Incidence Rates Table
County
|
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
|
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate † cases per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval)
|
CI*Rank ⋔ (95% Confidence Interval)
|
Average Annual Count
|
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Incidence Rates (95% Confidence Interval) 
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| North Carolina 6 | N/A | 18.8 (18.4, 19.1) | N/A | 2,387 |
rising 
|
0.9 (0.5, 1.2) |
| US (SEER+NPCR) 1 | N/A | 17.3 (17.2, 17.4) | N/A | 67,373 |
falling 
|
-0.7 (-1.3, -0.1) |
| Northampton County 6 | Rural | 22.3 (13.6, 34.6) | 27 (1, 90) | 5 |
rising
|
14.0 (1.9, 42.5) |
| Orange County 6 | Urban | 21.5 (18.3, 25.1) | 30 (4, 76) | 35 |
rising
|
12.5 (1.9, 33.9) |
| Cherokee County 6 | Rural | 18.9 (12.7, 27.2) | 60 (1, 90) | 8 |
rising
|
5.2 (1.0, 10.4) |
| Transylvania County 6 | Rural | 16.7 (11.5, 23.7) | 80 (4, 90) | 9 |
rising
|
5.1 (1.9, 8.9) |
| Franklin County 6 | Urban | 20.2 (16.0, 25.1) | 49 (3, 87) | 18 |
rising
|
4.3 (1.0, 8.8) |
| Bladen County 6 | Rural | 22.4 (16.2, 30.5) | 25 (1, 88) | 10 |
rising
|
4.1 (0.4, 8.8) |
| Yancey County 6 | Rural | 13.9 (7.9, 23.2) | 88 (5, 90) | 4 |
stable 
|
4.1 (-2.2, 11.8) |
| Wayne County 6 | Urban | 25.2 (21.5, 29.3) | 3 (1, 53) | 35 |
rising
|
4.0 (1.7, 6.9) |
| Columbus County 6 | Rural | 24.6 (19.3, 31.0) | 6 (1, 78) | 17 |
rising
|
3.8 (0.6, 7.8) |
| Jackson County 6 | Rural | 17.2 (12.3, 23.5) | 77 (6, 90) | 9 |
rising
|
3.8 (0.1, 8.9) |
| Rutherford County 6 | Rural | 22.3 (18.0, 27.5) | 26 (1, 82) | 21 |
rising
|
3.5 (1.9, 5.3) |
| Robeson County 6 | Rural | 24.8 (21.0, 29.0) | 5 (1, 56) | 33 |
rising
|
3.3 (1.3, 5.6) |
| McDowell County 6 | Rural | 26.3 (20.6, 33.2) | 2 (1, 69) | 16 |
rising
|
3.2 (0.1, 6.9) |
| Montgomery County 6 | Rural | 22.7 (16.0, 31.5) | 21 (1, 88) | 8 |
stable
|
3.2 (-0.7, 7.8) |
| Haywood County 6 | Rural | 20.0 (15.8, 25.1) | 50 (3, 87) | 19 |
stable
|
3.0 (0.0, 6.5) |
| Randolph County 6 | Urban | 23.8 (20.6, 27.2) | 12 (1, 58) | 45 |
rising
|
3.0 (1.4, 5.0) |
| Chowan County 6 | Rural | 25.0 (15.4, 38.9) | 4 (1, 90) | 5 |
stable
|
2.7 (-2.3, 8.3) |
| Halifax County 6 | Rural | 20.3 (15.7, 26.1) | 42 (2, 87) | 14 |
stable
|
2.7 (-0.2, 6.0) |
| Harnett County 6 | Rural | 19.6 (16.4, 23.2) | 53 (9, 85) | 27 |
rising
|
2.7 (0.9, 5.0) |
| Alamance County 6 | Urban | 21.5 (18.7, 24.6) | 31 (5, 69) | 46 |
rising
|
2.6 (0.7, 4.9) |
| Richmond County 6 | Rural | 20.3 (15.3, 26.5) | 44 (2, 88) | 12 |
