Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Missouri by County

Bladder (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Missouri 6 N/A 18.5 (18.0, 18.9) N/A 1,466 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 18.8 (18.7, 18.9) N/A 75,136 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.8, -1.7)
Adair County 6 Rural 10.6 (6.1, 17.7) 84 (40, 84) 3 stable stable trend -3.3 (-8.5, 1.8)
Andrew County 6 Urban 16.9 (10.3, 26.6) 64 (3, 84) 4
*
*
Audrain County 6 Rural 21.7 (15.2, 30.2) 26 (1, 81) 8 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.4, 3.8)
Barry County 6 Rural 21.0 (15.8, 27.7) 33 (3, 79) 11 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.7, 6.4)
Benton County 6 Rural 21.1 (15.2, 29.7) 31 (2, 81) 9 stable stable trend -1.9 (-6.1, 2.7)
Bollinger County 6 Urban 26.6 (16.6, 41.7) 3 (1, 82) 4
*
*
Boone County 6 Urban 19.8 (16.9, 23.1) 40 (11, 71) 35 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.5, 3.2)
Buchanan County 6 Urban 23.5 (19.5, 28.2) 14 (2, 59) 25 stable stable trend 5.4 (-2.0, 18.7)
Butler County 6 Rural 19.3 (14.6, 25.2) 43 (5, 81) 12 stable stable trend -0.7 (-5.0, 3.9)
Callaway County 6 Urban 19.3 (14.5, 25.3) 44 (4, 82) 11 falling falling trend -14.9 (-36.0, -0.9)
Camden County 6 Rural 23.1 (18.6, 28.7) 18 (2, 67) 21 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.8, 3.3)
Cape Girardeau County 6 Urban 25.2 (20.9, 30.1) 6 (1, 54) 26 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.7, 5.9)
Cass County 6 Urban 15.9 (13.0, 19.2) 73 (34, 82) 22 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.7, -0.2)
Cedar County 6 Rural 15.3 (9.3, 24.9) 77 (6, 84) 4 stable stable trend -2.2 (-7.0, 2.3)
Chariton County 6 Rural 26.0 (15.1, 44.0) 5 (1, 84) 3
*
*
Christian County 6 Urban 20.1 (16.4, 24.4) 36 (7, 75) 21 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.6, 1.9)
Clay County 6 Urban 20.9 (18.6, 23.5) 35 (10, 61) 59 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.4)
Clinton County 6 Urban 22.2 (15.0, 32.0) 22 (1, 83) 6
*
*
Cole County 6 Urban 19.0 (15.2, 23.4) 47 (9, 79) 18 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.3, 1.4)
Cooper County 6 Urban 14.6 (8.4, 24.0) 78 (6, 84) 3
*
*
Crawford County 6 Rural 17.4 (11.5, 25.5) 60 (4, 84) 6 falling falling trend -5.3 (-21.0, -1.8)
Dallas County 6 Urban 18.9 (11.7, 29.3) 48 (1, 84) 5 falling falling trend -30.0 (-52.1, -3.6)
Dent County 6 Rural 16.3 (9.8, 26.5) 70 (4, 84) 4
*
*
Dunklin County 6 Rural 12.8 (8.3, 19.0) 82 (28, 84) 5 stable stable trend -2.4 (-7.3, 2.1)
Franklin County 6 Urban 19.5 (16.3, 23.1) 42 (10, 75) 28 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.1, 1.4)
Gasconade County 6 Rural 17.9 (11.4, 27.8) 58 (3, 84) 5 stable stable trend -3.2 (-7.8, 1.2)
Greene County 6 Urban 18.5 (16.5, 20.6) 56 (25, 71) 68 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.8, 1.3)
Harrison County 6 Rural 26.1 (15.0, 43.8) 4 (1, 83) 3
*
*
Henry County 6 Rural 18.8 (12.8, 27.2) 49 (3, 84) 7 stable stable trend -1.6 (-9.1, 5.3)
Howell County 6 Rural 16.2 (11.9, 21.8) 72 (14, 84) 10 stable stable trend -1.1 (-5.6, 3.5)
Iron County 6 Rural 29.5 (18.0, 46.8) 2 (1, 82) 4
*
*
Jackson County 6 Urban 15.8 (14.6, 17.1) 75 (50, 78) 134 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.4)
Jasper County 6 Urban 21.5 (18.3, 25.2) 27 (5, 64) 32 stable stable trend 3.1 (-0.6, 13.8)
Jefferson County 6 Urban 21.1 (18.6, 23.8) 32 (10, 60) 56 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.6, 2.6)
Johnson County 6 Rural 17.4 (12.5, 23.4) 61 (7, 84) 9 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.7, 2.4)
Laclede County 6 Rural 14.0 (9.7, 19.7) 79 (22, 84) 7 stable stable trend -3.9 (-8.1, 0.0)
Lafayette County 6 Urban 18.2 (13.0, 25.0) 57 (5, 83) 8 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.0, 2.5)
Lawrence County 6 Rural 22.0 (16.6, 28.7) 25 (2, 78) 11 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.4, 4.4)
Lincoln County 6 Urban 16.5 (12.3, 21.7) 68 (15, 84) 11 falling falling trend -4.0 (-7.3, -0.8)
Linn County 6 Rural 23.9 (14.3, 38.3) 13 (1, 84) 4 stable stable trend 2.8 (-2.0, 8.3)
Livingston County 6 Rural 16.6 (9.9, 26.8) 66 (3, 84) 4
*
*
Macon County 6 Rural 16.5 (10.1, 26.2) 67 (4, 84) 4
*
*
Madison County 6 Rural 21.5 (13.0, 34.3) 28 (1, 84) 4 stable stable trend -0.6 (-5.4, 4.4)
Marion County 6 Rural 25.0 (18.3, 33.5) 7 (1, 75) 10 falling falling trend -27.5 (-51.3, -0.8)
McDonald County 6 Rural 20.0 (13.4, 29.1) 37 (2, 84) 6
*
*
Miller County 6 Rural 21.2 (14.9, 29.6) 29 (2, 81) 8 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.2, 2.9)
Mississippi County 6 Rural 24.8 (15.5, 38.4) 9 (1, 83) 4 stable stable trend 1.3 (-3.7, 7.2)
Moniteau County 6 Urban 24.7 (15.6, 37.4) 10 (1, 83) 5
*
*
Monroe County 6 Rural 31.2 (19.3, 49.1) 1 (1, 81) 5
*
*
Montgomery County 6 Rural 20.0 (11.7, 32.9) 38 (1, 84) 4 stable stable trend -2.0 (-7.2, 2.8)
Morgan County 6 Rural 16.2 (11.0, 23.8) 71 (8, 84) 6 stable stable trend -0.4 (-5.2, 4.7)
New Madrid County 6 Rural 23.3 (15.5, 34.2) 16 (1, 83) 6 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.6, 3.7)
Newton County 6 Urban 16.8 (13.0, 21.4) 65 (15, 83) 14 stable stable trend 2.5 (0.0, 5.5)
