Incidence Rates Table
County
|
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
|
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate † cases per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval)
|
CI*Rank ⋔ (95% Confidence Interval)
|
Average Annual Count
|
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Incidence Rates (95% Confidence Interval)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| North Carolina 6 | N/A | 18.8 (18.4, 19.1) | N/A | 2,387 |
rising 
|
0.9 (0.5, 1.2) |
| US (SEER+NPCR) 1 | N/A | 17.3 (17.2, 17.4) | N/A | 67,373 |
falling 
|
-0.7 (-1.3, -0.1) |
| Alamance County 6 | Urban | 21.5 (18.7, 24.6) | 31 (5, 69) | 46 |
rising
|
2.6 (0.7, 4.9) |
| Alexander County 6 | Urban | 15.4 (10.7, 21.6) | 85 (10, 90) | 8 |
stable 
|
-1.7 (-6.3, 2.9) |
| Anson County 6 | Urban | 21.8 (14.4, 31.7) | 28 (1, 90) | 6 |
|
|
| Ashe County 6 | Rural | 14.0 (9.5, 20.6) | 87 (25, 90) | 7 |
stable
|
-2.1 (-5.4, 1.3) |
| Avery County 6 | Rural | 17.9 (11.1, 28.0) | 69 (1, 90) | 5 |
|
|
| Beaufort County 6 | Rural | 20.9 (15.9, 27.2) | 35 (1, 88) | 14 |
stable
|
2.1 (-1.0, 5.4) |
| Bertie County 6 | Rural | 19.9 (12.3, 31.0) | 52 (1, 90) | 5 |
stable
|
0.7 (-3.5, 5.3) |
| Bladen County 6 | Rural | 22.4 (16.2, 30.5) | 25 (1, 88) | 10 |
rising
|
4.1 (0.4, 8.8) |
| Brunswick County 6 | Urban | 20.3 (17.4, 23.7) | 43 (8, 80) | 50 |
rising
|
2.1 (0.6, 4.0) |
| Buncombe County 6 | Urban | 15.8 (14.0, 17.8) | 84 (53, 88) | 59 |
stable
|
1.2 (-0.1, 2.6) |
| Burke County 6 | Urban | 23.2 (19.4, 27.7) | 14 (1, 74) | 29 |
stable
|
2.1 (-0.3, 4.9) |
| Cabarrus County 6 | Urban | 18.4 (16.0, 21.0) | 63 (23, 85) | 45 |
stable
|
-1.0 (-3.2, 1.3) |
| Caldwell County 6 | Urban | 23.5 (19.6, 28.2) | 13 (1, 70) | 27 |
stable
|
1.8 (-0.5, 4.4) |
| Carteret County 6 | Rural | 20.2 (16.2, 25.1) | 46 (3, 86) | 22 |
stable
|
0.9 (-2.7, 4.7) |
| Caswell County 6 | Rural | 17.5 (11.2, 26.3) | 75 (2, 90) | 6 |
stable
|
0.3 (-4.6, 5.8) |
| Catawba County 6 | Urban | 19.1 (16.4, 22.1) | 57 (15, 84) | 39 |
stable
|
1.4 (-1.1, 4.1) |
| Chatham County 6 | Urban | 18.2 (14.8, 22.4) | 64 (13, 88) | 22 |
stable
|
0.6 (-2.2, 3.9) |
| Cherokee County 6 | Rural | 18.9 (12.7, 27.2) | 60 (1, 90) | 8 |
rising
|
5.2 (1.0, 10.4) |
| Chowan County 6 | Rural | 25.0 (15.4, 38.9) | 4 (1, 90) | 5 |
stable
|
2.7 (-2.3, 8.3) |
| Clay County 6 | Rural | 23.2 (13.2, 39.0) | 16 (1, 90) | 4 |
|
|
| Cleveland County 6 | Rural | 22.6 (18.9, 26.8) | 22 (1, 74) | 30 |
stable
|
-11.4 (-29.9, 5.6) |
