Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for New York by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <50

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
New York 7 *** 117.0 (116.2, 117.9) N/A 14,470 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.1, 0.5)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 106.1 (105.9, 106.3) N/A 209,535 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.1)
Kings County 7 *** 117.5 (115.2, 119.9) 35 (25, 44) 2,013 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.9, 1.5)
Queens County 7 *** 109.1 (106.8, 111.5) 49 (40, 54) 1,678 rising rising trend 1.4 (1.1, 1.6)
New York County 7 *** 115.7 (112.8, 118.6) 41 (27, 47) 1,312 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Suffolk County 7 *** 124.3 (121.1, 127.6) 22 (12, 33) 1,163 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.6, 1.3)
Nassau County 7 *** 125.2 (121.8, 128.6) 20 (11, 33) 1,041 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.3, 1.2)
Bronx County 7 *** 104.6 (101.6, 107.6) 55 (45, 58) 963 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.2)
Westchester County 7 *** 115.8 (112.0, 119.6) 40 (26, 49) 713 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.6)
Erie County 7 *** 124.3 (120.0, 128.6) 24 (10, 35) 675 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.3)
Monroe County 7 *** 113.4 (108.9, 117.9) 46 (27, 52) 504 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.6, 1.3)
Richmond County 7 *** 137.4 (131.5, 143.5) 7 (1, 17) 414 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.7, 1.9)
Onondaga County 7 *** 113.9 (108.3, 119.8) 43 (24, 54) 313 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.4, 1.3)
Orange County 7 *** 125.8 (119.4, 132.4) 18 (7, 39) 295 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.5, 1.5)
Rockland County 7 *** 121.3 (114.3, 128.6) 27 (10, 47) 228 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.1, 1.3)
Albany County 7 *** 119.5 (112.4, 127.0) 29 (11, 49) 215 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.4, 1.9)
Dutchess County 7 *** 110.1 (103.2, 117.3) 48 (27, 57) 197 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.2, 0.9)
Saratoga County 7 *** 122.2 (114.2, 130.6) 26 (8, 48) 178 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.3, 1.8)
Oneida County 7 *** 128.2 (119.8, 137.1) 13 (3, 38) 175 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.1, 1.6)
Niagara County 7 *** 135.1 (126.0, 144.7) 8 (1, 30) 167 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.7, 2.0)
Broome County 7 *** 126.4 (116.9, 136.6) 16 (4, 46) 133 rising rising trend 2.1 (1.0, 3.2)
Ulster County 7 *** 106.7 (98.1, 115.9) 52 (29, 59) 116 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.7, 0.9)
Rensselaer County 7 *** 113.7 (104.3, 123.7) 45 (14, 57) 111 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.7, 1.5)
Schenectady County 7 *** 105.8 (96.6, 115.6) 54 (27, 60) 99 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.6, 1.1)
Chautauqua County 7 *** 133.8 (121.9, 146.4) 10 (1, 41) 96 rising rising trend 2.2 (1.3, 3.1)
Oswego County 7 *** 126.3 (114.6, 138.7) 17 (2, 50) 89 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.5, 2.7)
Jefferson County 7 *** 122.3 (110.5, 135.0) 25 (4, 54) 84 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.5, 2.6)
Putnam County 7 *** 126.4 (114.1, 139.8) 15 (2, 51) 79 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.8, 1.1)
Chemung County 7 *** 140.8 (126.5, 156.3) 4 (1, 33) 71 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.9, 2.9)
Ontario County 7 *** 111.6 (100.1, 124.0) 47 (12, 59) 71 stable stable trend 1.0 (0.0, 2.0)
Steuben County 7 *** 116.0 (103.7, 129.5) 39 (7, 58) 65 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.1)