stable
|
2.6 (-1.1, 6.9) |
| Davidson County 6 | Urban | 24.1 (21.2, 27.3) | 9 (1, 51) | 55 |
rising
|
2.4 (0.8, 4.2) |
| Cumberland County 6 | Urban | 18.1 (16.1, 20.4) | 66 (31, 85) | 60 |
rising
|
2.2 (0.8, 3.7) |
| Sampson County 6 | Rural | 20.6 (16.1, 25.9) | 40 (2, 87) | 16 |
stable
|
2.2 (-1.4, 6.3) |
| Beaufort County 6 | Rural | 20.9 (15.9, 27.2) | 35 (1, 88) | 14 |
stable
|
2.1 (-1.0, 5.4) |
| Brunswick County 6 | Urban | 20.3 (17.4, 23.7) | 43 (8, 80) | 50 |
rising
|
2.1 (0.6, 4.0) |
| Burke County 6 | Urban | 23.2 (19.4, 27.7) | 14 (1, 74) | 29 |
stable
|
2.1 (-0.3, 4.9) |
| Davie County 6 | Urban | 23.9 (18.5, 30.5) | 10 (1, 82) | 15 |
stable
|
2.0 (-0.7, 5.2) |
| Duplin County 6 | Rural | 21.1 (16.2, 27.0) | 34 (1, 86) | 14 |
stable
|
1.9 (-2.5, 7.0) |
| Pender County 6 | Urban | 22.9 (18.3, 28.5) | 19 (1, 80) | 18 |
rising
|
1.9 (0.1, 4.1) |
| Watauga County 6 | Rural | 20.2 (15.1, 26.7) | 48 (1, 89) | 11 |
stable
|
1.9 (-3.0, 7.9) |
| Caldwell County 6 | Urban | 23.5 (19.6, 28.2) | 13 (1, 70) | 27 |
stable
|
1.8 (-0.5, 4.4) |
| Iredell County 6 | Urban | 17.8 (15.4, 20.5) | 72 (28, 86) | 41 |
rising
|
1.7 (0.3, 3.3) |
| Macon County 6 | Rural | 16.3 (11.6, 22.5) | 82 (8, 90) | 10 |
stable
|
1.7 (-2.1, 6.1) |
| Moore County 6 | Urban | 18.2 (15.0, 22.0) | 65 (15, 88) | 26 |
stable
|
1.7 (-1.1, 4.9) |
| Onslow County 6 | Urban | 24.1 (20.7, 27.9) | 8 (1, 60) | 38 |
stable
|
1.7 (-0.9, 4.6) |
| Greene County 6 | Rural | 19.1 (12.3, 28.7) | 56 (1, 90) | 5 |
stable
|
1.6 (-2.6, 6.6) |
| Wilson County 6 | Rural | 20.5 (16.7, 24.9) | 41 (3, 85) | 22 |
stable
|
1.6 (-1.3, 5.0) |
| Catawba County 6 | Urban | 19.1 (16.4, 22.1) | 57 (15, 84) | 39 |
stable
|
1.4 (-1.1, 4.1) |
| Rockingham County 6 | Urban | 23.9 (20.0, 28.3) | 11 (1, 70) | 30 |
stable
|
1.4 (-0.7, 3.4) |
| Scotland County 6 | Rural | 22.5 (16.5, 30.1) | 24 (1, 87) | 10 |
stable
|
1.3 (-3.1, 6.4) |
| Surry County 6 | Rural | 23.0 (18.9, 27.9) | 18 (1, 77) | 23 |
stable
|
1.3 (-1.1, 3.9) |
| Buncombe County 6 | Urban | 15.8 (14.0, 17.8) | 84 (53, 88) | 59 |
stable
|
1.2 (-0.1, 2.6) |
| Lee County 6 | Rural | 19.3 (15.1, 24.5) | 54 (4, 88) | 15 |
stable
|
1.1 (-2.2, 5.2) |
| Johnston County 6 | Urban | 17.9 (15.6, 20.6) | 68 (25, 86) | 43 |
stable
|
1.0 (-0.8, 3.2) |
| Nash County 6 | Urban | 17.6 (14.3, 21.5) | 74 (19, 88) | 22 |
stable
|
1.0 (-1.5, 3.8) |
| Rowan County 6 | Urban | 20.8 (17.9, 24.0) | 38 (7, 77) | 40 |
stable
|
1.0 (-0.8, 2.9) |
| Carteret County 6 | Rural | 20.2 (16.2, 25.1) | 46 (3, 86) | 22 |
