Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Ohio by County

Liver & Bile Duct (All Stages^), 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Ohio 6 7.6 (7.4, 7.8) N/A 1,184 rising rising trend 2.4 (1.6, 3.1)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 8.6 (8.6, 8.7) N/A 35,262 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.4)
Cuyahoga County 6 9.4 (8.8, 10.1) 8 (3, 21) 170 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.6, 3.9)
Franklin County 6 8.2 (7.6, 9.0) 19 (9, 35) 112 stable stable trend -4.1 (-11.6, 4.0)
Hamilton County 6 8.9 (8.1, 9.8) 10 (4, 29) 92 rising rising trend 3.0 (2.0, 4.1)
Montgomery County 6 9.6 (8.6, 10.7) 7 (2, 24) 70 rising rising trend 4.0 (2.6, 5.4)
Summit County 6 7.0 (6.1, 7.9) 35 (18, 54) 53 rising rising trend 3.1 (0.9, 5.4)
Lucas County 6 8.7 (7.6, 9.9) 14 (3, 35) 49 rising rising trend 4.7 (3.2, 6.3)
Stark County 6 6.6 (5.6, 7.7) 44 (18, 59) 35 rising rising trend 3.7 (1.6, 5.8)
Lorain County 6 8.2 (7.0, 9.5) 20 (5, 45) 35 rising rising trend 6.3 (4.0, 8.5)
Butler County 6 7.3 (6.2, 8.5) 30 (11, 55) 33 rising rising trend 3.0 (1.2, 4.8)
Mahoning County 6 8.0 (6.7, 9.5) 24 (5, 49) 29 rising rising trend 3.9 (1.8, 6.0)
Trumbull County 6 7.8 (6.4, 9.4) 25 (5, 55) 24 rising rising trend 3.7 (1.4, 6.0)
Lake County 6 6.8 (5.6, 8.2) 38 (14, 59) 24 rising rising trend 3.8 (1.3, 6.4)
Clermont County 6 8.5 (6.9, 10.3) 18 (3, 47) 22 rising rising trend 5.1 (2.4, 7.9)
Warren County 6 6.6 (5.3, 8.2) 42 (12, 61) 18 rising rising trend 5.1 (1.9, 8.5)
Clark County 6 8.5 (6.7, 10.6) 17 (2, 51) 17 rising rising trend 5.4 (2.2, 8.8)
Medina County 6 6.6 (5.2, 8.3) 43 (10, 62) 16 rising rising trend 4.4 (1.4, 7.5)
Licking County 6 6.8 (5.3, 8.5) 39 (10, 62) 15 stable stable trend -2.3 (-8.2, 3.9)
Portage County 6 6.7 (5.1, 8.6) 41 (9, 63) 13 stable stable trend 1.8 (-2.5, 6.2)
Greene County 6 5.9 (4.5, 7.6) 52 (18, 64) 13 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.6, 5.1)
Fairfield County 6 6.4 (4.9, 8.2) 47 (12, 63) 13 stable stable trend 3.2 (-0.1, 6.7)
Ross County 6 11.7 (8.9, 15.1) 1 (1, 31) 12 rising rising trend 6.9 (2.7, 11.2)
Columbiana County 6 7.7 (5.8, 10.1) 27 (3, 61) 12 rising rising trend 3.6 (0.4, 7.0)
Richland County 6 6.1 (4.6, 8.0) 50 (14, 64) 11 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.4, 5.2)
Scioto County 6 10.4 (7.7, 13.8) 5 (1, 47) 11 stable stable trend 3.7 (-0.6, 8.1)
Muskingum County 6 8.6 (6.4, 11.5) 15 (1, 57) 10
*
*
Wood County 6 6.0 (4.4, 8.1) 51 (13, 65) 10 stable stable trend 4.5 (-0.7, 9.9)
Delaware County 6 4.3 (3.1, 5.8) 63 (39, 65) 9 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.7, 4.4)
Ashtabula County 6 6.2 (4.5, 8.5) 49 (10, 65) 9 falling falling trend -15.4 (-26.2, -3.1)
Geauga County 6 6.4 (4.5, 8.9) 46 (7, 65) 9 rising rising trend 6.7 (2.8, 10.7)
Wayne County 6 5.5 (3.9, 7.5) 57 (21, 65) 9 stable stable trend 4.0 (-0.3, 8.5)
Allen County 6 5.7 (4.0, 7.9) 56 (15, 65) 8 stable stable trend 1.4 (-2.3, 5.2)
Jefferson County 6 7.7 (5.4, 10.8) 28 (1, 63) 8 stable stable trend 2.6 (-1.8, 7.1)
Miami County 6 5.2 (3.7, 7.3) 60 (21, 65) 8 stable stable trend 1.4 (-2.7, 5.6)
Pickaway County 6 10.4 (7.3, 14.4) 6 (1, 54) 8 rising rising trend 4.8 (1.1, 8.5)
Marion County 6 8.6 (6.0, 12.1) 16 (1, 60) 7 stable stable trend 4.7 (-1.3, 11.1)
Washington County 6 7.7 (5.4, 10.9) 26 (2, 63) 7 rising rising trend 5.2 (1.8, 8.7)
