Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Ohio by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <50

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Ohio 6 112.4 (111.3, 113.6) N/A 7,678 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.5, 1.1)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 105.2 (105.0, 105.5) N/A 202,435 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.1, 0.3)
Franklin County 6 106.1 (103.0, 109.4) 63 (46, 75) 883 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.3, 0.5)
Cuyahoga County 6 114.6 (111.1, 118.2) 41 (23, 58) 815 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.5, 1.4)
Hamilton County 6 112.4 (108.1, 116.8) 46 (28, 66) 531 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.8, 1.5)
Summit County 6 118.3 (112.9, 123.8) 33 (14, 55) 372 rising rising trend 5.2 (2.3, 7.4)
Montgomery County 6 119.6 (114.1, 125.3) 31 (13, 54) 360 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.3, 1.7)
Lucas County 6 111.7 (105.9, 117.8) 47 (22, 71) 278 stable stable trend 0.3 (-5.0, 2.2)
Butler County 6 108.2 (102.2, 114.5) 58 (30, 78) 242 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.1, 1.9)
Stark County 6 113.1 (106.7, 119.8) 45 (19, 72) 236 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.6, 1.7)
Lorain County 6 123.5 (116.3, 131.0) 23 (6, 49) 223 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.2, 2.3)
Warren County 6 104.3 (97.0, 111.9) 67 (34, 83) 157 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.7, 1.1)
Lake County 6 119.7 (111.4, 128.5) 30 (8, 62) 156 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.6, 3.1)
Delaware County 6 102.2 (94.8, 110.0) 73 (39, 85) 145 falling falling trend -2.7 (-8.1, -0.6)
Clermont County 6 109.9 (101.7, 118.5) 56 (22, 80) 136 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.2, 1.2)
Mahoning County 6 102.1 (94.3, 110.4) 72 (38, 85) 128 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.4, 1.3)
Medina County 6 116.7 (107.6, 126.3) 38 (9, 70) 125 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.1, 1.6)
Licking County 6 114.7 (105.7, 124.3) 42 (13, 75) 120 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.4, 1.5)
Trumbull County 6 110.7 (102.0, 120.0) 54 (18, 80) 120 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.6, 2.0)
Greene County 6 113.3 (103.8, 123.5) 44 (11, 78) 107 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 1.0)
Fairfield County 6 107.8 (98.7, 117.5) 59 (21, 84) 104 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.1, 1.9)
Portage County 6 102.9 (93.6, 112.9) 69 (28, 85) 92 stable stable trend -7.3 (-16.2, 0.5)
Clark County 6 120.5 (109.5, 132.3) 29 (5, 72) 89 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.4, 2.9)
Miami County 6 129.0 (116.6, 142.4) 11 (2, 54) 80 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.3, 3.1)
Wood County 6 108.0 (97.5, 119.4) 60 (16, 84) 78 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.1, 3.0)
Richland County 6 111.7 (100.8, 123.5) 50 (12, 82) 77 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.7, 2.9)
Columbiana County 6 121.8 (109.4, 135.2) 27 (3, 74) 71 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.3, 2.1)
Wayne County 6 107.5 (96.4, 119.6) 61 (14, 84) 69 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.2, 2.4)
Muskingum County 6 130.6 (116.6, 145.8) 10 (1, 60) 64 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.6, 2.0)
Geauga County 6 122.3 (108.9, 137.0) 21 (2, 71) 62 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.1, 2.5)
Tuscarawas County 6 117.3 (104.4, 131.4) 37 (5, 80) 60 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.5, 2.5)
Scioto County 6 130.6 (116.0, 146.5) 7 (1, 65) 59 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.6, 1.0)
Allen County 6 101.5 (90.1, 113.9) 75 (26, 87) 58 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.2, 1.8)
Lawrence County 6 154.0 (136.3, 173.5) 1 (1, 21) 55 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.9, 2.7)
Ross County 6 114.0 (100.9, 128.4) 43 (6, 82) 55 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.9, 1.6)
Ashtabula County 6 98.5 (87.1, 111.0) 82 (31, 87) 55 falling falling trend -6.7 (-16.4, -1.7)
Jefferson County 6 141.8 (124.7, 160.7) 2 (1, 39) 50 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.7, 3.4)
Union County 6 118.4 (103.7, 134.6) 32 (3, 81) 47 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.2, 1.8)
Belmont County 6 118.4 (103.4, 134.9) 34 (3, 82) 46 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.6, 2.8)
Huron County 6 126.9 (110.4, 145.2) 15 (1, 76) 43 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.4, 4.7)
Washington County 6 130.7 (113.8, 149.5) 8 (1, 71) 43 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.3, 3.0)
Erie County 6 106.2 (92.2, 121.7) 64 (12, 86) 42 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.8, 2.8)
Hancock County 6 97.4 (84.6, 111.6) 83 (23, 87) 42 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.4, 2.1)
Marion County 6 105.0 (91.1, 120.3) 66 (13, 86) 42 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.6, 2.8)
