Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Mississippi by County

Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Mississippi 6 16.3 (15.7, 16.9) N/A 571 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.1, 1.9)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 18.6 (18.5, 18.7) N/A 70,394 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -0.9)
Winston County 6 13.3 (7.8, 21.8) 47 (3, 55) 4 stable stable trend -2.4 (-7.0, 2.1)
Wayne County 6 18.7 (11.7, 28.5) 18 (1, 55) 5
*
*
Washington County 6 16.6 (11.8, 22.7) 24 (2, 54) 9 stable stable trend 4.3 (-1.7, 11.7)
Warren County 6 11.2 (7.4, 16.4) 52 (20, 55) 6 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.8, 2.1)
Walthall County 6 21.1 (12.7, 33.3) 7 (1, 55) 4 stable stable trend -1.6 (-9.9, 6.8)
Union County 6 18.7 (12.6, 26.8) 17 (1, 53) 6 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.9, 4.6)
Tishomingo County 6 15.5 (9.4, 24.4) 37 (1, 55) 4
*
*
Tippah County 6 22.6 (15.1, 32.7) 1 (1, 49) 6 stable stable trend -1.0 (-5.0, 3.3)
Tate County 6 11.0 (6.5, 17.7) 54 (14, 55) 4 stable stable trend 0.0 (-8.0, 9.3)
Sunflower County 6 16.1 (10.1, 24.5) 30 (1, 55) 5 rising rising trend 4.4 (0.9, 8.7)
Smith County 6 16.1 (9.0, 27.0) 29 (1, 55) 3
*
*
Simpson County 6 16.2 (10.5, 24.0) 26 (1, 55) 5 stable stable trend 21.9 (-4.6, 54.8)
Scott County 6 15.3 (9.7, 22.9) 38 (2, 55) 5 stable stable trend -0.8 (-5.6, 4.5)
Rankin County 6 18.8 (16.1, 21.9) 16 (3, 37) 34 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.3, 3.5)
Prentiss County 6 18.2 (12.0, 26.5) 19 (1, 54) 6 stable stable trend -1.6 (-7.6, 5.0)
Pontotoc County 6 15.2 (10.0, 22.3) 39 (2, 55) 5 falling falling trend -4.1 (-7.9, -0.2)
Pike County 6 20.0 (14.6, 26.7) 11 (1, 49) 10 stable stable trend 0.8 (-3.5, 5.6)
Perry County 6 21.7 (12.1, 36.1) 3 (1, 55) 3 stable stable trend 1.2 (-6.8, 11.3)
Pearl River County 6 18.9 (14.5, 24.2) 15 (1, 46) 14 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.6, 0.9)
Panola County 6 12.8 (8.3, 19.0) 50 (8, 55) 5 stable stable trend -4.0 (-8.7, 0.5)
Oktibbeha County 6 17.5 (12.0, 24.6) 20 (1, 54) 7 stable stable trend -1.9 (-9.0, 6.0)
Newton County 6 13.3 (7.7, 21.7) 46 (3, 55) 3 stable stable trend -1.8 (-8.5, 5.4)
Neshoba County 6 10.5 (6.2, 16.8) 55 (18, 55) 4 stable stable trend -3.0 (-9.9, 3.4)
Montgomery County 6 19.4 (11.0, 33.1) 13 (1, 55) 3
*
*
Monroe County 6 19.1 (14.1, 25.7) 14 (1, 50) 10 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.9, 4.4)
Marshall County 6 12.8 (8.6, 18.6) 49 (10, 55) 6 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.9, 6.4)
Marion County 6 21.2 (14.0, 30.8) 6 (1, 52) 6 stable stable trend 0.4 (-5.1, 6.3)
Madison County 6 19.9 (16.3, 24.2) 12 (1, 37) 22 stable stable trend -4.8 (-15.4, 0.8)
Lowndes County 6 14.8 (10.9, 19.7) 41 (8, 54) 10 stable stable trend -2.0 (-6.5, 2.8)
Lincoln County 6 20.0 (14.2, 27.4) 10 (1, 50) 8 stable stable trend -0.8 (-6.2, 4.9)
Leflore County 6 16.8 (10.5, 25.3) 23 (1, 55) 5 stable stable trend 4.7 (-0.9, 11.9)
Lee County 6 21.5 (17.6, 26.1) 5 (1, 32) 21 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.8, 3.9)
Leake County 6 16.2 (9.9, 25.0) 28 (1, 55) 4
*
*
Lauderdale County 6 13.1 (9.9, 17.0) 48 (17, 55) 12 stable stable trend 11.6 (-1.0, 22.8)
Lamar County 6 17.3 (13.0, 22.5) 21 (2, 52) 11 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.6, 2.7)
Lafayette County 6 13.5 (9.3, 18.9) 45 (8, 55) 7 stable stable trend -2.9 (-6.8, 1.2)
