Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Ohio by County

Bladder (All Stages^), 2013-2017

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Ohio 6 *** 21.9 (21.6, 22.3) N/A 3,182 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.5, 0.1)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 20.0 (19.9, 20.0) N/A 74,787 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.7, -1.1)
Logan County 6 *** 34.9 (28.3, 42.8) 1 (1, 32) 20 rising rising trend 5.7 (2.8, 8.8)
Preble County 6 *** 29.0 (22.9, 36.4) 2 (1, 71) 16 rising rising trend 4.3 (1.1, 7.5)
Allen County 6 *** 28.6 (24.6, 33.2) 3 (1, 47) 38 rising rising trend 3.0 (1.2, 4.8)
Carroll County 6 *** 27.7 (20.6, 36.8) 4 (1, 84) 11 stable stable trend 1.7 (-2.1, 5.7)
Trumbull County 6 *** 27.3 (24.7, 30.1) 5 (2, 40) 85 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.2)
Jackson County 6 *** 27.3 (20.4, 35.8) 6 (1, 84) 11 rising rising trend 7.7 (2.6, 13.0)
Tuscarawas County 6 *** 27.2 (23.3, 31.6) 7 (1, 62) 35 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.5, 4.2)
Shelby County 6 *** 26.9 (21.1, 33.9) 8 (1, 82) 15 stable stable trend 2.6 (-0.3, 5.6)
Huron County 6 *** 26.4 (21.3, 32.4) 9 (1, 78) 20 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.3, 5.1)
Lake County 6 *** 26.2 (23.8, 28.9) 10 (3, 49) 87 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.3, 2.2)
Pike County 6 *** 25.7 (18.9, 34.5) 11 (1, 86) 10 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.2, 5.1)
Sandusky County 6 *** 25.5 (20.8, 31.2) 12 (1, 79) 21 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.1, 1.7)
Seneca County 6 *** 25.5 (20.5, 31.4) 13 (1, 82) 19 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.4, 0.8)
Henry County 6 *** 25.5 (18.8, 34.0) 14 (1, 86) 10 stable stable trend 0.0 (-4.8, 5.0)
Gallia County 6 *** 25.5 (19.0, 33.7) 15 (1, 85) 11 stable stable trend 2.1 (-2.5, 7.0)
Defiance County 6 *** 25.4 (19.5, 32.8) 16 (1, 85) 13 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.7, 3.8)
Lawrence County 6 *** 25.3 (20.6, 30.8) 17 (1, 80) 21 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.5, 5.3)
Licking County 6 *** 25.2 (22.2, 28.6) 18 (3, 66) 52 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.1, 1.9)
Hardin County 6 *** 25.2 (18.3, 33.9) 19 (1, 86) 9 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.4, 5.4)
Mahoning County 6 *** 25.1 (22.7, 27.7) 20 (4, 58) 88 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.7)
Hancock County 6 *** 25.0 (20.7, 30.2) 21 (2, 79) 23 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.6, 4.9)
Brown County 6 *** 25.0 (19.6, 31.6) 22 (1, 85) 15 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.6, 4.7)
Adams County 6 *** 24.9 (18.1, 33.6) 23 (1, 86) 9 stable stable trend 2.9 (-0.3, 6.3)
Stark County 6 *** 24.8 (22.9, 26.9) 24 (7, 53) 130 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.7, 2.2)
Highland County 6 *** 24.4 (19.0, 31.1) 25 (1, 85) 14 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.0, 4.6)
Coshocton County 6 *** 24.3 (18.4, 31.6) 26 (1, 86) 12 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.4, 2.7)
Athens County 6 *** 24.2 (18.8, 30.7) 27 (1, 85) 14 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.2, 4.2)
Portage County 6 *** 24.1 (21.0, 27.5) 28 (4, 74) 46 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.5, 2.1)
Fulton County 6 *** 24.0 (18.6, 30.8) 29 (1, 86) 14 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.9, 3.6)
Erie County 6 *** 24.0 (20.0, 28.7) 30 (3, 80) 27 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.3, 2.5)
Morgan County 6 *** 23.9 (15.6, 35.8) 31 (1, 88) 5 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.6, 4.5)
Putnam County 6 *** 23.9 (17.7, 31.7) 32 (1, 87) 10 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.7, 5.1)
Vinton County 6 *** 23.6 (14.2, 37.3) 33 (1, 88) 4
*
*
Clark County 6 *** 23.1 (20.2, 26.5) 34 (7, 78) 44 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.7, 2.9)
Darke County 6 *** 23.1 (18.3, 28.8) 35 (2, 85) 17 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.8, 2.6)
Wood County 6 *** 23.1 (19.6, 26.9) 36 (5, 81) 34 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.9, 2.1)
Union County 6 *** 23.0 (17.4, 29.9) 37 (2, 86) 12 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.2, 2.4)
Clermont County 6 *** 23.0 (20.3, 26.0) 38 (8, 78) 54 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.4, 1.7)
Van Wert County 6 *** 23.0 (16.8, 31.0) 39 (1, 87) 9 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.0, 4.5)
Perry County 6 *** 22.7 (16.5, 30.4) 40 (1, 88) 9 stable stable trend 1.8 (-4.1, 8.1)
Mercer County 6 *** 22.7 (17.2, 29.4) 41 (1, 87) 12 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.6, 2.4)
Lucas County 6 *** 22.7 (20.8, 24.6) 42 (16, 70) 117 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Knox County 6 *** 22.7 (18.1, 28.1) 43 (2, 85) 18 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.1, 4.1)
Ottawa County 6 *** 22.7 (17.8, 28.8) 44 (2, 86) 16 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.4, 4.0)
Morrow County 6 *** 22.6 (16.7, 30.1) 45 (2, 87) 10
*
*