stable
|
0.9 (-2.7, 4.7) |
| Stanly County 6 | Rural | 22.5 (17.9, 28.0) | 23 (1, 81) | 18 |
stable
|
0.9 (-2.0, 3.9) |
| Craven County 6 | Rural | 19.0 (15.7, 22.9) | 58 (11, 86) | 25 |
stable
|
0.8 (-2.1, 3.9) |
| Edgecombe County 6 | Urban | 23.2 (18.1, 29.5) | 15 (1, 82) | 16 |
stable
|
0.8 (-1.8, 3.7) |
| Gaston County 6 | Urban | 20.2 (17.9, 22.8) | 47 (12, 75) | 56 |
stable
|
0.8 (-0.9, 2.8) |
| Hoke County 6 | Urban | 21.2 (15.6, 28.1) | 32 (1, 88) | 10 |
stable
|
0.8 (-2.3, 4.9) |
| Bertie County 6 | Rural | 19.9 (12.3, 31.0) | 52 (1, 90) | 5 |
stable
|
0.7 (-3.5, 5.3) |
| Martin County 6 | Rural | 20.8 (13.9, 30.3) | 37 (1, 90) | 7 |
stable
|
0.7 (-3.3, 5.0) |
| Chatham County 6 | Urban | 18.2 (14.8, 22.4) | 64 (13, 88) | 22 |
stable
|
0.6 (-2.2, 3.9) |
| Lenoir County 6 | Rural | 23.2 (18.2, 29.1) | 17 (1, 81) | 17 |
stable
|
0.6 (-2.4, 3.7) |
| Stokes County 6 | Urban | 18.7 (14.1, 24.5) | 62 (3, 89) | 13 |
stable
|
0.6 (-2.4, 4.0) |
| Guilford County 6 | Urban | 18.0 (16.5, 19.6) | 67 (38, 82) | 112 |
stable
|
0.5 (-0.9, 2.1) |
| Hertford County 6 | Rural | 19.0 (12.3, 28.3) | 59 (1, 90) | 6 |
stable
|
0.5 (-3.2, 4.2) |
| Caswell County 6 | Rural | 17.5 (11.2, 26.3) | 75 (2, 90) | 6 |
stable
|
0.3 (-4.6, 5.8) |
| Wake County 6 | Urban | 15.9 (14.9, 17.0) | 83 (64, 87) | 181 |
stable
|
0.3 (-0.5, 1.3) |
| Durham County 6 | Urban | 16.8 (14.8, 18.9) | 79 (42, 87) | 57 |
stable
|
0.2 (-0.9, 1.5) |
| Lincoln County 6 | Urban | 20.3 (16.6, 24.6) | 45 (5, 84) | 23 |
stable
|
0.2 (-1.7, 2.4) |
| Mecklenburg County 6 | Urban | 16.4 (15.3, 17.6) | 81 (57, 86) | 177 |
stable
|
0.0 (-5.5, 1.4) |
| Wilkes County 6 | Rural | 17.7 (13.7, 22.4) | 73 (10, 89) | 16 |
stable
|
0.0 (-2.7, 2.8) |
| Forsyth County 6 | Urban | 20.0 (18.1, 22.0) | 51 (19, 73) | 92 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-2.2, 2.1) |
| Yadkin County 6 | Urban | 21.1 (15.6, 28.1) | 33 (1, 88) | 11 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-3.9, 3.5) |
| Granville County 6 | Rural | 24.2 (19.4, 29.8) | 7 (1, 74) | 19 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-3.5, 2.8) |
| Union County 6 | Urban | 17.9 (15.6, 20.4) | 70 (28, 87) | 46 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-2.1, 1.6) |
| Henderson County 6 | Urban | 15.2 (12.6, 18.2) | 86 (45, 90) | 28 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-2.2, 1.2) |
| Pitt County 6 | Urban | 17.0 (14.4, 20.1) | 78 (28, 88) | 31 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-1.9, 0.9) |
