Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for North Carolina by County

Prostate (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
North Carolina 6 N/A 128.9 (127.6, 130.2) N/A 8,238 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.3, 3.5)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 113.2 (113.0, 113.4) N/A 224,883 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.4, 3.7)
Alamance County 6 Urban 121.4 (111.9, 131.5) 57 (21, 83) 125 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.3, -0.9)
Alexander County 6 Urban 127.5 (108.9, 148.7) 42 (5, 91) 35 rising rising trend 9.4 (1.1, 18.6)
Alleghany County 6 Rural 103.1 (76.8, 138.6) 87 (8, 100) 11 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.3, 0.3)
Anson County 6 Urban 208.0 (175.7, 245.0) 1 (1, 10) 32 rising rising trend 10.7 (2.2, 25.9)
Ashe County 6 Rural 113.5 (94.7, 136.0) 72 (11, 97) 28 stable stable trend 5.1 (-2.9, 21.2)
Avery County 6 Rural 105.1 (82.7, 132.9) 84 (12, 100) 16 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.8, -0.6)
Beaufort County 6 Rural 125.1 (109.2, 143.2) 47 (7, 89) 47 stable stable trend 10.5 (-0.1, 22.6)
Bertie County 6 Rural 134.5 (108.2, 166.4) 29 (2, 94) 19 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.6, 7.5)
Bladen County 6 Rural 116.0 (96.8, 138.5) 65 (10, 97) 28 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.8, 0.6)
Brunswick County 6 Urban 112.6 (104.6, 121.2) 73 (42, 90) 173 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 1.1)
Buncombe County 6 Urban 114.6 (107.8, 121.9) 69 (41, 87) 216 stable stable trend 3.4 (-0.1, 10.3)
Burke County 6 Urban 114.9 (103.6, 127.4) 67 (27, 92) 77 stable stable trend 3.2 (-2.3, 16.3)
Cabarrus County 6 Urban 128.8 (119.7, 138.4) 36 (13, 71) 156 stable stable trend -4.7 (-13.8, 2.5)
Caldwell County 6 Urban 111.0 (99.1, 124.0) 79 (33, 95) 68 stable stable trend 0.9 (-7.3, 9.5)
Camden County 6 Urban 104.1 (72.2, 146.8) 86 (4, 100) 7 stable stable trend -3.5 (-8.3, 1.2)
Carteret County 6 Rural 84.4 (74.4, 95.7) 98 (85, 100) 55 falling falling trend -4.7 (-6.2, -3.4)
Caswell County 6 Rural 127.9 (105.4, 154.6) 41 (3, 94) 24 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.0, -1.1)
Catawba County 6 Urban 134.4 (124.5, 144.9) 30 (6, 62) 146 stable stable trend 3.5 (-0.4, 10.4)
Chatham County 6 Urban 120.6 (108.6, 133.9) 59 (16, 87) 76 stable stable trend 2.7 (-1.7, 11.6)
Cherokee County 6 Rural 110.8 (94.1, 130.9) 80 (19, 97) 34 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.5, 5.0)
Chowan County 6 Rural 140.5 (109.8, 178.8) 15 (1, 94) 15 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.7, 3.0)
Clay County 6 Rural 118.4 (91.0, 154.8) 61 (3, 100) 14 stable stable trend -1.8 (-6.0, 2.3)
Cleveland County 6 Rural 121.8 (110.0, 134.7) 56 (16, 86) 83 stable stable trend 3.2 (-2.4, 11.4)
Columbus County 6 Rural 142.2 (125.0, 161.4) 13 (2, 71) 52 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.6, 0.0)
Craven County 6 Rural 128.5 (116.7, 141.3) 39 (10, 80) 90 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.1, -1.0)
Cumberland County 6 Urban 141.6 (133.1, 150.5) 14 (5, 43) 221 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
Currituck County 6 Urban 88.8 (70.3, 111.3) 97 (46, 100) 17 falling falling trend -3.3 (-6.4, -0.1)
Dare County 6 Rural 118.0 (100.7, 138.1) 63 (8, 95) 36 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.6, 0.4)
Davidson County 6 Urban 112.2 (103.6, 121.5) 75 (43, 91) 131 stable stable trend 5.5 (-0.8, 16.0)
Davie County 6 Urban 100.9 (86.1, 118.0) 89 (38, 100) 34 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.4, 0.3)
Duplin County 6 Rural 134.0 (116.8, 153.2) 31 (4, 84) 46 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.9, 1.7)
Durham County 6 Urban 135.6 (127.5, 144.1) 27 (8, 55) 222 stable stable trend 3.8 (-1.8, 13.2)
