Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report by State

Pancreas (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Ruralurban

State
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 13.5 (13.4, 13.5) N/A 54,094 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.5, 0.6)
District of Columbia 6 15.9 (14.5, 17.3) 1 (1, 19) 107 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.4, 2.7)
Puerto Rico 6 8.2 (7.8, 8.6) N/A 370 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.7, 2.1)
Alabama 6 12.9 (12.5, 13.4) 36 (23, 43) 839 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.8, 1.2)
Alaska 6 13.0 (11.8, 14.3) 32 (2, 50) 95 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.7, 1.6)
Arizona 6 12.4 (12.1, 12.8) 41 (34, 47) 1,152 falling falling trend -3.5 (-6.5, -0.3)
Arkansas 6 12.8 (12.3, 13.3) 38 (22, 46) 494 rising rising trend 1.5 (1.0, 2.1)
California 7 12.4 (12.2, 12.5) 43 (37, 46) 5,537 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.5, 0.8)
Colorado 6 11.8 (11.4, 12.2) 47 (41, 50) 756 rising rising trend 0.6 (0.2, 1.0)
Connecticut 7 14.4 (13.9, 14.9) 5 (1, 23) 685 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.7, 1.1)
Delaware 6 14.2 (13.3, 15.1) 11 (1, 38) 196 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.5, 2.7)
Florida 6 13.5 (13.3, 13.6) 26 (18, 32) 4,327 rising rising trend 1.2 (1.0, 1.5)
Georgia 7 13.7 (13.4, 14.0) 21 (10, 31) 1,614 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.9, 1.6)
Hawaii 7 13.2 (12.5, 14.0) 30 (6, 45) 263 rising rising trend 0.5 (0.2, 0.9)
Idaho 7 13.8 (13.1, 14.5) 18 (2, 38) 298 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.5, 2.1)
Illinois 7 14.3 (14.0, 14.6) 7 (2, 17) 2,255 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.6, 1.0)
Iowa 7 13.8 (13.3, 14.4) 17 (3, 33) 573 rising rising trend 1.3 (1.0, 1.6)
Kansas 6 12.0 (11.5, 12.5) 45 (36, 50) 431 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.7, 1.8)
Kentucky 7 13.9 (13.5, 14.4) 13 (3, 30) 791 rising rising trend 1.6 (1.1, 2.1)
Louisiana 7 14.5 (14.0, 14.9) 4 (1, 20) 813 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.3, 1.2)
Maine 6 13.7 (13.0, 14.5) 20 (3, 39) 287 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.3, 1.5)
Maryland 6 13.5 (13.1, 13.9) 25 (12, 35) 1,023 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.8, 0.6)
Massachusetts 7 13.9 (13.5, 14.2) 15 (5, 29) 1,252 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.3, 1.2)
Michigan 6 14.2 (13.9, 14.5) 10 (3, 21) 1,882 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.4, 1.3)
Minnesota 6 14.2 (13.8, 14.6) 9 (2, 24) 1,001 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.0, 3.2)
Mississippi 6 13.9 (13.3, 14.4) 16 (3, 33) 511 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.0, 0.2)
Missouri 6 13.4 (13.1, 13.8) 27 (12, 36) 1,068 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.4, 1.4)
Montana 6 12.3 (11.5, 13.2) 44 (22, 50) 183 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.3, 2.2)
Nebraska 6 13.1 (12.4, 13.8) 31 (10, 45) 309 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.8, 2.2)
Nevada 6 12.4 (11.9, 13.0) 40 (29, 49) 459 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.3, 1.2)
New Hampshire 6 13.6 (12.9, 14.4) 23 (3, 41) 262 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.2, 1.4)
New Jersey 7 15.0 (14.7, 15.3) 2 (1, 5) 1,763 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.9, 1.4)
New Mexico 7 11.7 (11.1, 12.3) 48 (38, 50) 324 rising rising trend 0.6 (0.1, 1.1)
New York 7 14.3 (14.1, 14.5) 8 (3, 15) 3,689 rising rising trend 0.4 (0.1, 0.6)
North Carolina 6 13.9 (13.6, 14.2) 14 (6, 26) 1,798 rising rising trend 1.6 (1.2, 2.0)
North Dakota 6 11.5 (10.5, 12.6) 50 (32, 50) 107 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.2, 1.3)
Ohio 6 14.0 (13.7, 14.3) 12 (5, 24) 2,168 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.2, 1.6)
Oklahoma 6 12.4 (12.0, 12.9) 42 (31, 48) 592 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.2, 1.3)
Oregon 6 12.9 (12.5, 13.4) 34 (21, 44) 717 stable stable trend -3.2 (-7.8, 0.6)
Pennsylvania 6 14.5 (14.3, 14.8) 3 (2, 12) 2,618 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.7)
Rhode Island 6 13.3 (12.5, 14.2) 29 (3, 46) 193 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.2, 2.2)
South Carolina 6 13.7 (13.3, 14.1) 22 (8, 34) 923 stable stable trend -2.6 (-6.2, 0.7)
South Dakota 6 12.9 (11.9, 13.9) 37 (5, 50) 144 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.2, 3.2)
Tennessee 6 12.9 (12.6, 13.3) 35 (25, 42) 1,110 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.4, 1.3)
Texas 7 13.4 (13.2, 13.5) 28 (20, 34) 3,890 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.2, 2.5)
Utah 7 11.8 (11.2, 12.4) 46 (37, 50) 335 rising rising trend 1.4 (1.0, 1.9)
Vermont 6 12.7 (11.7, 13.8) 39 (6, 50) 118 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.4, 2.0)
Virginia 6 13.0 (12.6, 13.3) 33 (25, 41) 1,353 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.2, 1.2)
Washington 5 13.8 (13.4, 14.1) 19 (7, 30) 1,247 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.8, 1.3)
West Virginia 6 13.6 (13.0, 14.3) 24 (3, 40) 355 rising rising trend 2.0 (1.4, 2.6)
Wisconsin 6 14.3 (14.0, 14.7) 6 (2, 20) 1,113 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.9, 1.9)
Wyoming 6 11.6 (10.5, 12.8) 49 (25, 50) 85 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.1, 2.3)
Indiana 6
data not available
N/A
data not available
data not available
data not available
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/07/2024 6:11 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Data not available for this combination of data selections.
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
5 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2023 submission).
7 Source: SEER November 2023 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
CI*Rank data for Puerto Rico is not available.

Return to Top