Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Ohio by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <50

Sorted by Ruralurban

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Ohio 6 N/A 112.0 (110.9, 113.1) N/A 7,702 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.1, 0.8)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 104.6 (104.4, 104.8) N/A 205,200 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.2, 0.2)
Allen County 6 Urban 104.3 (92.8, 116.9) 70 (18, 86) 59 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.8, 1.7)
Ashtabula County 6 Urban 95.4 (84.2, 107.6) 82 (41, 88) 53 stable stable trend -2.5 (-15.9, 0.1)
Belmont County 6 Urban 126.2 (110.7, 143.3) 14 (1, 73) 48 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.3, 2.7)
Brown County 6 Urban 133.0 (113.8, 154.6) 8 (1, 70) 34 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.7, 3.1)
Butler County 6 Urban 108.3 (102.3, 114.6) 58 (26, 76) 245 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.1, 1.7)
Carroll County 6 Urban 121.4 (97.4, 149.4) 24 (1, 86) 18 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.5, 4.1)
Clark County 6 Urban 113.0 (102.4, 124.3) 44 (12, 79) 85 stable stable trend -0.5 (-6.1, 0.9)
Clermont County 6 Urban 116.8 (108.4, 125.6) 36 (10, 69) 144 stable stable trend 0.7 (0.0, 1.3)
Cuyahoga County 6 Urban 112.0 (108.6, 115.6) 49 (31, 64) 812 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.3, 1.1)
Delaware County 6 Urban 105.8 (98.3, 113.6) 65 (31, 81) 152 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 1.1)
Erie County 6 Urban 100.9 (87.4, 115.8) 77 (20, 87) 41 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.2, 2.1)
Fairfield County 6 Urban 109.3 (100.2, 119.0) 54 (16, 81) 106 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.1, 1.7)
Franklin County 6 Urban 104.9 (101.8, 108.1) 67 (48, 76) 881 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.3, 0.4)
Fulton County 6 Urban 124.4 (105.1, 146.0) 18 (1, 81) 30 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.6, 3.8)
Geauga County 6 Urban 123.5 (110.1, 138.1) 17 (3, 71) 63 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.1, 2.2)
Greene County 6 Urban 112.1 (102.6, 122.1) 46 (12, 77) 105 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.8, 1.1)
Hamilton County 6 Urban 111.1 (106.9, 115.5) 52 (29, 68) 535 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.6, 1.3)
Hocking County 6 Urban 113.4 (91.2, 139.4) 45 (2, 87) 18 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.8, 2.2)
Jefferson County 6 Urban 137.5 (120.5, 156.1) 4 (1, 51) 48 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.0, 2.9)
Lake County 6 Urban 121.7 (113.4, 130.5) 23 (7, 61) 160 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.6, 2.8)
Lawrence County 6 Urban 147.7 (130.0, 167.0) 1 (1, 37) 51 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.3, 2.3)
Licking County 6 Urban 117.1 (108.0, 126.7) 35 (9, 69) 124 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.4, 1.4)
Lorain County 6 Urban 122.9 (115.8, 130.3) 20 (7, 51) 223 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.3, 2.0)
Lucas County 6 Urban 111.4 (105.6, 117.5) 48 (22, 71) 277 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.2, 1.4)
Madison County 6 Urban 101.3 (85.7, 119.1) 76 (13, 88) 30 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.0, 2.4)
Mahoning County 6 Urban 103.5 (95.7, 111.9) 72 (36, 84) 129 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.2, 1.3)
Medina County 6 Urban 119.0 (109.9, 128.6) 30 (8, 67) 128 stable stable trend 0.7 (0.0, 1.4)
Miami County 6 Urban 126.8 (114.6, 139.9) 13 (2, 60) 80 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.2, 2.7)
Montgomery County 6 Urban 116.3 (110.9, 121.8) 40 (16, 62) 354 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.1, 1.5)
Morrow County 6 Urban 105.7 (86.9, 127.3) 66 (6, 88) 22 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.9, 3.7)
Ottawa County 6 Urban 121.1 (100.5, 144.6) 25 (1, 84) 25 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.3, 3.0)
Perry County 6 Urban 103.8 (85.1, 125.4) 71 (7, 88) 22 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.8, 3.7)
Pickaway County 6 Urban 100.8 (86.8, 116.4) 75 (17, 87) 37 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.2, 1.1)
Portage County 6 Urban 102.0 (92.6, 112.0) 74 (31, 85) 89 stable stable trend -4.1 (-19.0, 2.1)
Richland County 6 Urban 113.8 (102.9, 125.4) 43 (9, 79) 81 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.6, 2.8)
Stark County 6 Urban 116.4 (109.9, 123.1) 37 (14, 64) 244 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.5, 1.7)
Summit County 6 Urban 119.4 (114.0, 124.9) 27 (12, 52) 375 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.8, 2.1)
Trumbull County 6 Urban 105.8 (97.3, 114.7) 64 (27, 83) 117 stable stable trend -1.2 (-8.3, 0.2)
Union County 6 Urban 122.2 (107.7, 138.0) 21 (2, 74) 52 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.9, 1.6)
Warren County 6 Urban 107.0 (99.8, 114.6) 61 (28, 80) 165 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.4, 1.2)
Wood County 6 Urban 108.9 (98.3, 120.2) 56 (15, 83) 80 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.4, 2.5)
Adams County 6 Rural 120.9 (97.8, 147.7) 26 (1, 85) 19 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.5, 4.8)
