Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Maryland by County

Lung & Bronchus (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Maryland 6 N/A 50.0 (49.2, 50.7) N/A 3,830 falling falling trend -4.0 (-6.3, -2.0)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 53.1 (53.0, 53.2) N/A 216,523 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.2, -2.9)
Washington County 6 Urban 60.9 (56.2, 65.9) 9 (5, 15) 128 falling falling trend -7.3 (-14.4, -0.9)
Baltimore City 6 Urban 73.8 (70.9, 76.8) 2 (1, 5) 509 falling falling trend -6.5 (-10.4, -3.4)
Howard County 6 Urban 33.0 (30.4, 35.8) 23 (21, 24) 121 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.0, -2.1)
Anne Arundel County 6 Urban 53.6 (51.2, 56.1) 16 (12, 19) 379 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.9, -2.3)
Queen Annes County 6 Urban 48.7 (41.6, 56.7) 19 (11, 21) 36 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.9, -1.0)
Dorchester County 6 Rural 61.2 (51.9, 72.0) 7 (2, 19) 32 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.2, -0.6)
Garrett County 6 Rural 37.3 (30.1, 46.1) 21 (19, 24) 19 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.9, -0.5)
Montgomery County 6 Urban 29.4 (28.0, 30.7) 24 (23, 24) 384 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.2, -2.1)
Prince Georges County 6 Urban 36.4 (34.7, 38.1) 22 (21, 23) 382 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.4, -2.0)
Talbot County 6 Rural 49.8 (42.5, 58.4) 18 (10, 21) 37 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.3, -0.9)
Caroline County 6 Rural 64.1 (53.8, 75.8) 6 (1, 18) 29 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.3, -0.3)
Kent County 6 Rural 59.7 (48.5, 73.4) 13 (1, 20) 21 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.2, -0.3)
Charles County 6 Urban 51.0 (46.3, 56.1) 17 (12, 20) 91 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.9, -0.2)
Cecil County 6 Urban 70.6 (64.2, 77.5) 4 (1, 9) 95 stable stable trend -1.8 (-13.5, 1.3)
Worcester County 6 Rural 56.2 (49.7, 63.6) 14 (6, 19) 59 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.4, -0.1)
Carroll County 6 Urban 53.8 (49.6, 58.2) 15 (10, 19) 127 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.8)
Somerset County 6 Urban 78.4 (65.3, 93.7) 1 (1, 10) 26 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.7, 0.2)
Wicomico County 6 Urban 72.8 (66.1, 79.9) 3 (1, 7) 92 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.6)
Calvert County 6 Urban 60.5 (54.1, 67.5) 10 (4, 17) 68 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.2, 0.1)
Baltimore County 6 Urban 60.5 (58.4, 62.6) 11 (6, 14) 690 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -1.0)
Harford County 6 Urban 59.8 (56.1, 63.7) 12 (6, 15) 201 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.5)
St. Marys County 6 Urban 61.0 (54.9, 67.6) 8 (4, 16) 77 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Allegany County 6 Rural 66.9 (60.1, 74.4) 5 (1, 13) 72 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.4)
Frederick County 6 Urban 45.8 (42.5, 49.4) 20 (17, 21) 146 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.3, 6.3)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/05/2024 9:08 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top