Edgecombe County 6 Urban 173.2 (153.4, 195.2) 2 (1, 20) 60 rising rising trend 13.0 (1.5, 25.1)
Forsyth County 6 Urban 127.4 (120.7, 134.4) 43 (21, 66) 287 rising rising trend 5.8 (1.3, 11.0)
Franklin County 6 Urban 131.4 (116.1, 148.3) 33 (5, 83) 58 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.9, 0.9)
Gaston County 6 Urban 123.2 (114.8, 132.0) 53 (22, 79) 173 rising rising trend 2.9 (0.7, 6.9)
Gates County 6 Urban 89.4 (62.8, 125.9) 96 (10, 100) 8 stable stable trend -3.7 (-7.6, 0.3)
Graham County 6 Rural 73.4 (47.5, 111.9) 100 (46, 100) 5 stable stable trend -1.4 (-6.0, 2.9)
Granville County 6 Rural 125.3 (110.2, 142.1) 45 (8, 89) 53 falling falling trend -2.7 (-5.2, -0.1)
Greene County 6 Rural 123.7 (97.0, 155.9) 52 (3, 99) 16 stable stable trend -2.7 (-5.9, 0.4)
Guilford County 6 Urban 140.4 (134.4, 146.6) 16 (8, 38) 429 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.8, -0.9)
Halifax County 6 Rural 156.4 (138.3, 176.6) 5 (1, 43) 57 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.1, 0.3)
Harnett County 6 Rural 123.0 (111.1, 135.8) 54 (15, 86) 84 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.0, -0.7)
Haywood County 6 Rural 120.8 (107.8, 135.2) 58 (15, 89) 66 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.4, 0.0)
Henderson County 6 Urban 114.3 (104.9, 124.5) 70 (33, 90) 113 stable stable trend 2.9 (-1.9, 13.1)
Hertford County 6 Rural 132.8 (107.7, 162.8) 32 (2, 94) 21 rising rising trend 12.7 (2.4, 22.9)
Hoke County 6 Urban 150.0 (127.1, 175.9) 7 (1, 73) 35 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.6, 0.4)
Hyde County 6 Rural 140.0 (90.8, 211.7) 18 (1, 100) 5 stable stable trend -1.4 (-6.0, 3.2)
Iredell County 6 Urban 146.4 (136.4, 157.0) 8 (3, 39) 171 rising rising trend 5.2 (0.4, 12.1)
Jackson County 6 Rural 105.0 (88.9, 123.6) 85 (28, 99) 32 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.2, 0.3)
Johnston County 6 Urban 124.6 (115.4, 134.5) 49 (18, 79) 147 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.3)
Jones County 6 Rural 156.1 (118.4, 204.7) 6 (1, 93) 12 stable stable trend -1.5 (-5.1, 2.3)
Lee County 6 Rural 136.7 (120.3, 154.8) 25 (3, 76) 53 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.0, 1.2)
Lenoir County 6 Rural 135.3 (119.2, 153.2) 28 (3, 79) 53 falling falling trend -4.0 (-6.0, -2.1)
Lincoln County 6 Urban 128.6 (116.0, 142.4) 38 (9, 80) 81 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.7, -0.3)
Macon County 6 Rural 98.0 (83.8, 114.8) 92 (48, 100) 35 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.9, -1.3)
Madison County 6 Urban 100.8 (80.0, 126.4) 90 (22, 100) 17 falling falling trend -3.8 (-6.3, -1.5)
Martin County 6 Rural 137.6 (113.2, 166.6) 21 (2, 90) 24 stable stable trend 2.3 (-2.9, 15.5)
McDowell County 6 Rural 108.2 (92.7, 125.9) 81 (25, 98) 37 stable stable trend 6.3 (-3.4, 17.1)
Mecklenburg County 6 Urban 156.6 (151.5, 161.8) 4 (2, 14) 795 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.3, 5.3)
Mitchell County 6 Rural 111.8 (87.9, 142.1) 77 (7, 100) 15 stable stable trend 13.4 (-3.3, 26.7)
Montgomery County 6 Rural 91.0 (72.9, 113.0) 94 (47, 100) 19 falling falling trend -7.0 (-31.9, -3.0)
Moore County 6 Urban 145.9 (133.9, 158.9) 9 (3, 47) 113 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.3)
Nash County 6 Urban 111.4 (99.8, 124.1) 78 (32, 93) 72 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.4, 0.3)
New Hanover County 6 Urban 125.2 (117.0, 133.9) 46 (19, 76) 181 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.5, 1.1)
Northampton County 6 Rural 164.8 (136.4, 198.8) 3 (1, 62) 26 stable stable trend 17.8 (-3.6, 31.2)
Onslow County 6 Urban 122.0 (110.7, 134.1) 55 (17, 86) 91 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.2, 0.4)
