.4, 1.2)
St. Helena Parish 7 180.4 (138.9, 232.2) 3 (1, 53) 13 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.3, 3.6)
West Carroll Parish 7 137.0 (102.2, 181.1) 34 (1, 64) 11 stable stable trend 15.3 (-1.2, 46.4)
Madison Parish 7 161.7 (119.2, 215.1) 10 (1, 62) 10 rising rising trend 20.0 (2.9, 44.0)
Winn Parish 7 94.8 (69.6, 127.2) 64 (24, 64) 10 falling falling trend -4.7 (-7.3, -2.4)
La Salle Parish 7 99.2 (72.1, 133.5) 61 (16, 64) 9 falling falling trend -3.6 (-6.8, -0.6)
Caldwell Parish 7 138.4 (99.9, 187.7) 32 (1, 64) 9 stable stable trend 2.8 (-0.7, 17.3)
Catahoula Parish 7 121.7 (86.4, 168.1) 49 (2, 64) 8 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.4, 2.4)
East Carroll Parish 7 192.3 (136.8, 264.3) 1 (1, 57) 8 stable stable trend -2.1 (-9.0, 4.5)
Red River Parish 7 119.9 (81.5, 171.9) 51 (2, 64) 7 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.9, 2.8)
Tensas Parish 7 146.3 (97.7, 218.5) 16 (1, 64) 6 stable stable trend -1.3 (-5.3, 2.9)
Cameron Parish 7 110.8 (72.1, 165.3) 57 (2, 64) 5 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.8, 2.3)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/27/2024 6:05 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.


1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2022 submission.
7 Source: SEER November 2022 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2022 data.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top