Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Nebraska by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Nebraska 6 N/A 456.2 (452.1, 460.2) N/A 10,448 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.8, -1.3)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 444.4 (444.1, 444.7) N/A 1,744,459 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.7, -0.3)
Douglas County 6 Urban 485.5 (477.5, 493.6) 20 (11, 36) 2,942 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.7)
Lancaster County 6 Urban 420.7 (410.7, 430.8) 60 (47, 70) 1,426 falling falling trend -3.9 (-6.3, -2.6)
Sarpy County 6 Urban 486.0 (471.6, 500.7) 19 (10, 40) 902 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.2)
Hall County 6 Urban 431.8 (409.9, 454.5) 53 (30, 72) 306 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Buffalo County 6 Rural 452.4 (426.7, 479.2) 43 (16, 67) 247 falling falling trend -5.8 (-11.3, -1.7)
Lincoln County 6 Rural 491.5 (463.0, 521.4) 15 (5, 47) 241 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.2, 1.0)
Dodge County 6 Rural 485.3 (456.8, 515.3) 22 (7, 52) 236 falling falling trend -8.5 (-15.0, -1.4)
Scotts Bluff County 6 Rural 437.9 (410.6, 466.6) 49 (23, 71) 212 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.0, 8.6)
Madison County 6 Rural 461.1 (431.6, 492.2) 36 (11, 64) 198 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.9)
Platte County 6 Rural 463.3 (433.6, 494.5) 33 (11, 64) 196 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.5)
Adams County 6 Rural 466.4 (435.8, 498.6) 30 (10, 62) 189 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.6)
Cass County 6 Urban 496.5 (462.5, 532.5) 14 (5, 49) 173 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.6, 0.6)
Gage County 6 Rural 466.1 (431.8, 502.8) 31 (8, 65) 151 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.7, 1.2)
Saunders County 6 Urban 455.8 (420.3, 493.7) 39 (11, 69) 134 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.5, 1.0)
Washington County 6 Urban 466.0 (429.1, 505.4) 32 (8, 66) 128 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.0, 1.4)
Dawson County 6 Rural 393.8 (361.2, 428.7) 73 (42, 82) 114 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.7)
Otoe County 6 Rural 471.8 (429.9, 516.9) 27 (6, 67) 103 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.6, 1.8)
York County 6 Rural 461.2 (416.8, 509.2) 35 (7, 72) 89 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.1)
Dakota County 6 Urban 390.8 (354.2, 430.2) 75 (41, 83) 87 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.3)
Saline County 6 Rural 478.8 (432.4, 529.0) 26 (4, 66) 82 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 0.8)
Seward County 6 Urban 376.2 (339.3, 416.2) 78 (49, 85) 82 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.5)
Custer County 6 Rural 454.2 (404.8, 508.4) 40 (7, 75) 71 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.9, 1.2)
Red Willow County 6 Rural 444.1 (395.8, 497.2) 45 (8, 78) 70 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.9)
Holt County 6 Rural 441.9 (391.5, 497.4) 47 (8, 78) 66 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 0.8)
Keith County 6 Rural 433.4 (381.9, 490.8) 51 (9, 80) 63 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.4, 2.2)
Richardson County 6 Rural 470.5 (414.9, 532.4) 28 (4, 74) 61 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 1.0)
Hamilton County 6 Rural 480.1 (425.1, 540.8) 25 (3, 72) 61 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.6, 1.9)
Box Butte County 6 Rural 429.4 (379.1, 484.8) 54 (10, 81) 60 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.6)
Cedar County 6 Rural 485.5 (427.1, 550.2) 21 (3, 70) 59 stable stable trend 2.8 (-11.0, 12.7)
Cuming County 6 Rural 448.3 (393.7, 508.7) 44 (5, 79) 57 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 0.9)
Jefferson County 6 Rural 488.3 (428.5, 555.1) 17 (3, 70) 57 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.3, 2.4)
Butler County 6 Rural 439.8 (386.3, 499.3) 48 (8, 80) 53 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.2)
Knox County 6 Rural 422.7 (367.8, 484.0) 58 (10, 83) 53 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.4, 1.5)
Phelps County 6 Rural 413.0 (361.9, 469.8) 67 (15, 83) 52 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.0, 1.6)
Merrick County 6 Urban 469.8 (410.4, 535.9) 29 (4, 76) 50 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 0.9)
Burt County 6 Rural 487.3 (423.1, 559.4) 18 (3, 71) 50 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.3, 2.0)
Cheyenne County 6 Rural 351.2 (306.7, 400.8) 82 (54, 87) 49 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.7, 0.8)
Nemaha County 6 Rural 482.6 (419.8, 552.9) 24 (3, 74) 47 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.1, 3.3)
Antelope County 6 Rural 505.1 (435.9, 582.9) 12 (1, 68) 47 rising rising trend 7.4 (0.4, 18.1)
Colfax County 6 Rural 408.2 (355.4, 466.7) 69 (14, 84) 45 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.8, 1.5)
Boone County 6 Rural 532.1 (458.1, 615.6) 7 (1, 65) 44 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.7, 1.9)
Clay County 6 Rural 518.1 (447.0, 597.9) 10 (1, 65) 44 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.0, 2.0)
Howard County 6 Urban 452.7 (391.2, 521.9) 42 (5, 80) 43 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.8, -0.5)