Belmont County 6 6.4 (4.4, 9.3) 45 (4, 65) 7 rising rising trend 5.5 (0.1, 11.1)
Hancock County 6 6.9 (4.8, 9.7) 36 (4, 65) 7 rising rising trend 40.9 (7.5, 84.6)
Lawrence County 6 8.1 (5.6, 11.4) 21 (1, 62) 7 stable stable trend 4.0 (-0.7, 8.9)
Tuscarawas County 6 4.7 (3.3, 6.7) 62 (28, 65) 7 stable stable trend 2.7 (-0.4, 5.9)
Sandusky County 6 8.0 (5.4, 11.6) 22 (1, 63) 7 rising rising trend 7.8 (2.5, 13.5)
Erie County 6 5.7 (3.8, 8.4) 54 (10, 65) 6 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.2, 6.0)
Knox County 6 6.7 (4.4, 9.9) 40 (3, 65) 6 rising rising trend 5.6 (1.1, 10.4)
Athens County 6 8.0 (5.2, 11.9) 23 (1, 64) 5
*
*
Ashland County 6 7.2 (4.6, 10.8) 31 (2, 65) 5 stable stable trend 3.4 (-0.2, 7.2)
Highland County 6 8.8 (5.6, 13.3) 12 (1, 63) 5
*
*
Fulton County 6 9.2 (5.8, 13.9) 9 (1, 63) 5
*
*
Guernsey County 6 8.9 (5.6, 13.7) 11 (1, 64) 5
*
*
Brown County 6 7.6 (4.8, 11.6) 29 (1, 65) 5 stable stable trend 4.2 (-2.3, 11.1)
Coshocton County 6 8.8 (5.5, 13.5) 13 (1, 63) 5
*
*
Shelby County 6 7.0 (4.4, 10.7) 34 (2, 65) 5
*
*
Crawford County 6 6.8 (4.2, 10.6) 37 (2, 65) 4
*
*
Huron County 6 5.7 (3.4, 8.9) 55 (7, 65) 4
*
*
Pike County 6 10.5 (6.5, 16.4) 3 (1, 61) 4
*
*
Adams County 6 10.8 (6.5, 17.1) 2 (1, 63) 4
*
*
Fayette County 6 10.5 (6.3, 16.5) 4 (1, 63) 4
*
*
Madison County 6 7.2 (4.3, 11.3) 32 (1, 65) 4
*
*
Logan County 6 5.8 (3.5, 9.4) 53 (5, 65) 4
*
*
Williams County 6 7.0 (4.2, 11.3) 33 (2, 65) 4
*
*
Champaign County 6 6.3 (3.6, 10.5) 48 (2, 65) 3
*
*
Ottawa County 6 4.3 (2.5, 7.5) 64 (23, 65) 3
*
*
Darke County 6 4.1 (2.3, 6.9) 65 (27, 65) 3
*
*
Defiance County 6 5.4 (3.0, 9.1) 58 (7, 65) 3
*
*
Preble County 6 5.1 (2.9, 8.7) 61 (9, 65) 3
*
*
Union County 6 5.3 (3.0, 8.7) 59 (7, 65) 3
*
*
Auglaize County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carroll County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clinton County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gallia County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardin County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harrison County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Henry County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hocking County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Holmes County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Meigs County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mercer County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morgan County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morrow County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Noble County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Paulding County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Putnam County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Seneca County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Van Wert County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Vinton County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wyandot County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/06/2023 12:41 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Auglaize, Carroll, Clinton, Gallia, Hardin, Harrison, Henry, Hocking, Holmes, Jackson, Meigs, Mercer, Monroe, Morgan, Morrow, Noble, Paulding, Perry, Putnam, Seneca, Van Wert, Vinton, Wyandot

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top