Nodaway County 6 Rural 22.1 (14.4, 32.8) 23 (1, 83) 6
*
*
Osage County 6 Urban 22.5 (13.5, 35.6) 20 (1, 84) 4
*
*
Ozark County 6 Rural 18.6 (10.5, 33.3) 54 (1, 84) 3
*
*
Pemiscot County 6 Rural 16.4 (9.6, 26.6) 69 (4, 84) 4
*
*
Perry County 6 Rural 19.3 (12.3, 29.0) 45 (2, 84) 5 falling falling trend -34.3 (-52.0, -14.2)
Pettis County 6 Rural 23.3 (17.8, 30.0) 17 (1, 75) 13 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.5, 4.4)
Phelps County 6 Rural 19.1 (14.2, 25.3) 46 (6, 82) 10 stable stable trend 2.2 (-1.8, 13.8)
Pike County 6 Rural 18.6 (11.6, 28.7) 53 (2, 84) 4
*
*
Platte County 6 Urban 15.7 (12.7, 19.3) 76 (32, 83) 19 falling falling trend -2.7 (-5.0, -0.4)
Polk County 6 Urban 18.5 (13.0, 25.7) 55 (5, 84) 8 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.5, 4.6)
Pulaski County 6 Rural 18.6 (13.0, 25.8) 52 (4, 84) 7 stable stable trend -25.8 (-47.1, 0.8)
Randolph County 6 Rural 17.1 (11.3, 25.1) 62 (4, 84) 6 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.8, 1.8)
Ray County 6 Urban 15.8 (10.4, 23.4) 74 (8, 84) 6 stable stable trend -2.3 (-8.1, 3.3)
Saline County 6 Rural 24.5 (17.4, 33.9) 11 (1, 79) 8 rising rising trend 10.8 (2.5, 31.9)
Scott County 6 Rural 24.2 (18.5, 31.1) 12 (1, 70) 13 stable stable trend 2.0 (-10.5, 15.8)
St. Charles County 6 Urban 18.7 (17.0, 20.6) 50 (24, 67) 91 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -0.6)
St. Clair County 6 Rural 24.9 (14.8, 41.1) 8 (1, 84) 4 stable stable trend 1.3 (-4.2, 7.7)
St. Francois County 6 Rural 22.0 (17.6, 27.1) 24 (3, 71) 18 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.8, 2.6)
St. Louis City 6 Urban 13.8 (12.1, 15.8) 80 (58, 83) 47 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.0)
St. Louis County 6 Urban 17.0 (16.0, 18.0) 63 (45, 72) 234 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.8)
Ste. Genevieve County 6 Rural 22.4 (15.1, 32.5) 21 (1, 82) 6 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.3, 2.3)
Stoddard County 6 Rural 22.8 (16.8, 30.5) 19 (1, 78) 10 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.8, 6.3)
Stone County 6 Rural 21.2 (16.4, 27.7) 30 (3, 78) 14 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.6, 1.6)
Taney County 6 Rural 20.9 (16.7, 26.0) 34 (4, 76) 18 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.2, 2.0)
Texas County 6 Rural 13.8 (9.0, 20.5) 81 (22, 84) 5 stable stable trend -0.1 (-4.3, 4.4)
Vernon County 6 Rural 11.9 (6.8, 19.8) 83 (24, 84) 3
*
*
Warren County 6 Urban 19.8 (14.4, 26.7) 41 (2, 82) 9 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.5, 2.0)
Washington County 6 Rural 20.0 (13.5, 28.7) 39 (2, 84) 6 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.0, 4.3)
Wayne County 6 Rural 17.7 (10.4, 29.7) 59 (2, 84) 4 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.3, 4.1)
Webster County 6 Urban 23.5 (17.6, 30.9) 15 (1, 74) 11 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.8, 4.9)
Wright County 6 Rural 18.7 (11.9, 28.5) 51 (2, 84) 5 stable stable trend -1.1 (-5.9, 4.2)
Atchison County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Barton County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bates County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Caldwell County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carroll County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carter County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clark County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dade County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Daviess County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
DeKalb County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Douglas County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gentry County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grundy County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hickory County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Holt County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Howard County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knox County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lewis County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Maries County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mercer County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oregon County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Putnam County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ralls County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reynolds County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ripley County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schuyler County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scotland County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shannon County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shelby County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sullivan County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Worth County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/03/2024 9:22 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2023 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top