Jones County 6 13.8 (10.4, 18.0) 44 (13, 55) 12 stable stable trend -3.2 (-7.0, 0.7)
Jasper County 6 17.3 (10.0, 28.1) 22 (1, 55) 4 rising rising trend 12.9 (3.2, 46.1)
Jackson County 6 16.5 (13.8, 19.5) 25 (8, 47) 28 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.1, 1.9)
Itawamba County 6 20.7 (14.0, 29.7) 8 (1, 52) 6 stable stable trend -0.5 (-6.0, 5.3)
Hinds County 6 15.6 (13.5, 18.0) 34 (14, 48) 40 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.6, -0.1)
Harrison County 6 21.6 (18.9, 24.6) 4 (1, 23) 50 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.6, 3.5)
Hancock County 6 16.1 (11.8, 21.5) 31 (3, 53) 10 stable stable trend -20.4 (-45.6, 7.9)
Grenada County 6 16.2 (9.7, 25.4) 27 (1, 55) 4 stable stable trend 1.2 (-5.2, 8.3)
George County 6 12.4 (7.0, 20.3) 51 (6, 55) 3
*
*
Forrest County 6 15.9 (12.1, 20.5) 32 (5, 53) 12 falling falling trend -6.6 (-18.8, -3.3)
DeSoto County 6 14.1 (11.7, 16.8) 43 (19, 53) 26 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.4, 2.4)
Covington County 6 14.9 (8.6, 24.3) 40 (1, 55) 3
*
*
Copiah County 6 15.7 (9.9, 23.5) 33 (1, 55) 5 stable stable trend 2.6 (-3.4, 9.8)
Coahoma County 6 15.5 (9.2, 24.6) 35 (1, 55) 4
*
*
Chickasaw County 6 15.5 (9.1, 25.0) 36 (1, 55) 4 stable stable trend 2.5 (-4.1, 10.3)
Bolivar County 6 11.1 (6.6, 17.6) 53 (13, 55) 4 stable stable trend 3.7 (-3.5, 13.3)
Attala County 6 20.4 (13.2, 30.5) 9 (1, 54) 5 rising rising trend 4.3 (0.2, 9.6)
Alcorn County 6 14.1 (9.8, 20.0) 42 (5, 55) 7 stable stable trend -3.7 (-26.0, 7.5)
Adams County 6 21.9 (15.7, 30.0) 2 (1, 46) 9 stable stable trend 0.3 (-4.7, 5.6)
Amite County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Benton County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carroll County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Choctaw County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Claiborne County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clarke County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Holmes County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Humphreys County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Issaquena County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson Davis County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kemper County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lawrence County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Noxubee County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Quitman County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sharkey County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stone County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tallahatchie County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tunica County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Webster County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilkinson County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yalobusha County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yazoo County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/28/2024 2:17 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Amite, Benton, Calhoun, Carroll, Choctaw, Claiborne, Clarke, Clay, Franklin, Greene, Holmes, Humphreys, Issaquena, Jefferson, Jefferson Davis, Kemper, Lawrence, Noxubee, Quitman, Sharkey, Stone, Tallahatchie, Tunica, Webster, Wilkinson, Yalobusha, Yazoo

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top