Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Michigan by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <50

Sorted by Count

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Michigan 6 N/A 104.3 (103.1, 105.5) N/A 6,079 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.9, -0.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 104.6 (104.4, 104.8) N/A 205,200 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.2, 0.2)
Oscoda County 6 Rural 111.5 (66.8, 173.8) 22 (1, 77) 4 stable stable trend 0.1 (-5.4, 5.3)
Gogebic County 6 Rural 63.6 (39.7, 96.3) 77 (26, 77) 4 stable stable trend 2.5 (-2.4, 7.7)
Iron County 6 Rural 94.5 (60.5, 140.7) 61 (1, 77) 5 falling falling trend -3.2 (-6.5, -0.7)
Alcona County 6 Rural 142.3 (93.4, 207.9) 2 (1, 76) 5 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.8, 4.6)
Montmorency County 6 Rural 162.5 (110.0, 231.3) 1 (1, 72) 6 stable stable trend 1.1 (-3.6, 5.3)
Mackinac County 6 Rural 115.2 (78.4, 163.8) 16 (1, 77) 6 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.9, 4.4)
Crawford County 6 Rural 110.8 (76.9, 154.4) 24 (1, 77) 7 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.8, 1.4)
Missaukee County 6 Rural 94.3 (65.9, 130.6) 62 (2, 77) 7 stable stable trend -1.5 (-5.1, 1.6)
Arenac County 6 Rural 103.1 (72.9, 141.7) 42 (1, 77) 8 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.2, 2.0)
Lake County 6 Rural 125.6 (88.9, 172.5) 5 (1, 76) 8 stable stable trend 0.6 (-19.0, 21.4)
Presque Isle County 6 Rural 134.0 (95.1, 183.8) 3 (1, 75) 8 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.1, 2.5)
Benzie County 6 Urban 102.1 (74.4, 136.8) 43 (2, 77) 9 stable stable trend -15.2 (-47.5, 3.8)
Roscommon County 6 Rural 101.1 (74.3, 134.3) 49 (2, 77) 10 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.8, 1.2)
Osceola County 6 Rural 85.4 (63.7, 112.0) 70 (8, 77) 10 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.1, 1.0)
Oceana County 6 Rural 76.1 (56.9, 99.5) 74 (21, 77) 11 stable stable trend -0.9 (-5.2, 2.8)
Antrim County 6 Rural 105.0 (79.4, 136.1) 37 (2, 76) 11 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.3, 4.1)
Leelanau County 6 Urban 118.2 (89.5, 153.2) 11 (1, 74) 11 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.2, 3.2)
Houghton County 6 Rural 66.7 (50.2, 86.5) 76 (54, 77) 12 falling falling trend -2.8 (-9.0, -1.0)
Menominee County 6 Rural 99.7 (75.7, 129.0) 53 (2, 77) 12 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.2, 4.5)
Kalkaska County 6 Urban 123.2 (94.1, 158.3) 7 (1, 72) 12 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.4, 2.7)
Ogemaw County 6 Rural 123.9 (94.6, 159.3) 9 (1, 73) 12 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.8, 5.2)
Charlevoix County 6 Rural 96.5 (73.9, 123.7) 59 (4, 77) 12 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.4, 2.8)
Dickinson County 6 Rural 91.9 (70.4, 117.9) 66 (6, 77) 12 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.5, 4.0)
Iosco County 6 Rural 114.8 (88.6, 146.2) 17 (1, 74) 13 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.9, 5.4)
Cheboygan County 6 Rural 110.4 (85.7, 140.1) 25 (1, 75) 14 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.3, 3.3)
Manistee County 6 Rural 110.0 (85.4, 139.5) 19 (1, 74) 14 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.7, 1.4)
Mason County 6 Rural 101.6 (79.7, 127.6) 46 (3, 76) 15 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.3, 2.8)
Gladwin County 6 Rural 125.4 (98.5, 157.4) 6 (1, 71) 15 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.3, 4.0)
Alpena County 6 Rural 102.5 (80.8, 128.2) 40 (2, 75) 15 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.7, 1.6)
Huron County 6 Rural 101.9 (80.4, 127.2) 44 (3, 76) 16 stable stable trend -13.6 (-28.4, 1.4)
Otsego County 6 Rural 122.9 (97.6, 152.7) 8 (1, 70) 16 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.8, 3.2)
Clare County 6 Rural 111.1 (88.7, 137.3) 20 (1, 73) 17 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.5, 3.7)
Delta County 6 Rural 95.0 (76.3, 116.9) 60 (7, 76) 18 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.7, 1.5)
Chippewa County 6 Rural 86.6 (69.8, 106.2) 69 (15, 77) 19 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.7, 2.3)
Wexford County 6 Rural 109.0 (88.7, 132.5) 26 (2, 72) 20 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.1, 3.2)
Branch County 6 Rural 84.1 (69.0, 101.6) 71 (26, 77) 22 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.4, 2.9)
Hillsdale County 6 Rural 90.2 (74.3, 108.6) 68 (14, 77) 23 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.2, 1.8)
Emmet County 6 Rural 126.5 (104.4, 151.8) 4 (1, 63) 23 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.3, 2.8)
Mecosta County 6 Rural 119.3 (98.7, 142.9) 14 (1, 68) 24 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.7, 3.9)
