Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Nebraska by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Nebraska 6 459.1 (455.1, 463.2) N/A 10,374 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.3, 1.8)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 442.3 (442.0, 442.6) N/A 1,698,328 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.6, 0.1)
Antelope County 6 474.4 (408.4, 548.8) 22 (2, 74) 45 rising rising trend 10.4 (1.4, 18.2)
Franklin County 6 518.5 (423.5, 631.4) 6 (1, 73) 26 rising rising trend 9.8 (2.0, 25.1)
Hamilton County 6 500.0 (443.8, 561.9) 12 (1, 61) 63 rising rising trend 7.6 (0.3, 13.3)
Red Willow County 6 449.4 (400.5, 502.9) 38 (6, 75) 70 stable stable trend 7.2 (-2.4, 14.6)
Cass County 6 490.4 (456.3, 526.5) 15 (3, 49) 168 stable stable trend 4.1 (0.0, 8.3)
Blaine County 6 595.9 (349.1, 972.0) 2 (1, 87) 4 stable stable trend 3.2 (-1.1, 8.9)
Madison County 6 467.9 (437.8, 499.7) 28 (7, 58) 195 rising rising trend 3.1 (0.6, 7.9)
Garden County 6 444.8 (341.2, 576.9) 45 (1, 84) 16 rising rising trend 3.0 (0.7, 5.4)
Buffalo County 6 464.2 (438.1, 491.5) 31 (10, 57) 251 stable stable trend 2.8 (-0.1, 7.3)
Cedar County 6 431.3 (377.2, 491.5) 54 (7, 80) 55 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.6, 12.5)
Keya Paha County 6 340.9 (185.9, 584.1) 81 (1, 87) 4 stable stable trend 2.3 (-7.1, 11.9)
Scotts Bluff County 6 445.6 (417.8, 474.7) 44 (13, 66) 213 stable stable trend 2.3 (-2.9, 9.6)
Boyd County 6 410.3 (305.3, 545.3) 59 (2, 86) 14 stable stable trend 1.6 (-19.6, 23.4)
Thayer County 6 507.2 (429.4, 596.1) 9 (1, 72) 38 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.6, 3.1)
Jefferson County 6 461.9 (403.1, 527.8) 33 (3, 75) 52 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.6, 2.6)
Valley County 6 483.2 (407.3, 571.1) 19 (1, 77) 33 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.9, 4.1)
Chase County 6 443.1 (361.1, 539.2) 47 (1, 83) 23 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.7, 3.6)
Furnas County 6 503.0 (427.1, 589.9) 11 (1, 74) 38 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.1, 2.9)
Sheridan County 6 386.3 (322.4, 460.5) 73 (12, 85) 33 stable stable trend 0.9 (-5.5, 9.4)
Douglas County 6 484.5 (476.5, 492.7) 18 (11, 33) 2,869 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.1, 1.8)
Nance County 6 448.2 (361.3, 551.1) 39 (2, 84) 22 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.0, 3.4)
Hitchcock County 6 563.9 (457.2, 690.4) 3 (1, 65) 24 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.8, 2.9)
Lancaster County 6 428.8 (418.7, 439.2) 55 (39, 64) 1,429 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.5, 2.8)
York County 6 486.3 (439.6, 536.9) 17 (3, 62) 90 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.3, 1.5)
Burt County 6 506.1 (441.5, 578.6) 10 (1, 64) 52 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.0, 2.1)
Gage County 6 455.3 (421.3, 491.6) 37 (9, 66) 147 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.4, 1.4)
Saline County 6 509.3 (460.2, 562.4) 8 (1, 51) 82 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.4, 1.4)
Garfield County 6 434.7 (331.8, 565.1) 53 (1, 85) 15 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.5, 2.4)
Greeley County 6 557.8 (440.4, 699.2) 4 (1, 74) 20 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.6, 3.4)
Lincoln County 6 475.7 (447.6, 505.2) 21 (6, 54) 233 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.3, 1.0)
Boone County 6 521.8 (449.1, 604.3) 5 (1, 63) 44 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.5, 2.1)
Johnson County 6 444.3 (376.5, 522.1) 46 (3, 81) 32 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.3, 3.0)
Phelps County 6 440.2 (387.6, 498.3) 50 (7, 77) 56 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.5, 2.0)
Saunders County 6 470.1 (433.9, 508.7) 26 (6, 62) 136 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.6, 1.2)
Washington County 6 465.1 (428.1, 504.7) 30 (7, 64) 127 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.9, 1.5)
Dakota County 6 398.8 (361.3, 439.2) 64 (32, 81) 86 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.5, 1.9)
Keith County 6 418.4 (368.0, 474.9) 56 (10, 80) 60 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.4, 2.7)
Nemaha County 6 441.1 (381.0, 508.7) 49 (4, 79) 43 stable stable trend 0.0 (-13.9, 4.9)
Otoe County 6 471.1 (429.0, 516.6) 25 (4, 64) 102 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.8, 1.8)
Adams County 6 468.5 (437.8, 500.8) 27 (7, 58) 190 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.8)
Butler County 6 436.3 (381.4, 497.6) 52 (5, 79) 50 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.4)
Box Butte County 6 418.3 (368.7, 473.1) 57 (13, 80) 59 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.8)
Cuming County 6 442.6 (388.5, 502.6) 48 (4, 78) 56 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.2)
Polk County 6 447.8 (376.6, 529.5) 41 (2, 81) 33 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.0, 1.6)