Ashland County 6 Rural 119.0 (101.9, 138.2) 29 (2, 83) 35 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.3, 4.5)
Athens County 6 Rural 110.6 (94.6, 128.4) 51 (4, 85) 35 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.7, 1.8)
Auglaize County 6 Rural 105.5 (88.5, 124.9) 63 (7, 87) 27 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.6, 2.0)
Champaign County 6 Rural 107.9 (89.2, 129.3) 59 (5, 87) 24 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.0, 4.4)
Clinton County 6 Rural 104.7 (87.1, 124.7) 69 (8, 88) 25 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.8, 1.7)
Columbiana County 6 Rural 116.6 (104.5, 129.8) 39 (7, 77) 68 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.1, 2.0)
Coshocton County 6 Rural 121.6 (101.1, 145.0) 22 (1, 85) 25 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.0, 3.3)
Crawford County 6 Rural 103.0 (85.3, 123.2) 73 (10, 88) 24 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.7, 2.5)
Darke County 6 Rural 90.0 (74.9, 107.2) 84 (35, 88) 25 stable stable trend -4.3 (-22.0, 0.6)
Defiance County 6 Rural 95.5 (77.9, 115.7) 81 (13, 88) 21 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.9, 2.3)
Fayette County 6 Rural 135.0 (111.4, 162.2) 7 (1, 78) 23 rising rising trend 3.6 (1.2, 6.2)
Gallia County 6 Rural 123.0 (100.1, 149.6) 19 (1, 85) 20 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.3, 1.5)
Guernsey County 6 Rural 140.6 (118.9, 165.0) 3 (1, 67) 30 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.8, 4.0)
Hancock County 6 Rural 99.3 (86.3, 113.7) 78 (20, 88) 42 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.8, 2.2)
Hardin County 6 Rural 95.9 (75.9, 119.4) 80 (9, 88) 16 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.7, 3.6)
Harrison County 6 Rural 125.6 (92.7, 166.3) 16 (1, 88) 10 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.3, 4.3)
Henry County 6 Rural 97.7 (77.2, 121.9) 79 (6, 88) 16 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.1, 2.1)
Highland County 6 Rural 128.6 (109.2, 150.4) 11 (1, 76) 32 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.7, 3.1)
Holmes County 6 Rural 75.6 (60.8, 92.7) 88 (67, 88) 19 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.7, 2.7)
Huron County 6 Rural 117.0 (101.2, 134.5) 38 (4, 83) 40 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.3, 4.6)
Jackson County 6 Rural 130.0 (108.3, 154.9) 9 (1, 79) 25 rising rising trend 2.4 (0.2, 8.0)
Knox County 6 Rural 118.0 (102.0, 135.7) 33 (2, 83) 40 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.5, 2.3)
Logan County 6 Rural 105.4 (88.5, 124.6) 68 (7, 87) 28 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.4, 2.1)
Marion County 6 Rural 105.7 (91.9, 121.1) 62 (11, 86) 42 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.6, 2.4)
Meigs County 6 Rural 114.1 (89.5, 143.4) 41 (1, 87) 15 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.2, 4.5)
Mercer County 6 Rural 108.4 (89.8, 129.6) 57 (3, 87) 24 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.4, 1.3)
Monroe County 6 Rural 135.5 (100.0, 179.4) 6 (1, 86) 10 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.7, 4.8)
Morgan County 6 Rural 112.6 (81.3, 151.8) 50 (1, 88) 9 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.1, 2.6)
Muskingum County 6 Rural 127.3 (113.5, 142.3) 12 (1, 63) 62 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.9, 1.8)
Noble County 6 Rural 143.1 (102.2, 194.3) 2 (1, 87) 8 stable stable trend 2.2 (-1.0, 5.2)
Paulding County 6 Rural 79.7 (57.4, 107.8) 87 (21, 88) 8 falling falling trend -9.7 (-37.3, -0.1)
Pike County 6 Rural 138.7 (113.9, 167.2) 5 (1, 76) 22 stable stable trend 2.5 (-0.3, 5.4)
Preble County 6 Rural 112.7 (94.2, 133.9) 47 (4, 86) 26 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.9, 4.0)
Putnam County 6 Rural 93.5 (74.9, 115.2) 83 (12, 88) 18 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.0, 2.3)
Ross County 6 Rural 117.4 (104.1, 132.0) 34 (4, 79) 57 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.5, 1.8)
Sandusky County 6 Rural 113.7 (97.9, 131.1) 42 (4, 83) 38 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.9, 1.7)
Scioto County 6 Rural 128.4 (113.9, 144.2) 10 (1, 62) 57 stable stable trend -0.9 (-6.1, 0.0)
Seneca County 6 Rural 109.4 (93.4, 127.4) 55 (7, 86) 33 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.3)
Shelby County 6 Rural 125.9 (107.7, 146.1) 15 (1, 78) 35 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.2, 4.2)
Tuscarawas County 6 Rural 118.9 (106.0, 133.0) 32 (4, 77) 62 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.4, 2.5)
Van Wert County 6 Rural 87.5 (68.3, 110.3) 85 (20, 88) 14 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.5, 4.0)
Vinton County 6 Rural 119.4 (86.9, 160.2) 31 (1, 88) 9 stable stable trend -9.7 (-26.5, 1.5)
Washington County 6 Rural 119.2 (102.9, 137.2) 28 (2, 81) 39 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.3, 2.8)
Wayne County 6 Rural 111.3 (100.0, 123.5) 53 (11, 82) 72 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.3, 2.5)
Williams County 6 Rural 86.1 (69.2, 105.8) 86 (36, 88) 18 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.0, -0.6)
Wyandot County 6 Rural 107.6 (83.5, 136.4) 60 (2, 88) 14 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.2, 3.5)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/13/2024 10:22 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top