Knox County 6 116.9 (101.0, 134.5) 40 (3, 84) 39 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.0, 2.7)
Sandusky County 6 116.3 (100.5, 134.0) 39 (3, 83) 39 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.0, 2.1)
Pickaway County 6 100.8 (86.8, 116.4) 76 (18, 87) 37 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.4, 1.2)
Ashland County 6 123.3 (106.0, 142.7) 22 (1, 80) 37 rising rising trend 2.9 (0.3, 5.9)
Seneca County 6 112.0 (95.7, 130.3) 52 (6, 86) 34 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.2, 1.5)
Athens County 6 102.2 (87.0, 119.2) 68 (12, 87) 34 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.2, 1.7)
Highland County 6 134.9 (115.1, 157.2) 4 (1, 71) 33 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.5, 3.6)
Shelby County 6 118.2 (100.7, 137.8) 35 (2, 84) 33 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.9, 3.9)
Brown County 6 120.6 (102.4, 141.2) 28 (2, 83) 31 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.0, 2.9)
Fulton County 6 129.4 (109.6, 151.7) 12 (1, 77) 31 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.3, 4.3)
Madison County 6 103.0 (87.2, 120.9) 70 (11, 87) 30 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.8, 2.4)
Logan County 6 112.3 (94.7, 132.1) 51 (3, 86) 29 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.1, 2.7)
Guernsey County 6 134.0 (112.9, 157.8) 5 (1, 77) 29 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.3, 4.5)
Auglaize County 6 111.5 (93.9, 131.4) 53 (3, 86) 29 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.0, 2.9)
Darke County 6 98.1 (82.2, 116.0) 81 (18, 88) 27 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.1, 3.0)
Preble County 6 117.3 (98.3, 138.8) 36 (2, 85) 27 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.3, 5.0)
Coshocton County 6 127.7 (106.6, 151.8) 13 (1, 82) 26 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.4, 4.3)
Crawford County 6 110.0 (91.7, 130.8) 57 (4, 86) 26 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.5, 3.3)
Ottawa County 6 124.6 (103.8, 148.3) 19 (1, 83) 26 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.2, 3.4)
Mercer County 6 111.9 (92.7, 133.8) 48 (3, 87) 24 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.1, 2.1)
Clinton County 6 99.5 (82.3, 119.1) 80 (13, 88) 24 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.5, 2.0)
Jackson County 6 122.3 (101.1, 146.5) 24 (1, 85) 24 rising rising trend 2.6 (0.1, 11.3)
Champaign County 6 102.8 (84.6, 123.7) 71 (7, 87) 23 stable stable trend -11.3 (-22.5, 1.7)
Perry County 6 106.9 (88.0, 128.6) 62 (5, 87) 23 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.3, 3.5)
Fayette County 6 131.0 (107.5, 158.2) 9 (1, 81) 22 rising rising trend 3.7 (1.2, 6.6)
Defiance County 6 99.8 (81.7, 120.6) 79 (11, 88) 21 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.4, 3.0)
Pike County 6 130.5 (106.7, 157.9) 6 (1, 83) 21 rising rising trend 2.8 (0.2, 5.5)
Morrow County 6 100.9 (82.4, 122.3) 77 (10, 88) 21 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.7, 4.4)
Gallia County 6 125.5 (102.4, 152.1) 17 (1, 84) 21 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.3, 2.0)
Hocking County 6 124.5 (101.3, 151.5) 20 (1, 85) 20 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.9, 3.1)
Adams County 6 121.9 (98.9, 148.6) 26 (1, 86) 20 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.8, 5.9)
Hardin County 6 111.3 (89.8, 136.2) 49 (2, 87) 19 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.3, 4.4)
Williams County 6 92.7 (74.9, 113.3) 85 (20, 88) 19 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.2, -0.4)
Carroll County 6 121.9 (98.0, 149.9) 25 (1, 86) 18 rising rising trend 4.5 (2.2, 10.6)
Putnam County 6 92.3 (73.7, 114.1) 84 (20, 88) 17 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.0, 2.5)
Meigs County 6 125.5 (100.0, 155.6) 16 (1, 86) 17 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.4, 5.2)
Holmes County 6 67.5 (53.5, 83.8) 88 (81, 88) 17 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.1, 2.4)
Henry County 6 100.4 (79.3, 125.3) 74 (6, 88) 16 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.0, 3.2)
Wyandot County 6 105.7 (81.9, 134.3) 65 (2, 88) 13 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.5, 3.9)
Van Wert County 6 79.3 (60.9, 101.5) 87 (39, 88) 13 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.8, 4.4)
Monroe County 6 141.4 (105.6, 185.4) 3 (1, 86) 11 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.5, 4.7)
Harrison County 6 127.8 (94.9, 168.3) 14 (1, 87) 10 stable stable trend 0.3 (-4.7, 5.1)
Vinton County 6 125.3 (92.1, 166.4) 18 (1, 88) 10 rising rising trend 4.6 (1.7, 7.8)
Morgan County 6 110.6 (80.2, 148.6) 55 (1, 88) 9 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.7, 2.7)
Paulding County 6 84.2 (61.1, 113.0) 86 (8, 88) 9 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.3, 4.3)
Noble County 6 100.9 (67.6, 144.3) 78 (1, 88) 6 stable stable trend 1.0 (-3.1, 4.9)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/28/2023 11:39 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top