Webster County 6 499.7 (416.0, 597.7) 13 (1, 76) 28 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.2, 1.7)
Richardson County 6 488.2 (431.7, 551.0) 16 (2, 64) 64 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.9, 1.4)
Colfax County 6 377.0 (326.8, 432.8) 75 (29, 84) 42 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.3, 1.4)
Dawson County 6 404.6 (371.3, 440.2) 62 (33, 79) 115 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 1.1)
Dodge County 6 516.6 (486.6, 547.9) 7 (1, 33) 245 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6)
Fillmore County 6 455.9 (390.2, 530.8) 36 (2, 77) 40 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.5, 1.8)
Nuckolls County 6 473.3 (398.9, 559.8) 23 (1, 77) 35 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.6, 1.9)
Platte County 6 458.2 (428.3, 489.7) 35 (9, 61) 189 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Cheyenne County 6 382.7 (335.2, 435.6) 74 (28, 83) 51 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.3, 1.3)
Clay County 6 492.7 (425.5, 568.2) 14 (1, 70) 44 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.3, 2.2)
Dundy County 6 391.5 (296.3, 515.3) 71 (3, 86) 12 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.7, 2.8)
Sarpy County 6 473.2 (458.8, 487.9) 24 (11, 43) 855 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.2)
Sherman County 6 446.1 (356.7, 553.6) 43 (1, 83) 22 stable stable trend -0.5 (-5.0, 4.0)
Custer County 6 414.4 (368.3, 465.2) 58 (14, 80) 67 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.5, 1.2)
Deuel County 6 394.5 (297.2, 520.2) 68 (2, 86) 12 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.0, 2.8)
Dixon County 6 463.7 (393.0, 544.0) 32 (2, 78) 35 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.0, 1.7)
Dawes County 6 324.4 (276.5, 379.0) 82 (57, 86) 36 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 1.1)
Holt County 6 408.9 (360.3, 462.8) 60 (17, 81) 61 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.4)
Knox County 6 406.5 (353.4, 466.0) 61 (14, 82) 52 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.0, 1.3)
Thurston County 6 479.1 (405.7, 561.6) 20 (1, 76) 32 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.9, 1.3)
Hall County 6 448.0 (425.4, 471.5) 40 (18, 62) 309 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.3)
Morrill County 6 356.3 (290.6, 433.4) 79 (22, 86) 23 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.5, 1.2)
Cherry County 6 359.5 (301.6, 426.3) 78 (34, 85) 31 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.6, 1.2)
Harlan County 6 438.0 (355.8, 536.0) 51 (2, 83) 25 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.5, 0.9)
Howard County 6 466.2 (403.5, 536.8) 29 (2, 74) 43 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.6, 0.0)
Pierce County 6 376.6 (321.8, 438.7) 76 (26, 85) 37 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.0, 1.5)
Seward County 6 395.8 (357.6, 437.2) 65 (30, 81) 84 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.3)
Brown County 6 395.7 (313.8, 495.2) 66 (5, 85) 20 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.6, 1.3)
Wayne County 6 351.4 (300.9, 408.2) 80 (45, 86) 38 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.1, 0.9)
Grant County 6 393.8 (218.1, 667.6) 69 (1, 87) 4 stable stable trend -1.7 (-7.3, 4.1)
Rock County 6 393.2 (283.4, 541.6) 70 (2, 86) 10 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.4, 2.1)
Frontier County 6 394.6 (308.9, 500.2) 67 (4, 85) 17 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.3, 0.6)
Kimball County 6 363.2 (290.9, 450.3) 77 (12, 86) 20 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.0, 0.3)
Perkins County 6 447.4 (355.0, 558.5) 42 (1, 83) 19 stable stable trend -1.8 (-6.0, 2.4)
Wheeler County 6 308.0 (185.6, 501.0) 84 (4, 87) 4 stable stable trend -2.1 (-8.8, 4.8)
Hooker County 6 246.3 (144.1, 431.4) 86 (32, 87) 4 stable stable trend -3.2 (-7.3, 1.2)
Stanton County 6 256.5 (207.1, 314.8) 85 (76, 87) 20 falling falling trend -4.3 (-8.0, -1.0)
Gosper County 6 313.3 (227.9, 425.1) 83 (19, 87) 10 falling falling trend -5.4 (-8.5, -3.3)
Pawnee County 6 389.8 (299.0, 502.2) 72 (4, 86) 17 falling falling trend -8.9 (-28.1, -0.3)
Kearney County 6 400.2 (342.4, 465.7) 63 (12, 83) 37 falling falling trend -9.5 (-16.6, -0.7)
Merrick County 6 461.5 (404.1, 525.5) 34 (2, 74) 51 stable stable trend -9.7 (-20.0, 0.5)
Logan County 6 609.8 (406.0, 888.8) 1 (1, 84) 7
*
*
Sioux County 6 192.0 (97.5, 345.1) 87 (54, 87) 3
*
*
Arthur County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Banner County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hayes County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loup County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McPherson County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Thomas County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/20/2024 7:32 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Arthur, Banner, Hayes, Loup, McPherson, Thomas

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top