Wayne County 7 *** 119.5 (106.7, 133.5) 30 (4, 56) 64 stable stable trend 1.4 (0.0, 2.7)
St. Lawrence County 7 *** 99.4 (88.5, 111.2) 57 (33, 61) 62 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.1)
Cayuga County 7 *** 127.9 (113.7, 143.4) 14 (1, 52) 60 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.3, 2.3)
Clinton County 7 *** 116.7 (103.3, 131.3) 38 (4, 58) 56 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.2, 3.2)
Cattaraugus County 7 *** 118.3 (104.1, 133.9) 34 (4, 58) 51 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.5, 1.9)
Warren County 7 *** 134.1 (117.7, 152.1) 9 (1, 50) 50 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.2, 3.3)
Sullivan County 7 *** 107.9 (94.6, 122.5) 50 (13, 61) 48 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.8)
Madison County 7 *** 117.4 (102.7, 133.6) 36 (4, 59) 47 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.3, 2.4)
Tompkins County 7 *** 83.2 (72.4, 95.1) 61 (54, 61) 45 falling falling trend -6.6 (-10.2, -2.9)
Washington County 7 *** 115.1 (100.2, 131.7) 42 (5, 59) 43 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.2, 3.0)
Herkimer County 7 *** 118.6 (102.9, 136.1) 32 (3, 58) 42 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.3, 3.2)
Otsego County 7 *** 138.0 (119.5, 158.4) 6 (1, 48) 42 stable stable trend 1.5 (0.0, 3.0)
Fulton County 7 *** 125.3 (108.5, 143.9) 19 (1, 57) 41 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.9, 1.8)
Genesee County 7 *** 117.2 (101.5, 134.7) 37 (4, 59) 41 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.1, 2.7)
Columbia County 7 *** 119.0 (102.9, 136.9) 31 (2, 59) 40 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.7, 2.5)
Tioga County 7 *** 141.8 (122.6, 163.1) 3 (1, 42) 40 rising rising trend 2.4 (0.9, 3.9)
Chenango County 7 *** 142.1 (122.6, 163.7) 2 (1, 41) 39 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.4, 3.1)
Livingston County 7 *** 96.2 (82.1, 111.9) 58 (28, 61) 35 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.2, 2.4)
Greene County 7 *** 124.9 (106.7, 145.4) 21 (1, 57) 34 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.4, 2.1)
Orleans County 7 *** 131.8 (112.5, 153.5) 11 (1, 55) 34 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.8, 3.8)
Montgomery County 7 *** 113.8 (97.1, 132.4) 44 (4, 60) 34 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 1.1)
Cortland County 7 *** 118.6 (100.5, 138.8) 33 (2, 59) 32 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.2, 3.5)
Wyoming County 7 *** 121.3 (103.0, 142.0) 28 (1, 59) 32 rising rising trend 2.4 (0.5, 4.3)
Franklin County 7 *** 99.6 (84.6, 116.6) 56 (18, 61) 32 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.0, 1.2)
Seneca County 7 *** 150.6 (127.5, 176.6) 1 (1, 43) 31 rising rising trend 3.0 (1.3, 4.8)
Delaware County 7 *** 130.8 (110.4, 153.9) 12 (1, 55) 30 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.6, 1.6)
Allegany County 7 *** 107.0 (89.4, 127.0) 51 (5, 61) 27 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.7, 3.6)
Essex County 7 *** 90.5 (73.2, 110.7) 59 (28, 61) 19 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.6, 3.6)
Lewis County 7 *** 106.6 (84.4, 132.7) 53 (3, 61) 16 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.9, 3.7)
Schoharie County 7 *** 90.4 (71.3, 113.1) 60 (21, 61) 16 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.6, 3.8)
Yates County 7 *** 124.3 (98.0, 155.2) 23 (1, 60) 16 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.2, 3.3)
Schuyler County 7 *** 140.3 (110.0, 176.5) 5 (1, 58) 15 stable stable trend 2.6 (-0.3, 5.7)
Hamilton County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/29/2022 5:36 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Hamilton

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top