| Columbus County 6 | Rural | 24.6 (19.3, 31.0) | 6 (1, 78) | 17 |
rising
|
3.8 (0.6, 7.8) |
| Craven County 6 | Rural | 19.0 (15.7, 22.9) | 58 (11, 86) | 25 |
stable
|
0.8 (-2.1, 3.9) |
| Cumberland County 6 | Urban | 18.1 (16.1, 20.4) | 66 (31, 85) | 60 |
rising
|
2.2 (0.8, 3.7) |
| Dare County 6 | Rural | 10.7 (7.1, 15.7) | 90 (64, 90) | 6 |
stable
|
-1.2 (-6.4, 4.3) |
| Davidson County 6 | Urban | 24.1 (21.2, 27.3) | 9 (1, 51) | 55 |
rising
|
2.4 (0.8, 4.2) |
| Davie County 6 | Urban | 23.9 (18.5, 30.5) | 10 (1, 82) | 15 |
stable
|
2.0 (-0.7, 5.2) |
| Duplin County 6 | Rural | 21.1 (16.2, 27.0) | 34 (1, 86) | 14 |
stable
|
1.9 (-2.5, 7.0) |
| Durham County 6 | Urban | 16.8 (14.8, 18.9) | 79 (42, 87) | 57 |
stable
|
0.2 (-0.9, 1.5) |
| Edgecombe County 6 | Urban | 23.2 (18.1, 29.5) | 15 (1, 82) | 16 |
stable
|
0.8 (-1.8, 3.7) |
| Forsyth County 6 | Urban | 20.0 (18.1, 22.0) | 51 (19, 73) | 92 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-2.2, 2.1) |
| Franklin County 6 | Urban | 20.2 (16.0, 25.1) | 49 (3, 87) | 18 |
rising
|
4.3 (1.0, 8.8) |
| Gaston County 6 | Urban | 20.2 (17.9, 22.8) | 47 (12, 75) | 56 |
stable
|
0.8 (-0.9, 2.8) |
| Granville County 6 | Rural | 24.2 (19.4, 29.8) | 7 (1, 74) | 19 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-3.5, 2.8) |
| Greene County 6 | Rural | 19.1 (12.3, 28.7) | 56 (1, 90) | 5 |
stable
|
1.6 (-2.6, 6.6) |
| Guilford County 6 | Urban | 18.0 (16.5, 19.6) | 67 (38, 82) | 112 |
stable
|
0.5 (-0.9, 2.1) |
| Halifax County 6 | Rural | 20.3 (15.7, 26.1) | 42 (2, 87) | 14 |
stable
|
2.7 (-0.2, 6.0) |
| Harnett County 6 | Rural | 19.6 (16.4, 23.2) | 53 (9, 85) | 27 |
rising
|
2.7 (0.9, 5.0) |
| Haywood County 6 | Rural | 20.0 (15.8, 25.1) | 50 (3, 87) | 19 |
stable
|
3.0 (0.0, 6.5) |
| Henderson County 6 | Urban | 15.2 (12.6, 18.2) | 86 (45, 90) | 28 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-2.2, 1.2) |
| Hertford County 6 | Rural | 19.0 (12.3, 28.3) | 59 (1, 90) | 6 |
stable
|
0.5 (-3.2, 4.2) |
| Hoke County 6 | Urban | 21.2 (15.6, 28.1) | 32 (1, 88) | 10 |
stable
|
0.8 (-2.3, 4.9) |
| Iredell County 6 | Urban | 17.8 (15.4, 20.5) | 72 (28, 86) | 41 |
rising
|
1.7 (0.3, 3.3) |
| Jackson County 6 | Rural | 17.2 (12.3, 23.5) | 77 (6, 90) | 9 |
rising
|
3.8 (0.1, 8.9) |
| Johnston County 6 | Urban | 17.9 (15.6, 20.6) | 68 (25, 86) | 43 |
stable
|
1.0 (-0.8, 3.2) |
| Jones County 6 | Rural | 27.3 (15.0, 46.4) | 1 (1, 90) | 4 |
|
|
| Lee County 6 | Rural | 19.3 (15.1, 24.5) | 54 (4, 88) | 15 |
stable
|
1.1 (-2.2, 5.2) |
