Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Ohio by County

Bladder (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Ohio 6 N/A 21.6 (21.3, 22.0) N/A 3,337 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.6, -0.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 18.8 (18.7, 18.9) N/A 75,136 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.8, -1.7)
Seneca County 6 Rural 31.5 (25.9, 38.0) 1 (1, 40) 23 stable stable trend 4.3 (0.0, 14.6)
Athens County 6 Rural 29.6 (23.7, 36.5) 2 (1, 68) 19 stable stable trend -14.4 (-29.7, 2.6)
Adams County 6 Rural 29.1 (21.6, 38.5) 3 (1, 82) 11 rising rising trend 3.4 (0.8, 6.7)
Gallia County 6 Rural 29.0 (22.1, 37.6) 4 (1, 79) 12 stable stable trend 2.7 (-1.1, 7.5)
Washington County 6 Rural 28.9 (24.3, 34.4) 5 (1, 57) 28 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.6, 2.7)
Crawford County 6 Rural 28.6 (22.9, 35.4) 6 (1, 67) 19 rising rising trend 3.1 (0.3, 9.4)
Carroll County 6 Urban 28.4 (21.3, 37.4) 7 (1, 81) 12 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.8, 5.1)
Marion County 6 Rural 27.3 (22.6, 32.8) 8 (1, 70) 24 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.3, 3.3)
Monroe County 6 Rural 27.1 (18.3, 39.6) 9 (1, 87) 6 stable stable trend 2.7 (-2.0, 8.4)
Van Wert County 6 Rural 26.9 (20.1, 35.5) 10 (1, 84) 11 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.7, 4.4)
Pike County 6 Rural 26.9 (19.7, 36.0) 11 (1, 85) 10 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.3, 3.8)
Preble County 6 Rural 26.0 (20.5, 32.8) 12 (1, 81) 16 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.7, 6.2)
Union County 6 Urban 26.0 (20.4, 32.6) 13 (1, 81) 15 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.3, 3.2)
Jefferson County 6 Urban 25.8 (21.5, 30.8) 14 (1, 70) 27 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.9, 3.1)
Guernsey County 6 Rural 25.8 (20.0, 32.9) 15 (1, 83) 14 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.6, 5.3)
Paulding County 6 Rural 25.7 (17.7, 36.6) 16 (1, 88) 7 stable stable trend 2.5 (-2.9, 8.9)
Huron County 6 Rural 25.6 (20.7, 31.5) 17 (1, 77) 20 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.4, 5.0)
Vinton County 6 Rural 25.0 (15.1, 39.5) 18 (1, 88) 4
*
*
Columbiana County 6 Rural 24.9 (21.5, 28.8) 19 (3, 69) 39 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.6)
Defiance County 6 Rural 24.9 (19.1, 32.0) 20 (1, 84) 13 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.4, 4.0)
Clark County 6 Urban 24.8 (21.8, 28.2) 21 (4, 68) 50 stable stable trend -0.1 (-13.8, 4.8)
Geauga County 6 Urban 24.4 (20.9, 28.5) 22 (3, 74) 36 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.7, 2.2)
Richland County 6 Urban 24.4 (21.2, 27.9) 23 (4, 71) 44 rising rising trend 3.2 (0.4, 11.1)
Brown County 6 Urban 24.2 (19.0, 30.7) 24 (1, 85) 15 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.5, 5.0)
Jackson County 6 Rural 24.1 (17.9, 32.1) 25 (1, 87) 10 stable stable trend 4.5 (-0.1, 10.8)
Hancock County 6 Rural 24.1 (19.9, 29.0) 26 (3, 78) 24 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.5, 4.4)
Champaign County 6 Rural 23.9 (18.2, 31.0) 27 (1, 87) 13 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.6, 3.6)
Mahoning County 6 Urban 23.9 (21.6, 26.4) 28 (8, 64) 86 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
Erie County 6 Urban 23.7 (19.8, 28.4) 29 (3, 78) 28 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.1, 2.8)
Coshocton County 6 Rural 23.7 (18.0, 30.7) 30 (2, 86) 12 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.8, 2.7)
Portage County 6 Urban 23.6 (20.7, 26.9) 31 (6, 73) 49 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.2, 1.7)
Lake County 6 Urban 23.5 (21.2, 26.0) 32 (9, 67) 82 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.2, 1.8)
Knox County 6 Rural 23.5 (19.0, 28.9) 33 (2, 82) 20 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.6, 3.8)
Miami County 6 Urban 23.5 (20.0, 27.5) 34 (5, 79) 34 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.2, 3.2)
Stark County 6 Urban 23.5 (21.7, 25.4) 35 (11, 61) 127 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.9, 2.1)
Ross County 6 Rural 23.4 (19.3, 28.1) 36 (3, 82) 24 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.5, 3.6)
Ashtabula County 6 Urban 23.2 (19.7, 27.1) 37 (5, 81) 33 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.1, 1.1)
Allen County 6 Urban 23.0 (19.5, 27.0) 38 (6, 78) 33 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.6, 3.8)
Lorain County 6 Urban 23.0 (21.0, 25.2) 39 (13, 69) 99 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Trumbull County 6 Urban 22.9 (20.6, 25.5) 40 (11, 70) 74 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.2)
Belmont County 6 Urban 22.9 (18.9, 27.7) 41 (4, 83) 24 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.9, 2.4)
Muskingum County 6 Rural 22.9 (19.1, 27.3) 42 (5, 82) 26 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.0, 2.9)
Greene County 6 Urban 22.9 (20.1, 26.0) 43 (8, 75) 50 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.1, 2.6)
