Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for North Carolina by County

Liver & Bile Duct (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
North Carolina 6 *** 8.6 (8.3, 8.8) N/A 1,098 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.2, 2.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 8.6 (8.5, 8.6) N/A 34,507 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.3)
Alamance County 6 *** 9.3 (7.5, 11.3) 27 (7, 68) 20 rising rising trend 4.4 (1.6, 7.3)
Alexander County 6 *** 7.7 (4.8, 12.0) 54 (4, 76) 4
*
*
Anson County 6 *** 9.7 (5.6, 16.0) 23 (1, 76) 3
*
*
Ashe County 6 *** 9.0 (5.7, 14.4) 34 (2, 76) 5
*
*
Beaufort County 6 *** 6.5 (4.1, 10.1) 72 (12, 76) 5 stable stable trend 4.0 (-3.7, 12.3)
Bladen County 6 *** 10.2 (6.6, 15.5) 15 (1, 76) 5
*
*
Brunswick County 6 *** 6.3 (4.8, 8.2) 73 (31, 76) 15 stable stable trend 3.0 (-1.6, 7.8)
Buncombe County 6 *** 9.8 (8.4, 11.4) 21 (7, 55) 37 rising rising trend 4.3 (2.0, 6.6)
Burke County 6 *** 10.8 (8.4, 13.8) 12 (2, 60) 14 rising rising trend 8.5 (5.6, 11.4)
Cabarrus County 6 *** 7.9 (6.3, 9.8) 51 (14, 74) 18 stable stable trend 2.8 (-0.9, 6.7)
Caldwell County 6 *** 9.2 (6.9, 12.1) 30 (4, 74) 11 stable stable trend 3.3 (-0.4, 7.1)
Carteret County 6 *** 7.9 (5.7, 10.9) 50 (7, 76) 9 stable stable trend -0.9 (-5.7, 4.2)
Caswell County 6 *** 8.9 (5.1, 15.1) 36 (1, 76) 3
*
*
Catawba County 6 *** 7.9 (6.3, 9.9) 49 (14, 74) 17 rising rising trend 5.6 (1.1, 10.3)
Chatham County 6 *** 7.2 (5.2, 9.9) 67 (14, 76) 9 stable stable trend 4.0 (-0.6, 8.8)
Cherokee County 6 *** 7.4 (4.7, 12.2) 63 (5, 76) 5
*
*
Cleveland County 6 *** 9.7 (7.5, 12.5) 24 (3, 71) 13 rising rising trend 9.0 (4.7, 13.5)
Columbus County 6 *** 8.9 (6.1, 12.7) 37 (3, 76) 7
*
*
Craven County 6 *** 7.6 (5.7, 10.0) 57 (12, 76) 11 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.3, 3.7)
Cumberland County 6 *** 8.4 (7.1, 10.0) 43 (13, 69) 28 stable stable trend 2.6 (-0.2, 5.5)
Dare County 6 *** 7.8 (4.8, 12.3) 53 (4, 76) 5 stable stable trend 1.6 (-3.5, 7.0)
Davidson County 6 *** 8.9 (7.2, 10.8) 38 (8, 70) 21 rising rising trend 5.4 (2.5, 8.3)
Davie County 6 *** 5.5 (3.2, 9.3) 75 (17, 76) 4
*
*
Duplin County 6 *** 5.2 (3.3, 8.1) 76 (32, 76) 5 stable stable trend 1.9 (-2.4, 6.4)
Durham County 6 *** 10.1 (8.6, 11.8) 17 (5, 56) 32 stable stable trend 2.8 (-0.7, 6.4)
Edgecombe County 6 *** 7.5 (5.0, 11.0) 59 (7, 76) 6 rising rising trend 3.7 (0.3, 7.2)
Forsyth County 6 *** 8.3 (7.2, 9.6) 46 (17, 67) 39 rising rising trend 3.6 (0.4, 6.8)
Franklin County 6 *** 8.0 (5.5, 11.4) 47 (6, 76) 7 stable stable trend 2.2 (-3.0, 7.7)
Gaston County 6 *** 12.6 (10.8, 14.7) 4 (1, 27) 35 stable stable trend -1.5 (-7.0, 4.4)
Granville County 6 *** 16.1 (12.5, 20.6) 1 (1, 20) 14 stable stable trend 4.9 (-0.3, 10.4)
Guilford County 6 *** 8.4 (7.3, 9.5) 45 (20, 67) 52 rising rising trend 2.5 (1.0, 4.1)
Halifax County 6 *** 9.9 (6.9, 13.9) 19 (2, 74) 8 rising rising trend 12.6 (7.9, 17.6)
Harnett County 6 *** 10.1 (7.8, 12.9) 16 (3, 68) 13 stable stable trend 3.1 (-0.6, 7.0)
Haywood County 6 *** 11.2 (8.4, 14.7) 9 (1, 63) 12 rising rising trend 7.8 (4.4, 11.2)
Henderson County 6 *** 7.8 (5.9, 10.1) 52 (11, 76) 14 rising rising trend 4.3 (1.2, 7.6)
Iredell County 6 *** 7.4 (5.9, 9.2) 65 (16, 75) 17 stable stable trend 2.9 (-0.8, 6.7)
Jackson County 6 *** 10.1 (6.6, 14.9) 18 (1, 75) 6 stable stable trend 6.1 (0.0, 12.6)
Johnston County 6 *** 7.6 (6.0, 9.6) 55 (16, 75) 17 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.2, 5.6)
Lee County 6 *** 13.2 (9.6, 17.8) 3 (1, 54) 9 rising rising trend 3.8 (0.7, 7.0)
Lenoir County 6 *** 8.6 (5.9, 12.2) 40 (4, 76) 7 stable stable trend 3.4 (-2.3, 9.5)
Lincoln County 6 *** 9.2 (6.7, 12.3) 29 (3, 74) 10 rising rising trend 5.9 (2.1, 9.8)
Macon County 6 *** 11.1 (7.5, 16.2) 10 (1, 74) 7 rising rising trend 18.2 (10.6, 26.4)
McDowell County 6 *** 12.3 (8.8, 16.9) 5 (1, 65) 9
*
*
Mecklenburg County 6 *** 8.5 (7.8, 9.4) 42 (20, 61) 91 rising rising trend 4.1 (2.2, 6.0)
Montgomery County 6 *** 9.1 (5.4, 14.8) 32 (2, 76) 4
*
*
Moore County 6 *** 8.0 (6.1, 10.4) 48 (10, 75) 13 stable stable trend 2.3 (-2.0, 6.7)
