Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Minnesota by County

Pancreas (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Ruralurban

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Minnesota 6 N/A 14.2 (13.8, 14.6) N/A 1,001 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.0, 3.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 13.5 (13.4, 13.5) N/A 54,094 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.5, 0.6)
Anoka County 6 Urban 15.9 (14.2, 17.8) 12 (5, 41) 64 rising rising trend 3.4 (1.8, 5.4)
Benton County 6 Urban 13.7 (9.3, 19.6) 34 (3, 60) 6 rising rising trend 3.5 (0.6, 7.4)
Blue Earth County 6 Urban 13.7 (10.1, 18.3) 35 (4, 60) 10 stable stable trend 3.5 (-0.3, 8.8)
Carlton County 6 Urban 14.7 (10.2, 20.7) 24 (2, 60) 7 stable stable trend 2.6 (-2.6, 9.0)
Carver County 6 Urban 13.2 (10.2, 16.8) 47 (7, 59) 14 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.3, 2.6)
Chisago County 6 Urban 12.4 (9.0, 16.8) 56 (8, 60) 9 stable stable trend 1.1 (-3.1, 6.5)
Clay County 6 Urban 14.0 (10.3, 18.6) 31 (3, 60) 10 rising rising trend 4.3 (0.7, 9.4)
Dakota County 6 Urban 14.2 (12.7, 15.8) 29 (10, 50) 71 rising rising trend 2.9 (1.3, 4.9)
Dodge County 6 Urban 14.3 (8.3, 23.0) 28 (1, 60) 4
*
*
Fillmore County 6 Urban 12.6 (7.4, 20.5) 54 (2, 60) 4 stable stable trend 9.7 (-6.6, 35.5)
Hennepin County 6 Urban 13.7 (12.8, 14.6) 36 (20, 49) 196 rising rising trend 2.1 (1.1, 3.2)
Houston County 6 Urban 15.5 (9.5, 24.5) 16 (1, 60) 4
*
*
Isanti County 6 Urban 13.3 (9.1, 18.9) 45 (3, 60) 7
*
*
Le Sueur County 6 Urban 15.6 (10.3, 22.8) 15 (1, 60) 6
*
*
Mille Lacs County 6 Urban 17.6 (12.0, 25.2) 5 (1, 58) 7
*
*
Nicollet County 6 Urban 14.5 (9.8, 20.8) 26 (2, 60) 6
*
*
Olmsted County 6 Urban 15.6 (13.1, 18.3) 14 (4, 50) 30 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.6, 4.8)
Polk County 6 Urban 14.9 (10.2, 21.3) 20 (2, 60) 7 falling falling trend -17.4 (-36.1, -0.3)
Ramsey County 6 Urban 14.8 (13.5, 16.3) 21 (9, 45) 91 rising rising trend 2.6 (1.3, 4.2)
Scott County 6 Urban 14.8 (12.0, 18.1) 22 (4, 55) 20 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.8, 6.2)
Sherburne County 6 Urban 12.7 (9.6, 16.5) 51 (7, 60) 12 rising rising trend 3.8 (0.5, 8.4)
St. Louis County 6 Urban 14.3 (12.3, 16.5) 27 (8, 53) 42 stable stable trend 2.7 (-10.9, 11.9)
Stearns County 6 Urban 13.9 (11.5, 16.7) 32 (8, 57) 25 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.9, 4.8)
Wabasha County 6 Urban 12.1 (7.3, 19.4) 58 (3, 60) 4
*
*
Washington County 6 Urban 13.5 (11.7, 15.5) 42 (14, 56) 43 rising rising trend 2.6 (1.0, 4.8)
Wright County 6 Urban 13.5 (10.9, 16.5) 40 (8, 58) 20 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.3, 5.2)
Aitkin County 6 Rural 10.2 (6.2, 18.0) 59 (10, 60) 4 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.1, 4.1)
Becker County 6 Rural 13.7 (9.5, 19.3) 37 (3, 60) 7 stable stable trend 1.5 (-3.2, 7.4)
Beltrami County 6 Rural 16.4 (11.7, 22.3) 10 (1, 57) 9 stable stable trend 3.5 (-1.6, 10.4)
Brown County 6 Rural 12.4 (7.9, 19.0) 57 (3, 60) 5
*
*
Cass County 6 Rural 14.9 (10.5, 21.1) 19 (2, 60) 8 stable stable trend 2.4 (-1.5, 7.1)
Chippewa County 6 Rural 16.1 (9.1, 27.4) 11 (1, 60) 3
*
*
Crow Wing County 6 Rural 14.6 (11.5, 18.4) 25 (4, 58) 16 rising rising trend 8.4 (3.1, 23.4)
Douglas County 6 Rural 14.8 (10.9, 20.0) 23 (2, 59) 10 stable stable trend 4.0 (-2.0, 13.8)
Freeborn County 6 Rural 9.4 (5.9, 14.6) 60 (16, 60) 5 stable stable trend -16.7 (-47.1, 2.8)
Goodhue County 6 Rural 12.8 (9.1, 17.6) 50 (5, 60) 9 stable stable trend 2.2 (-1.8, 7.6)