| Person County 6 | Urban | 20.6 (15.6, 26.9) | 39 (1, 88) | 12 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-3.8, 2.3) |
| Cabarrus County 6 | Urban | 18.4 (16.0, 21.0) | 63 (23, 85) | 45 |
stable
|
-1.0 (-3.2, 1.3) |
| Dare County 6 | Rural | 10.7 (7.1, 15.7) | 90 (64, 90) | 6 |
stable
|
-1.2 (-6.4, 4.3) |
| Vance County 6 | Rural | 19.1 (14.1, 25.5) | 55 (2, 89) | 11 |
stable
|
-1.3 (-4.4, 1.8) |
| Alexander County 6 | Urban | 15.4 (10.7, 21.6) | 85 (10, 90) | 8 |
stable
|
-1.7 (-6.3, 2.9) |
| Ashe County 6 | Rural | 14.0 (9.5, 20.6) | 87 (25, 90) | 7 |
stable
|
-2.1 (-5.4, 1.3) |
| New Hanover County 6 | Urban | 18.7 (16.5, 21.2) | 61 (25, 84) | 54 |
stable
|
-6.0 (-13.4, 1.7) |
| Cleveland County 6 | Rural | 22.6 (18.9, 26.8) | 22 (1, 74) | 30 |
stable
|
-11.4 (-29.9, 5.6) |
| Pasquotank County 6 | Rural | 12.0 (8.1, 17.4) | 89 (47, 90) | 6 |
falling
|
-23.2 (-51.3, -2.4) |
| Anson County 6 | Urban | 21.8 (14.4, 31.7) | 28 (1, 90) | 6 |
|
|
| Avery County 6 | Rural | 17.9 (11.1, 28.0) | 69 (1, 90) | 5 |
|
|
| Clay County 6 | Rural | 23.2 (13.2, 39.0) | 16 (1, 90) | 4 |
|
|
| Jones County 6 | Rural | 27.3 (15.0, 46.4) | 1 (1, 90) | 4 |
|
|
| Madison County 6 | Urban | 17.4 (10.8, 27.0) | 76 (1, 90) | 5 |
|
|
| Pamlico County 6 | Rural | 21.7 (12.3, 36.5) | 29 (1, 90) | 4 |
|
|
| Polk County 6 | Rural | 20.9 (13.3, 31.8) | 36 (1, 90) | 6 |
|
|
| Swain County 6 | Rural | 17.8 (10.7, 28.8) | 71 (1, 90) | 4 |
|
|
| Warren County 6 | Rural | 22.8 (15.0, 33.6) | 20 (1, 90) | 6 |
|
|
| Alleghany County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Camden County 6 | Urban |
|
|
|
|
|
| Currituck County 6 | Urban |
|
|
|
|
|
| Gates County 6 | Urban |
|
|
|
|
|
| Graham County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Hyde County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Mitchell County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Perquimans County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Tyrrell County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Washington County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/10/2024 6:49 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Alleghany, Camden, Currituck, Gates, Graham, Hyde, Mitchell, Perquimans, Tyrrell, Washington
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/10/2024 6:49 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Alleghany, Camden, Currituck, Gates, Graham, Hyde, Mitchell, Perquimans, Tyrrell, Washington
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.