Guernsey County 6 *** 22.6 (17.2, 29.3) 46 (2, 87) 12 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.8, 3.4)
Muskingum County 6 *** 22.6 (18.8, 26.9) 47 (5, 84) 26 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.5, 2.8)
Ashtabula County 6 *** 22.5 (19.0, 26.5) 48 (6, 83) 31 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.8, 1.0)
Miami County 6 *** 22.4 (18.9, 26.3) 49 (8, 83) 31 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.8, 3.9)
Meigs County 6 *** 22.2 (15.6, 31.2) 50 (1, 88) 7 stable stable trend 2.6 (-0.8, 6.0)
Clinton County 6 *** 22.2 (16.7, 29.1) 51 (2, 87) 11 stable stable trend -2.7 (-6.2, 0.9)
Wayne County 6 *** 22.2 (18.9, 25.9) 52 (8, 83) 33 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.7, 1.4)
Lorain County 6 *** 22.1 (20.1, 24.3) 53 (18, 76) 88 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.2)
Geauga County 6 *** 22.1 (18.6, 26.1) 54 (7, 84) 30 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.5, 1.3)
Ashland County 6 *** 22.1 (17.4, 27.7) 55 (3, 87) 16 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.0, 3.4)
Hocking County 6 *** 21.9 (15.9, 29.9) 56 (2, 88) 9 stable stable trend 1.9 (-3.4, 7.5)
Paulding County 6 *** 21.9 (14.2, 32.7) 57 (1, 88) 5 stable stable trend 0.9 (-4.6, 6.7)
Fairfield County 6 *** 21.8 (18.8, 25.3) 58 (12, 82) 38 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.0, 2.7)
Auglaize County 6 *** 21.8 (16.8, 28.0) 59 (3, 87) 13 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.6, 1.9)
Columbiana County 6 *** 21.7 (18.5, 25.4) 60 (11, 83) 34 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.0, 0.3)
Medina County 6 *** 21.6 (18.9, 24.6) 61 (14, 82) 48 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.2, -2.0)
Ross County 6 *** 21.3 (17.4, 25.9) 62 (6, 86) 21 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.0, 4.0)
Summit County 6 *** 21.2 (19.6, 22.8) 63 (31, 77) 148 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.6)
Cuyahoga County 6 *** 21.2 (20.2, 22.2) 64 (38, 73) 358 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.3)
Montgomery County 6 *** 21.1 (19.6, 22.7) 65 (31, 76) 148 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.0)
Warren County 6 *** 20.9 (18.3, 23.7) 66 (19, 83) 49 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.0, 1.6)
Richland County 6 *** 20.9 (17.9, 24.2) 67 (15, 85) 36 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.1, 2.2)
Jefferson County 6 *** 20.8 (17.0, 25.3) 68 (9, 86) 22 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.2, 2.3)
Washington County 6 *** 20.7 (16.8, 25.5) 69 (8, 86) 20 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.1, 2.4)
Crawford County 6 *** 20.6 (15.7, 26.6) 70 (4, 87) 13 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.1, 2.5)
Belmont County 6 *** 20.4 (16.6, 24.9) 71 (10, 87) 21 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.2, 2.0)
Fayette County 6 *** 20.0 (14.0, 27.9) 72 (3, 88) 7 stable stable trend 0.5 (-5.7, 7.1)
Greene County 6 *** 19.8 (17.1, 22.8) 73 (28, 85) 41 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.9, 2.7)
Scioto County 6 *** 19.4 (15.7, 23.8) 74 (15, 88) 19 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.3, -0.8)
Delaware County 6 *** 19.3 (16.5, 22.4) 75 (32, 87) 37 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.7, 0.5)
Marion County 6 *** 19.2 (15.2, 24.0) 76 (14, 88) 16 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.3, 1.2)
Pickaway County 6 *** 19.2 (14.7, 24.6) 77 (9, 88) 13 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.8, 3.1)
Franklin County 6 *** 19.1 (18.0, 20.3) 78 (55, 84) 219 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.8)
Madison County 6 *** 19.1 (14.1, 25.5) 79 (7, 88) 10 stable stable trend 0.0 (-4.2, 4.3)
Butler County 6 *** 18.6 (16.7, 20.6) 80 (50, 86) 76 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.1, 1.2)
Williams County 6 *** 18.4 (13.5, 24.8) 81 (10, 88) 9 stable stable trend -1.3 (-5.2, 2.7)
Hamilton County 6 *** 17.8 (16.6, 19.0) 82 (65, 87) 169 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.7)
Harrison County 6 *** 17.6 (10.9, 27.9) 83 (3, 88) 4 stable stable trend -3.1 (-8.1, 2.3)
Champaign County 6 *** 17.4 (12.6, 23.5) 84 (11, 88) 9 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.0, 1.9)
Monroe County 6 *** 17.2 (10.4, 27.6) 85 (4, 88) 4 stable stable trend 22.2 (-18.1, 82.4)
Wyandot County 6 *** 14.8 (9.5, 22.3) 86 (24, 88) 5 stable stable trend -0.4 (-6.9, 6.5)
Noble County 6 *** 14.7 (8.4, 25.0) 87 (10, 88) 4
*
*
Holmes County 6 *** 13.2 (8.8, 19.1) 88 (55, 88) 6 stable stable trend 1.6 (-4.1, 7.7)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/08/2021 11:22 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2017 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2017) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2019 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2017) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2019 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2017 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2019 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top