| Lenoir County 6 | Rural | 23.2 (18.2, 29.1) | 17 (1, 81) | 17 |
stable
|
0.6 (-2.4, 3.7) |
| Lincoln County 6 | Urban | 20.3 (16.6, 24.6) | 45 (5, 84) | 23 |
stable
|
0.2 (-1.7, 2.4) |
| Macon County 6 | Rural | 16.3 (11.6, 22.5) | 82 (8, 90) | 10 |
stable
|
1.7 (-2.1, 6.1) |
| Madison County 6 | Urban | 17.4 (10.8, 27.0) | 76 (1, 90) | 5 |
|
|
| Martin County 6 | Rural | 20.8 (13.9, 30.3) | 37 (1, 90) | 7 |
stable
|
0.7 (-3.3, 5.0) |
| McDowell County 6 | Rural | 26.3 (20.6, 33.2) | 2 (1, 69) | 16 |
rising
|
3.2 (0.1, 6.9) |
| Mecklenburg County 6 | Urban | 16.4 (15.3, 17.6) | 81 (57, 86) | 177 |
stable
|
0.0 (-5.5, 1.4) |
| Montgomery County 6 | Rural | 22.7 (16.0, 31.5) | 21 (1, 88) | 8 |
stable
|
3.2 (-0.7, 7.8) |
| Moore County 6 | Urban | 18.2 (15.0, 22.0) | 65 (15, 88) | 26 |
stable
|
1.7 (-1.1, 4.9) |
| Nash County 6 | Urban | 17.6 (14.3, 21.5) | 74 (19, 88) | 22 |
stable
|
1.0 (-1.5, 3.8) |
| New Hanover County 6 | Urban | 18.7 (16.5, 21.2) | 61 (25, 84) | 54 |
stable
|
-6.0 (-13.4, 1.7) |
| Northampton County 6 | Rural | 22.3 (13.6, 34.6) | 27 (1, 90) | 5 |
rising
|
14.0 (1.9, 42.5) |
| Onslow County 6 | Urban | 24.1 (20.7, 27.9) | 8 (1, 60) | 38 |
stable
|
1.7 (-0.9, 4.6) |
| Orange County 6 | Urban | 21.5 (18.3, 25.1) | 30 (4, 76) | 35 |
rising
|
12.5 (1.9, 33.9) |
| Pamlico County 6 | Rural | 21.7 (12.3, 36.5) | 29 (1, 90) | 4 |
|
|
| Pasquotank County 6 | Rural | 12.0 (8.1, 17.4) | 89 (47, 90) | 6 |
falling
|
-23.2 (-51.3, -2.4) |
| Pender County 6 | Urban | 22.9 (18.3, 28.5) | 19 (1, 80) | 18 |
rising
|
1.9 (0.1, 4.1) |
| Person County 6 | Urban | 20.6 (15.6, 26.9) | 39 (1, 88) | 12 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-3.8, 2.3) |
| Pitt County 6 | Urban | 17.0 (14.4, 20.1) | 78 (28, 88) | 31 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-1.9, 0.9) |
| Polk County 6 | Rural | 20.9 (13.3, 31.8) | 36 (1, 90) | 6 |
|
|
| Randolph County 6 | Urban | 23.8 (20.6, 27.2) | 12 (1, 58) | 45 |
rising
|
3.0 (1.4, 5.0) |
| Richmond County 6 | Rural | 20.3 (15.3, 26.5) | 44 (2, 88) | 12 |
stable
|
2.6 (-1.1, 6.9) |
| Robeson County 6 | Rural | 24.8 (21.0, 29.0) | 5 (1, 56) | 33 |
rising
|
3.3 (1.3, 5.6) |
| Rockingham County 6 | Urban | 23.9 (20.0, 28.3) | 11 (1, 70) | 30 |
stable
|
1.4 (-0.7, 3.4) |
| Rowan County 6 | Urban | 20.8 (17.9, 24.0) | 38 (7, 77) | 40 |
stable
|
1.0 (-0.8, 2.9) |
| Rutherford County 6 | Rural | 22.3 (18.0, 27.5) | 26 (1, 82) | 21 |
rising
|
3.5 (1.9, 5.3) |
| Sampson County 6 | Rural | 20.6 (16.1, 25.9) | 40 (2, 87) | 16 |
stable
|
2.2 (-1.4, 6.3) |