Gratiot County 6 Rural 97.2 (80.6, 116.1) 55 (8, 75) 24 stable stable trend -17.0 (-31.2, 1.2)
Sanilac County 6 Rural 120.4 (100.2, 143.3) 12 (1, 67) 25 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.3, 4.7)
Cass County 6 Urban 98.1 (82.2, 116.1) 56 (9, 75) 27 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.6, 2.2)
Marquette County 6 Rural 81.1 (68.1, 95.7) 73 (36, 77) 28 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.2, 0.5)
Newaygo County 6 Rural 119.0 (101.1, 139.2) 13 (2, 61) 31 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.1, 3.4)
Tuscola County 6 Rural 107.7 (91.5, 125.9) 31 (4, 70) 32 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.6, 2.2)
Isabella County 6 Rural 99.8 (84.6, 116.9) 52 (8, 74) 33 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.7, 1.3)
St. Joseph County 6 Rural 101.6 (86.9, 118.0) 47 (8, 73) 34 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.9, 2.3)
Barry County 6 Urban 106.9 (92.0, 123.4) 34 (5, 70) 37 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.8, 2.3)
Ionia County 6 Urban 93.3 (80.7, 107.3) 64 (18, 75) 40 falling falling trend -11.3 (-21.1, -0.9)
Montcalm County 6 Urban 97.3 (84.2, 111.9) 57 (11, 74) 40 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.0, 2.0)
Shiawassee County 6 Rural 110.7 (96.2, 126.6) 23 (4, 66) 43 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.4, 1.7)
Van Buren County 6 Rural 103.1 (89.8, 117.8) 41 (9, 71) 43 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.3, 1.6)
Lenawee County 6 Rural 83.5 (73.2, 94.8) 72 (45, 77) 48 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.6)
Clinton County 6 Urban 106.5 (93.6, 120.6) 33 (6, 68) 50 stable stable trend -2.2 (-16.8, 0.4)
Lapeer County 6 Urban 101.7 (89.5, 115.1) 45 (9, 71) 51 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.1)
Grand Traverse County 6 Urban 105.7 (93.8, 118.7) 32 (7, 66) 57 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.1)
Midland County 6 Urban 122.0 (108.4, 136.8) 10 (2, 47) 59 falling falling trend -2.6 (-6.5, -0.3)
Allegan County 6 Rural 90.3 (80.4, 101.0) 67 (28, 75) 61 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.0, 1.4)
Bay County 6 Urban 110.7 (98.9, 123.5) 21 (5, 62) 65 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.6, 1.9)
Eaton County 6 Urban 107.3 (96.0, 119.5) 29 (6, 64) 66 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.5, 1.3)
Calhoun County 6 Urban 97.6 (87.9, 108.0) 54 (19, 71) 75 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.6)
Muskegon County 6 Urban 74.5 (67.1, 82.4) 75 (65, 77) 76 falling falling trend -16.1 (-32.9, -0.2)
Monroe County 6 Urban 94.2 (85.3, 103.8) 63 (28, 72) 83 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.9, 1.9)
Berrien County 6 Urban 105.3 (95.7, 115.5) 36 (10, 65) 90 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.8)
Jackson County 6 Urban 108.0 (98.7, 118.0) 28 (9, 58) 100 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.5)
St. Clair County 6 Urban 116.0 (106.2, 126.4) 15 (4, 47) 105 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.4, 0.8)
Saginaw County 6 Urban 105.4 (96.7, 114.7) 35 (12, 62) 110 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.8)
Livingston County 6 Urban 100.8 (92.6, 109.5) 48 (17, 67) 113 falling falling trend -2.1 (-9.4, -0.7)
Kalamazoo County 6 Urban 100.2 (93.0, 107.7) 51 (21, 66) 149 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 1.0)
Ottawa County 6 Urban 96.4 (89.8, 103.4) 58 (29, 69) 160 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.9, 1.3)
Ingham County 6 Urban 104.4 (97.2, 111.9) 39 (15, 62) 165 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.0, 1.2)
Washtenaw County 6 Urban 100.1 (94.1, 106.4) 50 (24, 63) 216 falling falling trend -1.2 (-5.5, -0.5)
Genesee County 6 Urban 93.0 (87.5, 98.7) 65 (40, 70) 218 falling falling trend -4.7 (-14.6, -1.7)
Kent County 6 Urban 104.0 (99.6, 108.7) 38 (20, 54) 417 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.8)
Macomb County 6 Urban 113.9 (109.9, 118.1) 18 (9, 33) 603 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.5, 0.3)
Oakland County 6 Urban 107.8 (104.5, 111.1) 30 (18, 45) 840 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.7, -0.3)
Wayne County 6 Urban 109.2 (106.4, 112.1) 27 (16, 41) 1,162 falling falling trend -0.6 (-2.2, -0.2)
Alger County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baraga County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Keweenaw County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Luce County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ontonagon County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schoolcraft County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/09/2024 4:53 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Alger, Baraga, Keweenaw, Luce, Ontonagon, Schoolcraft

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top