Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Ohio by County

Liver & Bile Duct (All Stages^), 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Ohio 6 7.6 (7.4, 7.8) N/A 1,184 rising rising trend 2.4 (1.6, 3.1)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 8.6 (8.6, 8.7) N/A 35,262 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.4)
Ross County 6 11.7 (8.9, 15.1) 1 (1, 31) 12 rising rising trend 6.9 (2.7, 11.2)
Adams County 6 10.8 (6.5, 17.1) 2 (1, 63) 4
*
*
Pike County 6 10.5 (6.5, 16.4) 3 (1, 61) 4
*
*
Fayette County 6 10.5 (6.3, 16.5) 4 (1, 63) 4
*
*
Scioto County 6 10.4 (7.7, 13.8) 5 (1, 47) 11 stable stable trend 3.7 (-0.6, 8.1)
Pickaway County 6 10.4 (7.3, 14.4) 6 (1, 54) 8 rising rising trend 4.8 (1.1, 8.5)
Montgomery County 6 9.6 (8.6, 10.7) 7 (2, 24) 70 rising rising trend 4.0 (2.6, 5.4)
Cuyahoga County 6 9.4 (8.8, 10.1) 8 (3, 21) 170 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.6, 3.9)
Fulton County 6 9.2 (5.8, 13.9) 9 (1, 63) 5
*
*
Hamilton County 6 8.9 (8.1, 9.8) 10 (4, 29) 92 rising rising trend 3.0 (2.0, 4.1)
Guernsey County 6 8.9 (5.6, 13.7) 11 (1, 64) 5
*
*
Highland County 6 8.8 (5.6, 13.3) 12 (1, 63) 5
*
*
Coshocton County 6 8.8 (5.5, 13.5) 13 (1, 63) 5
*
*
Lucas County 6 8.7 (7.6, 9.9) 14 (3, 35) 49 rising rising trend 4.7 (3.2, 6.3)
Muskingum County 6 8.6 (6.4, 11.5) 15 (1, 57) 10
*
*
Marion County 6 8.6 (6.0, 12.1) 16 (1, 60) 7 stable stable trend 4.7 (-1.3, 11.1)
Clark County 6 8.5 (6.7, 10.6) 17 (2, 51) 17 rising rising trend 5.4 (2.2, 8.8)
Clermont County 6 8.5 (6.9, 10.3) 18 (3, 47) 22 rising rising trend 5.1 (2.4, 7.9)
Franklin County 6 8.2 (7.6, 9.0) 19 (9, 35) 112 stable stable trend -4.1 (-11.6, 4.0)
Lorain County 6 8.2 (7.0, 9.5) 20 (5, 45) 35 rising rising trend 6.3 (4.0, 8.5)
Lawrence County 6 8.1 (5.6, 11.4) 21 (1, 62) 7 stable stable trend 4.0 (-0.7, 8.9)
Sandusky County 6 8.0 (5.4, 11.6) 22 (1, 63) 7 rising rising trend 7.8 (2.5, 13.5)
Athens County 6 8.0 (5.2, 11.9) 23 (1, 64) 5
*
*
Mahoning County 6 8.0 (6.7, 9.5) 24 (5, 49) 29 rising rising trend 3.9 (1.8, 6.0)
Trumbull County 6 7.8 (6.4, 9.4) 25 (5, 55) 24 rising rising trend 3.7 (1.4, 6.0)
Washington County 6 7.7 (5.4, 10.9) 26 (2, 63) 7 rising rising trend 5.2 (1.8, 8.7)
Columbiana County 6 7.7 (5.8, 10.1) 27 (3, 61) 12 rising rising trend 3.6 (0.4, 7.0)
Jefferson County 6 7.7 (5.4, 10.8) 28 (1, 63) 8 stable stable trend 2.6 (-1.8, 7.1)
Brown County 6 7.6 (4.8, 11.6) 29 (1, 65) 5 stable stable trend 4.2 (-2.3, 11.1)
Butler County 6 7.3 (6.2, 8.5) 30 (11, 55) 33 rising rising trend 3.0 (1.2, 4.8)
Ashland County 6 7.2 (4.6, 10.8) 31 (2, 65) 5 stable stable trend 3.4 (-0.2, 7.2)
Madison County 6 7.2 (4.3, 11.3) 32 (1, 65) 4
*
*
Williams County 6 7.0 (4.2, 11.3) 33 (2, 65) 4
*
*
Shelby County 6 7.0 (4.4, 10.7) 34 (2, 65) 5
*
*
Summit County 6 7.0 (6.1, 7.9) 35 (18, 54) 53 rising rising trend 3.1 (0.9, 5.4)
Hancock County 6 6.9 (4.8, 9.7) 36 (4, 65) 7 rising rising trend 40.9 (7.5, 84.6)
Crawford County 6 6.8 (4.2, 10.6) 37 (2, 65) 4
*
*
Lake County 6 6.8 (5.6, 8.2) 38 (14, 59) 24 rising rising trend 3.8 (1.3, 6.4)
Licking County 6 6.8 (5.3, 8.5) 39 (10, 62) 15 stable stable trend -2.3 (-8.2, 3.9)
Knox County 6 6.7 (4.4, 9.9) 40 (3, 65) 6 rising rising trend 5.6 (1.1, 10.4)
Portage County 6 6.7 (5.1, 8.6) 41 (9, 63) 13 stable stable trend 1.8 (-2.5, 6.2)
Warren County 6 6.6 (5.3, 8.2) 42 (12, 61) 18 rising rising trend 5.1 (1.9, 8.5)