Orange County 6 Urban 124.9 (113.9, 136.8) 48 (13, 82) 102 stable stable trend 4.6 (-2.5, 17.1)
Pamlico County 6 Rural 124.2 (97.8, 158.5) 51 (2, 98) 16 stable stable trend -1.4 (-17.1, 11.4)
Pasquotank County 6 Rural 130.2 (110.6, 152.4) 34 (3, 89) 33 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.5, -0.8)
Pender County 6 Urban 128.2 (112.6, 145.5) 40 (7, 88) 53 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.4, 1.8)
Perquimans County 6 Rural 130.0 (101.8, 166.0) 35 (2, 97) 16 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.4, 2.3)
Person County 6 Urban 118.0 (100.5, 138.2) 62 (10, 95) 35 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.9, -1.1)
Pitt County 6 Urban 124.5 (113.8, 136.0) 50 (14, 82) 107 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.4, 8.7)
Polk County 6 Rural 119.9 (98.3, 146.6) 60 (5, 97) 23 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.9, 3.2)
Randolph County 6 Urban 108.1 (99.0, 118.0) 82 (48, 94) 108 falling falling trend -3.1 (-8.0, -2.1)
Richmond County 6 Rural 137.5 (118.5, 159.0) 22 (3, 84) 39 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.8, 0.7)
Robeson County 6 Rural 144.3 (131.6, 158.0) 11 (3, 49) 102 stable stable trend 7.1 (-3.0, 14.2)
Rockingham County 6 Urban 114.8 (103.3, 127.3) 68 (24, 93) 78 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.0)
Rowan County 6 Urban 112.2 (102.7, 122.5) 76 (37, 91) 108 falling falling trend -3.3 (-6.1, -1.6)
Rutherford County 6 Rural 127.1 (113.0, 142.8) 44 (8, 87) 63 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.3, 1.6)
Sampson County 6 Rural 136.4 (120.1, 154.4) 26 (3, 78) 53 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.6, 1.7)
Scotland County 6 Rural 112.3 (93.2, 134.4) 74 (12, 99) 26 stable stable trend 15.8 (-0.9, 32.3)
Stanly County 6 Rural 113.6 (99.7, 129.1) 71 (24, 94) 51 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.0, 1.4)
Stokes County 6 Urban 100.4 (85.7, 117.4) 91 (42, 100) 35 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.5)
Surry County 6 Rural 106.1 (93.6, 120.1) 83 (39, 97) 55 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.8, -0.4)
Swain County 6 Rural 143.3 (111.5, 182.6) 12 (1, 95) 14 stable stable trend 9.7 (-8.4, 34.5)
Transylvania County 6 Rural 101.2 (86.0, 119.3) 88 (39, 100) 34 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.9, -0.9)
Tyrrell County 6 Rural 140.1 (83.0, 228.4) 17 (1, 100) 4 stable stable trend 1.1 (-3.7, 6.4)
Union County 6 Urban 140.0 (130.7, 149.9) 19 (5, 48) 181 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.8)
Vance County 6 Rural 128.7 (109.3, 150.7) 37 (3, 91) 34 stable stable trend 9.9 (-3.6, 25.4)
Wake County 6 Urban 137.5 (133.0, 142.2) 23 (12, 39) 751 falling falling trend -4.2 (-7.2, -1.8)
Warren County 6 Rural 136.8 (112.2, 166.5) 24 (2, 92) 23 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.9, 4.1)
Washington County 6 Rural 137.9 (106.6, 178.4) 20 (1, 96) 14 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.0, 1.1)
Watauga County 6 Rural 117.1 (100.7, 135.8) 64 (12, 94) 39 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.3, 0.7)
Wayne County 6 Urban 145.6 (132.9, 159.2) 10 (3, 47) 103 stable stable trend -0.4 (-7.9, 0.9)
Wilkes County 6 Rural 82.8 (71.9, 95.2) 99 (83, 100) 43 falling falling trend -4.3 (-6.7, -2.1)
Wilson County 6 Rural 115.8 (102.5, 130.5) 66 (19, 93) 59 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.2, -0.5)
Yadkin County 6 Urban 90.6 (75.3, 108.7) 95 (57, 100) 25 falling falling trend -3.5 (-6.1, -0.9)
Yancey County 6 Rural 95.6 (75.0, 121.5) 93 (28, 100) 15 rising rising trend 12.4 (3.9, 25.2)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/04/2024 12:15 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2023 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top