Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Missouri by County

Melanoma of the Skin (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Missouri 6 N/A 19.3 (18.8, 19.7) N/A 1,402 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.3, 1.3)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 22.7 (22.6, 22.8) N/A 86,630 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.5, 1.5)
St. Louis County 6 Urban 22.4 (21.2, 23.7) 19 (13, 35) 280 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.9, 1.1)
Jackson County 6 Urban 15.4 (14.1, 16.7) 66 (46, 70) 121 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.2, 1.1)
St. Charles County 6 Urban 24.7 (22.7, 26.9) 14 (5, 29) 117 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.9, 1.9)
Greene County 6 Urban 17.9 (15.9, 20.2) 49 (26, 65) 58 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.2, 2.4)
Jefferson County 6 Urban 18.6 (16.3, 21.2) 44 (20, 63) 50 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.3, 0.0)
Clay County 6 Urban 17.7 (15.5, 20.2) 51 (25, 66) 48 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.6, 2.4)
Boone County 6 Urban 27.8 (24.2, 31.6) 6 (1, 25) 48 rising rising trend 3.9 (1.7, 6.6)
Franklin County 6 Urban 28.3 (24.2, 33.0) 5 (1, 29) 37 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.1, 3.8)
St. Louis City 6 Urban 10.8 (9.2, 12.5) 76 (65, 76) 36 stable stable trend 1.7 (0.0, 3.4)
Jasper County 6 Urban 21.1 (17.7, 25.0) 24 (9, 58) 29 rising rising trend 5.6 (0.6, 24.0)
Cass County 6 Urban 17.4 (14.2, 21.2) 52 (19, 72) 22 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.1, 3.8)
Camden County 6 Rural 26.2 (21.1, 32.6) 11 (1, 45) 22 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.6, 6.3)
Cape Girardeau County 6 Urban 21.6 (17.4, 26.5) 23 (5, 62) 20 rising rising trend 4.7 (2.0, 8.1)
Christian County 6 Urban 20.3 (16.4, 24.8) 30 (9, 65) 20 stable stable trend -3.2 (-21.5, 1.6)
Platte County 6 Urban 15.6 (12.5, 19.2) 62 (28, 74) 19 stable stable trend -7.8 (-17.8, 0.8)
Cole County 6 Urban 20.6 (16.5, 25.5) 26 (7, 65) 18 rising rising trend 3.5 (0.1, 7.5)
St. Francois County 6 Rural 21.8 (17.2, 27.2) 22 (5, 64) 16 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.5, 3.0)
Lincoln County 6 Urban 23.2 (18.0, 29.3) 16 (2, 62) 15 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.3, 4.9)
Buchanan County 6 Urban 14.6 (11.3, 18.6) 68 (30, 76) 14 stable stable trend 1.4 (-2.4, 5.6)
Newton County 6 Urban 18.2 (14.0, 23.3) 46 (12, 73) 14 stable stable trend 8.8 (-0.5, 31.3)
Phelps County 6 Rural 22.0 (16.4, 28.9) 21 (2, 70) 11 stable stable trend 4.7 (-0.3, 11.2)
Taney County 6 Rural 15.6 (11.5, 20.6) 63 (19, 76) 11 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.2, 3.6)
Callaway County 6 Urban 19.6 (14.5, 26.0) 40 (5, 73) 10 stable stable trend 3.7 (-0.2, 8.7)
Howell County 6 Rural 20.0 (14.7, 26.6) 33 (4, 72) 10 rising rising trend 3.4 (0.2, 7.5)
Johnson County 6 Rural 20.5 (15.1, 27.1) 29 (4, 72) 10 stable stable trend -2.7 (-16.4, 2.0)
Barry County 6 Rural 20.6 (14.9, 27.9) 28 (3, 73) 10 stable stable trend 1.0 (-4.1, 6.6)
Pulaski County 6 Rural 23.1 (16.8, 30.9) 17 (2, 68) 9 rising rising trend 5.4 (1.7, 10.6)
Marion County 6 Rural 28.5 (20.5, 38.6) 4 (1, 57) 9 stable stable trend 2.8 (-0.9, 7.0)
Scott County 6 Rural 19.9 (14.3, 26.9) 35 (5, 73) 9 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.9, 5.0)
Benton County 6 Rural 27.4 (18.4, 39.7) 7 (1, 68) 9 rising rising trend 5.4 (0.7, 11.8)
Lafayette County 6 Urban 19.7 (14.0, 27.1) 39 (5, 74) 8 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.6, 5.0)
Pettis County 6 Rural 16.4 (11.7, 22.4) 59 (12, 76) 8 stable stable trend 3.0 (-2.4, 9.2)
Lawrence County 6 Rural 17.8 (12.6, 24.6) 50 (8, 75) 8 stable stable trend 1.7 (-2.3, 6.1)
Butler County 6 Rural 14.6 (10.2, 20.3) 69 (20, 76) 8 rising rising trend 4.9 (2.3, 7.9)
Warren County 6 Urban 18.1 (12.7, 25.1) 47 (7, 75) 8 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.9, 5.1)
Stone County 6 Rural 17.4 (11.3, 25.7) 54 (5, 76) 7 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.8, 4.1)
Polk County 6 Urban 19.8 (13.6, 28.0) 37 (3, 74) 7 stable stable trend 3.8 (-1.0, 9.9)
Miller County 6 Rural 19.7 (13.2, 28.4) 38 (3, 75) 7
*
*
Stoddard County 6 Rural 17.1 (11.6, 24.5) 56 (7, 76) 7 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.7, 4.6)
Webster County 6 Urban 15.5 (10.6, 22.0) 64 (15, 76) 7 falling falling trend -5.3 (-14.9, -0.9)
Andrew County 6 Urban 27.0 (18.2, 39.1) 9 (1, 69) 6 rising rising trend 6.5 (2.5, 13.0)
Cedar County 6 Rural 26.8 (17.0, 40.5) 10 (1, 72) 6
*
*
Crawford County 6 Rural 18.3 (11.9, 27.3) 45 (4, 76) 6 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.7, 5.2)
Dunklin County 6 Rural 16.4 (10.7, 24.3) 57 (7, 76) 6
*
*
Henry County 6 Rural 19.4 (12.5, 29.0) 41 (2, 76) 6 stable stable trend 2.3 (-2.6, 8.0)
Laclede County 6 Rural 12.9 (8.4, 19.1) 73 (24, 76) 6
*
*
Morgan County 6 Rural 19.9 (12.5, 30.1) 36 (2, 76) 6 stable stable trend 0.0 (-4.2, 4.2)