Medina County 6 6.6 (5.2, 8.3) 43 (10, 62) 16 rising rising trend 4.4 (1.4, 7.5)
Stark County 6 6.6 (5.6, 7.7) 44 (18, 59) 35 rising rising trend 3.7 (1.6, 5.8)
Belmont County 6 6.4 (4.4, 9.3) 45 (4, 65) 7 rising rising trend 5.5 (0.1, 11.1)
Geauga County 6 6.4 (4.5, 8.9) 46 (7, 65) 9 rising rising trend 6.7 (2.8, 10.7)
Fairfield County 6 6.4 (4.9, 8.2) 47 (12, 63) 13 stable stable trend 3.2 (-0.1, 6.7)
Champaign County 6 6.3 (3.6, 10.5) 48 (2, 65) 3
*
*
Ashtabula County 6 6.2 (4.5, 8.5) 49 (10, 65) 9 falling falling trend -15.4 (-26.2, -3.1)
Richland County 6 6.1 (4.6, 8.0) 50 (14, 64) 11 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.4, 5.2)
Wood County 6 6.0 (4.4, 8.1) 51 (13, 65) 10 stable stable trend 4.5 (-0.7, 9.9)
Greene County 6 5.9 (4.5, 7.6) 52 (18, 64) 13 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.6, 5.1)
Logan County 6 5.8 (3.5, 9.4) 53 (5, 65) 4
*
*
Erie County 6 5.7 (3.8, 8.4) 54 (10, 65) 6 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.2, 6.0)
Huron County 6 5.7 (3.4, 8.9) 55 (7, 65) 4
*
*
Allen County 6 5.7 (4.0, 7.9) 56 (15, 65) 8 stable stable trend 1.4 (-2.3, 5.2)
Wayne County 6 5.5 (3.9, 7.5) 57 (21, 65) 9 stable stable trend 4.0 (-0.3, 8.5)
Defiance County 6 5.4 (3.0, 9.1) 58 (7, 65) 3
*
*
Union County 6 5.3 (3.0, 8.7) 59 (7, 65) 3
*
*
Miami County 6 5.2 (3.7, 7.3) 60 (21, 65) 8 stable stable trend 1.4 (-2.7, 5.6)
Preble County 6 5.1 (2.9, 8.7) 61 (9, 65) 3
*
*
Tuscarawas County 6 4.7 (3.3, 6.7) 62 (28, 65) 7 stable stable trend 2.7 (-0.4, 5.9)
Delaware County 6 4.3 (3.1, 5.8) 63 (39, 65) 9 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.7, 4.4)
Ottawa County 6 4.3 (2.5, 7.5) 64 (23, 65) 3
*
*
Darke County 6 4.1 (2.3, 6.9) 65 (27, 65) 3
*
*
Auglaize County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carroll County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clinton County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gallia County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardin County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harrison County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Henry County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hocking County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Holmes County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Meigs County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mercer County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morgan County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morrow County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Noble County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Paulding County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Putnam County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Seneca County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Van Wert County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Vinton County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wyandot County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 01/29/2023 3:49 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Auglaize, Carroll, Clinton, Gallia, Hardin, Harrison, Henry, Hocking, Holmes, Jackson, Meigs, Mercer, Monroe, Morgan, Morrow, Noble, Paulding, Perry, Putnam, Seneca, Van Wert, Vinton, Wyandot

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top