Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Louisiana by Parish

Prostate (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc
Parish
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Louisiana 7 *** 134.7 (132.7, 136.8) N/A 3,577 stable stable trend 3.9 (-1.5, 9.5)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 106.2 (106.0, 106.4) N/A 200,677 stable stable trend 1.8 (-2.6, 6.3)
West Carroll Parish 7 *** 107.4 (76.7, 147.5) 59 (6, 64) 8 stable stable trend 15.9 (-8.5, 46.8)
Bossier Parish 7 *** 119.3 (107.6, 132.0) 48 (24, 61) 78 stable stable trend 14.2 (-0.4, 31.1)
Jefferson Davis Parish 7 *** 132.2 (109.6, 158.3) 32 (4, 61) 25 stable stable trend 13.6 (-5.4, 36.4)
Iberville Parish 7 *** 166.2 (141.8, 194.0) 5 (1, 37) 35 stable stable trend 11.7 (-4.6, 30.7)
Pointe Coupee Parish 7 *** 146.3 (120.1, 177.2) 17 (1, 57) 23 rising rising trend 10.8 (1.2, 21.4)
Beauregard Parish 7 *** 112.4 (92.6, 135.3) 55 (17, 64) 24 stable stable trend 9.9 (-7.0, 29.9)
Ouachita Parish 7 *** 151.0 (139.0, 163.8) 15 (3, 33) 123 stable stable trend 9.1 (-8.2, 29.6)
St. Landry Parish 7 *** 134.4 (120.0, 150.2) 29 (9, 54) 67 stable stable trend 8.2 (-5.1, 23.4)
East Baton Rouge Parish 7 *** 162.8 (155.3, 170.7) 8 (2, 17) 371 stable stable trend 7.2 (-0.5, 15.4)
Madison Parish 7 *** 120.2 (84.6, 166.3) 46 (2, 64) 8 stable stable trend 6.3 (-7.8, 22.5)
Calcasieu Parish 7 *** 132.7 (123.1, 143.0) 31 (15, 51) 149 stable stable trend 2.4 (-2.3, 7.3)
Plaquemines Parish 7 *** 118.1 (91.4, 150.1) 49 (6, 64) 14 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.9, 1.9)
Terrebonne Parish 7 *** 124.3 (111.5, 138.1) 41 (19, 59) 74 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.8)
Acadia Parish 7 *** 144.7 (126.7, 164.7) 18 (3, 48) 50 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.4, 1.1)
Cameron Parish 7 *** 115.1 (73.7, 173.3) 53 (1, 64) 5 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.3, 2.1)
Concordia Parish 7 *** 128.5 (101.0, 161.6) 35 (3, 64) 16 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.3, 2.0)
Assumption Parish 7 *** 135.9 (110.1, 166.3) 26 (2, 61) 21 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.3, 1.7)
Catahoula Parish 7 *** 134.5 (96.6, 183.3) 27 (1, 64) 9 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.1, 2.3)
St. Mary Parish 7 *** 139.3 (121.1, 159.6) 22 (4, 54) 44 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.7, 0.9)
Franklin Parish 7 *** 166.9 (135.4, 203.9) 4 (1, 47) 21 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.4, 1.2)
West Baton Rouge Parish 7 *** 178.2 (147.3, 213.9) 2 (1, 37) 25 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.9, 0.6)
Allen Parish 7 *** 141.7 (115.1, 172.6) 20 (1, 60) 21 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.4, 0.9)
East Feliciana Parish 7 *** 159.1 (130.9, 192.4) 9 (1, 50) 23 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.3, 0.8)
Morehouse Parish 7 *** 167.9 (140.3, 199.8) 3 (1, 40) 28 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.1, 0.2)
St. James Parish 7 *** 151.4 (122.7, 185.4) 14 (1, 57) 21 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.5, 0.7)
Lincoln Parish 7 *** 127.5 (106.8, 151.1) 36 (8, 62) 28 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.7, 0.8)
LaFourche Parish 7 *** 122.5 (109.6, 136.6) 45 (19, 60) 68 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.0, -0.2)
St. Bernard Parish 7 *** 103.9 (84.9, 125.8) 62 (28, 64) 24 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.1, 0.0)
Orleans Parish 7 *** 141.2 (133.9, 148.9) 21 (12, 37) 303 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.5, -0.9)
Red River Parish 7 *** 104.6 (69.1, 153.4) 61 (6, 64) 6 stable stable trend -1.7 (-6.2, 3.1)
Richland Parish 7 *** 123.6 (97.4, 155.1) 43 (5, 64) 16 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.2, -0.2)
Avoyelles Parish 7 *** 138.4 (117.9, 161.5) 23 (4, 58) 34 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.7, 0.1)