Nash County 6 *** 9.8 (7.4, 12.7) 22 (3, 71) 12 stable stable trend 2.9 (-0.8, 6.7)
New Hanover County 6 *** 8.6 (7.1, 10.3) 41 (11, 70) 25 rising rising trend 3.5 (0.1, 7.0)
Northampton County 6 *** 11.6 (6.9, 19.0) 6 (1, 75) 4
*
*
Onslow County 6 *** 8.7 (6.6, 11.2) 39 (6, 74) 12 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.3, 5.2)
Orange County 6 *** 6.9 (5.2, 9.1) 68 (19, 76) 11 stable stable trend 2.6 (-2.5, 7.9)
Pasquotank County 6 *** 6.1 (3.4, 10.2) 74 (8, 76) 3 stable stable trend 3.9 (-0.9, 8.9)
Pender County 6 *** 7.4 (5.0, 10.7) 64 (8, 76) 6 stable stable trend 2.0 (-3.3, 7.7)
Person County 6 *** 9.2 (5.8, 13.9) 31 (1, 76) 5 stable stable trend 5.1 (-0.7, 11.1)
Pitt County 6 *** 7.5 (5.8, 9.5) 61 (17, 75) 15 rising rising trend 3.7 (0.6, 6.9)
Randolph County 6 *** 9.8 (8.0, 12.1) 20 (4, 65) 20 rising rising trend 5.9 (2.8, 9.1)
Richmond County 6 *** 6.8 (4.0, 10.8) 70 (7, 76) 4 stable stable trend 1.5 (-3.8, 7.0)
Robeson County 6 *** 6.8 (5.1, 9.0) 69 (18, 76) 11 stable stable trend 3.3 (-1.0, 7.9)
Rockingham County 6 *** 10.5 (8.1, 13.4) 13 (2, 66) 14 stable stable trend -12.9 (-30.0, 8.3)
Rowan County 6 *** 10.4 (8.4, 12.8) 14 (3, 59) 19 rising rising trend 5.3 (3.0, 7.6)
Rutherford County 6 *** 7.6 (5.4, 10.6) 56 (8, 76) 8
*
*
Sampson County 6 *** 9.2 (6.5, 12.8) 28 (3, 75) 8 rising rising trend 6.9 (1.4, 12.7)
Scotland County 6 *** 15.7 (11.1, 21.8) 2 (1, 43) 8
*
*
Stanly County 6 *** 11.4 (8.4, 15.3) 7 (1, 66) 10 rising rising trend 8.3 (3.8, 12.9)
Stokes County 6 *** 9.6 (6.6, 13.7) 25 (2, 75) 7 rising rising trend 7.1 (2.4, 12.1)
Surry County 6 *** 7.5 (5.3, 10.4) 62 (8, 76) 8 falling falling trend -33.1 (-52.8, -5.3)
Transylvania County 6 *** 6.6 (3.8, 11.0) 71 (6, 76) 4
*
*
Union County 6 *** 7.6 (6.1, 9.3) 58 (19, 75) 19 rising rising trend 6.6 (3.6, 9.7)
Vance County 6 *** 11.4 (7.9, 16.0) 8 (1, 71) 7 rising rising trend 8.0 (3.6, 12.6)
Wake County 6 *** 7.5 (6.8, 8.3) 60 (33, 70) 77 rising rising trend 6.0 (4.0, 8.0)
Warren County 6 *** 10.9 (6.3, 18.2) 11 (1, 76) 4
*
*
Watauga County 6 *** 7.3 (4.6, 11.3) 66 (6, 76) 5 stable stable trend 4.9 (-0.7, 10.8)
Wayne County 6 *** 9.3 (7.2, 11.8) 26 (4, 71) 15 rising rising trend 7.1 (3.7, 10.6)
Wilkes County 6 *** 8.4 (6.1, 11.4) 44 (6, 75) 9 rising rising trend 4.8 (0.8, 8.9)
Wilson County 6 *** 9.1 (6.8, 12.1) 33 (4, 74) 10 rising rising trend 3.7 (0.9, 6.6)
Yadkin County 6 *** 9.0 (5.6, 13.9) 35 (2, 76) 5 stable stable trend 5.7 (-1.3, 13.3)
Alleghany County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Avery County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bertie County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Camden County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chowan County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Currituck County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gates County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Graham County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hertford County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hoke County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hyde County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jones County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mitchell County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pamlico County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perquimans County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Polk County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swain County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tyrrell County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yancey County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 01/26/2022 9:10 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Alleghany, Avery, Bertie, Camden, Chowan, Clay, Currituck, Gates, Graham, Greene, Hertford, Hoke, Hyde, Jones, Madison, Martin, Mitchell, Pamlico, Perquimans, Polk, Swain, Tyrrell, Washington, Yancey

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top