Randolph County 6 Rural 19.4 (12.8, 28.4) 42 (3, 76) 6
*
*
Audrain County 6 Rural 17.2 (10.8, 26.0) 55 (6, 76) 5 stable stable trend -2.3 (-8.3, 3.1)
Cooper County 6 Urban 24.2 (15.0, 37.0) 15 (1, 75) 5 stable stable trend 5.2 (-1.1, 13.4)
Gasconade County 6 Rural 22.5 (13.7, 35.3) 18 (1, 76) 5 stable stable trend 0.5 (-4.6, 5.8)
Livingston County 6 Rural 24.9 (15.4, 38.3) 12 (1, 75) 5
*
*
Ray County 6 Urban 15.4 (9.5, 23.8) 65 (9, 76) 5 stable stable trend 2.1 (-3.1, 8.1)
Madison County 6 Rural 27.2 (16.3, 42.9) 8 (1, 73) 4
*
*
McDonald County 6 Rural 14.7 (9.0, 23.0) 67 (11, 76) 4
*
*
Nodaway County 6 Rural 16.4 (9.9, 25.9) 58 (4, 76) 4 stable stable trend -0.4 (-16.5, 4.7)
Washington County 6 Rural 13.2 (8.0, 20.8) 71 (17, 76) 4
*
*
Wayne County 6 Rural 30.8 (17.9, 49.4) 3 (1, 74) 4 stable stable trend 3.4 (-4.0, 10.6)
Wright County 6 Rural 17.4 (10.5, 27.5) 53 (4, 76) 4
*
*
Dallas County 6 Urban 19.4 (11.4, 30.8) 43 (2, 76) 4 stable stable trend 0.9 (-4.0, 5.9)
Moniteau County 6 Urban 20.6 (12.5, 32.4) 27 (1, 76) 4
*
*
Osage County 6 Urban 24.7 (14.8, 39.1) 13 (1, 76) 4
*
*
Perry County 6 Rural 18.0 (10.7, 28.5) 48 (3, 76) 4
*
*
Saline County 6 Rural 13.8 (8.2, 21.9) 70 (14, 76) 4 stable stable trend -0.6 (-6.7, 6.2)
Texas County 6 Rural 12.2 (7.2, 19.7) 74 (22, 76) 4
*
*
Dent County 6 Rural 20.0 (11.4, 32.8) 34 (1, 76) 4
*
*
Iron County 6 Rural 34.0 (19.5, 55.3) 1 (1, 74) 4
*
*
Vernon County 6 Rural 15.9 (9.3, 25.6) 61 (6, 76) 4
*
*
Lewis County 6 Rural 30.8 (17.4, 50.6) 2 (1, 74) 4
*
*
Adair County 6 Rural 13.0 (7.4, 21.4) 72 (14, 76) 3 stable stable trend -1.6 (-7.6, 4.6)
Macon County 6 Rural 20.1 (11.1, 33.4) 31 (1, 76) 3
*
*
Pike County 6 Rural 15.9 (9.1, 26.1) 60 (5, 76) 3 stable stable trend 1.4 (-3.2, 6.7)
Barton County 6 Rural 21.0 (11.3, 35.9) 25 (1, 76) 3
*
*
Bollinger County 6 Urban 20.0 (11.2, 34.0) 32 (1, 76) 3
*
*
Clinton County 6 Urban 11.9 (6.6, 20.1) 75 (18, 76) 3
*
*
Ozark County 6 Rural 22.1 (11.1, 40.7) 20 (1, 76) 3
*
*
Atchison County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bates County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Caldwell County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carroll County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carter County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chariton County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clark County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dade County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Daviess County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
DeKalb County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Douglas County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gentry County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grundy County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harrison County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hickory County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Holt County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Howard County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knox County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Linn County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Maries County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mercer County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mississippi County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montgomery County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
New Madrid County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oregon County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pemiscot County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Putnam County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ralls County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reynolds County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ripley County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schuyler County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scotland County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shannon County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shelby County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
St. Clair County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ste. Genevieve County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sullivan County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Worth County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/04/2024 4:59 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Atchison, Bates, Caldwell, Carroll, Carter, Chariton, Clark, Dade, Daviess, DeKalb, Douglas, Gentry, Grundy, Harrison, Hickory, Holt, Howard, Knox, Linn, Maries, Mercer, Mississippi, Monroe, Montgomery, New Madrid, Oregon, Pemiscot, Putnam, Ralls, Reynolds, Ripley, Schuyler, Scotland, Shannon, Shelby, St. Clair, Ste. Genevieve, Sullivan, Worth

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top