Madison County 6 Urban 22.8 (17.5, 29.4) 44 (2, 86) 13 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.9, 5.3)
Lucas County 6 Urban 22.6 (20.8, 24.5) 45 (16, 68) 122 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.3)
Licking County 6 Urban 22.6 (19.8, 25.6) 46 (10, 75) 51 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.4)
Clinton County 6 Rural 22.6 (17.3, 29.0) 47 (2, 86) 13 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.1, 1.4)
Pickaway County 6 Urban 22.5 (17.9, 28.2) 48 (3, 86) 16 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.8, 4.5)
Montgomery County 6 Urban 22.4 (20.9, 24.1) 49 (19, 66) 162 stable stable trend 0.9 (0.0, 1.8)
Holmes County 6 Rural 22.0 (16.5, 28.7) 50 (3, 87) 11 stable stable trend 3.2 (-1.8, 9.7)
Harrison County 6 Rural 21.8 (14.0, 33.1) 51 (1, 88) 5 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.8, 4.0)
Fairfield County 6 Urban 21.5 (18.7, 24.7) 52 (14, 81) 42 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.3, 1.8)
Meigs County 6 Rural 21.5 (15.2, 30.1) 53 (1, 88) 8 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.4, 5.9)
Cuyahoga County 6 Urban 21.4 (20.4, 22.4) 54 (36, 68) 377 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.1, 3.0)
Shelby County 6 Rural 21.4 (16.4, 27.4) 55 (3, 87) 13 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.8, 3.9)
Darke County 6 Rural 21.3 (16.9, 26.6) 56 (5, 86) 17 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.4, 9.2)
Ottawa County 6 Urban 21.2 (16.5, 27.1) 57 (5, 87) 15 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.9, 3.9)
Tuscarawas County 6 Rural 21.1 (17.7, 25.1) 58 (10, 85) 28 falling falling trend -8.6 (-20.0, -1.6)
Medina County 6 Urban 21.0 (18.6, 23.8) 59 (19, 81) 54 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.4, -1.4)
Summit County 6 Urban 20.9 (19.5, 22.5) 60 (33, 77) 157 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.1, 4.6)
Williams County 6 Rural 20.7 (15.4, 27.4) 61 (3, 88) 11 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.1, 3.1)
Perry County 6 Urban 20.6 (15.1, 27.7) 62 (3, 88) 10 stable stable trend 1.2 (-3.5, 6.5)
Fulton County 6 Urban 20.5 (15.5, 26.6) 63 (6, 88) 12 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.3, 2.4)
Putnam County 6 Rural 20.4 (15.0, 27.4) 64 (4, 88) 10 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.8, 3.7)
Sandusky County 6 Rural 20.2 (16.0, 25.2) 65 (9, 87) 17 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.6, 0.9)
Ashland County 6 Rural 20.1 (15.8, 25.4) 66 (8, 88) 15 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.0, 2.4)
Hocking County 6 Urban 19.9 (14.0, 27.8) 67 (3, 88) 8 stable stable trend 0.9 (-3.7, 6.4)
Logan County 6 Rural 19.9 (15.2, 25.8) 68 (8, 88) 13 falling falling trend -17.4 (-36.1, -5.4)
Lawrence County 6 Urban 19.9 (15.8, 24.8) 69 (11, 87) 17 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.5, 5.3)
Franklin County 6 Urban 19.6 (18.5, 20.8) 70 (49, 80) 246 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.6)
Wood County 6 Urban 19.6 (16.5, 23.0) 71 (19, 87) 30 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.7, 1.4)
Highland County 6 Rural 19.5 (14.6, 25.7) 72 (8, 88) 11 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.1, 3.9)
Warren County 6 Urban 19.3 (17.0, 21.9) 73 (32, 85) 52 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.2, 1.5)
Clermont County 6 Urban 19.2 (16.9, 21.8) 74 (38, 86) 52 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.3, 0.9)
Hardin County 6 Rural 19.1 (13.3, 26.7) 75 (3, 88) 7 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.6, 3.4)
Butler County 6 Urban 19.0 (17.2, 20.9) 76 (47, 85) 84 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.8, 1.9)
Delaware County 6 Urban 18.6 (16.1, 21.4) 77 (39, 87) 43 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.0, 0.2)
Wayne County 6 Rural 18.5 (15.5, 21.9) 78 (28, 87) 29 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.9, 0.5)
Auglaize County 6 Rural 18.2 (13.7, 23.9) 79 (12, 88) 11 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.6, 0.5)
Mercer County 6 Rural 18.2 (13.5, 24.1) 80 (11, 88) 11 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.5, 2.0)
Scioto County 6 Rural 17.4 (13.9, 21.6) 81 (26, 88) 18 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.5, -0.5)
Hamilton County 6 Urban 16.9 (15.7, 18.1) 82 (70, 87) 169 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.2)
Henry County 6 Rural 16.8 (11.7, 23.9) 83 (12, 88) 7 stable stable trend -1.2 (-5.6, 3.5)
Fayette County 6 Rural 16.5 (11.1, 23.8) 84 (13, 88) 6 stable stable trend 0.1 (-5.4, 5.8)
Morrow County 6 Urban 16.0 (11.2, 22.3) 85 (24, 88) 8
*
*
Noble County 6 Rural 15.7 (9.4, 26.1) 86 (6, 88) 5
*
*
Wyandot County 6 Rural 15.0 (9.8, 22.4) 87 (24, 88) 5 stable stable trend -0.6 (-6.4, 5.9)
Morgan County 6 Rural 14.0 (7.9, 24.0) 88 (10, 88) 3 stable stable trend -1.5 (-6.9, 3.9)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/09/2024 6:23 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2023 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top