Hubbard County 6 Rural 18.2 (12.1, 26.8) 4 (1, 58) 7 rising rising trend 5.4 (1.3, 11.7)
Itasca County 6 Rural 12.6 (9.0, 17.3) 55 (5, 60) 9 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.7, 4.9)
Kanabec County 6 Rural 13.1 (7.3, 22.3) 49 (2, 60) 3
*
*
Kandiyohi County 6 Rural 16.9 (12.5, 22.5) 7 (1, 55) 11
*
*
Koochiching County 6 Rural 22.3 (14.0, 35.1) 2 (1, 56) 5
*
*
Lake County 6 Rural 20.3 (12.0, 33.8) 3 (1, 60) 4
*
*
Lyon County 6 Rural 13.5 (8.3, 20.8) 43 (2, 60) 4 stable stable trend 2.9 (-1.9, 9.1)
Martin County 6 Rural 13.2 (8.5, 20.4) 46 (2, 60) 5 stable stable trend 2.3 (-2.8, 8.8)
McLeod County 6 Rural 14.1 (9.7, 19.9) 30 (3, 60) 7 stable stable trend 2.7 (-2.4, 9.7)
Meeker County 6 Rural 12.7 (7.8, 20.0) 52 (3, 60) 4
*
*
Morrison County 6 Rural 13.5 (9.3, 19.2) 41 (3, 60) 7 rising rising trend 4.0 (1.0, 8.2)
Mower County 6 Rural 13.4 (9.2, 18.9) 44 (3, 60) 7 stable stable trend 2.6 (-0.6, 6.4)
Nobles County 6 Rural 16.6 (10.5, 25.1) 8 (1, 60) 5
*
*
Otter Tail County 6 Rural 13.6 (10.5, 17.4) 39 (5, 59) 15 stable stable trend 3.4 (-1.8, 10.1)
Pine County 6 Rural 16.5 (11.6, 23.2) 9 (1, 58) 8 stable stable trend -12.6 (-39.8, 0.3)
Renville County 6 Rural 13.7 (7.9, 23.1) 33 (2, 60) 3
*
*
Rice County 6 Rural 12.7 (9.4, 16.8) 53 (7, 60) 10 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.6, 4.4)
Sibley County 6 Rural 15.4 (8.6, 26.0) 17 (1, 60) 3
*
*
Steele County 6 Rural 13.2 (9.0, 18.8) 48 (3, 60) 7
*
*
Stevens County 6 Rural 28.7 (16.1, 47.8) 1 (1, 57) 3
*
*
Todd County 6 Rural 13.7 (8.9, 20.5) 38 (2, 60) 6
*
*
Wadena County 6 Rural 15.9 (9.3, 26.3) 13 (1, 60) 4
*
*
Waseca County 6 Rural 15.4 (8.9, 24.9) 18 (1, 60) 4 stable stable trend 1.8 (-4.1, 8.5)
Winona County 6 Rural 17.3 (13.1, 22.7) 6 (1, 55) 11 rising rising trend 3.7 (0.1, 8.7)
Big Stone County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clearwater County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cook County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottonwood County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Faribault County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kittson County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lac qui Parle County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake of the Woods County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mahnomen County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marshall County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Murray County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Norman County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pennington County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pipestone County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pope County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Red Lake County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Redwood County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rock County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roseau County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swift County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Traverse County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Watonwan County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilkin County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yellow Medicine County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 01/20/2025 11:29 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2023 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top