Rapides Parish 7 *** 148.4 (136.2, 161.5) 16 (4, 36) 113 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -0.8)
Caldwell Parish 7 *** 115.4 (80.0, 162.0) 52 (3, 64) 7 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.9, 1.2)
Tensas Parish 7 *** 136.8 (88.9, 207.8) 24 (1, 64) 5 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.5, 1.8)
Ascension Parish 7 *** 151.7 (137.5, 167.0) 13 (3, 37) 92 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.2, -0.8)
Lafayette Parish 7 *** 144.4 (134.5, 154.9) 19 (7, 37) 172 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.1, -1.0)
St. Helena Parish 7 *** 122.9 (89.7, 166.4) 44 (2, 64) 9 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.9, 1.1)
West Feliciana Parish 7 *** 163.7 (130.1, 204.1) 7 (1, 53) 19 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.2, 1.4)
Jackson Parish 7 *** 134.5 (104.9, 170.5) 28 (2, 63) 15 falling falling trend -2.1 (-4.0, -0.2)
Vermilion Parish 7 *** 158.2 (139.4, 178.9) 11 (1, 35) 54 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.6, -0.5)
Vernon Parish 7 *** 97.2 (79.5, 117.7) 63 (34, 64) 22 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.8, 0.8)
East Carroll Parish 7 *** 183.5 (129.3, 253.9) 1 (1, 61) 8 stable stable trend -2.2 (-6.5, 2.4)
Bienville Parish 7 *** 163.9 (129.6, 205.7) 6 (1, 55) 16 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.5, -0.1)
Evangeline Parish 7 *** 110.3 (90.3, 133.7) 56 (19, 64) 22 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.5, -0.2)
Grant Parish 7 *** 109.0 (84.2, 139.0) 57 (13, 64) 14 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.3, 0.7)
Caddo Parish 7 *** 133.2 (124.7, 142.1) 30 (16, 48) 194 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.9, -0.9)
Claiborne Parish 7 *** 158.9 (127.3, 196.7) 10 (1, 55) 18 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.3, -0.4)
St. Martin Parish 7 *** 152.8 (133.4, 174.3) 12 (1, 41) 48 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.9, -0.7)
St. Charles Parish 7 *** 130.8 (112.1, 151.8) 34 (7, 60) 39 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.7, -0.2)
St. John the Baptist Parish 7 *** 116.6 (97.8, 138.2) 51 (13, 64) 30 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.7, -0.4)
St. Tammany Parish 7 *** 124.1 (116.3, 132.5) 42 (26, 55) 198 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.8, -1.3)
Union Parish 7 *** 117.1 (94.6, 144.1) 50 (10, 64) 20 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.9, -0.4)
Iberia Parish 7 *** 127.1 (111.5, 144.3) 37 (12, 60) 51 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.5, -1.0)
Natchitoches Parish 7 *** 126.6 (106.4, 149.8) 38 (8, 62) 29 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.6, -0.7)
Livingston Parish 7 *** 105.7 (94.7, 117.5) 60 (41, 64) 74 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.9, -0.7)
Tangipahoa Parish 7 *** 124.9 (113.0, 137.7) 39 (19, 58) 88 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.3, -1.4)
Sabine Parish 7 *** 124.8 (102.1, 151.7) 40 (7, 63) 22 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.4, -0.9)
Washington Parish 7 *** 114.7 (98.0, 133.6) 54 (19, 64) 36 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.9, -1.9)
Jefferson Parish 7 *** 119.9 (114.0, 126.1) 47 (32, 57) 325 falling falling trend -4.0 (-5.8, -2.2)
La Salle Parish 7 *** 90.4 (64.8, 123.4) 64 (25, 64) 8 falling falling trend -4.0 (-7.1, -0.9)
Webster Parish 7 *** 132.2 (113.1, 153.9) 33 (6, 60) 35 falling falling trend -4.2 (-6.1, -2.2)
Winn Parish 7 *** 108.3 (80.9, 142.8) 58 (10, 64) 11 falling falling trend -4.5 (-6.7, -2.1)
De Soto Parish 7 *** 136.7 (112.9, 164.4) 25 (2, 60) 24 falling falling trend -4.6 (-6.2, -2.9)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/22/2021 6:38 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.


1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2020 submission.
7 Source: SEER November 2020 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2020 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top