Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Louisiana by Parish

Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
Parish
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Louisiana 7 *** 19.0 (18.4, 19.5) N/A 989 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.5)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 19.1 (19.1, 19.2) N/A 71,520 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -1.0)
Evangeline Parish 7 *** 24.8 (18.2, 33.2) 1 (1, 45) 10 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.9, 1.8)
Beauregard Parish 7 *** 23.5 (17.3, 31.3) 2 (1, 47) 10 stable stable trend 3.1 (-0.8, 7.1)
St. Martin Parish 7 *** 23.1 (18.0, 29.4) 3 (1, 43) 14 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.5, 5.2)
Franklin Parish 7 *** 22.3 (14.1, 33.6) 4 (1, 52) 5 stable stable trend -0.8 (-5.7, 4.3)
Allen Parish 7 *** 21.7 (14.9, 30.8) 5 (1, 51) 7 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.3, 2.3)
St. Bernard Parish 7 *** 21.5 (15.3, 29.3) 6 (1, 50) 8 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.8, 4.7)
Terrebonne Parish 7 *** 21.5 (17.8, 25.7) 7 (1, 42) 25 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.8, 2.5)
St. Mary Parish 7 *** 21.4 (16.4, 27.4) 8 (1, 48) 13 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.2, 1.5)
Washington Parish 7 *** 21.1 (15.9, 27.4) 9 (1, 48) 12 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.2, 0.6)
LaFourche Parish 7 *** 20.7 (17.1, 25.0) 10 (1, 44) 23 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.7, 2.5)
Lafayette Parish 7 *** 20.7 (18.2, 23.5) 11 (2, 39) 50 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.2)
Jefferson Davis Parish 7 *** 20.3 (14.3, 28.1) 12 (1, 51) 8 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.6, 3.0)
Plaquemines Parish 7 *** 20.3 (12.9, 30.4) 13 (1, 52) 5 stable stable trend 2.3 (-2.0, 6.9)
St. Tammany Parish 7 *** 20.2 (18.0, 22.7) 14 (4, 40) 62 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.7, 0.8)
Rapides Parish 7 *** 20.0 (16.9, 23.5) 15 (2, 45) 31 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.0, 2.1)
Tangipahoa Parish 7 *** 19.9 (16.6, 23.6) 16 (2, 45) 28 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.8, 0.6)
St. John the Baptist Parish 7 *** 19.9 (14.5, 26.6) 17 (1, 50) 10 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.7, 3.7)
Iberville Parish 7 *** 19.8 (14.0, 27.4) 18 (1, 52) 8 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.4, 4.3)
East Baton Rouge Parish 7 *** 19.8 (17.9, 21.7) 19 (6, 39) 89 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.4, 1.4)
Vernon Parish 7 *** 19.6 (14.2, 26.4) 20 (1, 51) 9 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.6, 5.4)
Jefferson Parish 7 *** 19.6 (17.9, 21.4) 21 (7, 39) 103 stable stable trend -4.7 (-9.4, 0.2)
Bossier Parish 7 *** 19.5 (16.2, 23.2) 22 (3, 46) 26 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.4, 1.6)
Bienville Parish 7 *** 19.4 (10.5, 32.8) 23 (1, 52) 3
*
*
Grant Parish 7 *** 19.4 (12.3, 29.1) 24 (1, 52) 5 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.7, 2.3)
Caddo Parish 7 *** 19.3 (17.1, 21.8) 25 (5, 43) 58 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.2, 1.7)
Assumption Parish 7 *** 19.3 (12.6, 28.6) 26 (1, 52) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.5, 2.3)
Ascension Parish 7 *** 19.2 (15.7, 23.2) 27 (2, 47) 23 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.1, 2.0)
Livingston Parish 7 *** 19.0 (15.8, 22.7) 28 (4, 48) 26 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.6, 2.2)
Union Parish 7 *** 18.9 (12.5, 27.8) 29 (1, 52) 6 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.2, 4.4)
West Baton Rouge Parish 7 *** 18.9 (12.3, 28.0) 30 (1, 52) 5 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.4, 2.3)
St. Charles Parish 7 *** 18.7 (13.9, 24.7) 31 (1, 51) 11 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.5, 1.9)
Acadia Parish 7 *** 18.5 (14.2, 23.9) 32 (2, 51) 13 stable stable trend -2.8 (-5.9, 0.4)
West Feliciana Parish 7 *** 18.3 (10.7, 30.0) 33 (1, 52) 4
*
*
Iberia Parish 7 *** 18.3 (14.3, 23.1) 34 (2, 50) 15 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.8, 4.6)
St. Landry Parish 7 *** 18.0 (14.3, 22.4) 35 (4, 50) 17 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.3, 2.8)
Calcasieu Parish 7 *** 17.8 (15.4, 20.6) 36 (10, 48) 40 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.3, -0.8)
Orleans Parish 7 *** 17.8 (16.0, 19.8) 37 (14, 46) 74 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.7, 1.5)
Vermilion Parish 7 *** 17.5 (13.2, 22.8) 38 (3, 52) 12 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.3, 2.1)
Ouachita Parish 7 *** 17.5 (14.7, 20.6) 39 (9, 49) 30 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.8, 0.5)
De Soto Parish 7 *** 17.4 (11.7, 25.1) 40 (1, 52) 6 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.5, 4.0)
St. James Parish 7 *** 17.3 (10.9, 26.3) 41 (1, 52) 5 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.6, 5.4)
Pointe Coupee Parish 7 *** 17.1 (10.7, 26.1) 42 (1, 52) 5 stable stable trend -0.3 (-4.6, 4.2)
La Salle Parish 7 *** 17.0 (9.6, 28.2) 43 (1, 52) 3
*
*
Jackson Parish 7 *** 16.4 (9.4, 27.0) 44 (1, 52) 3
*
*
Avoyelles Parish 7 *** 16.2 (11.3, 22.4) 45 (4, 52) 8 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.5, 2.8)
Webster Parish 7 *** 15.4 (10.8, 21.4) 46 (6, 52) 8 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.3, 3.5)
Sabine Parish 7 *** 14.9 (9.5, 22.7) 47 (3, 52) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-5.5, 3.3)
Natchitoches Parish 7 *** 14.5 (9.7, 20.8) 48 (7, 52) 6
*
*
East Feliciana Parish 7 *** 14.2 (8.2, 23.4) 49 (2, 52) 4
*
*
Morehouse Parish 7 *** 13.3 (8.2, 20.6) 50 (7, 52) 4 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.1, 2.3)
Lincoln Parish 7 *** 13.3 (9.0, 18.9) 51 (14, 52) 6 stable stable trend -6.4 (-14.0, 1.8)
Richland Parish 7 *** 13.3 (7.5, 21.8) 52 (5, 52) 3 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.3, 0.2)
Caldwell Parish 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cameron Parish 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Catahoula Parish 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Claiborne Parish 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Concordia Parish 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
East Carroll Parish 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison Parish 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Red River Parish 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
St. Helena Parish 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tensas Parish 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
West Carroll Parish 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Winn Parish 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/30/2022 1:05 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Caldwell, Cameron, Catahoula, Claiborne, Concordia, East Carroll, Madison, Red River, St. Helena, Tensas, West Carroll, Winn

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top