Wayne County 6 Rural 392.5 (338.8, 452.7) 74 (25, 85) 42 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.5, 0.7)
Pierce County 6 Rural 424.1 (365.9, 489.5) 57 (8, 84) 42 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.0, 1.7)
Thayer County 6 Rural 525.7 (447.3, 614.8) 9 (1, 68) 40 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.2, 2.3)
Kearney County 6 Rural 425.3 (364.7, 493.8) 55 (7, 83) 38 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.1, 2.5)
Fillmore County 6 Rural 434.9 (370.5, 508.7) 50 (6, 83) 38 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.7, 1.2)
Dixon County 6 Rural 462.4 (393.1, 541.1) 34 (3, 80) 36 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.2, 1.4)
Furnas County 6 Rural 483.7 (409.8, 568.6) 23 (2, 77) 36 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.6, 2.7)
Dawes County 6 Rural 316.2 (269.0, 370.1) 85 (66, 88) 35 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.6)
Polk County 6 Rural 454.0 (383.4, 534.9) 41 (3, 82) 34 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.3)
Nuckolls County 6 Rural 459.5 (387.1, 543.9) 38 (3, 81) 34 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.0, 1.5)
Valley County 6 Rural 500.7 (421.6, 592.2) 13 (2, 76) 33 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.7, 3.7)
Cherry County 6 Rural 410.1 (345.9, 483.7) 68 (10, 85) 33 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.7, 2.1)
Thurston County 6 Rural 525.7 (445.6, 615.7) 8 (1, 71) 33 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.0, 2.2)
Johnson County 6 Rural 419.2 (353.9, 494.3) 61 (8, 84) 31 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.9, 2.4)
Sheridan County 6 Rural 368.6 (306.2, 441.3) 80 (24, 87) 31 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.5, 1.4)
Webster County 6 Rural 488.5 (405.1, 586.5) 16 (2, 80) 27 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.4, 1.5)
Franklin County 6 Rural 532.9 (434.8, 649.3) 6 (1, 75) 26 stable stable trend 6.5 (-12.0, 23.9)
Hitchcock County 6 Rural 593.2 (482.7, 724.2) 3 (1, 61) 25 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.3, 3.0)
Harlan County 6 Rural 460.6 (373.6, 564.7) 37 (2, 83) 25 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.1, 0.6)
Morrill County 6 Rural 373.9 (305.3, 454.2) 79 (16, 87) 24 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.2, 1.5)
Nance County 6 Rural 511.5 (416.2, 623.5) 11 (1, 80) 24 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.4, 4.4)
Stanton County 6 Rural 288.3 (235.6, 350.0) 86 (73, 88) 23 falling falling trend -3.4 (-7.1, -0.2)
Chase County 6 Rural 415.5 (336.2, 508.9) 64 (4, 86) 22 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.9, 3.0)
Sherman County 6 Rural 403.4 (322.5, 501.6) 70 (5, 87) 21 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.9, 3.2)
Greeley County 6 Rural 653.1 (519.4, 812.5) 1 (1, 50) 21 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.3, 3.6)
Brown County 6 Rural 421.7 (334.9, 526.6) 59 (3, 86) 20 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.6, 1.4)
Perkins County 6 Rural 443.5 (351.7, 554.0) 46 (3, 86) 19 stable stable trend -1.2 (-5.2, 2.8)
Kimball County 6 Rural 330.2 (260.8, 414.9) 83 (39, 88) 18 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.8, 0.4)
Frontier County 6 Rural 418.2 (330.6, 525.7) 63 (4, 86) 18 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.5, 1.5)
Pawnee County 6 Rural 387.4 (298.2, 498.1) 76 (4, 88) 17 falling falling trend -8.0 (-24.9, -1.4)
Garfield County 6 Rural 542.7 (416.8, 699.3) 5 (1, 79) 17 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.7, 3.1)
Garden County 6 Rural 418.5 (318.2, 547.2) 62 (2, 87) 15 stable stable trend 2.2 (0.0, 4.3)
Boyd County 6 Rural 432.4 (317.2, 580.1) 52 (2, 87) 13 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.3, 0.3)
Dundy County 6 Rural 413.9 (310.3, 547.8) 66 (2, 88) 12 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.8, 2.7)
Deuel County 6 Rural 381.4 (287.6, 503.3) 77 (4, 88) 12 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.9, 2.0)
Gosper County 6 Rural 355.9 (258.8, 481.9) 81 (6, 88) 11 falling falling trend -4.0 (-7.2, -1.9)
Rock County 6 Rural 415.4 (295.5, 577.4) 65 (2, 88) 10 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.4, 2.1)
Logan County 6 Rural 609.3 (400.1, 897.3) 2 (1, 86) 6
*
*
Keya Paha County 6 Rural 401.9 (230.8, 661.4) 71 (1, 88) 5 stable stable trend 1.8 (-7.0, 10.4)
Wheeler County 6 Rural 325.8 (201.1, 522.4) 84 (4, 88) 5 stable stable trend -2.6 (-9.0, 3.7)
Hayes County 6 Rural 400.4 (224.8, 659.0) 72 (1, 88) 4
*
*
Grant County 6 Rural 425.2 (237.5, 714.6) 56 (1, 88) 4 stable stable trend -1.7 (-6.3, 3.0)
Hooker County 6 Rural 273.1 (166.8, 455.2) 87 (20, 88) 4 stable stable trend -3.2 (-6.5, 0.2)
Sioux County 6 Rural 228.6 (130.1, 382.3) 88 (46, 88) 4
*
*
Blaine County 6 Rural 556.6 (328.6, 914.5) 4 (1, 88) 4 stable stable trend 3.1 (-0.7, 8.0)
Arthur County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Banner County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loup County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McPherson County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Thomas County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/04/2024 3:58 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Arthur, Banner, Loup, McPherson, Thomas

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top