| Scotland County 6 | Rural | 22.5 (16.5, 30.1) | 24 (1, 87) | 10 |
stable
|
1.3 (-3.1, 6.4) |
| Stanly County 6 | Rural | 22.5 (17.9, 28.0) | 23 (1, 81) | 18 |
stable
|
0.9 (-2.0, 3.9) |
| Stokes County 6 | Urban | 18.7 (14.1, 24.5) | 62 (3, 89) | 13 |
stable
|
0.6 (-2.4, 4.0) |
| Surry County 6 | Rural | 23.0 (18.9, 27.9) | 18 (1, 77) | 23 |
stable
|
1.3 (-1.1, 3.9) |
| Swain County 6 | Rural | 17.8 (10.7, 28.8) | 71 (1, 90) | 4 |
|
|
| Transylvania County 6 | Rural | 16.7 (11.5, 23.7) | 80 (4, 90) | 9 |
rising
|
5.1 (1.9, 8.9) |
| Union County 6 | Urban | 17.9 (15.6, 20.4) | 70 (28, 87) | 46 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-2.1, 1.6) |
| Vance County 6 | Rural | 19.1 (14.1, 25.5) | 55 (2, 89) | 11 |
stable
|
-1.3 (-4.4, 1.8) |
| Wake County 6 | Urban | 15.9 (14.9, 17.0) | 83 (64, 87) | 181 |
stable
|
0.3 (-0.5, 1.3) |
| Warren County 6 | Rural | 22.8 (15.0, 33.6) | 20 (1, 90) | 6 |
|
|
| Watauga County 6 | Rural | 20.2 (15.1, 26.7) | 48 (1, 89) | 11 |
stable
|
1.9 (-3.0, 7.9) |
| Wayne County 6 | Urban | 25.2 (21.5, 29.3) | 3 (1, 53) | 35 |
rising
|
4.0 (1.7, 6.9) |
| Wilkes County 6 | Rural | 17.7 (13.7, 22.4) | 73 (10, 89) | 16 |
stable
|
0.0 (-2.7, 2.8) |
| Wilson County 6 | Rural | 20.5 (16.7, 24.9) | 41 (3, 85) | 22 |
stable
|
1.6 (-1.3, 5.0) |
| Yadkin County 6 | Urban | 21.1 (15.6, 28.1) | 33 (1, 88) | 11 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-3.9, 3.5) |
| Yancey County 6 | Rural | 13.9 (7.9, 23.2) | 88 (5, 90) | 4 |
stable
|
4.1 (-2.2, 11.8) |
| Alleghany County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Camden County 6 | Urban |
|
|
|
|
|
| Currituck County 6 | Urban |
|
|
|
|
|
| Gates County 6 | Urban |
|
|
|
|
|
| Graham County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Hyde County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Mitchell County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Perquimans County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Tyrrell County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Washington County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/05/2024 4:06 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Alleghany, Camden, Currituck, Gates, Graham, Hyde, Mitchell, Perquimans, Tyrrell, Washington
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/05/2024 4:06 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Alleghany, Camden, Currituck, Gates, Graham, Hyde, Mitchell, Perquimans, Tyrrell, Washington
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.